A barley root mutant collection for NGS-based fast-forward genetics

Similar documents
Anchoring and ordering NGS contig assemblies by population sequencing (POPSEQ)

Next Generation Genetics: Using deep sequencing to connect phenotype to genotype

Genomic resources and gene/qtl discovery in cereals

Functional genomics to improve wheat disease resistance. Dina Raats Postdoctoral Scientist, Krasileva Group

Supplementary Data 1.

High density genotyping and phenotyping data: challenges of leveraging novel technologies for the valorization of PGR

Durum Wheat Genomics and Breeding EWG Annual report and action plan

Bulked Segregant Analysis For Fine Mapping Of Genes. Cheng Zou, Qi Sun Bioinformatics Facility Cornell University

Gene Mapping in Natural Plant Populations Guilt by Association

A Whole Genome Assembly of Rye (Secale cereale)

Application of Genotyping-By-Sequencing and Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Tetraploid Potato

Cloning drought-related QTLs. WUEMED training course June 5-10, 2006

Prioritization: from vcf to finding the causative gene

HIGH-QUALITY ASSEMBLY OF THE DURUM WHEAT GENOME CV. SVEVO

Module 1 Principles of plant breeding

latestdevelopments relevant for the Ag sector André Eggen Agriculture Segment Manager, Europe

CS273B: Deep Learning in Genomics and Biomedicine. Recitation 1 30/9/2016

DNBseq TM SERVICE OVERVIEW Plant and Animal Whole Genome Re-Sequencing

Mapping and Mapping Populations

Genetic dissection of complex traits, crop improvement through markerassisted selection, and genomic selection

Potential of human genome sequencing. Paul Pharoah Reader in Cancer Epidemiology University of Cambridge

Crash-course in genomics

Usage Cases of GBS. Jeff Glaubitz Senior Research Associate, Buckler Lab, Cornell University Panzea Project Manager

SEQUENCING. M Ataei, PhD. Feb 2016

Association Mapping in Plants PLSC 731 Plant Molecular Genetics Phil McClean April, 2010

Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops

Illumina s Suite of Targeted Resequencing Solutions

Selecting TILLING mutants

Overcoming the Phenotyping Bottleneck

I.1 The Principle: Identification and Application of Molecular Markers

Towards whole genome association genetic scans in barley

Genomic resources. for non-model systems

Genomics assisted Genetic enhancement Applications and potential in tree improvement

Gene Editing in Cereals. Emma Wallington

GBS Usage Cases: Non-model Organisms. Katie E. Hyma, PhD Bioinformatics Core Institute for Genomic Diversity Cornell University

Marker types. Potato Association of America Frederiction August 9, Allen Van Deynze

From Genotype to Phenotype

Sept 2. Structure and Organization of Genomes. Today: Genetic and Physical Mapping. Sept 9. Forward and Reverse Genetics. Genetic and Physical Mapping

BIOBREED & NUTRIEFFICIENT

Next GEM Next Generation Mutagenesis. Guri Johal. Department of Botany and Plant Pathology. Purdue University

Why can GBS be complicated? Tools for filtering, error correction and imputation.

Midterm 1 Results. Midterm 1 Akey/ Fields Median Number of Students. Exam Score

Next Genera*on Sequencing II: Personal Genomics. Jim Noonan Department of Gene*cs

Why can GBS be complicated? Tools for filtering & error correction. Edward Buckler USDA-ARS Cornell University

Comparison and Evaluation of Cotton SNPs Developed by Transcriptome, Genome Reduction on Restriction Site Conservation and RAD-based Sequencing

SNP calling and Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) Trushar Shah

The tomato genome re-seq project

Single Nucleotide Variant Analysis. H3ABioNet May 14, 2014

Linkage Disequilibrium

Wheat Genome Structural Annotation Using a Modular and Evidence-combined Annotation Pipeline

Association Mapping. Mendelian versus Complex Phenotypes. How to Perform an Association Study. Why Association Studies (Can) Work

Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk

F 1 TtYy Tall/Resistant

The 150+ Tomato Genome (re-)sequence Project; Lessons Learned and Potential

Content Objectives Write these down!

Gene editing in cereals

Answers to additional linkage problems.

Identifying Genes Underlying QTLs

Biol 321 April 23, Complementary Gene Action

UHT Sequencing Course Large-scale genotyping. Christian Iseli January 2009

Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC) Gaucher Clinic. Peripheral blood samples were collected from each

Utilization of the IWGSC Resources: Application to Wheat Breeding

Genomic analysis of natural variation for seed and plant size in maize Dr. Shawn Kaepler University of Wisconsin

Using the Association Workflow in Partek Genomics Suite

The Genome Analysis Centre. Building Excellence in Genomics and Computational Bioscience

Applying next-generation sequencing to enable marker-assisted breeding for adaptive traits in a homegrown haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.

DNA. bioinformatics. genomics. personalized. variation NGS. trio. custom. assembly gene. tumor-normal. de novo. structural variation indel.

Trudy F C Mackay, Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC , USA.

Gap Filling for a Human MHC Haplotype Sequence

GBS Usage Cases: Examples from Maize

Getting high-quality cytogenetic data is a SNP.

Chapter 22 Next Generation Sequencing Enabled Genetics in Hexaploid Wheat

The Genome Analysis Centre. Building Excellence in Genomics and Computa5onal Bioscience

Major Genes Conditioning Resistance to Rust in Common Bean. and a Protocol for Monitoring Local races of the Bean Rust Pathogne

LD Mapping and the Coalescent

RADSeq Data Analysis. Through STACKS on Galaxy. Yvan Le Bras Anthony Bretaudeau Cyril Monjeaud Gildas Le Corguillé

Progress in genomics applications in investigating abiotic stresses influencing perennial forage and biomass grasses

PUBH 8445: Lecture 1. Saonli Basu, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics School of Public Health University of Minnesota

Why do we need statistics to study genetics and evolution?

Roots and Drought and Breeding Better Crops. Adam Price

Adaptation to new environments

Lecture 23: Causes and Consequences of Linkage Disequilibrium. November 16, 2012

Design a super panel for comprehensive genetic testing

AD HOC CROP SUBGROUP ON MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES FOR MAIZE. Second Session Chicago, United States of America, December 3, 2007

B) You can conclude that A 1 is identical by descent. Notice that A2 had to come from the father (and therefore, A1 is maternal in both cases).

Patterns and mechanisms of recombination at the barley VRN- H1 locus. James Cockram

Excerpts from a Seminar at Bayer CropScience February 2015

Association studies (Linkage disequilibrium)

SNP calling. Jose Blanca COMAV institute bioinf.comav.upv.es

HCS806 Summer 2010 Methods in Plant Biology: Breeding with Molecular Markers

Utilization of Genomic Information to Accelerate Soybean Breeding and Product Development through Marker Assisted Selection

CURRICULUM VITAE. Current Position: Post-Doctoral research associate at Colorado State University.

Illumina Custom Capabilities: Amplicons, Enrichment and iselect

Anker P Sørensen Crop innovation through novel NGS applications

Lecture 21: Association Studies and Signatures of Selection. November 6, 2006

SolCAP. Executive Commitee : David Douches Walter De Jong Robin Buell David Francis Alexandra Stone Lukas Mueller AllenVan Deynze

AP 2010 Biotechnologie-Bioressources

Plant Science 446/546. Final Examination May 16, 2002

Plant Science into Practice: the Pre-Breeding Revolution

Lecture 2-3: Using Mutants to study Biological processes

Transcription:

A barley root mutant collection for NGS-based fast-forward genetics Roberto Tuberosa Dept. of Agricultural Sciences University of Bologna, Italy 2 nd Plant Genomics Congress Kuala Lumpur, 19-20 March, 2015 mmmm

TILLMore: a barley mutant population in the cultivar Morex Cv. Morex NaN 3 based mutagenesis ca. 3,500 M 5 lines (originally 4,906 M 3 ) Database with phenotypes 19 genes tilled, 104 mutants identified (7 knockouts, 53 missenses) Mutation frequency: 1 mutation/480 kb (= 2.1 /Mb) www.distagenomics.unibo.it/tillmore Resource available for collaboration Talamè et al. 2008, Pl. Biotech. J. 6: 477-485

TILLMore and forward-genetics Huge amount of induced phenotypic variation is present in the TILLMore collection: 32.7% (1,605 of 4,906) of M 3 families showed a distinct phenotype, either fixed or segregating, in field-plot observations. Most frequent phenotypes: Plant/leaf color (12.2%), spike morphology (9.2%), plant height/vigor (7.0%). Likely underestimated! Efficient forward-genetics methods for mutant gene mapping and cloning were recently developed based on: High-density SNP-array profiling & Bulk Segregant Analysis (BSA) Mapping-by-sequencing approaches (ShoreMap, MutMap, or others) Applications in barley (Cloning many-noded dwarf, Mascher et al. 2014; HvPHYC, Pankin et al. 2014)

Fast forward-genetics approaches To reduce the noise from the foreground genome and prioritize mutations from WGS: 1. Outcrossing Large/small F2 pools Ggggg g SHOREmap (Schneeberger et al., 2009) NGM (Austin et al., 2011) 2. Backcrossing/selfing BC1/M3 pools MutMap (Abe et al., 2012) MutMap+ (Fekih et al., 2013) Ggggg g James et al. 2013

Why focusing on roots Thousands of loci affect root development and functions. In cereals, root architecture (including seminal roots) affects field performance through water and nutrient acquisition (Sanguineti et al. 2007; Chloupek et al. 2010, Singh et al. 2011, Uga et al. 2013; Canè et al. 2014; Cristopher et al. 2014; Lynch et al. 2014). No comprehensive collection of root mutants in cereals. Barley collection of root hairs mutants (c/o I. Szarejko). Natural variation has been investigated in collections of wild (H. spontaneum) (Grando, 1995) and cultivated barley (Naz et al. 2014).

Why focusing on roots Root architecture is now fully integrated in new crop ideotypes Steep, cheap and deep (Lynch 2013) Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica, 17: 385-403. Lynch J (2013). Steep, cheap and deep, an ideotype for maize roots. Annals of Botany, 112: 347-357.

Objectives To screen the barley TILLMore mutant collection for root mutants at seedling stage. To set up a forward-genetics protocol for fast mapping and cloning (root) mutants using TILLMore. To test the feasibility to use TILLMore as a functional genomic platform for NGS-based forward genetics in barley.

Materials and Methods

Screening TILLMore for root mutants Presently, 3,500 M 5 lines; 3,071 lines with enough seeds. 12 pre-germinated healthy seedlings from each TILLMore family. Paper-rolls: 2-L beakers, distilled water, growth chamber (16/8 h photoperiod, 24/22 C day and night, 8 days). Two additional paper-rolls for putative mutated families. Lines with robust phenotypes are being further screened in rhizotrons, grown at 45 + flat A3 scannerring. Bovina et al. (2011). Plant Genetic Resources, 9: 357-360.

Seminal roots (approx. five in Morex wt) Nodal (adventitious) roots

10 cm Testing for Mendelian inheritance Cross Analysed F 2 (no.) Observed Mutants/wild-types (no.) Expected mutants/wild-types (no.) c2 test 2588 x Proctor 304 66 238 43 261 0.30 (ns) 194 x Proctor 75 16 59 18.7 56.3 0.47 (ns) 5141 x Proctor 91 19 72 22.7 68.3 0.91 (ns) 5992 x Proctor 95 27 68 23.7 71.3 0.98 (ns) Sr-5992 Morex F2 of Sr5992 x Proctor

Proctor Morex Mutant SR5992 Mutant SR5992 BULK Short-root BULK Short-root BULK wt-root BULK wt-root Mapping observed mutants: SNP array-based BSA Mutant F 2 plants wt F 2 plants 1. iselect Infinium barley 9k array (Comadran et al. 2012 ): Analysis of genotype calls and Ɵ values (Ɵ = 2/π*arctan(Y/X) Proctor; Morex; Mutant line Bulk mutants (15 F 2 plants) Bulk wt (15 F 2 plants) 8 wild-type F 2 plants 8 mutant F 2 plants in double

Mapping observed mutants: NGS Additional exome-capture/ngs-based approaches are being tested in order to streamline the linking of a mutant with the underlying gene. 2. Exome Seq-based BSA (Gravitropic mutant 194) See Mascher et al. 2014 3. Exome Seq of the four mutant lines, once mutation has been narrowed down by genetics/bsa Wild type Morex Reference Mutant Mutant Cannot rely on Linkage Disequilibrium alone!

NGS Mapping-by-sequencing pipeline (in collaboration with IPK, U. Scholz group) Exome capture assay (Mascher et al. 2013). Sequencing: Illumina HiSeq2000 (2 x 100 bp reads). Alignment of reads to the WGS assembly of cv. Morex, IBGSC 2012 (BWA-MEM /Novosort). Variant calling by SAMtools mpileup/bcftools (filtering: call quality > 40, read depth > 10). Merging to POPSEQ map (Mascher et al. 2013) to define the genetic map position (and focus on the region detected by SNP array-based BSA).

Results

Images from second step (two additional paper-rolls for putative mutated families) 41 Morex 98 187 194 Morex Morex Morex 485 Morex 940 Morex 1851 Morex 3000 Morex

Coiled and root hairs 310 MOREX WT

Rhizotron screening for Geotropic 194 Geotropic 194 Morex

Results of root mutant screening 3,071 M 5 lines screened, 150 root mutants identified 64 lines (2.1%) were fixed (putatively homozygous) for root phenotype (3 reps). 86 lines showed a root phenotype and were still segregating. 5% of lines showed a root phenotype 18 89 6 17 3 6 6 2

Norm intensity (B) Results of the SNP array-based BSA By means of Genotype calls Δϴ value between bulk samples, +/+ vs -/- Norm intensity (A)

Chromosome 1H Chromosome 2H Chromosome 3H Chromosome 4H Chromosome 5H Chromosome 6H Chromosome 7H 2,496 SNPs were mapped between Morex and Proctor (iselect 9k barley map)

Short root F2 Short-root Wt-Root F2 F2 SCRI_RS_212956 (48.7 cm) SCRI_RS_195940 (67.3 cm) BULK SEGREGANT ANALYSIS for ShR1-5992 (Visualized using FlapJack) 19 cm Morex Proctor Bulk - - Bulk + +

38.8 cm 40.4 cm 54.4 cm 68.4 cm Short root 5992 SCRI_RS_200387 46.4 cm Mut Allele Freq. (P=0.01) Mut Allele Freq. (P=0.05) 1H 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 14 cm 29.6 cm 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

56.7 cm 57.2 cm 59.4 cm 71.7 cm Geotropic 194 SCRI_RS_134034 59.4 cm One marker tested on F2 plants. Association with phenotype was rejected! Mut Allele Freq. (P=0.01) Mut Allele Freq. (P=0.05) 1H 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 0.25 0.2 2.2 cm 0.15 0.1 15 cm 0.05 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

50.7 cm 54.8 cm 70.7 cm 76.6 cm Two markers tested on F2 plants. Association with phenotype was rejected! Short root 5141 SCRI_RS_129686 67.2 cm Mut Allele Freq. (P=0.01) Mut. Allele Freq. (P=0.05= 1H 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 15.9 cm 25.9 cm 0.05 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Preliminary results: Mapping-by-sequencing Mutant 194 Mutant 5141 Mutant 2588 Mutant 5992 M194_Bulk+/+ M194_Bulk-/- N reads 94751042 109284804 95923558 92565184 71950544 84123414 Read mapped, I alignment, not duplicated 64626436 69755077 67313274 63716510 57815814 35001110 Cov. Of targeted capture regions (+/- 300 bp) 49552655 52565205 51691937 48999350 44326421 17105025 The variant call pattern (Mutant Allele Frequency) of short-root mutant 5141 targeted a gene-bearing contig assigned to the chr. 7H. G/A (expected transition from NaN 3 ) was concident with the peak of Δϴ between bulk samples (+/+ vs -/-). The targeted gene has been annotated as a root-length related gene in Arabidopsis. This gene was selected as primary candidate for further validation.

Summary 64 mutagenized M 5 lines (out of 3,071 lines. 2%) showed unambiguous seminal root phenotypes, were viable and fixed. Approx. 5% of line showed a seminal root phenotypes (similar to 6% rate observed by White et al. 2009, in cv. Optic). Most common phenotype was short roots (89 mutant lines) which is likely due to the large number of loci that govern root length. Several long roots, geotropic, coiled and root hairs mutants were also identified. BSA based on high-density SNP array enabled quick and inexpensive mutant mapping (down to 2.2-15.9 cm). Mapping can be completed with just two bulks (= two samples) of 15 plants each.

Summary How to go from mutants to genes in TILLMore? Just sequencing the mutation-carrying line! Full genome seq: yet undoable on a large scale. Exome-Seq: too many mutations per line (approx. 10,000 mutations, 100-200 coding and 10-20 knockouts per line) BSA and Exome Seq Targeted or Exome Seq of each mutant line once mutation has been narrowed down by genetics/bsa! Low mutation density in parent line should facilitate gene identification (expected: 1-3 knockouts per chromosome) Exome Seq-based BSA

Project 289300 EURoot Partner 9 UniBO Root angle in AM panel in durum wheat seedlings Seminal Root Angle ( ) Project 244374 DROPS Partner 12 UniBO DP045 DP034

From: Nazemi et al., 2015, submitted Variation for root aerenchyma in durum wheat Area of aerenchyma (AA) in nodal root cross sections of 10 durum wheat cultivars

DW Contrasting NILs for root QTLs in maize root-yield-1.06 root-aba1-2.04 120 (--) 129 (++) Os (--) Os (++) 250.0 200.0 BB 197.3 150.0 100.0 50.0 80.3 47.4 102.4 0.0 120 (--) 129 (++) OS-- OS++ For yield, see Landi et al. (2010, J. Exp. Bot.) For yield, see Landi et al. (2007, J. Exp. Bot.)

Many thanks to: DipSA - University of Bologna Plant Genetics Silvio Salvi Riccardo Bovina Sara Giulia Milner Valentina Talamé Carlos Busanello Simona Corneti Sandra Stefanelli Italian Ministry of Research EU FP7 EUROOT IPK - Gatersleben Nils Stein, Axel Himmelbach Uwe Scholz, Martin Mascher