Government of Mizoram R F D. (Results-Framework Document) for. Department of Rural Development ( )

Government of Mizoram R F D (Results-Framework Document) for Department of Rural Development (2014-2015)

Page : 2 of 35 Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Rural Development-(2014-2015) Section 1: Vision, Mission, Objectives and Functions Vision Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural Mizoram. Mission "Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural Mizoram through a multi pronged strategy for eradication of poverty by increasing livelihood opportunities, providing social safety net and developing infrastructure and improving of quality of life in rural Mizoram". Objectives 1 Providing for the enhancement of livelihood secutiry of households in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household. (MGNREGA) 2 Providing livelihood opportunities by effective implementation of NRLM/NERLP 3 Enhancement of productivity in rainfed/degraded lands through participatory watershed development approach and providing livelihood and production system and micro enterprise in rural areas. (IWDP/IWMP) 4 Providing basic housing and homestead to BPL households in rural areas. (IAY) 5 Providing developmental needs of the people living in remote & inacessible areas situated near the international border. (BADP) 6 Bridging critical gaps in local infrastructure and redressing regional imbalances in development within the State. (BRGF) 7 Capacity building and training of rural development/village level functionaries for local self government. (SIRD) Functions 1 Integrated Rural Development Programme. 2 National Rural Employment Programme. 3 Agriculture short term distress loans. 4 Community Development Blocks. 5 Land Use Policy. 6 7 Planning, co-ordination, evaluation and monitoring of Rural Development Scheme particularly all family oriented schemes under other Development Department and Centrally Sponsored Scheme such as IRDP, NREP, RLEGP etc. Rural Sanitation Scheme (CSRP) including construction of Ventilation Improvement Pit Latrines (VIP). 17/11/2014 11.0

Page : 3 of 35 Results-Framework Document (RFD) for Department of Rural Development-(2014-2015) Section 1: Vision, Mission, Objectives and Functions 8 Assistance to small and marginal farmers (ASMF) from 1990-1991. 9 Jowahar Rojgar Yojana (JRY). 17/11/2014 11.0

Page : 4 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [1] Providing for the enhancement of livelihood secutiry of households in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household. (MGNREGA) 20.00 [1.1] Approval of State Labour Budget for 2015-16 [1.1.1] Approval of Labour Budget of all Districts of the State by the Ministry of RD, GoI Date 2.00 05/02/2015 20/02/2015 09/03/2015 24/03/2015 31/03/2015 [1.2] Percentage of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS [1.2.1] [1.3] Average days of [1.3.1] employment provided to each households. [1.4] Person days generated [1.4.1] under NREGS (women) [1.5] Setting up of state quality [1.5.1] monitor under MGNREGA. % of rural households provided employment as per demand Average persondays per household % of persondays(women) generated Appointment of state quality monitors % 3.00 100 90 80 70 60 No. of days 3.00 75 70 62 54 46 % 1.50 50 45 40 35 30 Date 2.00 23/05/2014 02/06/2014 17/06/2014 02/07/2014 22/07/2014 [1.6] MIS reporting of [1.6.1] expenditure [1.7] Capacity building for [1.7.1] enhancing effectiveness of Gram Sabha [1.8] Conduct of Social audit in [1.8.1] villages. [1.9] Creation of Assets [1.9.1] % of expenditure reported on MIS No of villages where training conducted No. of villages where Social audit conducted % of durable assets created as compared to Annual Action Plan (AAP) % 3.00 100 90 80 70 60 2.00 849 764 679 594 509 2.00 849 764 679 594 509 % 1.50 100 90 80 70 60

Page : 5 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [2] Providing livelihood opportunities by effective implementation of NRLM/NERLP 15.00 [2.1] Training and Capacity Building of various stakeholders in both Intensive and Non-intensive blocks [2.1.1] No. of key stakeholders trained 2.00 500 400 300 200 100 [2.2] Formation of SHGs [2.2.1] No. of SHGs formed Nos 1.50 150 130 120 110 100 [2.3] Identification of CRP from [2.3.1] intensive blocks [2.4] Revolving Funds [2.4.1] [2.5] Interest Subvension [2.5.1] [2.6] Primary Level Federation [2.6.1] No. of CRP identified No. of CIF provided with Revolving Fund No. of SHG provided Interest Subvension No. of primary level Federation formed at the Village Council Level 1.50 16 14 12 11 9 1.00 500 450 400 350 300 1.00 200 180 160 140 120 1.00 50 45 40 35 30 [2.7] Village Organizations [2.7.1] formed [2.8] Institutiion Building (CIF) to [2.8.1] SHG [2.9] Training of SHGs on [2.9.1] Panchasutra in Intensive blocks No. of Village Organizations formed at the Village level No. of CIF provided to SHG 1.50 35 31 28 24 21 1.00 100 90 80 70 60 No. of SHGs trained 1.50 600 540 480 420 360 [2.10] Training of SHGs on [2.10.1] No. of SHGs trained 1.50 100 90 80 70 60 Panchasutra in Non- Intensive blocks

Page : 6 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [2.11] Preparation of Annual [2.11.1] Annual Action Plan Action Plan prepared by the SMMU [3] Enhancement of productivity in rainfed/degraded lands through participatory watershed development approach and providing livelihood and production system and micro enterprise in rural areas. (IWDP/IWMP) 15.00 [3.1] Creation of different land development through plantation, soil and moisture conservation and water harvesting structures [3.1.1] Area of Plantation including Horticulture, Afforestation Date 1.50 19/01/2015 18/02/2015 17/03/2015 20/03/2015 31/03/2015 Area in Ha 2.00 16270 14643 13016 11389 9762 [3.1.2] [3.1.3] [3.2] Formation of Self help [3.2.1] Groups [3.3] Providing assistance to individuals/group assistance under production system and micro enterprise [3.3.1] No. of Bunds, Checkdams/Gully Plugs created No. of Rainwater Harvesting Structure, Farm Ponds and Percolation Tanks created 3.00 459 413 367 321 275 2.00 1220 1098 976 854 732 No. of SHGs formed 1.00 863 777 690 604 518 No. of assistance provided to individuals/group in the form of production system and micro enterprise 3.50 1828 1645 1462 1280 1097 [3.4] Capacity building of [3.4.1] stakeholders in Watershed Development Programme PIA Level Number of Program mes 1.00 84 76 67 59 50

Page : 7 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [3.4.2] [3.4.3] [3.4.4] [3.4.5] [3.4.6] [4] Providing basic housing and homestead to 10.00 [4.1] Achievement of physical [4.1.1] BPL households in rural areas. (IAY) target for the year 2014-15 [4.2] Entry of Physical and [4.2.1] Financial performance in the IAY-MIS [4.2.2] [4.3] Monitoring of performance [4.3.1] of the Districts/Blocks. Self Help Group Level User Group Level Watershed Committee Level Livestock farmers Level Micro Enterpreneur Level No. of house constructed against annual allocation. % of physical data entry in MIS % of financial data entry in MIS Effective monitoring by way of quarterly meetings of Number of Program mes Number of Program mes Number of Program mes Number of Program mes Number of Program mes 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 188 292 146 42 42 169 150 132 113 263 234 204 175 131 117 102 88 38 34 29 25 38 34 29 25 5.00 1400 1293 1200 1100 1000 % 1.50 100 90 80 70 60 % 1.50 100 90 80 70 60 No.of Meetings. 2.00 32 24 16 8 0

Page : 8 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [5] Providing developmental needs of the people living in remote & inacessible areas situated near the international border. (BADP) 10.00 [5.1] Preparation/Finalization of Annual Action Plan under BADP. [5.1.1] [5.2] Development of institutional [5.2.1] system for inspection of BADP schemes. [5.3] Submission of physical and financial achievement reports to Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India [5.3.1] SLV&MC, DLV&MC etc. Timely approval of the AAP by the SLSC on BADP within parameter set out on the Guidelines. Putting in place 3rd Party Inspection Agency for BADP works. Quarterly submission of physical and financial achievement reports to the MHA, Govt.of India. Date 1.50 28/05/2014 28/06/2014 30/07/2014 28/08/2014 28/09/2014 Date 1.00 30/07/2014 29/08/2014 30/09/2014 30/10/2014 28/11/2014 no of days after each quarter 1.00 10 12 13 14 15 [5.4] Work Completion % [5.4.1] [5.5] Creation of Assets [5.5.1] [5.5.2] [5.5.3] % of work completed against the Annual Action Plan 2014-2015 No. of Community Hall constructed No. of Playground constructed No. of School Building (Primary/Middle/Hig h School) constructed % 1.50 100 90 80 70 60 1.00 65 61 55 50 45 1.00 40 38 35 33 30 1.00 30 27 24 22 18

Page : 9 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [5.5.4] [5.5.5] [6] Bridging critical gaps in local infrastructure 10.00 [6.1] Ensure that the HPC [6.1.1] and redressing regional imbalances in consolidate and approve development within the State. (BRGF) the District Plans No. of Water Reservoir/Tank constructed Suspension Bridges constructed Timely Approval of District Plans on BRGF by HPC. 1.00 25 21 17 15 13 1.00 20 18 16 14 12 Date 1.50 17/06/2014 17/07/2014 18/08/2014 17/09/2014 17/10/2014 [6.2] Fully transfer the Budget [6.2.1] allocation of BRGF to the two BRGF Districts Utilization of Budget allocation. % utilizatio n 1.50 100 90 80 70 60 [6.3] Execution of work under [6.3.1] BRGF. [6.4] Preparation of 5-year Perspective Plan for effective implementation of BRGF. [6.4.1] Submition of Monthly Progress Report (MPR) 1.00 7 8 9 11 12 Within 1 year. Date 2.00 30/06/2014 30/07/2014 01/09/2014 30/09/2014 30/10/2014 [6.5] Creation of Assets [6.5.1] [6.5.2] Road Communication Sector (Cont. of Road, Bridges, Side drain, Masonry step, Urinal etc..) Social Infrastructure sector (Cont. of Hall, Library Room, Market 2.00 70 63 56 49 42 1.00 50 45 40 35 30

Page : 10 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Shed, Pavillion etc..) Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% [6.5.3] [7] Capacity building and training of rural 10.00 [7.1] Improving service delivery [7.1.1] development/village level functionaries for of SIRD local self government. (SIRD) [7.2] Organisation of Training [7.2.1] Courses [7.3] Organisation of Colloquium [7.3.1] of SIRD and ETCs [7.4] Attendance of National [7.4.1] Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs [7.5] Construction of New SIRD [7.5.1] campus at Durtlang, Aizawl. [7.6] IEC, Evaluation and [7.6.1] Research Rural Education (Cont. of Science Lab, BNRGSK, Rural Housing etc..) Implementation of recommendation of concerned Committee, SIRD Governing Body etc. Number of Trainings conducted. Number of Colloquium held Number of Colloquium held Completion of the construction work within the timeline. No. of IEC, Evaluation and Research Activities taken up. 1.00 100 90 80 70 60 Date 2.00 28/11/2014 29/12/2014 29/01/2015 27/02/2015 31/03/2015 2.00 100 90 80 70 60 1.00 5 4 3 2 1 1.50 5 4 3 2 1 % 1.50 100 90 80 70 60 2.00 5 4 3 2 1 * Mandatory Objective(s)

Page : 11 of 35 Section 2: Inter se Priorities among Key Objectives, Success indicators and Targets Objective Weight Action Success Unit Indicator Weight Target / Criteria Value Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% * Efficient Functioning of the RFD System 5.00 Timely submission of Mid Term Achievement Timely submission of Results for 2013-2014 Timely submission of Draft RFD for 2014-2015 for approval. On-time submission Date 1.0 10/10/2014 11/10/2014 15/10/2014 25/10/2014 15/03/2014 On-time submission Date 2.0 01/05/2014 02/05/2014 05/05/2014 06/05/2014 07/05/2014 On-time submission Date 2.0 05/03/2014 06/03/2014 07/03/2014 10/03/2014 07/05/2014 * Effective redressal of citizens grievances 5.00 Timely disposal of citizens grievances lodged through FAKSELNA BOX Timely disposal of citizens grievances lodged through www.mipuiaw.nic.in Citizens grievances disposed off from FAKSELNA BOX within 30 days Citizens grievances disposed off through www.mipuiaw.nic.in within 30 days % 2.0 100 90 80 70 60 % 3.0 100 90 80 70 60 * Mandatory Objective(s)

Page : 12 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [1] Providing for the enhancement of livelihood secutiry of households in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household. (MGNREGA) [1.1] Approval of State Labour Budget for 2015-16 [1.1.1] Approval of Labour Budget of all Districts of the State by the Ministry of RD, GoI Date 02/02/2012 05/02/2014 05/02/2015 05/02/2016 03/02/2017 [1.2] Percentage of [1.2.1] households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS % of rural households provided employment as per demand % 99 100 100 100 100 [1.3] Average days of [1.3.1] employment provided to each households. Average persondays per household No. of days 80 80 75 100 100 [1.4] Person days generated [1.4.1] under NREGS (women) % of persondays(women) % 0 33 45 45 45 [1.5] Setting up of state quality [1.5.1] monitor under MGNREGA. Appointment of state quality monitors Date -- -- 02/06/2014 -- -- [1.6] MIS reporting of [1.6.1] expenditure % of expenditure reported on MIS % -- 92.2 90 92 93 [1.7] Capacity building for [1.7.1] enhancing effectiveness of Gram Sabha No of villages where training conducted -- 849 764 849 849 [1.8] Conduct of Social audit in [1.8.1] villages. No. of villages where Social audit conducted -- 849 764 849 849

Page : 13 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [2] Providing livelihood opportunities by effective implementation of NRLM/NERLP [2.1] Training and Capacity Building of various stakeholders in both Intensive and Nonintensive blocks [2.1.1] [1.9] Creation of Assets [1.9.1] % of durable assets created as compared to Annual Action Plan (AAP) % -- -- 90 92 95 No. of key stakeholders trained -- 948 400 405 410 [2.2] Formation of SHGs [2.2.1] No. of SHGs formed Nos -- 110 130 135 140 [2.3] Identification of CRP [2.3.1] from intensive blocks No. of CRP identified -- 20 14 20 25 [2.4] Revolving Funds [2.4.1] No. of CIF provided -- -- 450 455 460 with Revolving Fund [2.5] Interest Subvension [2.5.1] No. of SHG provided -- -- 180 185 190 Interest Subvension [2.6] Primary Level Federation [2.6.1] No. of primary level Federation formed at the Village Council Level -- -- 45 50 55 [2.7] Village Organizations [2.7.1] formed No. of Village Organizations formed at the Village level -- -- 31 35 40 [2.8] Institutiion Building (CIF) [2.8.1] to SHG No. of CIF provided to SHG -- -- 90 95 100 [2.9] Training of SHGs on [2.9.1] Panchasutra in Intensive blocks No. of SHGs trained -- 450 540 545 550

Page : 14 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [2.10] Training of SHGs on [2.10.1] No. of SHGs trained Panchasutra in Non- Intensive blocks -- 129 90 95 100 [2.11] Preparation of Annual [2.11.1] Action Plan Annual Action Plan prepared by the SMMU Date -- -- 18/02/2015 18/02/2016 17/02/2017 [3] Enhancement of productivity in rainfed/degraded lands through participatory watershed development approach and providing livelihood and production system and micro enterprise in rural areas. (IWDP/IWMP) [3.1] Creation of different land development through plantation, soil and moisture conservation and water harvesting structures [3.1.1] Area of Plantation including Horticulture, Afforestation Area in Ha -- 10092 21071 22000 22050 [3.1.2] No. of Bunds, Checkdams/Gully Plugs created -- 1713 2000 2100 2200 [3.1.3] No. of Rainwater Harvesting Structure, Farm Ponds and Percolation Tanks created -- 105 200 250 300 [3.2] Formation of Self help [3.2.1] Groups No. of SHGs formed -- 220 350 360 400 [3.3] Providing assistance to [3.3.1] individuals/group assistance under production system and micro enterprise No. of assistance provided to individuals/group in the form of production system and micro enterprise -- 250 350 360 400

Page : 15 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [3.4] Capacity building of [3.4.1] stakeholders in Watershed Development Programme PIA Level Number of Programm es -- 20 22 25 30 [3.4.2] [3.4.3] Self Help Group Level Number of -- 94 32 35 40 Programm es User Group Level Number of -- 190 70 75 80 Programm es [3.4.4] Watershed Committee Level Number of Programm es -- 129 351 360 370 [3.4.5] Livestock farmers Level Number of Programm es -- 30 140 145 150 [3.4.6] Micro Enterpreneur Level Number of Programm es -- 55 70 75 80 [4] Providing basic housing and [4.1] Achievement of physical [4.1.1] homestead to BPL households in target for the year 2014- rural areas. (IAY) 15 No. of house constructed against annual allocation. -- 3660 1290 1200 1200 [4.2] Entry of Physical and [4.2.1] Financial performance in the IAY-MIS % of physical data entry in MIS % -- 80 90 92 95

Page : 16 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [4.2.2] % of financial data entry in MIS % -- 80 90 92 95 [4.3] Monitoring of [4.3.1] performance of the Districts/Blocks. Effective monitoring by way of quarterly meetings of SLV&MC, DLV&MC etc. No.of Meetings. -- 24 24 25 26 [5] Providing developmental needs of the people living in remote & inacessible areas situated near the international border. (BADP) [5.1] Preparation/Finalization of Annual Action Plan under BADP. [5.1.1] Timely approval of the AAP by the SLSC on BADP within parameter set out on the Guidelines. Date -- 20/05/2013 30/06/2014 30/06/2015 30/06/2016 [5.2] Development of [5.2.1] institutional system for inspection of BADP schemes. Putting in place 3rd Party Inspection Agency for BADP works. Date -- 06/09/2013 30/07/2014 04/08/2015 02/08/2016 [5.3] Submission of physical [5.3.1] and financial achievement reports to Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India Quarterly submission of physical and financial achievement reports to the MHA, Govt.of India. no of days after each quarter -- 9 15 14 14 [5.4] Work Completion % [5.4.1] % of work completed % -- -- 90 92 95 against the Annual Action Plan 2014-2015 [5.5] Creation of Assets [5.5.1] No. of Community Hall -- 76 61 55 50 constructed [5.5.2] No. of Playground constructed -- 37 38 35 35

Page : 17 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [5.5.3] No. of School Building (Primary/Middle/High School) constructed -- 35 27 30 30 [5.5.4] No. of Water Reservoir/Tank constructed -- 31 21 40 45 [5.5.5] Suspension Bridges constructed -- 25 18 25 30 [6] Bridging critical gaps in local infrastructure and redressing regional imbalances in development within the State. (BRGF) [6.1] Ensure that the HPC consolidate and approve the District Plans [6.1.1] Timely Approval of District Plans on BRGF by HPC. Date -- -- 17/07/2014 17/07/2015 15/07/2016 [6.2] Fully transfer the Budget [6.2.1] allocation of BRGF to the two BRGF Districts Utilization of Budget allocation. % utilization -- 90 90 92 95 [6.3] Execution of work under [6.3.1] BRGF. Submition of Monthly Progress Report (MPR) -- -- 11 11 11 [6.4] Preparation of 5-year [6.4.1] Perspective Plan for effective implementation of BRGF. Within 1 year. Date -- 19/02/2013 30/07/2014 30/07/2015 29/07/2016 [6.5] Creation of Assets [6.5.1] Road Communication Sector (Cont. of Road, Bridges, Side drain, Masonry step, Urinal etc..) -- 141 63 65 68

Page : 18 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 [6.5.2] Social Infrastructure sector (Cont. of Hall, Library Room, Market Shed, Pavillion etc..) -- 142 45 48 50 [6.5.3] Rural Education (Cont. of Science Lab, BNRGSK, Rural Housing etc..) -- 180 90 95 100 [7] Capacity building and training of rural development/village level functionaries for local self government. (SIRD) [7.1] Improving service delivery of SIRD [7.1.1] Implementation of recommendation of concerned Committee, SIRD Governing Body etc. Date -- 31/12/2013 29/12/2014 30/12/2015 30/12/2016 [7.2] Organisation of Training [7.2.1] Courses Number of Trainings conducted. -- 174 90 95 100 [7.3] Organisation of [7.3.1] Colloquium of SIRD and ETCs Number of Colloquium held -- 2 4 4 5 [7.4] Attendance of National [7.4.1] Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs Number of Colloquium held -- 2 4 4 5 [7.5] Construction of New [7.5.1] SIRD campus at Durtlang, Aizawl. Completion of the construction work within the timeline. % -- 90 90 95 98 [7.6] IEC, Evaluation and [7.6.1] Research No. of IEC, Evaluation and Research Activities taken up. -- -- 4 5 5

Page : 19 of 35 Section 3: Trend Values of the Success Indicators Objective Action Success Indicator Unit Actual Value for FY 12/13 Actual Value Target Value Projected for for Value for FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Projected Value for FY 16/17 * Efficient Functioning of the RFD System Timely submission of Mid Term Achievement On-time submission Date -- -- 11/10/2014 12/10/2015 10/10/2016 Timely submission of Results for 2013-2014 On-time submission Date -- 05/03/2014 05/03/2014 10/03/2016 10/03/2017 Timely submission of Draft RFD for 2014-2015 for approval. On-time submission Date -- -- 06/03/2014 -- -- * Effective redressal of citizens grievances Timely disposal of citizens grievances lodged through FAKSELNA BOX Citizens grievances disposed off from FAKSELNA BOX within 30 days % -- -- 90 92 95 Timely disposal of citizens grievances lodged through www.mipuiaw.nic.in Citizens grievances disposed off through www.mipuiaw.nic.in within 30 days % -- -- 90 92 96 * Mandatory Objective(s)

Page : 20 of 35 Section 4: Acronym SI.No Acronym Description 1 AAP Annual Action Plan: The plan/work proposed to be undertaken for each Financial Year. 2 3 BADP BPL Border Area Development Programme: Border Area Development Programme, a 100% Centrally Sponsored programme was started with the twin objectives of balanced development of sensitive border areas though adequate provision of infrastructural facilities and promotion of a sense of security amongst the local population. Below Poverty Line: Below Poverty Line is an economic benchmark and poverty threshold used by the government of India to indicate economic disadvantage and to identify individuals and households in need of government assistance and aid. 4 BRGF Backward Region Grant Fund: The fund aims to supplement and converge existing developmental inflows into identified two BRGF Districts, Lawngtlai and Saiha Districts. 5 6 CRP DLV and MC Community Resource Person: CRPs are those who had come out of poverty by being members of the SHGs and practiced the cardinal principles of Self-Help. CRPs over the years have evolved as functional specialists with each one having their own strengths in specific areas like social mobilization, gender, financial management, book keeping, marketing, health, gender, paralegal assistants and so on. District Level Vigilance and Monitoring Committee: The Committee review strict adherence to prudent fiscal norms, inter-sectoral convergence, community participation and monitoring.

Page : 21 of 35 Section 4: Acronym SI.No Acronym Description 7 8 ETC GoI Extension Training Center: The ETC caters to the training needs of all block level extension officials, beneficiaries of Rural Development programmes and projects, NGOs, CBOs, AEC and VEC members, members of local institutions and all other block and village level organizations and workers. Government of India: Officially known as the Union Government, and also known as the Central Government, was established by the Constitution of India. 9 HPC High Power Committee: A committee formed to implement the development policies under Lunglei District. 10 IAY Indira Awaas Yojana: IAY aims at helping rural people below the poverty-line (BPL) belonging to SCs/STs, freed bonded labourers and non-sc/st categories in construction of dwelling units and upgradation of existing unserviceable kutcha houses by providing assistance in the form of full grant. 11 IWMP Integrated Wasteland Management Programme: IWMP helps to restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and developing degraded natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and water. 12 MGNREGA/S Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act/Scheme: MGNREGS has a mandate of providing at least 100 days guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer populace, providing livelihood security, drought-proofing, empowerment of the social disadvantage especially women, SC and ST etc. thus providing a powerful instrument for ensuring inclusive growth in rural India through its impact on social protection, livelihood security and democratic empowerment.

Page : 22 of 35 Section 4: Acronym SI.No Acronym Description 13 MIS Management Information System: It provides information that organizations require to manage themselves efficiently and effectively. 14 NERLP North Eastern Rural Livelihood Programme: It increase livelihood productivity among the local community through participatory approach and demand driven investment. 15 NRLM National Rural Livelihood Mission: The Mission aims at creating efficient and effective institutional platforms of the rural poor enabling them to increase household income through sustainable livelihood enhancements and improved access to financial services. 16 PIA Programme Implementing Agency implements the various schemes under their authority. 17 18 SHGs SIRD Self Help Groups: It is a village-based financial intermediary usually composed of 10 20 local women. Members make small regular savings contributions over a few months until there is enough capital in the group to begin lending. Funds may then be lent back to the members or to others in the village for any purpose. State Institute of Rural Development: State Institute of Rural Development (SIRD) focus on the qualitative development in the ongoing rural development schemes and sensitize the elected representatives of Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs) to be proactive through capacity building activities.

Page : 23 of 35 Section 4: Acronym SI.No Acronym Description 19 SLCC State Level Coordination Committee: A committee formed to monitor and coordinate the various schemes implemented under R.D. Deptt. 20 SLSC State Level Screening Committee: A committee to approve the annual action plan of the respective Blocks of the BADP covered area. 21 22 SLV and MC SMMU State Level Vigilance and Monitoring Cell: SLV and MC is to provide a crucial role to the Members of Parliament and elected representatives of implementation of the Rural Development Department programmes so that the schemes are executed in an effective manner and the benefits reach the poor in full measure. State Mission Mode Unit: To oversees the overall planning and implementation of National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM) in the State. 23 SPIP State Perspective Implementation Plan: It is a 5 years perspective plan under National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM). 24 WRC Wet Rice Cultivation: It is located in the low lying area of the State and it covers 50,476Ha within the state.

Page : 24 of 35 Section 4: Acronym SI.No Acronym Description

Page : 25 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments [1.1.1] Approval of Labour Budget of all Districts of 1 This indicator will keep track of the 1. Labour Budget is an GoI's letter conveying approval the State by the Ministry of RD, GoI approval of Labour Budget of all 8 estimated/projected demand of the labour Budget of the districts by the GoI. prepared every Financial State. year which contains details of anticipated demand for generation of man-days of employment for the state as a whole, so as to facilitate release of funds from the Govt of India. 2 [1.2.1] % of rural households provided employment This indicator will measure The percentage of as per demand percentage of employment provided employment provided against MIS or MPR data of the State. against demanded employment under employment demanded. the schemes during the financial year. [1.3.1] Average persondays per household 3 This indicator will measure average For every financial year, MIS or MPR data of the State. days of employment provided to each there is a Labour Budget on Job card holder households in a which man-days of Financial Year. employment to be generated is calculated for the whole State. This Labour Budget can be seen from MGNREGA website and the actual achievement of the State also can be seen from this site This signifies the projected work to be implemented in a financial year. It signifies the performance of the state in providing employment to the job card holders demanding employment. This indicator will signifies the performance of the Department under MGNREGS

Page : 26 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments [1.4.1] % of persondays(women) generated 4 This indicator will measure The percentage of Actual performance will be womendays generated vis-a-vis total employment provided to able to be seen from persondays generated in a Financial women against the total NREGAsoft. year and will measure the employment provided i.e., representation of women on the representation of the women implementation of the Schemes. on implementation of the schemes. It may be mentioned that most of the Job Card in Mizoram is registered in the name of the male head of the family since Mizo society is patriarchal system due to which the women participation in this scheme through MIS looks meagre. However, the actual participation of women on the ground prove otherwise. [1.5.1] Appointment of state quality monitors 5 This indicator will set in terms of It is an external quality Timely compilation. reference for quality monitoring of monitoring mechanism which works under MGNREGA. will supplement the creation of durable assets. [1.6.1] % of expenditure reported on MIS 6 This indicator will measure the % of The percentage which signify MIS data. actual expenditure reported in the the utilization of Fund by NREGS Soft. each District against the Fund sanctioned for the Districts. 7 [1.7.1] No of villages where training conducted This indicator will measure the no. of Training on Capacity Building NREGA villages where training for that is to be conducted in MPR/QPR of the Districts. is conducted. Capacity Building under the scheme schemes are implemented. every village where the It will checks the quality of works implemented. It shows the measure of fund utilization. It enhances the capacity of the job card holders.

Page : 27 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments [1.8.1] No. of villages where Social audit 8 This indicator will measure the no. of It is an Audit Unit that Minutes of the Social Audit conducted villages in which social audit of the monitors the scheme to bring meetings. scheme is conducted. in transparency in the Implementation of the scheme. 9 [1.9.1] % of durable assets created as compared to This indicator will measure the % of Annual Action Plan(AAP) is Annual Action Plan (AAP) actual assets created as projected in the plan/works proposed to MPR/QPR of the Districts the Annual Action Plan. be undertaken for each Financial year. [3.1.1] Area of Plantation including Horticulture, 10 This indicator will measure the actual This refers to the Area QPR of the State Level Nodal Afforestation area covered under the scheme covered/created under the Agency against that allocated by the GoI on scheme in the field of the basis of State Perspective and Afforestation, Horticulture Strategic Plan etc. 11 [3.2.1] No. of SHGs formed This indicator will measure the no. of Self-Help Group (SHG) is a 1st batch of IWMP Projects of 2009- small voluntary association of Sanction copy. Central funds are released. 10 for which 2nd installment of the same socio-economic poor people, preferably from background. They come together for the purpose of solving their common problems through self-help and mutual help. Audit unit to monitor the schemes. This signify the plan to be implemented in a Financial Year. This is signified in terms of Hectare, area, etc.

Page : 28 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments [3.4.1] PIA Level 12 This indicaor will measure the no. of Programme Implementing Capacity building report of the programmes organised for Capacity Agency(PIA) implements the SLNA. Building at the PIA level. various schemes under their jurisdiction. [3.4.2] Self Help Group Level 13 This indicator will measure the no. of This defines the no. of Capacity Building report of the programmes organised for Capacity programmes organized for SLNA. Building of the Self Help Groups. capacity building for the SHGs. This signify the capacity building aspect. 14 [3.4.3] User Group Level This indicator will measure the no. of programmes organised for Capacity building of the User Group. This defines the no. of programmes organized for capacity building for the User Groups. This signify the capacity building aspect. 15 [3.4.4] Watershed Committee Level This indicator will measure the no. of programmes organised for Capacity Building of the Watershed Committee. This defines the no. of programmes organized for capacity building for the Watershed Committee. This signify the capacity building aspect. 16 [3.4.5] Livestock farmers Level This indicator will measure the no. of programmes organised for Capacity Building of the Livestock farmers. This defines the no. of programmes organized for capacity building for the Livestock farmers. This signify the capacity building aspect.

Page : 29 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments 17 [3.4.6] Micro Enterpreneur Level This indicator will measure the no. of programmes organised for Capacity Building of the Micro Enterpreneur This defines the no. of programmes organized for capacity building for the Micro- Enterpreneur. This signify the capacity building aspect. 18 [4.1.1] No. of house constructed against annual This indicator will measure the This maybe defined as the allocation. percentage acheivement of dwelling no. of houses constructed MPR of the State. house constructed against the annual Central allocation. annually based on Allocation of fund from GOI. [4.2.1] % of physical data entry in MIS 19 This indicator will measure the This defines the number of MIS data physical performance data entered in Houses constructed which is the IAY MIS in % terms. entered in Awaasoft. This signify the no. of houses constructed. This signify the progress of house construction. [4.2.2] % of financial data entry in MIS 20 This indicator will measure the This defines the number MIS data financial performance data entered in utilisation which is entered in the IAY MIS in % terms. Awaasoft. This signify the financial utilization of fund. 21 [4.3.1] Effective monitoring by way of quarterly This indicator will measure the This is defined by the meetings of SLV&MC, DLV&MC etc. combined quarterly meetings at the Monitoring of performances Meeting minutes. State and District levels for review of performance under the scheme. under the IAY by way of quarterly meetings of SLV&MC, DLV&MC etc. This signify the effect of monitoring.

Page : 30 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments 22 [5.1.1] Timely approval of the AAP by the SLSC on This indicator will keep track of the Annual Action Plan is BADP within parameter set out on the Guidelines. formulation of AAP and its prepared every Financial Meeting minutes. subsequent approval by the State Level Screening Committee. Year which has to be approved by the State Level Screening Committee. [5.2.1] Putting in place 3rd Party Inspection 23 This indicator will track of the The service of 3rd Party Engagement order of 3rd Party Agency for BADP works. placement of 3rd party inspection Monitoring is availed for Monitoring Agency. agency for monitoring and evaluation inspection of works under of the programme execution. BADP. 24 [5.3.1] Quarterly submission of physical and This indicator will keep tab on time This defines the Quarterly financial achievement reports to the MHA, Govt.of submission of quarterly progress report on Physical and QPR of State. India. reports. Financial achievement which is submitted to MHA,GOI. This signify the approval of AAP within the time limit set. This signify the appointment of External Monitoring. This signify the performance in Implementation. 25 [5.4.1] % of work completed against the Annual Action Plan 2014-2015 This indicator will measure the work completed against the work projected. This defines the completed works against the AAP. This signify the performance in Implementation. [6.2.1] Utilization of Budget allocation. 26 This indicator will measure the fund Percentage of utilization of QPR of State. utilizatiion percentage against the fund against annual annual allocation. allocation is measured. This signify the % of Utilization.

Page : 31 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments 27 [6.3.1] Submition of Monthly Progress Report This indicator will measure the no. of Progress report under BRGF (MPR) sanctioned works monitored and is submitted monthly. Inspection Report. evaluated in percentage. This signify the Monthly Progress Report. [6.4.1] Within 1 year. 28 This indicator will measure the time Time taken for preparation of Date and Month of period of preparation of 5-years 5 Years perspective plan is Submission. perspective plans or implementation measured. of the scheme. This signify the preparationof Perspective Plan. 29 30 31 [7.1.1] Implementation of recommendation of concerned Committee, SIRD Governing Body etc. [7.2.1] Number of Trainings conducted. [7.3.1] Number of Colloquium held This indicator will keep track of the actual implementation of the recommendation/suggestions of National/State level Committees, SIRD Governing Body etc by the SIRD. This indicator will measure the no. of trainings conducted for various schemes by the SIRD. This indicator will measure the no. of colloquim organised for the SIRD and its subsidiary ETCs. Implementations of recommendation of Committees relating to SIRD is to be measured. This defines the no. of trainings conducted for various schemes under Rural Development by State Institute of Rural Development. SIRD and its subsidiary Extension Training Centres (ETCs) conducted Colloquium i.e., an academic conference/ seminar. This signify the Implementation of Recommendation. This signify the Capacity Building Aspect. This signify the no.of seminar held.

Page : 32 of 35 Section 4: Description and Definition of Success Indicators and Proposed Measurement Methodology SI.No Success indicator Description Definition Measurement General Comments 32 [7.4.1] Number of Colloquium held This indicator will measure the no. of national colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs attended in a calendar year. Number of Colloquium held is to be measured. 33 [7.5.1] Completion of the construction work within This indicator will keep track of the Construction of new SIRD the timeline. on-going construction of new SIRD Campus at Durtlang, Aizawl QPR of SIRD. Campus at Durtlang Aizawl. is on-going. [7.6.1] No. of IEC, Evaluation and Research 34 This indicator will measure the This is defined as the number QPR submited by the training Activities taken up. number of IEC activities, evaluation of Information Education & institute and research conducted by SIRD. Communication(IEC) activities, research and evaluation This signify the no. of evaluation etc. undertaken.

Page : 33 of 35 Section 5 : Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments Location Type State Organisation Type Organisation Name Relevant Success Indicator What is your requirement from this organisation Justification for this requirement Please quantify your requirement from this Organisation What happens if your requirement is not met. Central Government Ministry Ministry of Rural Development [1.1.1] Approval of Labour Budget of all Districts of the State by the Ministry of RD, GoI Timely release of requisite funds for achieveing the target Target set could not be achieved inthe absence of adequate fund Target will not be achieved [7.2.1] Number of Trainings conducted. [5.1.1] Timely approval of the AAP by the SLSC on BADP within parameter set out on the Guidelines. Timely release of requisie for achieving the target target set could not be achieved in the absence of adequate fund target will not be achieved [5.3.1] Quarterly submission of physical and financial achievement reports to the MHA, Govt.of India. [5.4.1] % of work completed against the Annual Action Plan 2014-2015 Timely Approval of District Plans on BRGF by HPC. [6.2.1] Utilization of Budget allocation. [6.3.1] Submition of Monthly Progress

Page : 34 of 35 Section 5 : Specific Performance Requirements from other Departments Location Type State Organisation Type Organisation Name Relevant Success Indicator What is your requirement from this organisation Justification for this requirement Please quantify your requirement from this Organisation What happens if your requirement is not met. Report (MPR) [6.4.1] Within 1 year.

Page : 35 of 35 Section 6: Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry Jointly responsible for influencing this outcome / impact with the following department (s) / ministry(ies) Success Indicator Unit FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 1 Enhance livelihood security of Ministry of RD, State RD Dept., DRDAs, Percentage of households % households in rural areas. SIRD having self employment 97.42 98 98 98 Increase in Per capita income rural households. Wage employment under MGNREGA 2 Enhance basic housing to Ministry of RD, State RD Dept., DRDAs Insrease in housing coverage % 980 800 700 600 BPL households in rural of Rural households areas. Rupees 3 Improved infrastructure in Ministries of Home Affairs/ Panchayati Increase in length of rural Kms backward/ border areas. Raj, State Finance Dept, State RD Deptt. connectivity in Increase in no. of Primary health centres. Increase in no of schools 215 200 180 180 Increase in no of anganwadis