Weekly Insect Sampling Report: July 2, 2015

Similar documents
Recent Insect and Plant Pathogen Activity

Volume XXXIV Issue 7, May 25, 2012

ALFALFA SEED INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT. J.J. Soroka, D.W. Goerzen, and D.C. Murrell

Scott Meers Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development

Wheat Science News. MANAGING VOLUNTEER CORN IN ORDER TO BREAK THE GREEN BRIDGE IN WHEAT James R. Martin Extension Professor of Wheat Science

Recent Insect and Plant Pathogen Activity

Wheat IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans

Field Techniques in IPM, PMA 4570/6228

SMALL GRAINS UPDATES

Manitoba Insect and Disease Update

Alfalfa Seed Insect Pest Management D.W. Goerzen and J.J. Soroka

Wheat Insect Update. Dr. Janet Knodel Extension Entomologist Crop Outlook and Int l Durum Forum November 6, 2007 Minot, ND Wheat Insect Updates

Biologically-Based, Insect Pest Management in Tomato and Pepper

Volume XLI Issue 8, May 25, General Situation. Cotton

Management of the Army Cutworm and Pale Western Cutworm

Funding Critical to the Project Provided by: Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission And the Oregon Sweet Cherry Commission

Integrated Pest Management for the Cereal Leaf Beetle

1 Alfalfa Insect Control Recommendations E-220-W E-220-W. Field Crops ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

ALFALFA SEED INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT J.J. Soroka and D.W. Goerzen

AG TALK NEWSLETTER. Starland County ASB Members

Insect Management and Conservation Tillage in Oklahoma

SMALL GRAIN INSECT CONTROL David Gunter, Extension Feed Grain Specialist

Armyworm Scouting and Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador. Integrated Pest Management Research

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Prairie Pest Monitoring Network Weekly Updates July 2, 2014 Otani, Giffen, Weiss, Olfert

Cotton Comments OSU Southwest Oklahoma Research and Extension Center Altus, OK

Leopold Center. Use of planting date to avoid injury from soybean insect pests COMPETITIVE GRANT REPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

Greenbugs infesting seedling wheat

LESSER GRAIN BORER. Stored Product Insect Guide. SCIENTIFIC NAME: Rhyzopertha dominica

Insect Losses and Management on Desert Lettuce:

Kansas State University Extension Entomology Newsletter

Beginner School Insect Management

Cotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR Regional Pest Monitoring Program

Combating insecticide resistance in major UK pests: modelling section

Cranberry Fruitworm in BC. Tracy Hueppelsheuser British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture BC Cranberry Congress, Feb. 4, 2014

Using thresholds and risk assessment for pest management

Number 102 August 17, 2007

Insect Pest Updates. Bertha Armyworm in Western Canada in 2016 M. Vankosky, O. Olfert, S. Meers, S. Hartley, J. Gavloski, J. Otani

Integrated Pest Management

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ALFALFA, CLOVER AND PASTURES Prepared by Lee Townsend, Extension Entomologist

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 10, 11 and 12, points possible

Russian Wheat Aphid in Utah

Green Bean Production and Management

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 16, points possible

Insecticide Applications on Minnesota s 2016 Soybean Acres

P l a i n s P e s t M a n a g e m e n t N e w s

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Effective insect control does not necessarily have to be an expensive component

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

Leafhoppers in Alfalfa

IPM strategy for tomato

Scouting for insect pests, diseases and weeds of target crops. Dr. Dora Kilalo Dept. of Plant Science and Crop Protection

New Soybean Pests and IPM Study Results 2016

Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center. Monday, June 12, 2017

Monitoring and decision making strategies for soybean aphid management. Jordan Bannerman Department of Entomology University of Manitoba

INSIDE THIS ISSUE. Corn Rootworms South Dakota untreated check

Crop Pests. Chapter 9. Objectives. Discussion. Crop Pests

DOUGLAS-FIR CONE GALL MIDGE (Contarinia oregonensis)

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID USE THE GRDC FITE STRATEGY WHERE IS IT NOW?

AGRIS Co-operative and Wanstead Farmers Co-operative

Fertility Management Tips

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

Update on Blueberry Insect Pest Management. Pest Management

Utah s Emergency Insect and Quarantine Pests Program

PEST&CROP INDEX 2010

EVALUATION OF POTATO INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) for the Cereal Leaf Beetle in Washington State WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION EM054E

(Insecticide Seed Treatments, etc.) Scott Stewart (IPM Specialist)

Utah s Emergency Insect and Quarantine Pests Program

CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC METHODS FOR INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT IN ALFALFA ABSTRACT

Volume XXXVI Issue 12, June 14, 2013

Activity 13 Yield Impacts and Insecticide Management of Swede Midge in Canola Annual Report March 31, 2016

Module. Integrated Pest Management. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Components of an IPM Program

Current Research on Spotted Wing Drosophila Management in Small Fruits

Orange Wheat Blossom Midge

MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER

Project Report No Improving risk assessment and control of saddle gall midge (Haplodiplosis marginata)

Eco-Label Opportunities for Processing Vegetable Crops. W. R. Stevenson J. A. Wyman P. Rogers L. Granadino

Robert J. Lamb Cereal Research Centre Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2M9

Pest Management in Canola

Browned Elm Trees : August 29, 2003 No. 22

ALFALFA: ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL

MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER

A Year in Review: 2001 Pest Problems Across Manitoba

Kansas Insect Newsletter

Summary. Introduction. Spatial Variability in a Corn Pest Corn Rootworms. Yong-Lak Park, Michael M. Ellsbury, Rayda K. Krell,

FV406 - Brassicas: Integrated Management of Whitefly, Aleyrodes proletella. Simon Springate John Colvin, Simon Jackson.

Managing Corn Pests with Bt Corn: Some Questions and Answers March 2003

Integrated Management of Sweet Corn Insects in New Hampshire

Introduction ~ Regional Pest Monitoring

John Gavloski Entomologist, Manitoba Agriculture

Lloyd Traven, M.Sc. Peace Tree. We ALL say we want it-- BUT.. Will THEY Buy it?

#ZERO RESIDUE. Mealy bug and White fly IN ROSES SEE IT. BELIEVE IT. DO IT PART 5 ZERORESIDUE.

WEEVIL PEA LEAF THE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Incorporating Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus Into an IPM Program for Corn Earworm in Sweet Corn

Transcription:

Weekly Insect Sampling Report: July 2, 2015 Overview: Beginning the week of May 21 st, the small grains team at Washington State University began conducting weekly sampling of insect pest populations in wheat and barley fields throughout the dryland region of Washington State. Current funding for the regional insect sampling network comes from WSU Extension. The objective of this monitoring network is to alert the small grains industry about the size and location of damaging insect pest populations to aid in early detection and management efforts for each insect pest. In this fourth week we sampled 10 fields for 5 pests: Hessian fly, Aphids, Cereal Leaf Beetle (CLB), Grasshoppers, Wheat Midges, and Wheat Head Armyworm (complex). Data for previous weeks are also published on the smallgrains.wsu.edu website Monitoring summary: The table below presents the insect monitoring results from the week of July 2 nd. Shown are the counts of each insect pest from fields located throughout the dryland region in Eastern Washington State. Sites not sampled are indicated with an NA. Cells shown in green indicate the pest was not found. Cells colored yellow indicate the pest was found below economic thresholds. Growers in these regions should be on the lookout for these pests but management action is not warranted unless populations exceed thresholds. Cells shown in red indicate the pest was found at higher than average levels. We recommend that growers continue to monitor their fields for these insects, even though insects such as wheat head armyworm seem to be completely absent from the southern region where we are sampling. At many sites we are also finding high numbers of beneficial insects such as the ladybird beetle and the soft-winged flower beetle (Collops spp), which is often mistaken for the cereal leaf beetle. These beneficial insects play a great role in managing pest species! They are very sensitive to insecticides that are labeled for use on wheat, so balance the pros and cons before making a spray application. Soft-winged flower beetle (left) and cereal leaf beetle (right)

WEEKLY INSECT TRAPPING & FIELD SAMPLING REPORT: July 2, 2015 FIELD # AREA NAME CLB HESSIANFLY APHIDS GRASSHOPPER WHEAT WHEAT HEAD Larvae Immature All Stages All stages MIDGE ARMY WORM AVG #/plant AVG #/plant AVG #/plant AVG#/sweep AVG #/trap AVG #/trap Visually Inspected Swept (2 traps per field) (2 traps per field) 1 Farmington 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 2 Plaza 0 0 1.2 0 0 0 3 St. John 0 0.02 0.12 0 0 0 4 Endicott 0 0 0 0.7 0 0 5 Colton 0 0 0.34 0 0 0 6 Walla Walla 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Dayton 0 0 0.02 0.04 0 0 8 Mayview 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 9 Colville 0 0.01 0.6 0.08 262 0 10 Chewelah 0 0 0.4 0.12 5 0 11 Peone Prairie 0 0 0.82 0.01 65.5 0 12 Nine Mile Falls 0.01 0 0.22 0.05 1.5 0 13 Fairfield 0 0 1.54 0 0.5 0 14 Revere 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 15 Ritzville 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 16 Edwall 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 17 Mondovi 0 0 0.64 0.09 0 0 18 N. St Andrews 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.5 19 S. St Andrews 0 0 0 0.29 0 0.5

Aphids: Aphids were found at 11 sampling locations at densities ranging from 0.02 to 1.54 aphids per plant. Shown, right, is a map of aphids occurrence (circles). Yellow circles indicate fields where aphids were observed, and green circles indicate fields where aphids were not observed (from samples of 50 plants per field). Also shown is a prediction of aphid occurrence throughout the dryland region using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Areas shaded green would indicate low-risk locations where aphids are not expected to be present, yellow are medium risk locations where aphids are not likely to exceed 5 aphids per plant. Areas shaded red would indicate a high risk but there are none this week. As the season progresses populations will continue to move North and East. Growers in these regions should be aware that aphid populations are likely present and growing. See the smallgrains.wsu.edu website for information on economic thresholds for aphids in order to make appropriate management decisions.

Hessian fly: Larvae of Hessian fly (HF), the primary damaging stage in wheat and barley crops, were found at 2 of the 19 sampling locations. Only 1 larvae were found at each site and these densities are below economic thresholds for HF. These second-generation adults are likely laying eggs and we expect to find damaging larval stages in future weeks. Shown right, yellow circles indicate fields where HF were observed, and green circles indicate fields where HF were not observed (from samples of 50 plants per field). Also shown is a prediction of HF occurrence throughout the dryland region using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Areas shaded green are locations where HF are not expected to be found at this time, and areas shaded yellow are regions where HF are likely present but below economic thresholds. As the season progresses populations will continue to move North and East. See the smallgrains.wsu.edu for more information on economic thresholds and management options for HF.

Cereal Leaf Beetle: Cereal leaf beetles were collected at 1 of the 19 sampling locations this week at a density of from 0.01 insects per plant. These densities are below economic thresholds for CLB. Shown, right, is a map of CLB occurrence. The circles indicate fields that were sampled as part of the network. Yellow circles indicate fields where CLB were observed, and green circles indicate fields where CLB were not observed (from samples of 50 plants per field). Also shown is a prediction of CLB occurrence throughout the dryland region using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Areas shaded green are locations where CLB are not expected to be found at this time, and areas shaded yellow are regions where CLB are likely present but below economic thresholds. As the season progresses populations will continue to move North and East. See the smallgrains.wsu.edu for more information on economic thresholds and management options for CLB.

Grasshoppers: Grasshoppers (GH) were found at 13 of 19 sampling locations, at a density ranging from 0.01 to 0.29. The average grasshopper density is calculated per sweep, out of 100 total sweeps. On the map right, the circles indicate fields that were sampled as part of the network. Green circles indicate fields where grasshoppers were not observed and yellow circles indicate fields where grasshoppers were observed. Also shown is a prediction of grasshopper occurrence throughout the dryland region using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Areas shaded green are regions where grasshoppers are likely to be absent, yellow are regions are where grasshoppers are likely to present at low densities, and red are regions where grasshoppers are expected to be seen in high densities. See the smallgrains.wsu.edu for more information on economic thresholds and management options for grasshoppers.

Wheat Armyworm Complex: The wheat armyworm complex consists of two species: the true WHA, Dargida diffusa; and the false WHA, Dargida terrapictalis. WHA were found at 2 of 19 sites this week at at density of 0.5 insects. These species are collected by pheromone lures in bucket traps (for a total of 2 traps per site). On the map to the right, the circles indicate fields that were sampled as part of the network. Green circles indicate fields where and average of 2 or less WHA were observed, yellow circles would indicate fields where 2-10 WHA were observed and red circles would indicate where over 10 WHA were observed. Also shown is a prediction of WHA occurrence throughout the dryland region using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Areas shaded green are regions were WHA are likely to be present at very low densities, yellow are regions where WHA are likely present at medium densities and red are regions where WHA are expected to be very high. Pheromone traps draw in insects from across a large area of the field/s. This makes them highly sensitive and not necessarily an accurate indication of infestation levels on a per-plant-basis. Contact your local Extension educator or see the smallgrains.wsu.edu website for information prior to making management decisions.

Wheat Midge. Wheat Midge (WM) was found at 5 of 19 sampling locations, at a density ranging from 0.5 to 262 insects per trap. This species is collected by pheromone lures in delta traps (for a total of 2 traps per site). On the map to the right, the circles indicate fields that were sampled as part of the network. Green circles indicate fields where an average of 1 or fewer midges were observed, yellow circles indicate fields where 1-5 midges were observed and red circles indicate where over 5 midges were observed. Also shown is a prediction of WM occurrence throughout the dryland region using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Areas shaded green are regions were WM are likely to be present at very low densities, yellow are regions where WM are likely present at medium densities and red are regions where WM are expected to be at high densities. Pheromone traps draw in insects from across a large area of the field/s. This makes them highly sensitive and not necessarily an accurate indication of infestation levels on a per-plant-basis. Contact your local Extension educator or see the smallgrains.wsu.edu website for information prior to making management decisions.