Process and Timetable for Annual Performance Review of Officers Reporting Directly to The Regents

Similar documents
GOVERNANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COMPENSATION: ACTION ITEM

Compensation Policies and Practices: Actions in Response to Task Force Recommendations

ACADEMIC DIVISION ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) GARY NIMAX ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT FOR COMPLIANCE AND ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Terms of Reference Governance Committee

CONTENTS I. POLICY SUMMARY

NCCCS Strategic Plan. Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Education December 5, 2017

Introduction to High Performance Governance: Board Basics

Title and Total Compensation Study Update to UW System February 22, 2017

Technology Awareness and Development Committee Charter (Approved by TADC Board March 21, 2018)

Governance & Community Engagement Committee

That S09-6 and SM-S12-2 be replaced by this policy, and be it further

Appendix L International Finance Corporation 2013 Change Initiative

A Guide to Understanding the Fundamental Concepts of Governance for Scrum Alliance, Inc.

Enterprise Risk Management Plan FY Submitted: April 3, 2017

Board Policy 1 Division Foundation Statements

An investment in UC pays dividends far beyond what can be measured in dollars. An educated, high-achieving citizenry is priceless.

Strategic Plan f y f y

Management Excluded Job Description

Post Prioritization Report Process

SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY ONE WASHINGTON SQUARE SAN JOSE, CA S16-3, University Policy, SJSU Strategic Planning Policy

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

British Columbia Lottery Corporation Board Manual Tab 10 TERMS OF REFERENCE: HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON COMPENSATION: ACTION ITEM

IBM Approach to Maintaining Pay Equity

TO MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE: DISCUSSION ITEM

Internal Audit Charter

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE

University Students Council of the University of Western Ontario Position Description CLUBS FINANCE COORDINATOR

Board Member Agreement

Quality, Audit and Risk Committee Charter

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CHAIRPERSON Approved by the Board of Directors on June 7, 2018

CAE INC. MEMBERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERSHIP AND QUORUM

Making the Performance Evaluation Process Meaningful. Human Resources

This report can be found on CNSC s website at:

UWG INFORMATION SESSIONS OCTOBER 25,

Update on Effective Teachers Core Initiative

The Regents of the University of California. COMMITTEE ON AUDIT November 20, 1997

UCPath Spotlight UCOP August 4, ucpath.universityofcalifornia.edu/

Office of the Vice President for Human Resources and Equal Opportunity Officer

The Regents of the University of California. COMMITTEE ON AUDIT November 15, 2001

FY18-FY20 STRATEGIC PLAN

Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment Plan

TOR NAME Responsible Owner Effective date Technology Strategy Committee (TSC) Terms of Reference (TOR) College Board

ETHICS & COMPLIANCE PROGRAM REVIEW: A LOOK AT FOUR COPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

Update 8: Board Response to the December 16, 2015 Higher Learning Commission Determination

UCSB Audit and Advisory Services Audit Memorandum. Annual Report on Executive Compensation (AREC) March 29, 2016

GUIDELINES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

GW Human Resources Strategic Plan

Fraternity & Sorority Officer Transition Training Program

Page 1 of 3 2/1/2017 Board Policy Manual Table of Contents

Our Vision: To establish a standard of partnership, innovation, value added resource maximization, and financial expertise such that:

CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CLEARING CORPORATION (THE CORPORATION ) BOARD CHARTER

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MANDATE

HENRICO CASA PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUCCESSION PLAN POLICIES

Chapter 3 Workers Compensation Board: Governance and Long-term Sustainability

Objective Standards Of Performance

Strategic Alignment and Accountability: HFHS s Turning Points. April 17, Susan Hawkins. Sr. Vice-President, Performance Excellence

UNCW s Coordinated Compliance, Policy, and Ethics Program. Jim Koebel Assistant General Counsel for Compliance

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Research Shared Services:

The Regents of the University of California. NATIONAL LABORATORIES SUBCOMMITTEE September 13, 2017

PENTAIR PLC GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

Human Resources Strategic Plan

Maritz Drives Success with an Effective IC Risk Program

MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES LTD. TERMS OF REFERENCE HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Corporate Governance Principles. As Amended June 7, 2017

Excellence in Action: Division of Human Resources Summary Response to the Human Resources Assessment. Division of Human Resources

September Northcoast Research. Investor Meetings Chicago & Milwaukee. Kelly Services 1

SEACOR Holdings Inc. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (Effective as of November 13, 2018)

COMPENSATION AND TALENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER

PENTAIR PLC GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

DISCUSSION ITEM REPORT ON INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUDIT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS

Board of Directors Mandate

Diversity and Inclusion at the Urban Institute. A Roadmap for Action and Accountability

SYNLAIT MILK LIMITED AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ( IIROC ) BOARD CHARTER

CSR / Sustainability Governance and Management Assessment By Coro Strandberg President, Strandberg Consulting

Improved Service Delivery at Iowa State University. Status Report November 14, 2018

Cardinal Health, Inc. Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines

Hiring i freezes/furloughs Spending restrictions. Budget reductions Service level reductions

Saskatoon North Partnership for Growth (P4G) Draft Work Plan

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Human Resources and Compensation Committee report

(3) All ongoing and fixed term staff members will have an individual VU Develop Plan annually agreed no later than March each year.

BOARD POLICY BOARD PROCESS

B Y D A N D E N E H Y

WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT OF 1998 ORIENTATION HANDBOOK FOR THE NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND THE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Performance Appraisal 16/17

Building a Government Balanced Scorecard. Phase 1 - Planning

CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14

Improved Service Delivery at ISU: A Deeper Dive

Creating a Culture of Compliance Through Effective Program Structure 2012 HCCA Compliance Institute

Using Baldrige, Enterprise SPICE, and other Robust Performance Excellence Tools to Drive Organizational Improvement

Charter School Board Governance Award Criteria & Application

VOLUNTEER JOB DESCRIPTIONS

Policy Direction Volunteer Engagement

Project Update: Tufts Support Services (TSS)

American Vaulting Association Board of Directors Role Descriptions

Transcription:

March 6, 2006 Process and Timetable for Annual Performance Review of Officers Reporting Directly to The Regents Prepared for: Regents Meeting of March 16, 2006

Performance Management Proposal Definition Performance management is a process used by organizations to ensure executives and employees focus on the right values, strategies and priorities. It typically involves goal setting, ongoing performance, behavioral (competency) expectations, input on strengths and development opportunities. Proposal The Regents have an obligation to provide a performance management program for UC positions where they have direct oversight. 1

Performance Management Program Objectives and Positions Included Objectives 1. Align incumbent performance with the Regent s strategic direction and priorities 2. Through collaboration with the President, ensure Chancellors and managers focus on top priorities 3. Promote incumbent development through Regent input and review 4. Assist the Regents in evaluating incumbent performance and determining possible impact on pay 5. Reinforce the importance of strong performance management practices across the UC system Positions Included President (Bob Dynes) General Counsel (James Holst) Treasurer (Interim: Marie Berggren) * Secretary of The Regents (Leigh Trivette) * This program is complementary to and would not impact the Treasurer s investment performance metrics or incentive opportunity. 2

Performance Management Cycle Selected Regents* Responsibilities Approve incumbent s annual goals Meet with incumbent to review annual performance Determine need for pay increase recommendation Regent s Communicate Top Priorities Develop Goals for Coming Year (April - May) Determine Compensation Impact (Oct Nov) Review Prior Year s Performance and Approve New Goals (July Sept) Incumbent Responsibilities Draft annual goals for Regent s review Provide progress report and/or goal adjustments (as necessary) Complete annual self-assessment Meet with Selected Regents* to review annual performance * See page 7 for specific Regent responsibilities 3

Performance Management Areas Three Components Goal Achievement + Ongoing Responsibilities + Leadership Competencies = Annual Job Performance What is Accomplished How it is Accomplished 4

Examples of Performance Areas Performance areas may include initiatives beyond the incumbent s full control In these instances, level of effort should be considered in the assessment President Hire new Chancellor UC funding Strategic Vision General Counsel Examples of Annual Goals Introduce new process for measuring client satisfaction Outside counsel oversight Collaboration Treasurer Assess need for new investment partners Examples of Ongoing Responsibilities Investment performance Examples of Leadership Competencies Leading Teams Secretary of The Regents Develop new Regent onboarding process Regent meeting support Knowledge of Governance Practices 5

Performance Management Schedule and Timing Schedule Timing Position Incumbent Selected Regents* Responsible All Regents 1. Incumbent submits annual goals for coming year to Selected Regents* April 1 Draft 2. Selected Regents* provide input and approve final goals May 1 Input & Approve 3. Regents receive final goals May Regents Meeting Informed 4. Incumbent submits self-assessment for prior year to Selected Regents* July 31 Draft 5. Selected Regents* review self-assessment and provide assessment August 31 Input & Review 6. Incumbent and Selected Regents* meet to discuss prior year s performance September Input Input & Approve 7. Regents receive summary of incumbent s prior year s performance September Regents Meeting Informed 8. Compensation Committee recommends compensation impact for Regents ratification, contingent on legislative budget action (see note) October Regents Meeting Compensation Committee Approval Approval * See page 7 for specific Regent responsibilities Note: Committee on Investments would also recommend and approve the Treasurer s incentive award 6

Regents Responsible for Providing Performance Input and Review = Primary Responsibility Responsibility for Providing Input and Review Chair of the Regents Vice Chair of the Regents Chair of the Compensation Committee Chair of the Education Policy Committee Chair of the Investment Committee Chair of the Finance Committee Chair of the Special Committee on Regents Procedures President Incumbent to be Reviewed General Counsel (1) Treasurer (2) Secretary of The Regents (3) (1) General Counsel would also receive feedback from the President (2) Treasurer would also receive feedback from UCOP s SVP Business and Finance (3) Secretary of The Regents would also receive feedback from the President 7

Self-Assessment Instructions The instructions cover goals, on-going responsibilities and leadership competencies The self-assessment may note performance areas beyond the full control of the incumbent (e.g., UC system-wide initiatives) 3/6/2006 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FOR POSITIONS REPORTING TO THE REGENTS GOAL SETTING AND SELF-ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS Incumbents in roles where there is a direct reporting relationship to the Regents (UC President, General Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary of The Regents) are asked to provide the information requested below. Please submit your response to sections 1, 2 and 3 for the coming year to UCOP s Associate VP of Human Resources by April 1st for distribution to the appropriate Regents. Please add your self-assessment to sections 2, 3 and 4 covering the prior year s performance to UCOP s Associat VP of Human Resources by July 31st for distribution to the appropriate Regents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 1: Background (Name, Position, Approximate Number of Years in Position) Section 2: Annual Goals and Self-Assessment A goal represents a key initiative or special project that you own. A goal should be measurable even if the measure is subjective, such as a Regent assessment. If a goal is multi-year, it should have a significant one-year milestone. By April 1st: Provide 4 to 6 critical goals for the coming year and indicate how each will be measured. By July 31st: For each of the goals you identified, provide your self-assessment. This may include examples of goa achievement, progress and/or areas where you fell short. If your goals changed during the year (modifications, deletions, additions), indicate this as well. Section 3: Primary Ongoing Responsibilities and Self-Assessment Primary ongoing responsibilities are those important duties and accountabilities that do not change from year to yea unless the position changes significantly. By April 1st: Record your primary ongoing responsibilities. This list should be substantially the same each year, and may include approximately 5 or more key responsibilities. By July 31st: Provide your self-assessment. Note only significant achievements or areas that may need more attention; you do not need to provide a self-assessment for every responsibility. A copy of this form is attached Section 4: Leadership Competencies Self-Assessment (Under Development To Be Defined for Each Role) Leadership competencies define the primary behavioral expectations. They do not change from year to year, unles the position changes significantly. By July 31st: Provide your self-assessment. Note only significant achievements or areas that may need more attention; you do not need to provide a self-assessment for every competency. 8

Next Steps Develop three to six leadership competencies for each position; validate with incumbents Refine proposed approach and form based on Regent input Launch new performance management program in April, 2006 9