Republic of Korea. Submission on Art 6.2 and 6.4 of the Paris Agreement

Similar documents
The EIG s views on APA agenda item 3(b) and 3(c)

Informal information note by the Co-Facilitators

Article 6.4 and the future of offsetting

Submission by Saint Lucia on behalf of CARICOM. APA Agenda Item 3 - Nationally Determined Contributions: features, information and accounting

PNG s Legal Views on the Operations of Article 6.2

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the APA on transparency February 2016

The enhanced transparency framework. an analysis of the Paris Agreement

Standardized Crediting Framework Rwanda Pilot Second Capacity Building Workshop

ACCOUNTING UNDER THE PARIS AGREEMENT

Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Kentaro Takahashi Programme Manager Climate and Energy Area

SUBMISSION OF TURKEY ON AGENDA ITEM 3 (MITIGATION SECTION OF DECISION 1/CP.21) OF AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON THE PARIS AGREEMENT (APA1-4)

New Market Mechanism

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to SBSTA on Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement October 2017

1. General reflections

Introducing the Adaptation Benefit Mechanism (ABM)

SUBMISSION BY NORWAY ON APA AGENDA ITEM 7

understanding of progress towards the long-term vision agreed under the Paris Agreement through the following benchmark targets:

SUBMISSION BY THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

KEY ISSUES IN COMPLETING THE PARIS CLIMATE ARCHITECTURE

Contents. Informal document by the Chair. Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice Forty-eighth session Bonn, 30 April to 10 May 2018

FCCC/APA/2016/INF.1/Add.1

DRAFT TEXT on CMP 12 agenda item 4 Matters relating to the clean development mechanism. Draft decision -/CMP.12

Status of the international negotiations related to the enhanced transparency framework

1 OVERARCHING CONSIDERATIONS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the APA on Article 13: Transparency September 2017

Revision of the Joint Implementation guidelines

Paris Agreement on Climate Change. International Climate Change and Energy Law, Spring semester 2016 Prof. Dr. Christina Voigt

Survey on the International Negotiation on Market Mechanism Report

SUBMISSION BY THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

Version 2 of 10 December 2015 at 21:00 DRAFT PARIS OUTCOME 1. Proposal by the President. Draft decision -/CP.21

Report of the Conference of the Parties on its tenth session, held at Buenos Aires from 6 to 18 December 2004

The NDC Cycle in the Paris Agreement

Views on modalities and procedures for the new market-based mechanism

List of checks to be performed by the international transaction log Draft, 3 November 2004

FCCC/KP/CMP/2015/8/Add.1

MS WORD VERSION FOR WORKING PURPOSES ONLY

Paris Agreement. Seminar on international climate negotiations 11 October 2016, Chisinau Tomasz Chruszczow, Chair of UNFCCC SBI

Informal note by the co-facilitators final version

Empowering the Ratchet-up Mechanism:

-SUBMISSION BY MEXICO REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Accounting for mitigation targets in Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement

What is the Legal Basis for the Use of Certified Emission Reductions after 2020?

REDD+ and the Paris Agreement Prespective

Updates on the JCM and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement

STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE GROUP OF 77 AND CHINA

Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7.4 of the Kyoto Protocol

Review of the CDM M&P

Introduction to Carbon Markets. Ankara, 5 September 2016

COP22 Marrakech Glossary of Key Terms November Table of Contents

Paris Agreement summary

FCCC/APA/2018/L.2/Add.1

Prepared for the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice 48th meeting, Bonn Climate Change Conference 30 April - 10 May

Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

Additional priority areas for capacity-building relating to the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol

Criteria for Sustainable Development and how to use the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Framework

I. General Considerations on the Adaptation Communication

Building blocks for a robust Sustainable Development Mechanism. Carbon Market Watch Policy Brief May 2017

National procedure for using Joint Implementation (JI) mechanism under Track I (National JI Track I Procedure)

DESIGNING THE ENHANCED TRANSPARENCY FRAMEWORK PART 1: REPORTING UNDER THE PARIS AGREEMENT

The IPCC Special Report on [1.5 C]: The context for the invitation by COP 21. Dr. Florin Vladu Manager, UNFCCC Secretariat Geneva, 15 August 2016

Quick Facts on Article 6 - Market Mechanisms

Decision 3/CMP.1 Modalities and procedures for a clean development mechanism as defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol

Major Economies Business Forum Transparency and Measurement, Reporting, and Verification

A Proposal for AWG-LCA Republic of Korea

CDM WATCH RESPONSE TO CALL FOR PUBLIC INPUTS

DRAFT TEXT on CMP 11 agenda item 4 Issues relating to the clean development mechanism. Draft decision -/CMP.11

PNG s FOCUSED SUBMISSION ON MPGs FOR THE TRANSPARENCY FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION AND SUPPORT REFFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 13 OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT

CDM pre/post 2012 and future instruments. New Market Mechanism Capacity Building-Osaka General Meeting Osaka, Japan, 7-8 March 2013

NDC Features, Transparency and Ambition JUNE 2017

Guidance from the twenty-third session of the Conference of the Parties: Co-Chairs proposal

Elements of the outcome. Note by the Chair

Issues to consider when linking Carbon Markets

Post-2020 Ci-Dev Portfolio Transition Report

Background information on existing PoA regulations

Synthesis of submissions on agenda item 4 of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement

REDD+ Academy. National Forest Monitoring Systems (NFMS) for REDD+

Markets 2.0 under UNFCCC

The Paris Agreement and the EU NDC

Current status and outcomes of REDD negotiations under UNFCCC

Executive Summary. September 2016

Views on possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based mechanisms

Guidance on the implementation of Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 08/09/ :59

FCCC/SBSTA/2013/INF.10

OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARTIES TO CONSIDER AND ADDRESS NON-PARTY COMMUNICATIONS IN THE UNFCCC FRAMEWORK

Informal note by the co chairs

Keeping track: Options To Develop International Greenhouse Gas Unit Accounting After 2012

Links to the UNFCCC: NDCs and the global stocktake

Revised work programme for the biennium

Elements of the 2015 Agreement Switzerland s views

Tracking progress towards NDCs and relevant linkages between Articles 4, 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement

AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON LONG-TERM COOPERATIVE ACTION UNDER THE CONVENTION First part of the Seventh session Bangkok, 28 September to 9 October 2009

Tracking progress towards NDCs and relevant linkages between Articles 4, 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement

Current Status of the JCM and UNFCCC negotiations on markets

JICA Technical Cooperation on Low Carbon Development and Challenges of JCM in Indonesia

UNITED NATIONS. Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol preparatory work by the secretariat. Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/2004/7 29 October 2004.

DRAFT UNFCCC/CCNUCC Page 1

U.S. Submission on methodologies and systems used to measure and track climate finance

FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/13/Add.1. Decision 2/CMP.8

Transcription:

Republic of Korea Submission on Art 6.2 and 6.4 of the Paris Agreement The conclusion of the SBSTA 46 invites Parties to submit their views on the content of the guidance (Article 6, paragraph 2) and the content of the rules, modalities and procedures (Article 6, paragraph 4), including the structure and areas, issues and elements to be addressed. The Republic of Korea welcomes the opportunity to submit its views on matters relating to Article 6, paragraph 2 and 4 of the Paris Agreement, pursuant to the request made in the conclusion of SBSTA 46. 1. Approach for the guidance of Art 6.2 and the rules, modalities and procedures (RMP) of Art 6.4 The guidance of Art 6.2 and the rules, modalities and procedures of Art 6.4 shall deal with the issuance, transfer and use of mitigation outcomes (MO) and emission reduction (ER). In addition to the guidance under Art 6.2 and the rules, modalities and procedures of Art 6.4, the guidance necessary in relation to reporting and review of units (Article 13) and another guidance concerning the use of units towards the achievement of NDCs (Article 4.13) are needed. Korea is of the view that in order to avoid overlaps among the discussions and further the progress on the implementation of the Paris work programme, the guidance under Art 6.2 and the rules, modalities and procedures under Art 6.4 shall provide the standards and guidelines focusing on the issuance, transfer and use of units. And the guidance in relation to reporting and review of units should be a part of the guidelines for the biennial report under the transparency framework under Art 13. Furthermore, the rules, modalities and procedures concerning the use of units towards the achievement of NDCs should also be reflected in the guidance under Art. 4.13. 1

2. Headings and elements of Art 6.2 A. Purpose and Principles The purpose of the guidance under Art 6.2 is to provide standards and guidelines necessary for the implementation of various types of cooperative approaches. - Parties could design and implement a sub-mechanism under Art 6.2 with bilateral or multilateral agreements. Such a sub-mechanism, in its operationalization, shall be consistent with the guidance under Art 6.2 The principles defined in Art.6 including, inter alia, promotion of sustainable development and environmental integrity, and avoidance of double counting under Art. 6 are applied to the guidance under Art 6.2. Parties shall adhere to the principles when designing and implementing a sub-mechanism. B. Definition and concept ITMO : it is a unit for the international transfer under Art 6.2 and 6.4. An ITMO denotes a mitigation outcome (MO) generated under Art 6.2 or emission reduction (ER) generated under Art 6.4, which has been internationally transferred. 1 MO and 1 ER are equivalent in terms of unit, which is 1 tco2e. (1 MO = 1 ER = 1 ITMO = 1 tco2e.) Environmental Integrity : the use of cooperative approach shall not result in higher GHG emissions compared to the situation without the use of it. Sustainable Development : mitigation activities under Art 6.2 shall contribute to and be consistent with Sustainable Development Goals and objectives of the host country. Assessment of sustainable development might be substituted by approval of the host country. Avoiding Double Counting : double counting can occur in relation to the issuance, transfer, and use of MO under Art 6.2. Parties that design and operate a sub-mechanism under cooperative approach shall establish and implement measures for avoiding double counting 1. 1 Double issuance occurs when more than one unit of mitigation outcome is issued for one unit of emissions reduction under two or more schemes. To prevent double issuance, Parties intending to operate sub-mechanisms are required to have in place a review system to verify that a proposed project has not been registered under other schemes. Double transfer occurs when one unit of mitigation outcome is transferred to two or more acquiring Parties. Parties are required to establish a unit-tracking system to avoid double transfer. Double usage occurs when mitigation results are used by two or more Parties towards the achievement of their respective NDC. In order to avoid double usage, Parties should carry out corresponding adjustments. 2

C. Scope and type of Activities The scope of activities shall be defined by an agreement between Parties participating in sub-mechanism. Activities may include project, program, policybased measures and others. The scope of activities under cooperative approaches could be coextensive with the scope of activities under Art 6.4. Various activities which reduce emissions by sources and removals by sink. D. Participation requirement Parties that intend to participate in cooperative approach shall meet, inter alia, the following requirements. The information concerning the requirements needs to be reported under the transparency framework. - Having submitted NDCs - Having established National Registry - Having established a designated national authority(dna) E. Governance Parties shall establish national institutions including designated national authority in order to maintain sub-mechanism under cooperative approach. And Parties shall provide relevant information on sub-mechanism to the public. F. Issuance, transfer, use of Mitigation Outcome A sub-mechanism shall issue MOs in accordance with the guidance under Art 6.2. First, a sub-mechanism shall operate in conformity with the scope and type of activities. Second, a sub-mechanism shall demonstrate that its operations are in accordance with environmental integrity and sustainable development and report any relevant information under the transparency framework. Third, information on mitigation activities such as project description, participating entities, location, etc. should be open to the public in order to prevent double counting including double issuance, double transfer and double usage. International transfers and acquisitions of ITMOs shall be recorded by both the transferring Party and the acquiring Party in a national tool (double entry book keeping). The specific contents and format of reporting shall be defined in the modalities, procedures and guidelines (MPGs) for the biennial reports under the transparency framework. To avoid double counting that may arise in relation to the use of ITMOs towards the achievement of NDCs, the acquiring Party has to subtract the volume of ITMOs from its GHG inventories, and the transferring Party has to add the volume of ITMOs to its GHG inventories (corresponding adjustment). 3

Corresponding adjustment is relevant and important with respect to both accounting for NDCs and cooperative approaches. In relation to accounting for NDCs, corresponding adjustment should take into account the diversity, such as type and target year/period, of NDCs, as different NDCs may require different approaches to corresponding adjustment. In regard to cooperative approaches, corresponding adjustment should be done in such a way that the use of ITMOs for the achievement of NDCs is cost-effective. Otherwise, Parties have little incentive to engage in cooperative approaches. And use of cooperative approaches should be supplementary to domestic mitigation efforts. In order to develop detailed guidance for corresponding adjustment, these different cases of corresponding adjustment should be taken into consideration, and the guidance for corresponding adjustment should be developed in accordance with the principles of transparency, accuracy, completeness, comparability and consistency (TACCC). Korea suggests that joint consultations between experts involved in SBSTA 46 agenda sub-item (10 a&b) and those involved in APA agenda item 3(c) be taken place to develop different approaches to corresponding adjustment 2. G. Infrastructure Parties shall establish and maintain a National Registry to supervise the issuance, transfer and use of units. National Registry shall be linked with International Transaction Log in accordance with the rules and procedures defined by the Secretariat. Designated National Authority shall consider and determine whether mitigation activities under cooperative approach contribute to the sustainable development of the host country. Parties shall designate an entity as their Designated National Authority, and the same entity may serve as DNA under Art 6.2 and 6.4. 3. Headings and elements of Art 6.4 A. Purpose and Principles The purpose of the rules, modalities and procedures is to provide the standards and guidelines for the implementation of mechanism under Art 6.4. The principles defined in Art.6 including, inter alia, promotion of sustainable development and environmental integrity, and avoidance of double counting under Art 6 shall be applied to the guidance under Art 6.4. 2 Korea is of the views that market mechanism shall be designed with flexibilities to accommodate different NDCs under the Paris Agreement. And the nature of NDC must not be changed for the use of market mechanism. 4

B. Definition and concept Emission Reduction : GHG reductions generated from mitigation activities under Art 6.4 ITMO : it is a unit for the international transfer under Art 6.2 and 6.4. An ITMO denotes a mitigation outcome (MO) generated under Art 6.2 or emission reduction (ER) generated under Art 6.4, which has been internationally transferred. 1 MO and 1 ER are equivalent in terms of unit, which is 1 tco2e. (1 MO = 1 ER = 1 ITMO = 1 tco2e.) Environmental Integrity : the use of mechanism under Art 6.4 should deliver an overall mitigation in global emissions. Sustainable Development : mitigation activities for emission reduction under Art 6.4 shall contribute to and be consistent with Sustainable Development Goals and objectives of the host country. Assessment of sustainable development might be substituted by approval of the host country. Avoiding Double Counting : double counting can occur in relation to the issuance, transfer, and use of ER under Art 6.4. Parties shall establish and implement measures for avoiding double counting 3. C. Scope and type of Activities The Scope of activities may include projects and programs based on the preferential base. The scope may be further expanded after the establishment of a Supervisory body. Activities which reduce emissions by sources and removals by sink are applicable for ER under Art 6.4. D. Participation requirement Parties that intend to participate in mechanism under Art 6.4 shall meet, inter alia, the following requirements. The information concerning the requirements needs to be reported under the transparency framework. - Having submitted NDCs - Having established National Registry - Having established a designated national authority(dna) 3 The definition of double counting is the same as the one used in section 2. B. 5

E. Governance (CMA) CMA shall consider and adopt the rules, modalities, and procedures for the mechanism established under Art 6.4. (Supervisory Body) SB shall supervise the implementation of the rules, modalities and procedures, approve Project Design Document, new methodologies of activity and issuance of units, and operate the Registry under Art 6.4 (Designated National Authority) Designated National Authority shall consider and determine whether mitigation activities contribute to the sustainable development of the host country. (Designated Operational Entity) DOE shall assess the feasibility of mitigation activities and verify monitoring report F. Issuance, transfer, use of Emission Reduction Supervisory Body shall develop detailed rules, modalities, and procedures on the issuance of units. Such rules, modalities, and procedures shall be considered and adopted by CMA. International transfers and acquisitions of ER shall be recorded by both the transferring Party and the acquiring Party in a national tool (double entry book keeping). The specific contents and format of reporting shall be defined in the guidelines for the biennial reports under the transparency framework. To avoid double counting that may arise in relation to the use of ITMOs towards the achievement of NDCs, the acquiring Party has to subtract the volume of ITMOs from its GHG inventories, and the transferring Party has to add the volume of ITMOs to its GHG inventories. G. Infrastructure Supervisory Body shall establish and maintain the Registry under Art 6.4 to supervise the issuance, transfer, and use of units. Registry shall be linked with International Transaction Log. Parties shall designate an entity as their Designated National Authority, and the same entity may serve as DNA under Art 6.2 and 6.4. H. Others The registered CDM projects valid after 2020 shall continue to be valid after reassessment in accordance with relevant rules, modalities, and procedures under Art 6.4. 6

4. Expectation and timeline for the process In order to complete the development of the guidance under Art 6.2 and the rules, modalities and procedures under Art 6.4 before COP 24, their headings and elements should be agreed at SBSTA 47 At SBSTA 49, a decision with three Annexes containing the guidance under Art. 6.2, 6.4, and 6.8 shall be adopted by the CMA Technical works in the form of additional workshop and technical papers should take place in order to fulfill the mandate in a timely manner. 7