On Time Performance. PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sept 24, Presented by Kenneth Mc Donald - COO Sonali Bose - CFO

Similar documents
Presentation to MBTA Caucus

Give a Hoot: Endangered Night Owl Service Indicates Threatened Regional Transportation System

Rail Service Criteria Update

Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP) and Related Transit Initiatives

SFMTA Operational Efficiency & Project Delivery

draft 9/11/2012 WATERFRONT TRANSPORTATION NETWORK ASSESSMENT Prepared by SFMTA OEWD City Planning Port September 6, 2012

Strategic Plan PROPOSED STRATEGIC PLAN METRICS. Progress Report

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. November 2015 San Francisco, California

Transforming the SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

11. Operating and Maintenance Costs

The Evolution of TransLink : Past, Present, and Future

FAST Freight Advisory Committee August 9, Transportation 2040 Update

HIDDEN COSTS: The Need for Transfers in the MBTA System

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. General Manager, Nuria I. Fernandez

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 1 Focus. April 2014 San Francisco, California

Fiscal Management and Control Board Briefing APRIL 30, 2018

Strategic Plan Progress Report SEPTEMBER 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

S. F. Municipal Transportation Agency Citizens Advisory Council City & County of San Francisco RECOMMENDATIONS / MOTIONS 2014

Transit Value Capture Coordination: Best Practices & Recommendations

MBTA Fare Policy. Approved December 21, I. Purpose

Status of Projects to Reduce the Impacts of Transportation on Stormwater using Common Transportation Control Measures

Using Payment Innovation to Improve Urban Transportation Networks

Transit and Reducing Greenhouse Gases: A Look at the Numbers

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. April 2016 San Francisco, California

Update on WMATA Salary and Wage Administration

Transit Works. Improving the quality of life for all Californians.

TransLink Program Update & Bay Area Initiatives

The New SFMTA Strategic Plan

Intro Strategic Plan SFTP TDM Facilities Transit Bicycle Pedestrian Taxi STRATEGIC PLAN. Presented by Ed Reiskin, Director of Transportation

Strategic Plan Progress Report AUGUST 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Action Item Highlights. November 2014 San Francisco, California

Open Payment Fare Solution Universal Transportation Payment Solution

American Public Transportation Association 1666 K Street, N.W. Suite 1100 Washington, DC (202)

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan

Meeting Facilitator Gavels in Meeting and Presenter Comes to the Podium.

(Image of a moving Muni light rail vehicle in the Geneva Yard at night)

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

Strategic Plan Progress Report Key Metrics and Actions SEPTEMBER 2012 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Should we Expect ITS Programs to Generate Revenue?

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

Strategic Plan. SFMTA Board of Directors Workshop

Moving Transit Technology

ABSTRACT CONNECTOR BUS SYSTEM. Name: Matthew Denton Crooks, Master of Science, May 2013

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

General Manager Remarks

San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (SF FCMS)

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

View from Cabot Yard, South Boston. ACEC State Markets Conference April 2019

2007 MBTA Draft Fare Policy

Re: Item 5a: Proposed Regional Means-Based Transit Fare Program Framework. Dear Chair Josefowitz and Programming and Allocations Committee Members:

2015 MBTA Bus Maintenance Costs Were Nation s Highest

T BayArea. Irjah. To: MTC Planning Committee, ABAG Administrative Committee Date: April 6, Fr: Executive Director, MTC

A BETTER FUTURE FOR BAY AREA TRANSIT

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

VIA Long Range Plan Glossary

Strategic Plan Update

Transit Effectiveness Project Policy Advisory Group February 1, 2006

LIFT Program - Overview

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Cost Estimation

Purpose of the Countywide Transportation Plan SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

PUBLIC TRANSPORT ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL AND PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING

DRAFT 2011 CLIMATE ACTION STRATEGY for the Surface Transportation Sector SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Muni Equity Strategy

Caltrain Fare Study Update. Caltrain Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2018 Agenda Item #9

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. March 2017 San Francisco, California

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

THE ROLE OF CONNECTIVITY PLANS IN THE INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Caltrain Fare Study Update

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM. DATE January 21, 2010

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Chapter 3 Stakeholder Interviews and Summary of Needs

A report produced by the Central Transportation Planning Staff for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Challenges in Creating a Single Transportation Payment Account APTA Revenue Management and Fare Collection Summit Orlando, March 2015

Quantifying Transit s Impact on Climate Change

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus with Employee Survey Update. February 2016 San Francisco, California

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Subject: Triennial TDA Performance Audit Final Report

Deputy General Manager/ Chief Financial Officer

State of Good Repair: Prioritizing and Evaluating Implications of Investments in Transit Capital Asset Rehabilitation and Replacement

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

You Have the Data, Now What?

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

Target Setting in Transit: Using Data to Involve Staff Across an Agency

Chronology of the Transit Planning Process

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS APPENDIX

In-Station Customer Experience Fiscal and Management Control Board March 20, 2017

Where s the bus? Real-Time Info & Service Alerts

Memorandum. Date: RE: Citizens Advisory Committee

Next Generation Customer Information System. SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee March 23, 2018

Transportation Sustainability Program

Strategic Plan Progress Report. SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee Meeting February 26, 2019

Deputy General Manager/ Chief Financial Officer

Strategic Plan Progress Report Key Metrics and Actions

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

2016 ACI WORLDWIDE MASS TRANSIT PAYMENTS SURVEY

Staffing Request for Expo Line Phase 2 and Gold Line Foothill Phase 2A - Systems Integration

Transcription:

On Time Performance PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sept 24, 2007 Presented by Kenneth Mc Donald - COO Sonali Bose - CFO

Purpose To respond to the Board s request on the range of resources and timeline required to meet the Proposition E on-time performance and service goals To provide background data and information related to the Proposition E goals 2

Section 8A.103 Proposition E On-time performance: at least 85 percent of vehicles must run on-time, (on-time is no more than one minute early or four minutes late) Service delivery: 98.5 percent of scheduled service hours must be delivered At least 98.5 percent scheduled vehicles must begin service at the scheduled time 3

PEER COMPARISON (from TEP) Source: National Transit Database SFMTA San Francisco NYCT New York City MBTA Boston CTA Chicago LACMTA Los Angeles SEPTA Philadelphia WMATA Washington, DC Service Area (square miles) Density (persons per square mile) Transit Density (vehicle revenue-hours per square mile) Usage (unlinked passenger trips per capita) Speed (mph) Productivity (unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue hour) Cost Efficiency (operating cost per vehicle revenue hour) Cost Effectiveness (operating cost per passenger trip) 49 320 3,240 360 1,220 840 690 16,200 25,000 1,400 10,300 7,000 4,000 1,900 66,800 99,000 1,400 28,400 5,900 6,700 8,400 272 331 86 127 46 100 304 8.1 14.0 16.9 12.8 13.3 13.4 16.8 66 84 88 46 55 59 69 $132 $133 $183 $105 $124 $134 $160 $2.00 $1.59 $2.08 $2.26 $2.27 $2.29 $2.32 4

NATIONAL PEER FARE INFORMATION System Adult Fare (current) Monthly Pass (current) Average Fare (2006, TEP) System Light Rail Bus SFMTA $1.50 $45 $0.65 $0.48 $0.48 NYCT (New York City) $2.00 $76 $0.96 $0.79 MBTA (Boston) Bus: $1.50, Subway: $2.00 $89 Unlimited travel on Inner Express Bus PLUS all Subway, Local Bus, Inner Harbor Ferry, and Commuter Rail. $59 for subway and local bus $0.78 $0.75 $0.48 CTA (Chicago) $2.00 $75 $0.85 $0.81 LACMTA (Los Angeles) $1.25 $62 $0.56 $0.58 $0.56 SEPTA (Philadelphia) $2.00 $78 $0.97 $0.59 $0.79 WMATA (Washington, DC) Bus: $1.25, Heavy Rail: $1.35 $3.90 $1.06 $0.66 Muni has the lowest monthly pass fare and the lowest system fare 5

LOCAL PEER FARE INFORMATION System Adult Fare Monthly Pass SFMTA $1.50 $45 SamTrans $1.50 $48 Golden Gate $3.00-$8.00 No monthly pass VTA $1.75 $61.25 BART $1.40-$7.45 No monthly pass 6

Peer Fare Recovery Study by LACMTA TRANSIT AGENCY MODES FARE RECOVERY RATE AVERAGE FARE PER BOARDING NYCT (New York City) Bus & Rail 59.20% $0.96 MBTA (Boston) Bus & Rail 28.90% $0.77 CTA (Chicago) Bus & Rail 45.20% $0.85 LACMTA (Los Angeles) Bus & Rail 24.70% $0.59 SEPTA (Philadelphia) Bus & Rail 40.00% $0.97 WMATA (Wash., DC) Bus & Rail 40.80% $1.06 LOCAL (Source: MTC) SFMTA (San Francisco) Bus & Rail 25.2% $0.56 AC Transit (East Bay) Bus 19.70% BART Rail 59.09 SamTrans Bus 17.50% Golden Gate Bus, Ferry 26.94% VTA Bus, Rail 11.74% 7

Peer - On Time Performance SFMTA: 70.1% system wide NYMTA: 68.9% bus CTA: 78.1% bus LACMTA: 68-71% bus WMATA: 1 min early to 4 min late 5 min early to 5 min late 1 min early to 5 min late 1 min early to 5 min late 1 min early to 5 min late 8

Factors Affecting Muni s On Time Performance Demographics and Environment Traffic, Population, Density, Topography, Speed Operating Environment Number of stops, Modes, Obsolete technology and infrastructure, Higher than average requirements for technology, infrastructure and maintenance Governance City Department, Unfunded voter-mandated performance standards, Multiple Policy Bodies, Sales Tax distributed through another Agency for capital projects Financial Issues Structural deficit, Complex Fare Media and Collection, Budgets have not increased as Transit First policy evolved, Limited dedicated funding, Fare Policy (rate increases) 9

Requirements To Improve Muni s On Time Performance Capital and Equipment Central Control Center, Radio System, NextMuni Maintenance and Repair Facilities Vehicle Storage Yards Fare Collection System Vehicle Replacement program revenue and non revenue Vehicle Rehabilitation program bus and rail Track and Overhead Lines In Good State of Repair (power) Dedicated Bus Lanes Expanded Street Enforcement Signal Prioritization 10

Requirements To Improve Muni s On Time Performance - Processes Expanded Training Safety Enhancements Information and Transportation Management Systems Inventory and Procurement Best Practices Analytical Tools to aid in Management Decisions Operational Policies and Procedures, SOP s Implement TEP recommendations Adequate Funding 11

Requirements To Improve Muni s On Time Performance Direct Staffing Needs Schedule Schedulers Estimators Dispatchers Vehicles Mechanics Electricians Automotive Repairers Painters Vehicle Cleaners Transit Route Congestion Management PCO dedicated to transit routes Sign installers Traffic Engineers Signal Technicians Power Technicians Paint Shop staff Operators Street Supervision Street Supervisors Safety Personnel 12

Requirements To Improve Muni s On Time Performance Support Personnel Proof of Payment inspectors Project Managers Parking Meter Shop Repairers Sign Installers Grants Procurement Contract Administrators Capital Program Analysts Supervisors and Managers Fare Media Budget and Accounting Station Agents Administrative Analysts Marketing and Communications Staff Engineers Program Managers Real Estate and Property Managers Signal Technicians Operations Support Transportation Planners Construction Inspectors Revenue Collection Human Resources Staff Information Technology Staff Public Relations Officers Clerical Staff 13

Projected Funding Requirement Fiscal Year 2008 operating funded budget $668.3 million New unfunded operating requests by divisions during the FY 2007-2008 budget process was $78 million to include over 430 new positions (60 existing positions realigned) We are projecting that approximately $90 million in additional operating expenses would be required to reach 80% OTP and $150 million to reach 85% OTP 14

Conclusion Reaching Proposition E On Time Performance Goal and Service Standards are Possible Additional resources are required Resources and Initiatives must be phased in over five years for maximum effectiveness 15