Dealing with chance Four strategies. Simple, direct Absolutes. Persuasion Top management support. Training. Corruption Alienation. 3 lines of defense

Similar documents
Nip Point Severs Worker s Finger

HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING: DESIGN OF MEDICAL DEVICES

Pulley Severed Fingertip

Identification and Control of Critical Process Points Using Complementary Risk Assessments (corrected)

Electrical Shock. To share lessons learned gained from incident investigations through a small group discussion method format.

Employee Injures Back While Lifting Retaining Ring on Paper Machine

IMPROVE. Chapter 3-6 FMEA Institute of Industrial Engineers 3-6-1

Process Hazard Analysis Fundamentals. Walt Frank, P.E. Frank Risk Solutions F R A N K R I S K S O L U T I O N S

FirstDose Application Release Enhancements. FirstDose Application Release Enhancements. Complete list of Enhancements

List of Tables. Part I Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures

Queen's University Environmental Health & Safety. 1. Introduction

Employee Falls from Overhead Pipe Rack

FMEA Failure Mode Effects Analysis. ASQ/APICS Joint Meeting May 10, 2017

Steam Valve Locked Out in Wrong Position

Back Injury: Strain of Lumbar Spine

ELEMENTS OF A HIGH PERFORMING SAFETY PROGRAM

COMPARISON OF PROCESS HAZARD ANALYSIS (PHA) METHODS

Handrail Falling from Overhead Misses Worker

Hazard Analysis Technique Selection

Systematic Risk Management: An Overview of ICH Q-9

Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)

Risk Management: FDA and Industry Experience. Dan Snider, Ph.D Vice President Morgantown RD Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Washington Hospital Services Transcript for HazCom 2013 and GHS for Part 1

EEL 4924 Electrical Engineering Design (Senior Design) Preliminary Design Report

Hair caught in Drive Shaft Causes Partial Scalping

Acid/Olefin Release to Acid Blowdown Drum

Twisted Ankle Injury

Worker Burns Arm on Hot Pipe

STE Sustainable Safety Series. OSHA s Proposed Subparts D and I: What s the Big Deal?

Steam Plant Pump Check

Work Health and Safety Toolkit for Congregations

Worker s Knee Injured While Lifting Box

Chapter 2 QAS Components

Back Strain While Moving Pallets with Pallet Jack

Moving Bin with Hoist Causes Foot Fracture

Employee Injured When Struck by Air Manifold Cart

Fall Protection Safety Program and Training Materials

Required Courses $800/$720*

Toxic Flammable Gas Release From Rail Car Results in 3 Fatalities

Fork Truck Accident While Using Unloader

Cleanup Causes Back Injury

Crane Hook Lowered onto Dryer Hood

Practical Strategies for Improving Quality Risk Management activities in GMP environments

CS ENERGY PROCEDURE FOR A JOB SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CS-OHS-11

Manufacturing Technology Committee Risk Management Working Group Risk Management Training Guides

Worker Strains Back Lifting Bale

BEHAVIOUR ON SAFE SITES

Quick Guide. TLX Basic DWS System

General Electrical Safety Awareness Course: E100

Worker Injured on Scissor Lift

PMS is an integrated Clinic Management solution that helps local SMEs on:

Documents the request as clearly and completely as possible on the Change Request Form Submits request to project manager

PART II SCHEDULE. Scope of Services. Special Terms and Conditions. Virginia Railway Express

This procedure applies to all personnel and departments that operate lift trucks at the University of Windsor.

Equipment Placement Results in Back Strain

C Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations (NACE II)

COMMONWEALTH SCAFFOLD Quality Scaffolding Across New England

Worker Fatally Injured by Being Caught Between Hydraulic Cylinder and Reel Section

Boom Truck Mounting Bolt Failure

Congested Walkway Causes Worker Injury

Liquid Nitrogen Dewars Near-miss Report

Team L5 Automation Practices in Large Molecule Bioanalysis

I. VersaCall Modules Data Input & Machine Interface Module Machine Interface Modules Receives Inputs Directly from CNC Machine Wired

Overloaded Forklift. To share lessons learned gained from incident investigations through a small group discussion method format.


Contents of the Failure Mode Effects Analysis the Plant Wellness Way Distance Education Course FMEA Training Online

Overview Engineering Unit

A Workplace Accident and Injury Reduction (AWAIR) Program

PURPOSE OF THE PROCEDURE To minimize the incidence of employee injuries from machines and equipment as per OSHA

Brian Moore. All Contractors. Regarding: Contractor Safety Introduction Letter and Packet. To Whom It May Concern:

Management of Risk Assessment

Backhoe Boom Collapses Endangering Workers

Manufacturing, Retail and Distribution

MOTILITY IDA. Ejaculate files PACKAGING

EXAMINING RISK FAILURE MODES EFFECT ANALYSIS (FMEA)

INHERENTLY SAFER PROCESS DESIGN PRINCIPLES. Paul Amyotte, Christian Etowa and Mike Pegg Department of Chemical Engineering Dalhousie University

R.Raffaelli Bologna 3 maggio 2017

Are designed to provide a safe working environment, and Govern use of fall protection procedures and equipment.

OpenPro Application TimeCard System for Payroll Job Costing and Manufacturing

Drive Manufacturing Incidents to Zero: Leverage the Power of Your Team to Take Effective, Corrective, and Preventive Actions

Atlant s atwatch CAPA TM. Corrective and Preventive Action System (CAPA) Product & Services Bundle for

Challenge H: For an even safer and more secure railway

Worker Burned by Plasma Arc Cutter

Nip Point Injury. Lessons Learned. Volume 05 Issue USW

OSHA 1994 AND FMA Chapter 4 (cont.)

AIS Inventory Count System October 2017

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER CR&CF RISK UNIT Lockout/Tagout/Verify Standard

Injury and Illness Prevention Program Checklist

Winnefox Library System Position Description

HIGH-PERFORMANCE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS FOR YOUR BUSINESS. IT S IN THE DETAILS. PRINTERS AND SCANNERS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS

Application Note. Consistent Formulation Quality Preventing Errors in the Dispensing Room

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Implementation Go-Live Planning Checklist

Safety and Health Management Planning for General Farm and Ranch Operations

Process Safety Management (PSM)

SOFTWARE APPS AS MEDICAL DEVICES. The Regulatory Landscape 2015 WHITE PAPER WHITE PAPER PRODUCED BY MAETRICS

Using Wrong Tool Causes Injury

Qualitative & Quantitative Hazard Analysis

ACCIDENT PREVENTION PLAN!

Critical Systems Specification. Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 9 Slide 1

S.T.E.P. UP TO A SAFER WORKPLACE SAFETY TRAINING & ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM CERTIFICATE SERIES STEP UP TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT WELCOME!

Transcription:

Hazard avoidance overview Concepts of Hazard Avoidance Dealing with chance Four strategies Enforcement Psychological Engineering Analytical ١ ٢ Enforcement approach Simple, direct Absolutes Judgment Corruption Alienation Psychological approach Persuasion Top management support Young workers Training ٣ ٤ Engineering approach 3 lines of defense engineering controls admin or work practice controls personal protective equipment Engineering principles of safe design Eliminate Substitute Erect barriers Guard Control Warn ٥ ٦

More engineering principles Consider the human interface w/process w/materials Install filters Ventilate exhaust dilute Safety factors 4:1 scaffold hardware 5:1 overhead crane hoists 6:1 scaffold ropes ٧ ٨ Fail-safe principles General Fail-Safe Principle active mode inert mode zero mechanical state deadman controls Fail-safe principle of redundancy Principle of worst Case Murphy s Law Drawbacks to engineering approach Exception conditions Workers defeat guards False sense of security Cause other hazards ٩ ١٠ Summary Enforcement approach Psychological approach Engineering approach Next session: Analytical approach Analytical approach ١١ ١٢

Hazard control approaches Enforcement Psychological Engineering Analytical Analytical approach The analytical approach deals with hazards by studying their mechanisms, analyzing statistical histories, computing probabilities of accidents, conducting epidemiological and toxicological studies, and weighing costs and benefits of hazards elimination. ١٣ ١٤ What is the purpose of hazard analysis? Identify hazards Determine causes Determine possible effects Prevention More structured hazard analyses Accident analysis "a posteriori" FMEA "a priori" Fault-tree ١٥ ١٦ Preliminary Hazard Analysis Identify system, machine, operation under analysis Identify (in a table) possible hazards their causes their effects likelihood of occurrence control strategies who is responsible Sign off occurs for individual hazards only when adequate controls are in place Class Exercise A company wants to purchase a new hydraulic press. Conduct a preliminary hazard analysis. ١٧ ١٨

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FMEA is an inductive technique. It is used to determine how long a piece of complex equipment will operate satisfactorily and what the effects of any failure of individual component might be. Tool to evaluate potential failures and their causes Used to prioritize potential failures according to their risk, pointing to actions to eliminate or reduce the likelihood of occurrence Provides a methodology to document the analysis for future use and for continuous process improvement. ١٩ FMEA terms Criticality: The mathematical product of the Severity and Occurrence ratings. Number is used to place priority on items that require additional quality planning. Relative ranking. Risk priority number: severity X occurrence X detection. Relative ranking. Failure Mode: It is the mechanism by which a cause leads to an effect. A potential Failure Mode describes the way in which a product or process could fail to perform its desired function as described by the needs, wants, and expectations of the internal and external Customers. ٢٠ FMEA traditional steps Identify subject of FMEA Assemble team Flow chart or system map Identify potential failures in processes (failure modes); Identify the possible effects of those failure modes; Identify the causes of the failure modes Identify the criticality or Risk Priority Number of each failure mode cause ٢١ ٢٢ FMEA traditional steps continues Prioritize on their criticality/rpn; Redesign the process to prevent the failure mode and/or put in place process controls to detect the fil failure mode bf before the effect occurs; Implement and test the new design or control process Step 3B. Consecutively number each process step. Process Step Process Step Process Step Process Step Medication ordered Auto electronic transfer to package fills script; sends to floor Nurse administers ٢٣ ٢٤

Steps 3D. Identify all sub-processes under each block. Consecutively letter these sub-steps. Step 3C. If the process is complex, choose an area to focus on. Process Step Process Step Process Step Process Step Medication ordered Auto electronic transfer to package fills script; sends to floor Nurse administers Medication ordered Auto electronic transfer to package fills script; sends to floor Nurse administers ٢٥ A-Dummy terminal B-PC s A-Check drug allergies B-Check drug interactions C-Check proper dosages D--Orders Labs E-order sent to auto dispensing A-Automatically fills orders checked B-Drugs pulled and script filled C-Med cart filled D-Cart sent to floor A-Log on to laptop B-Medcart C-Medications scanned D-Patient band scanned E-Medication given to patient F-Patient record updated ٢٦ Steps 3D. Identify all sub-processes under each block. Consecutively letter these sub-steps. Steps 3E. Create a flow diagram composed of the sub-processes. Medication ordered Auto electronic transfer to package fills script; sends to floor Nurse administers Log onto laptop Get med cart Scan meds Scan patient band Give med A-Dummy terminal B-PC s A-Check drug allergies B-Check drug interactions C-Check proper dosages D-Orders Labs E-order sent to auto dispensing A-Automatically fills orders checked B-Drugs pulled and script filled C-Med cart filled D-Cart sent to floor A-Log on to laptop B-Medcart C-Medications scanned D-Patient band scanned E-Medication given to patient F-Patient record updated ٢٧ Update record ٢٨ Step 4. Hazard Analysis: List potential failure modes for each process step. Log onto laptop Get med cart Scan meds Step 4. Hazard Analysis: List potential failure modes for each process step. Scan patient band Give med Update record 1.laptop missing 2.network down 3. No battery power 4.CPRS not functioning 5.forget password 6. pkg down 7.RF system not working 8.Server off line/down 1.Med cart not there 2.Filled incorrectly 3.Expired meds 4.Wrong cart 1.medication missing from cart 2.Scanner/laptop missing 3.No power for laptop 4.Barcode label missing 5.Barcode label not readable 6.No power for scanner 1.Wrong ID 2.Band missing 3.Band not readable 4.Patient not there 1.Patient won t/ can t take med Failure Modes: 1.Cannot update record ٢٩ ٣٠

Process Step Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect Potential Cause Severity 7 Probability 4 Detectability 1 Risk Priority Number 28 Description of Action Outcome Measure Person Responsible 4A Log onto laptop 4A1 laptop unavailable Can t match patient to medication Status ٣١ Process Step 4A Log onto laptop Potential Failure Mode 4A1 laptop unavailable Potential Effect Can t match patient to medication Potential Cause 4A1a Theft 4A1b locked in office Severity 7 7 7 Probability 4 4 1 Detectability 1 1 1 Risk Priority Number 28 28 7 Description of Action Purchase backup Outcome Measure Total downtime < 15 minutes Person Responsible CIO Status Purchase order in place ٣٢ Process Step 4A Log onto laptop Potential Failure Mode 4A2 No Power Potential Effect Can t match patient to medication Potential Cause Severity 7 Probability 6 Detectability 1 Risk Priority Number 42 Description of Action Outcome Measure Person Responsible Status ٣٣ Process Step Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect 4A Log onto laptop 4A2 No Power Can t match patient to medication Potential Cause 4A2a battery failure 4A2b battery not charged Severity 7 7 7 Probability 6 4 6 Detectability 1 1 1 Risk Priority Number 42 28 42 Description of Action Have power cords available in all unit supply rooms Outcome Measure Total downtime < 5 minutes Have power cords available in all unit supply rooms Total downtime < 5 minutes Person Responsible CIO CIO Status Purchased Purchased ٣٤ What if two failures have the same risk priority number, but the severity, occurrence, and detection scores are different? How do you prioritize? For example: S=8, o=5, d=1 S=1, o=4, d=10 ٣٥ FMEA Importance FMEA becomes important to the safety and health manager when the failure of a piece of equipment can result in an industrial injury or illness. FMEA can direct attention to critical components that should be set up on a preventive maintenance schedule that permits parts to be inspected and replaced before failure. FMEA is excellent for determining optimum points for improving and controlling product quality ٣٦

FMEA Drawback Because many component failures would have no effect on safety, that aspect of an FMEA does not involve accident possibilities. FMEA is limited to determination of all causes and effects, hazardous or not FMEA does very little to analyze problems which could arise from operator errors, or hazardous characteristics of equipment created by bad design or adverse environments. ٣٧ Home Work Conduct a FMEA analysis for Flow chart the major processes, then choose one component process on which to focus. Flow chart the steps in that component process. The create an FMEA worksheet and determine how to make the process safer. ٣٨ Fault tree analysis AND OR Drawbacks maybe situations erroneous computations Loss-Incident Causation Models Proximal causes Distal causes Point of irreversibility Aggravating factors Mitigating factors Diagramming ٣٩ ٤٠ Research Toxicology Epidemiology Benefit-Cost Analysis Expected cost: Cost of improvement Expected benefit: Reduction of hazard = (reduction in loss probability) x (cost of loss) Case Study 3.9 ٤١ ٤٢

Hazard Classification Scale OSHA scale Scale of 1 to 10 Risk Assessment Code (RAC) Standard Code of Practice for Safety of Machinery ٤٣ 1910.119(e)( e)(2) (process safety management) The employer shall use one or more of the following methodologies that are appropriate to determine and evaluate the hazards of the process being analyzed. What-If Checklist What-If/Checklist Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Fault Tree Analysis ٤٤