SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS)

Similar documents
An Overview of the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) and its Relationship to UNFC

Application of UNFC and PRMS Bridging Document for oil & gas classification and management

CCOP EPPM: Workshop on UNFC Resource Classification in Cooperation with UNECE

Evaluation and Classification of Hydrocarbon Resources

Standardization of the Evaluation Criteria on Petroleum Resources

SPE/WPC/AAPG Petroleum Resource Classification

Guidelines for Application of the Petroleum Resources Management System

Mapping of Petroleum and Minerals Reserves and Resources Classification Systems

PRMS CBM Applications

PROSPECT - LEAD FIELD RECOVERABLE IN-PLACE TOTAL RESOURCES UNDISCOVERED RESOURCES DISCOVERED RESOURCES ESTIMATED ULTIMATE RECOVERY (EUR)

Incorporating Numerical Simulation Into Your Reserves Estimation Process: A Practical Perspective

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

Analogs in Resource Assessment and Beyond

Understanding Contingent Resources. Prepared for REU Houston 2015 Keith Braaten August 12, 2015

CO2 Storage Resources Management System

Bridging Document. between. the Oil and Fuel Gas Reserves and Resources Classification of the Russian Federation of and

UK Oil and Gas Reserves and Resources. As at end 2016

JWB/E2039/nxd/ th January, Reserves and Resources Update

Update UN Framework Classification for Fossil Energy & Mineral Resources

OECD TASK FORCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEEA-CF REPORTING OF STOCKS OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN PHYSICAL UNITS

Stakeholder Requirements and Developing Specifications for the United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC-2009) Presented by Charlotte Griffiths

Chinese Petroleum Resource Classification System and mapping to UNFC

For personal use only

United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC-2009) Harmonisation without Homogenisation

Net Risked Prospective Oil Resources

Proposal of a consistent framework to integrate geothermal potential classification with energy extraction

Executive Summary. Competent Person s Report Harvey Gas Prospect, UK North Sea. Harvey Gas Prospect CPR. PREPARED FOR: Independent Oil and Gas plc

UNFC Stakeholder Benefits

SPE Reservoir Engineering and Production Optimization Mike Verney, P. Eng. February 28, 2017

The United Nations Framework Classification for Fossil Energy and Mineral Resources

PRMS and Professional Qualification Issues. October 2010

Draft document prepared by the Task Force on Application of UNFC-2009 to Renewable Energy Resources 1

United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC-2009)

Probabilistic Aggregation and Project Definition: A Missed Opportunity E. Morales and W. John Lee

Executive Summary. Competent Person s Report Harvey Gas Prospect, UK North Sea. Harvey Gas Prospect CPR. PREPARED FOR: Independent Oil and Gas plc

United Nations Framework Classification for Fossil Energy and Mineral Reserves and Resources 2009 incorporating Specifications for its Application

For personal use only

Application of United Nations Framework Classification 2009 (UNFC-2009) to nuclear fuel resources IAEA

RESOURCE PLAYS: UNDEVELOPED RESERVES THE LEARNING CURVE

Examining Reservoir Water Retention During SAGD. Thursday January 31 st, 2013

Dorado-1 Oil Discovery 18 July 2018

For personal use only Operations Update

Reservoir Engineering and Reserves Adam Borushek, Principal Reservoir Engineer RISC Advisory

For personal use only

The Imperial Barrel Award Committee

World and U.S. Fossil Fuel Supplies

COPYRIGHT. Why Take This Module? Why Take This Module? Headlights function with two purposes: The R & R process also has two fundamental purposes:

Competent Person s Report on the Ororo Field, OML95, Offshore Nigeria.

Petroleum Resources Classification & Reserves Estimation

Reservoir Engineering and Reserves Adam Borushek, Principal Reservoir Engineer RISC Advisory

7 April Prospective resources in Indonesia

For personal use only

The relationship between the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) Template 2013 and the United Nations

For personal use only

For personal use only

Practices and Pitfalls in Estimating Coalbed Methane Resources and Reserves*

TSX-V: YO. September. Duvernay Shale Peters & Co. Energy Conference

Oil and Gas Reserves and Production Volume

Integrated Forecasting, Economics and Reserves

The CRIRSCO Template and its relationship to UNFC-2009 and PRMS. Stephen Henley CRIRSCO

Potential Recovery Rates

John Harris President Reservoir Development Services. Houston, Texas March 9-10, 2011

SPE Reserves, Resources and Definition Workshop

Energy Supply Setting

Outcome of the Seminar on the application of the UNFC

Competent Person s Report on Certain Petroleum Interests of Gulf Keystone Petroleum and its Subsidiaries in Kurdistan, Iraq

Armour Energy Limited 2 September 2015 Armour to Become a Significant Gas, LPG, Condensate and Oil Producer

Proved Reserves Statement (SEC Rules) Certain Properties in Europe as of 31 st December, 2015

2018 Reserves and Resources Statement

It is expected that different reserve estimators estimating reserves for an unconventional Reservoir have similar results (eg +/-10%).

2017 Reserves and Resources Statement

Harikrishnan Hari Tulsidas

Unconventional Gas Market Appraisal

Reserve growth in oil fields of the North Sea

A suggestion for SEEA classifications of energy resources

Shades of Energy Independence

Energy. on this world and elsewhere. Instructor: Gordon D. Cates Office: Physics 106a, Phone: (434)

Status of SPEE Monograph 4 Estimating Developed Reserves in Unconventional Reservoirs John Seidle MHA Petroleum Consultants

International Energy Forum - Global CCS Institute Symposium on Carbon Capture and Storage

Fossil Fuels: Climate change and Security of Supply

For personal use only

Rose & Associates Overview Louisiana Energy Conference

The Unconventional Oil and Gas Market Outlook

UK Oil and Gas Reserves and Resources as at end 2017

RESOURCE ASSESSM ENT AND PRODUCTION FORECASTS

RESOURCE ASSESSM ENT AND PRODUCTION FORECASTS

A world class oil story. Senegal project update 08 March 2017

2016 Reserves and Resources Statement

For personal use only

KPV/jls/AH /gcah December 18, Proved Reserve Statement for the Reggane Nord Block, Algeria as of September 30, 2014

Status of Geothermal Resource Classification & Key Stakeholders

New Zealand Energy Corp.

Coal and Natural Gas The Evolving Nature of Supply and Demand

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Rockrose: CPR of Certain UK Oil Fields

Case Study on UNFC-2009:

AADE Symposium 2011 Haynesville Shale. Presented by James R. Redfearn Vice President Drilling & Completions Mid Continent Region January 19, 2011

ADX ASSETS & STRATEGY A PIVOTAL PERIOD AHEAD

Canadian Spirit Resources Inc. Corporate Presentation. April 2018

Transcription:

SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) PRMS Prepared by the SPE Oil & Gas Reserves Committee (OGRC) 1

Who is the OGRC? International representation (USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Italy, Hungary, Saudi Arabia) Focus on technical standards Inter-organizational cooperation 2

SPE Vision for Reserves/Resources SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE definitions and classification system (and associated estimating guidelines) will continue to be maintained evergreen and enhanced to incorporate new best practices, and unconventional resources, and will be recognized as the premier classification standard. SPE will actively promote and facilitate in-depth understanding of the definitions and their universal adoption by the oil, gas, and related industries; international financial organizations; governments; regulatory agencies; and reporting bodies. 3

Our Stakeholders small independents Oil & Gas Companies Large IOC s and NOC s Securities Regulators Government Agencies Investors Financial Organizations All stakeholders require complete, consistent and reliable information on future production and associated cash flow estimates through full life recovery. 4

Scope of Projects Prospect Generation Align with the hydrocarbon finding, developing and producing business! Wildcat Drilling Discovery, Appraisal, Development Field Optimization Enhanced Recovery We require a system that will support assessment processes throughout the asset lifecycle Decline, Abandonment + + + 5

Evolution of Petroleum Evaluation Guidelines API 1936 API/AGA 1961 SPE/API 1964 SPEE 1985 WPC 1987 SPE 1987 1997 SPE/WPC Petroleum Reserves Definitions 2000 SPE/WPC/AAPG Petroleum Resources Classification and Definitions 2001 SPE/WPC/AAPG Guidelines for the Evaluation of Petroleum Reserves and Resources 2007 SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (SPE-PRMS) 2005 SPE/WPC/AAPG Glossary of Terms Consolidate, build on, update, and replace prior guidance 6

SPE Mapping Project Agencies Selected for Comparison 1. US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC-1978) Securities Disclosures Government Reporting International Standards 2. UK Statement of Recommended Practices (SORP-2001) 3. Canadian Security Administrators (CSA -2002) 4. Russian Ministry of Natural Resources (RF-2005) 5. China Petroleum Reserves Office (PRO-2005) 6. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD 2001) 7. United States Geological Survey (USGS-1980) 8. United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC-2004) (see final report December 2005 on SPE.org) 7

PRMS - Major Principles 1. The System is Project Based. 2. Classification is based on project s chance of commerciality. Categorization is based on recoverable uncertainty. 3. Base case uses evaluator s forecast of future conditions. 4. Applies to both conventional and unconventional resources 8

Project-Based System project lease reservoir What is my entitlement using this project? How much is there? Reservoir (in-place volumes) net recoverable resource Project (production & cash flow schedules) Property (ownership/contract terms) What is my share of costs and revenues? 9

Discovered Separate Classification & Categorization Production Undiscovered Sub-commercial Commercial Reserves Contingent Resources Unrecoverable Prospective Resources classify by Chance of Commerciality (Risk) of project applied chance of development chance of discovery Unrecoverable categorize estimates based on uncertainty of sales quantities associated with project reservoir in-place uncertainty + project recovery efficiency 10

Resources Classification System PRODUCTION Discovered IIP Sub- Commercial Recoverable Total Initially-in-Place (IIP) Unrecoverable Commercial Undiscovered IIP Recoverable Potentially Commercial Unrecoverable TOTAL PETROLEUM INITIALLY-IN-PLACE (PIIP) DISCOVERED PIIP UNDISCOVERED PIIP SB-COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL Proved 1P Low Estimate Probable RESERVES 2P CONTINGENT RESOURCES UNRECOVERABLE PROSPECTIVE RESOURCES Best Estimate UNRECOVERABLE Possible 3P 1C 2C 3C High Estimate Increasing Chance of Commerciality Range of Uncertainty Not to scale 11

Resources Class Criteria Discovered Established through testing, sampling and/or logging the existence of a significant quantity of potentially moveable hydrocarbons. Commercial Meets evaluator s economic criteria No significant contingencies that would prevent development Reasonable expectation that all internal/external approvals will be forthcoming Intent to initiate development within a reasonable time frame reasonable time frame depends on the specific circumstances and varies according to the scope of the project. 12

UNDISCOVERED PIIP TOTAL PETROLEUM INITIALLY-IN-PLACE (PIIP) SUB-COMMERCIAL DISCOVERED PIIP COMMERCIAL Increasing Chance of Commerciality Sub-classify by Project Maturity PRODUCTION Project Maturity Sub-classes On Production RESERVES Approved for Development Justified for Development Commercial Criteria CONTINGENT RESOURCES Development Pending Development Unclarified or On Hold Development not Viable UNRECOVERABLE Discovery Criteria PROSPECTIVE RESOURCES Prospect Lead Play UNRECOVERABLE Range of Uncertainty Not to scale 13

Reserves Status Additional Classification Modifiers Recoverable quantities my be subdivided based on the funding and operational operational status of wells and associated facilities into: Developed (Producing or Non-Producing) Undeveloped Reserves status may be applied to Proved, Probable and Possible Economic Status Projects may be further characterized by economics and commercial modifiers into: Economic (Reserves) Marginal Economic (Contingent Resources) Sub-Marginal Economic (Contingent Resources) Reserves and Economic Status may be applied separately or in combination with Project Maturity Sub-classes 14

% probability of value or more Possible Probable Proved Categorize by Uncertainty The system accommodates multiple approaches to assessing uncertainty. Deterministic Methods Probabilistic Methods Cum Prod incremental 1P 2P 3P scenario 100% P90 EUR Proved Probable Possible reasonably certain 1P scenario high degree of confidence Less likely than Proved More Likely than Possible 2P scenario more likely than not Less likely than Probable 3P scenario - unlikely 0% cum prod 1P 2P 3P EUR P50 P10 15

COMMERCIAL Based on Forecast Conditions Project decisions are based on the evaluators view of Forecast Conditions = those assumed to exist during the project s implementation Conditions include: Prices and costs Technology available Environmental standard Fiscal terms Regulatory constraints PROVED forecast case 1P 2P 3P RESERVES PROBABLE POSSIBLE Alternate economic scenarios are typically considered in the decision process and, in some cases, to supplement reporting requirements. For example, one sensitivity case may assume current conditions will remain constant throughout the life of the project ( constant case ). 16

Unconventional Resources Conventional Reservoirs Heavy Oil Tight Gas Sands Oil Shale Extra -Heavy Oil Bitumen Unconventional Reservoirs Gas Shales Coalbed Methane Gas Hydrates Increasing In-Place Volume Pervasive over large areas and not significantly affected by current hydrodynamic influences, i.e. buoyancy of petroleum on water! SPE classification still applies (but may require alternative assessment approaches). 17

PRMS Development and Approval Process Final Approval March 2007 Submit for SPE board and partner approval OGRC Definitions Revision Project - Phase 1 Sept 2004 Oct 2006 100 Day Industry Review Period (30 presentations global feedback) OGRC reviews/incorporates feedback into a final PRMS 18

Summary of Major Changes in 2007 SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE PRMS Revision Comment Combines 4 previous documents into single "Petroleum Resources Management System": 1997 SPE/WPC Petroleum Reserves Guidelines 2000 SPE/WPC/AAPG Petroleum Resources Classification and Definitions 2001 SPE/WPC/AAPG Guidelines for the Evaluation of Petroleum Reserves & Resources 2005 SPE/WPC/AAPG Glossary of Terms Separate documents combined, abbreviated and clarified Base case uses forecast conditions but still permits option to use constant conditions Most companies base decisions on forecast conditions; some regulators require constant conditions for consistent reporting Recognizes growing importance of unconventional resources Low, mid and high categories of Contingent Resources relabeled to 1C, 2C & 3C respectively PRMS applies to both conventional and unconventional resources Aligns with 1P, 2P & 3P Reserve uncertainty categories but constrained by commerciality barrier(s) Introduces classification modifiers: - Reserves status of developed and undeveloped can be applied to 1P, 2P & 3P Reserves - Reserves, Contingent Resources & Prospective Resources sub-classified by project maturity - Contingent Resources subdivided into 'marginal economic' & 'sub-marginal economic' Additional classification modifiers optional but may greatly assist in understanding and tracking reserves and resources 19

Undiscovered Discovered classify by commercial certainty Total Resource System is Project-Based PRODUCTION The key is the PROJECT Proved Probable Possible Commercial Contingent Resources Sub-commercial No Project No recoverable resource Prospective Resources categorize by recovery certainty 20

What s Next? Education Programs (ATW s, JCORET, ) Implementation Guides, Examples Collaboration with Other Standards 21