Data & Materials Sharing Agreement. Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery. Clinical Trials Data Sharing Addendum & Related Information

Similar documents
Joint statement on public disclosure of results from clinical trials

EFPIA-PHRMA PRINCIPLES FOR RESPONSIBLE CLINICAL TRIAL DATA SHARING REPORT ON THE 2016 MEMBER COMPANY SURVEY

Guiding Principles on the Sharing of Clinical Trial Data. DNDi POLICIES

DATA SHARING AGREEMENT

ClinicalTrials.gov REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS

PHV-3 Version 4 - Non-Interventional Post-Authorisation Safety Studies of Medicinal Products for Human Use

Clinical Trials: Registration, Results Reporting, and Data Sharing

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Guide

POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Guide

Information for clinical researchers on transparency of clinical trial reporting

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR EVALUATION OF FOR PREQUALIFICATION 1. Points to consider for manufacturers of human vaccines

Human Subjects Research Policy Update. Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance

DIRECTOR v BAYER. Clinical trial disclosure (Xofigo) CASE AUTH/2908/11/16

Aims and challenges of clinical trial data sharing

Ethical Governance Framework

Guidance on Request for Information on Rapid Response Platform Technologies for Epidemic Preparedness

Comments from: 1. General comments

EMA Comments on Implementing Measures for Pharmacovigilance (PCIM/11/01)

Regulatory Challenges for the Licensure of Future Vaccines

Governance Policies for PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network

Department of Institutional Research and Planning. Survey Policy

Not My Study Challenges of Clinical Trial Disclosure at an Academic Medical Center

Challenges in Capturing Long Term Follow up of Recipients of Genetically Modified Cells. Cell Therapy Liaison Meeting January, 2018

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration and Results Reporting: Updates and Recent Activity

Policy Appendix IV: DRCR.net Industry Collaboration Policies Version 5.0, February 2, 2009

GCP Convergence Improves Transportability of Medical Device Clinical Data

Module VIII- Post-authorisation safety studies

STEERING COMMITTEE FOR THE UK STEM CELL BANK AND FOR THE USE OF STEM CELL LINES

NOTICE: THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT Between Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the Recipient institution

Policy Appendix IV: DRCR.net Industry Collaboration Policies Version 6.0, August 2, 2017

Governance Policies for PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network

Trends in Oversight of Human Research Protections?

Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results: Obligations and Industry Practices

New Pharmacovigilance legislation. Post-authorisation safety studies. ENCePP Plenary meeting. 3 May 2012

Governance Policies for PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Approved August 31, 2015

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

ClinicalTrials.gov. Why Does it Affect Me? Should I Be Concerned?

10/9/2012. Alicia Joy, IRB. Wednesday October 10, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

Investigational New Drug Application

13 May 2010 BY . Subject: Comments on the Concept Paper on the Revision of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

PERFORMANCE IN INITIATING AND DELIVERING CLINICAL RESEARCH INFORMATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

ICH E18: Guideline for Genomic Sampling and Management of Genomic Data. Prepared by the ICH E18 Expert Working Group

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

NOTICE. Subject: Stakeholders suggestions/comments on Clinical Trials conductance in India

HIV VACCINE PROGRAM and P5 PARTNERSHIP

Background: ClincalTrials.gov and the database for Aggregate Analysis of ClincalTrials.gov (AACT)

Towards Greater International Transparency of Clinical Trials

A SHORT GUIDE TO THE PROCEDURE FOR A CLINICAL TRIAL APPLICATION IN THE KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN

Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network Portfolio Eligibility Criteria and Guidelines

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search

Draft proposal for an addendum, on transparency, to the Functional specifications for the EU portal and EU database to be audited - EMA/42176/2014

The Critical Path to TB Drug Regimens Initiative

ANNEX. CHAPTER I General principles

What s New in GCP? FDA Draft Guidance Details FIH Multiple Cohort Trials

Development and Implications of a Redacted Clinical Trial Protocol for Posting Online With the Published Manuscripts

A new Model of Vaccine R&D Global Health Public Private Partnership : The Global Health Vaccine Center of Innovation (GHVCI)

PERtussIS COrrelates of Protection Europe. Newsletter Issue 1. periscope-project.eu

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

TOP 10 INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES WHEN CONDUCTING HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Recommendations for Strengthening the Investigator Site Community

Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Data and Biospecimen Access Policy and Guiding Principles

Theme Sub-theme Quote / issue. Inconsistency and

BUSINESS PLAN OCTOBER 2009 SEPTEMBER

ISPE Comments on the CIOMS 2006 draft Special Ethical Considerations for Epidemiologic Research 1

Toward Greater Transparency and Rigor

Becoming Aware of the Requirements Surrounding Clinical Trial Disclosure (ClinicalTrials.gov)

The Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research

Annex VIIIB Paragraphs to be included in the Informed Consent Form for the collection and use of biological samples in clinical trials

FDA Sponsor and Investigator Responsibility Checklist

WMA Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles f or Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

'Health, demographic change and well-being' Clinical Studies

Combination Products Coalition ( CPC ); Points to Consider in Drafting FDA s Co-development Guidance and Other Companion Diagnostic Guidances

HIV ENV MANUFACTURING WORKSHOP A workshop sponsored by the Division of AIDS/NIAID/NIH and the Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Protection of Research Participants: The IRB Process and the Winds of Change

ClinicalTrials.gov Updates. Gabrielle Gaspard Assistant Director Human Research Compliance

NIH Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information

Guidance on Requirements of the Sponsor and the Investigator as a Sponsor

Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee: Inquiry on clinical trials and disclosure of data

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS. MMRF Immunotherapy Networks of Excellence

Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Data A U.S. Perspective

SUBJECT: Public Meeting on Expansion of the Clinical Trial Registry and Results Data Bank [Docket No. NIH ]

What s New in GCP? FDA Clarifies, Expands Safety Reporting Guidance

KPI Definition Comment Relates to Baseline Target

Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Module V- Pharmacovigilance System Master File

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Revision of Helsinki Declaration

Public release of clinical information in drug submissions and medical device applications

Critical Path to TB Drug Regimens (CPTR)

March 23, Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D Director, National Institutes of Health 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Clinical Evaluation Phases 1,2,3,4

Getting Connected: The Benefits of a Unified Clinical Platform

IFPMA Response to World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Consultation 30 September 2005

Advocate Health Care Network. Human Research Protection Program. Plan

Amarex Clinical Research Washington DC metro area A Product Development Services Company. From Lab to Market Approval

Terry Sousa UMass Medical School PRS Administrator for Clinicaltrials.gov

AACT-Results: The Results dataset extensions for the AACT database

Initial Draft Discussion Document for A Canadian Orphan Drug Regulatory Framework

POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DRUG (IND) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR312)

Transcription:

Data & Materials Sharing Agreement Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery Clinical Trials Data Sharing Addendum & Related Information I. Overview of this Document The primary purpose of this document is to provide background, clarifications, and proposed additions regarding clinical trials to the Data & Materials Sharing Agreement ( DMSA ) for the Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery ( CAVD ). This document is also intended to explain how the CAVD DMSA and this Addendum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) Open Access Policy work together for CAVD Members. Once agreement on data sharing among an initial group CAVD Members that are or soon will be involved in the conduct of clinical trials is reached, the proposed Clinical Trials Data Sharing Addendum (the Addendum ) will be signed by that initial group of CAVD Members, and will be subsequently signed by any additional CAVD Members that agree to be involved in CAVD-funded clinical trials. II. Background and Purpose of the Addendum The CAVD DMSA came into effect in 2006. At that time, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (the Foundation ) was not funding CAVD Members to undertake clinical trials. Understandably, the DMSA did not include or exclude data sharing terms specific to clinical trials. Under the DMSA as it currently stands, CAVD Members are expected to utilize the services of the BMGF-funded Central Services Facilities (CSFs), which includes two Vaccine Immune Monitoring Consortia that provide standardized assays to characterize humoral and cellular immune responses. Data from these standardized assays are transferred to the Vaccine Immunology Statistical Center ( VISC ), shared with all CAVD Members and ultimately with the broader scientific community at specified times. Though not currently an obligation on CAVD Members, results from assays not performed by the CSFs (but that are funded by the Foundation under a CAVD grant) should also be shared with CAVD Members. This encompasses immunological assays redundant with services available from the CSFs, as well as characterization by the clinical study team of participant specimens using other standardized, qualified or validated assays described in their study plan. Individual grant agreements may also require sharing of all data from assays performed on specimens from a foundation supported clinical study regardless of the source of the laboratory funding. Prior to the initiation of any laboratory or statistical study by the Vaccine Immune Monitoring Centers ( VIMCs ) or VISC, the Vaccine Development Consortium (VDC) will 1

work with the VIMC or VISC, as appropriate, to register the study on the CAVD portal. VDCs acknowledge the importance of consulting with the VISC regarding study design, data format, and data transfer methods, to ensure agreement of data definitions and plans for statistical analyses. Also since 2006, there have been new initiatives launched by the Foundation that change requirements and process for the sharing of data arising from foundation funding. In 2015 the BMGF launched an open access policy which includes a requirement to share the clinical trial data underlying peer-reviewed publications. What follows is background on the foundation s open access policy, and then details regarding the proposed Addendum to the CAVD DMSA that pertains specifically to the sharing of clinical trials data. A. Open Access Policy The Foundation s Open Access Policy 1 came into effect on January 1, 2015 and applies to all grants made after that date, including Foundation grants to CAVD Members. The data sharing requirement of the Open Access Policy is in addition to the data sharing principles in the CAVD DMSA. Compliance with the data access requirements of the Open Access Policy can be achieved in several ways. One option for CAVD Members is to provide a link to the publication and underlying data and results to the CAVD Alliance Manager for posting on the CAVD s public web site. The linked data set would, of course, have to be open for others to download and use the data. B. Sharing of Clinical Trial Data The Addendum is intended to clarify and expand the data sharing to include clinical study data and results. The Addendum and its provisions follow the results of a study conducted by the Institute of Medicine and released on January 15, 2015 entitled Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk. 2 Two overarching principles govern the construct and interpretation of the Addendum: 1. CAVD Members will not take any action in the gathering, dissemination or use of data that violates controlling law or regulations or generally accepted ethical standards for the conduct of clinical trials and sharing of resulting data; and 2. CAVD Members agree that rapid and broad sharing of clinical trial data can increase scientific knowledge and participation in the scientific processes to rapidly develop an AIDS vaccine. 1 http://www.gatesfoundation.org/how-we-work/general-information/open-access-policy 2 http://www.iom.edu/activities/research/sharingclinicaltrialdata.aspx 2

These principles require CAVD Members to ensure that participants consent is obtained and respected for data sharing activities, wherever possible, and that participant-level data is appropriately de-identified or anonymized to maintain confidentiality, in accordance with the Protocol and informed consent disclosure. It is also recognized that while the rapid and broad sharing of data is the ideal, CAVD Members that generate data may need to delay sharing data and results in the interest of protecting intellectual property rights that are important for the overall development program. But such delays will be limited to the time necessary to secure those rights. As described below in Section III.C.2, CAVD Members may select a site for the storage of the data sets governed by the Addendum. III. Scope and Content of the Addendum A. Results and Data Sets Governed by Addendum. The Addendum governs sharing of clinical trial results from Foundation funded research and of three categories of data sets: 1) Summary Level Results. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation strongly believes that outcomes (results) of clinical studies must be shared with the trial participants, community stakeholders, HIV-vaccine investigators and the public in a clear and timely way. Disclosure of the results of a trial include a description of the details of the study (including its purpose, location, products being tested, and study population), the outcomes of the study including adverse reactions and their frequency, and contact information for the sponsor of the study. A lay summary of trial results must be communicated in a manner that supports Good Participatory Practice for biomedical HIV prevention trials 3. The disclosure of Summary Level Results and a lay summary thereof is not intended to include participant-level data. 2) Full Data Set. This includes the full analyzable data set (all participant-level data collected in the study, including safety, behavioral and immunogenicity data, and other sequencing and assay data pertinent to understanding the response of participants to the treatment under evaluation), the metadata about the study, metadata about the study product, and all versions of the protocol used in the trial, the full statistical analysis plan, data definitions, and analytic code. In other words, the data set should be deposited with sufficient detail and documentation such that the data can be understood and utilized. The full data 3 http://www.avac.org/sites/default/files/resourcefiles/good%20participatory%20practice%20guidelines_june_2011.pdf 3

set must be updated if new data from immunogenicity, virological, sequencing or other assays are performed on stored specimens and that work is funded by the Foundation or otherwise required to be shared in that individual grant agreement. 3) Abbreviated Full Data Set. For phase 1 and Experimental Medicine phase 1 studies, CAVD Members may provide a subset of the full data set. Experimental medicine studies are defined as those that are not intended to establish a substantial safety data base, or where the substances being tested are not intended to be developed into a drug or vaccine, or where the studies only enroll a very small number of participants to assess an important biomedical concept. For these phase 1 and experimental medicine phase 1 studies, an abbreviated version of the full data set containing study and product descriptors, demographic and baseline characteristics of participants and the key immunogenicity or assay data are acceptable. The following elements are those included in an abbreviated full data set : a) Study Metadata. Study title, phase, milestones (start and completion dates), primary and secondary objectives, locations of participating sites, and treatment regimens (study products, treatment arms/groups, product administration and schedules for sample collection and study procedures. b) Study product metadata. Study product name, type (such as vaccine, biologic, or adjuvant), study product brief description, manufacturer and/or developer, and Investigational New Drug identifiers and holders. c) Participant demographics and descriptors. Subject characteristics (provided they are de-identified or anonymized), intervention days since enrollment (for example, treatment assignment, product administration visit days) and other data important participant data for the understanding of the study findings. For example, if anti-hiv products are given the HIV-infected subjects then baseline viral load and concomitant ARV medication data should be provided. d) Assay data and metadata. Assay data/values, assay name, type (such as cellular, humoral, or host genetic), a brief assay description (including method, platform, antigens, and analytes) and laboratory where performed. 4

B. Definition of Study Completion. An important boundary to the above-described data sets is the definition of the study completion, which triggers the subsequent dates that the summary results and the full data set need to be released. CAVD Members must propose and the Foundation must approve the definition to be used to determine the study completion date, prior to the start of the study and as part of the data sharing plan, as well as providing that in the Study Protocol. A frequent definition for study completion is the date of the last participant s last study visit. Alternate definitions of study completion may be appropriate if the last participants last study visit definition is not supported by the study design. C. Obligations Regarding Sharing of Clinical Trial Data A data access plan, including at least the definition for study completion, will be established with respect to each CAVD grant from the Foundation, either in the form of a stand-alone document or as part of the grant agreement. Clinical trials conducted by CAVD Members must be registered with the appropriate government agency and information about the trial should be made publicly available. The registration should occur prior to the start of the study. CAVD Members need to provide to the CAVD portal via the CAVD Alliance Manager the web site address with the appropriate accession number or web link to the registry. Examples: FDA s clinicaltrials.gov 4 or other agencies listed by the WHO s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. 5 Following study completion, CAVD Members must provide the following to the CAVD Alliance Manager for posting to the CAVD private or public web site. 1. Summary Level Results. Summary Level Results (including adverse event summaries) and a lay summary of the trial must be made available to the CAVD community no later than 6 months after study completion and publicly available no later than 12 months after study completion. To satisfy the requirement to share the Summary Level Results with the CAVD community the CAVD Member must provide the Summary Level Results to the CAVD Alliance Manager for posting to the CAVD Members-only portal, or provide a link as to where CAVD Members can access these materials. The CAVD Member may choose the mechanism by which the Summary Level Results and the lay summary thereof are made publicly available, if a link to where they are stored is provided to the CAVD Alliance Manager, for posting to the public 4 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ 5 http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/ 5

CAVD website. For example, CAVD Members may use existing services such as www.clinicaltrials.gov or publish the clinical trial results in an open access publication that includes a lay summary. See, for example, PLOS Pathogens Author Summary section and PNAS Significance Section). The Summary Level Results and the lay summary (as discussed in Section III.A.1.) do not need to be separate documents or postings if the CAVD Member can achieve the goal of clearly presenting results to a scientific and non-scientific audience with a single document or posting. 2. Full or Abbreviated Full Data Set. The clinical trial full data set (or abbreviated full data set) must be made available no later than 18 months following completion of the study so that other researchers can request access to the de-identified or anonymized participant level data. CAVD Members are responsible for ensuring that the selected site has submission and access policies in place, utilizes an independent peer review of requests, and provides controlled access following execution of a written data use agreement. Examples of clinical data sharing sites that have such policies include, but are not necessarily limited to, clinicalstudydatarrequest.com 6 and the Yoda Project 7. The expense associated with sharing the full data set will be covered by the foundation if needed. The CAVD Member must inform the CAVD Alliance Manager where the data is located and the process by which the public can access the data so that this information can be provided on the CAVD public web site as per the DMSA. 3. Post publication data. For clinical trial data that is published, the postpublication data package must be shared. Sharing of the post-publication data package with information supporting the findings, tables and figures and figures of the publication will also fulfill the data sharing requirement of the Foundation s Open Access Policy. 6 https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/ 7 http://yoda.yale.edu/ 6

CAVD DATA & MATERIALS SHARING AGREEMENT Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery Clinical Trials Addendum THIS ADDENDUM is hereby entered into effective as of the date of signature on the signature page which follows. WHEREAS, each Party is a member of the Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (CAVD) and a signatory to the Data and Material Sharing Agreement (which entered into effect on December 11, 2006) WHEREAS, the CAVD did not initially provide funds for the conduct of clinical trials; WHEREAS, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (the Foundation ) has decided to provide funding for the conduct of clinical trials and related activities as part of the CAVD; and WHEREAS, the signatories to this Addendum (identified in Annex A) are recipients of funding from the Foundation to conduct clinical trials or related activities and have agreed to be bound by the terms of this Addendum. Now, therefore, the Parties agree to the following terms and conditions: 1. The definitions, terms and conditions of the DMSA remain in full force and effect as among the CAVD Members, including the signatories to this Addendum. Hence, all capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Addendum will have the same meaning as given to those terms in the DMSA. 2. Section 1(a) ( Definitions ) of Annex C (Data & Materials Sharing Guiding Principles) is amended by adding the following definitions: a. Full Data Set means the full analyzable data set (all participant-level data collected in the study, including safety, behavioral and immunogenicity data, and other sequencing and assay data pertinent to understanding the response of participants to the treatment under evaluation), the metadata about the study, metadata about the study product and all versions of the protocol, the full statistical analysis plan and analytic code. The full data set may be updated if new data from immunogenicity, virological, sequencing or other assays are performed on stored specimens from the Trial and that work is funded by the Foundation or otherwise required to be shared in that individual grant agreement. 7

b. Abbreviated Full Data Set means (as it relates to phase 1 and Experimental Medicine phase 1 studies) a subset of the full data set. Experimental medicine studies are those phase 1 studies that are not intended to establish a substantial safety data base, or where the substances being tested are not intended to be developed into a health-product and studies that only enroll a very small number of participants to assess an important immunogenicity concept. For these phase 1 and experimental medicine phase 1 studies, abbreviated full datasets containing study and product descriptors, demographic and baseline characteristics of participants and the key endpoint (e.g. immunogenicity or assay) data are acceptable. The following elements are included in an abbreviated full data set : (1) Study Metadata. Study title, phase, milestones (start and completion dates), primary and secondary objectives, treatment regimens (study products, treatment arms/groups, product administration and sample collection schedules), and locations of participating sites. (2) Study product metadata. Study product name, type (such as vaccine, biologic, or adjuvant), study product brief description, manufacturer and/or developer, and Investigational New Drug identifiers and holders. (3) Participant demographics and descriptors. Subject characteristics (provided they are de-identified or anonymized), intervention days since enrollment (for example, treatment assignment, product administration visit days) and other data important participant data for the understanding of the study findings. For example, if anti-hiv products are given the HIV-infected subjects then baseline viral load and concomitant ARV medication data should be provided. (4) Assay data and metadata. Assay data/values, assay name, type (such as cellular, humoral, or host genetic), a brief assay description (including method, platform, antigens, and analytes) and laboratory where performed. c. Post-Publication Data Package means a subset of the full data package supporting the findings, tables and figures of the publication. d. Study Completion is the last study visit of the last participants visit in the study unless the CAVD Member proposes an alternate definition of study completion before the start of the study in the Trial Protocol, and as part of the data sharing plan. Alternate definitions of study completion may be appropriate if the last participants last study visit definition if not supported by the study design. The 8

Foundation must approve any definition of study completion other than last study visit of the last participants visit. e. Summary Level Results include a description of the details of the study (including its purpose, location, products being tested, and study population), the outcomes of the study including adverse reactions and their frequency, and contact information for the sponsor of the study. 3. Section 1(e) ( Treatment of Data ) of Annex C (Data & Materials Sharing Guiding Principles) is amended by adding sub-sections (vi) and (vii) as follows: a. Clinical trials conducted by CAVD Members must be registered and information about the trial be made publicly available, through clinicaltrials.gov 8, a service of the US National Institutes of Health, agencies listed by the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization 9, or a comparable, publicly-accessible registry. Trial registration should occur prior to the start of the study and information about the registration (including the accession number and web address) shall be provided to the CAVD Alliance Manager for posting on the CAVD web site. b. CAVD Members that generate data may need to delay sharing of data and results in the interest of protecting intellectual property rights, or because analysis of data or the primary manuscript has not been completed. Such delays will be limited to the time necessary to pursue such activities, as agreed to by the CAVD Senior Alliance Manager on behalf of the Foundation. Following study completion, CAVD Members must provide the following: 1. Summary Level Results. Summary Level Results (including adverse event summaries) and a lay summary of the trial must be made available to the CAVD community no later than 6 months after study completion and be made publicly available no later than 12 months after study completion. To satisfy the requirement to share the Summary Level Results with the CAVD community the CAVD Member must provide the Summary Level Results to the CAVD Alliance Manager for posting to the CAVD members-only portal, or provide a link as to where CAVD Members can access these materials. The CAVD Member may choose the mechanism by which the Summary Level Results and the lay summary thereof are made publicly available, if a link as to where they 8 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ 9 http://www.who.int/ictrp/en 9

are stored is provided to the CAVD Alliance Manager for posting to the public CAVD website. For example, CAVD Members may use existing services such as at www.clinicalrials.gov or publish the clinical trial results in an open access publication that includes a lay summary. The Summary Level Results and the lay summary do not need to be separate documents or postings if the CAVD Member can achieve the goal of clearly presenting results to a scientific and non-scientific audience with a single document or posting. 2. Full or Abbreviated Full Data Set. The clinical trial full data set (or abbreviated full data set) must be made available no later than 18 months following completion of the study so that other researchers can request access to de-identified or anonymized participant level data. CAVD Members are responsible for ensuring that the selected site has submission and access policies in place, utilizes an independent peer review of requests, and provides controlled access following execution of a written data use agreement. Examples of clinical data sharing sites that have such policies include, but are not necessarily limited to, www.clinicalstudydatarrequest.com and yoda.yale.org. The expense associated with sharing the full data set will be covered by the Foundation if needed. The CAVD Member must inform the CAVD Alliance Manager where the data is located and the process by which non CAVD members can access the data so that this information can be provided on the CAVD public web site. 3. Post publication data. For clinical trial data that is published, the Post- Publication Data Package must be shared. Sharing of the post-publication data package with information supporting the findings, tables and figures and figures of the publication also fulfills the data sharing requirement of the Foundation s Open Access Policy. 10

SIGNATORY To the CLINICAL TRIALS ADDENDUM to the CAVD DATA & MATERIALS SHARING AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Party hereby executes the Clinical Trials Addendum to the CAVD Data & Material Sharing Agreement. Institution By: Name: Title: Date Signed: By: Name: Title: Dated Signed: Acknowledged by Principal Investigator: Principal Investigator of a CAVD Project 11