Deregulation, Locational Marginal Pricing, and Critical Load Levels with Applications

Similar documents
Congestion and Price Prediction Under Load Variation Fangxing Li, Senior Member, IEEE, and Rui Bo, Student Member, IEEE

THE Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) methodology has

Incidence Matrix-Based LMP Calculation: Algorithm and Applications

Modelling of Locational Marginal Based Transmission Pricing in Restructured Power System

ISO Net Surplus Collection & Allocation in Wholesale Power Markets under LMP

Probabilistic LMP Forecasting Considering Load Uncertainty Rui Bo, Student Member, IEEE, and Fangxing Li, Senior Member, IEEE

Advanced Studies on Locational Marginal Pricing

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 22, NO. 4, NOVEMBER

Measuring the volatility of wholesale electricity prices caused by wind power uncertainty with a correlation model

Coupon-Based Demand Response Considering Wind Power Uncertainty: A Strategic Bidding Model for Load Serving Entities

A Dynamic Market Mechanism for Integration of Renewables and Demand Response

Probabilistic Model of Payment Cost Minimization Considering Wind Power and Its Uncertainty

RTO Overview and Day 2 Markets. EAI Technical Conference May 26, 2011

It s s Getting Better All the Time (with Mixed Integer Programming)

Forecasting Real-Time Locational Marginal Price: A State Space Approach

Locational Marginal Pricing II: Unlocking the Mystery

Analysis of Power System Operational Uncertainty from Gas System Dependence

Price Formation Education Session Day 1 Economic Dispatch

A Probability-Driven Multilayer Framework for Scheduling Intermittent Renewable Energy

LMP ANALYTICS AND PREDICTIVE MODELING

Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)

Study of AMES Wholesale Power Market Testbed

A DYNAMIC FRAMEWORK FOR SMART ENERGY SYSTEMS Opportunities & Challenges

Integrating High Levels of Variable Renewable Energy Sources

Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)

Technical Bulletin Comparison of Lossy versus Lossless Shift Factors in the ISO Market Optimizations

Recent Development in Reliable Energy Market in the US and Singapore

A Dynamic Framework for Real time and Regulation Markets for Smart Grids

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP): Basics of Nodal Price Calculation

Power Markets and Renewables Deployment in Developing Countries

Cyber physical social systems: Modelling of consumer assets and behavior in an integrated energy system

Robust Optimization Based Economic Dispatch for Managing System Ramp Requirement

Midwest ISO EIM Start-up and Exiting Issues Todd Ramey, Executive Director Market Administration. March 7-8, 2011

Mobilizing Grid Flexibility for Renewables Integration through Topology Control and Dynamic Thermal Ratings

Generation Dispatch. PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM /13/2017

Single Schedule Market Pricing Issues

Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study

VALUE OF SHORT RUN DEMAND RESPONSE FOR INTEGRATING WIND: UNIT COMMITMENT & GENERATION EXPANSION MODELING WITH PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD

Locational Based Marginal Pricing

New York CES: Renewable Energy Standard Underlying Fundamentals

NPTEL

Computational Modeling for Resilient Electricity-Gas Infrastructures (CMREX)

Robust and Decentralized Operations for Managing Renewable Generation and Demand Response in Large-Scale Distribution Systems

MISO-PJM Interface Pricing Post Implementation Metrics and Criteria

Renewables and electricity market design

The Evolution of the PJM Market in the United States: Looking Back to Look Forward

Market Design Concepts to Prepare for Significant Renewable Generation

532 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 23, NO. 2, MAY 2008

Demand Response in Wholesale Electricity Markets

PJM PROMOD Overview. August 1, PJM

WITH the deregulation of electrical power systems, market

Optimal DG placement in deregulated electricity market

LMP Implementation in New England

Analysis of the Broader Regional Markets Initiatives

INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO)

Integration of Demand Response with Renewable Energy for Efficient Power System Operation

Atlantic Energy Group Washington, D.C. 10 Jan 2008

FERC s Standard Market Design Proposal

Dynamic Testing of Wholesale Power Market Designs: Presenter:

Demand Dispatch and Probabilistic Wind Power Forecasting in Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch: A Case Study of Illinois

Adaptive Robust Optimization with Dynamic Uncertainty Sets for Power System Operation Under Wind

Harnessing Renewables in Power System Restoration

CHAPTER 5 SOCIAL WELFARE MAXIMIZATION FOR HYBRID MARKET

Price Formation Education 4: Shortage Pricing and Operating Reserve Demand Curve

Value-based Transmission Investment and Operations. Marija Ilic Invited Panel, IEEE PES 2014 Washington DC

1.818J/2.65J/3.564J/10.391J/11.371J/22.811J/ESD166J SUSTAINABLE ENERGY

MISO PJM Cross-Border Planning

Flexible Ramping Products

Robust Supply Function Bidding in Electricity Markets With Renewables

the Real-Time Market will be based on the system marginal costs produced by the Real-Time

Quantifying Spinning Reserve in Systems With Significant Wind Power Penetration

Design Considerations for an Alberta Capacity Market

Transaction Security Cost Analysis By Take-risk Strategy

Optimizing the Generation Capacity Expansion. Cost in the German Electricity Market

Congestion and Marginal Losses

Congestion and Marginal Losses

Maximizing the Utility Value of Distributed Energy Resources

Congestion and Marginal Losses

Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing

MANAGING BID-TO-BILL WORKFLOW IN NEW SPP INTEGRATED MARKETPLACE

Background: ERCOT studies in 80 s and 90 s using NARP (N Area Reliability Program): o Small model in which each node represented a major load center

A Market Solution to the Duck Curve

Assessment Of Market Clearing Price And Social Welfare In A Competitive Electricity Market

ENERGY PORTFOLIO MAN AGEMENT. Hydro and pump storage modelling in ABB Ability PROMOD Benchmark report

Power System Economics and Market Modeling

PJM Wholesale Markets. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia

the Real-Time Market will be based on the system marginal costs produced by the Real-Time

Lessons Learned in Wind Integration

Bi-level two-stage stochastic SCUC for ISO day-ahead scheduling considering uncertain wind power and demand response

Policy and Regulatory Approaches to Grid Integration of Renewable Energy in the US

Transmission Constraint Relaxation Parameter Revision ISO Straw Proposal

Latest Computational and Mathematical Tools for Transmission Expansion

Reduced Network Modeling of WECC as a Market Design Prototype

Development of simultaneous energy and reserve dispatch model and corresponding pricing mechanism. Stefanos Delikaraoglou and Yi Ding

MAXIMIZING VALUE OF GENCO ASSETS IN MISO MARKET

Market-Based Transmission Expansion Planning

Price Formation. PJM Market Participants February 14, Joe Bowring Catherine Tyler

Overview of PJM: Looking Back to Look Forward Tokyo Power Market Summit

Implications of Cost and Bid Format on Electricity Market Studies: Linear Versus Quadratic Costs

Impacts of Strategic Bidding of Wind Power Producers on Electricity Markets

Transcription:

ECE 620 Lecture Nov. 2nd, 2016 Deregulation, Locational Marginal Pricing, and Critical Load Levels with Applications Fangxing (Fran) Li, Ph.D., P.E. Professor Dept. of EECS The University of Tennessee at Knoxville Contact: fli6@utk.edu, 865-974-8401 Web: web.eecs.utk.edu/~fli6/ 1 Overview Introduction to power industry de-regulation Locational marginal pricing (LMP) Critical Load Levels: observation and solution algorithm Applications of the CLL concept Concluding Remarks 2 1

Before De-regulation Regulated power industry Regulated by government boards A monopoly system and vertically integrated Obligation to serve with guaranteed rate of return Historical reason for regulated business model to stimulate the private investment in the power sector. Cost Profit Generation Transmission Distribution Service Revenue 3 Regulated power industry Vertically integrated monopoly business. Utility 1 Utility 2 Generation Transmission Distribution Scheduled exchange Generation Transmission Distribution Consumers Consumers 4 2

Why De-regulation To improve efficiency and reduce cost Local load is mainly served by local generation, even if there is cheaper power available somewhere else To encourage technology innovation No need for regulation The primary goal of regulation has been achieved 5 What s new with de-regulation Create competition and market mechanism Mainly at the wholesale market at the current stage Transmission is the platform for sellers (GenCo) and buyers(disco) to trade energy Generation may be owned by Independent Power Providers (IPPs) 6 3

De-regulated power industry: Wholesale energy market Generation Generation Generation Independent System Operator Transmission Distribution Distribution Distribution Service Service Service Service Service Service 7 Overview Introduction to power industry de-regulation Locational marginal pricing (LMP) Critical Load Levels: observation and solution algorithm Applications of the CLL concept Concluding Remarks 8 4

Energy market pricing: LMP Pricing method: Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP). PJM, NYISO, ISO-New England, CAISO, ERCOT, MISO & SPP. Marginal cost for pricing The extra/incremental cost to produce an extra unit of output In energy market: cost for 1MWh additional load. Location affects the price. 9 Understanding marginal cost 500@$10 500@$11 500@$12 500@$13 500 500 400 0 Demand=1400 Marginal cost = $12; the cost to serve the next unit of demand. 10 5

Understanding marginal cost In engineers term: MC = d Cost / d Demand Cost d Cost d Demand D 1400 12 ($ / MWh ) 15300 10500 5000 Quantity 500 1000 1400 1500 2000 11 LMP: Uncongested Case Marginal price is related to locations: circuit laws. $15/MWh Up to 300MW G Nashville 150 100 Knoxville 0 G $20/MWh Up to 300MW 150 L 150MWh 50 50 LMP=$15/MWh LMP=$15/MWh Impedance = 1 per unit for all three lines; Chattanooga Line Limit= 12 6

LMP: Congested Case Limit=80MW $15/MWh Up to 300MW G Nashville 120 LMP=$15/MWh $15: Generation (Energy) Price $0: Trans. Congestion Price Knoxville 30 80 150 40 40 G L $20/MWh Up to 300MW 150MWh LMP=$20/MWh Chattanooga $15: Generation (Energy) Price $5: Transmission Congestion Price 13 Mathematical LMP Model Linearized DCOPF model (losses ignored) GSF k-i = generation shift factor to line k from bus i. M LMP B k GSF k 1 k B λ=lagrange multiplier of (2) μ k =Lagrange multiplier of (3) of the k th transmission constraint 14 7

More about LMP model LMP calculation based on linearized DCOPF model Production (generation) cost minimization model for economic dispatch Linear Model: piece-wise linear generation cost, transmission constraints modeled with linearized DC power flow model, approximated loss model, etc Can be robustly and efficiently solved Employed by ISOs (with variations to include non-linear losses) and by market simulators from ABB, GE, etc. 15 Overview Introduction to power industry de-regulation Locational marginal pricing (LMP) Critical Load Levels: observation and solution algorithm Applications of the CLL concept Concluding Remarks 16 8

Motivation Let s start with the PJM 5-bus system sample. 17 CLL: Step changes in LMP as load varies LMP ($/MWh) 40 35 30 25 20 15 LMP at Five Buses Critical Load Level: where LMP step change occurs as load varies. 10 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Load (MW) A B C D E The system load variation is based on a linear pattern. This is aligned with other studies such as voltage stability study using Continuation Power Flow. 18 9

Some observations from actual data 5-minutes real-time prices within a hour (10-11am) for on 07/24/2009 at the CAPITAL zone in NYISO. 12 data points in each hour 19 Reasons for step changes 40 35 LMP at Five Buses Price may decrease LMP ($/MWh) 30 25 20 15 10 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Load (MW) A B C D E What happened here (Critical Load Levels)? Shift of Marginal Unit A Congestion B 20 10

Predict CLL as load varies Now the questions is: how to find CLLs? A brute-force approach by running repeated DCOPF at every load levels is too time consuming. This can be solved systematically. Changing Load Variation Participation Factor: 21 Mathematical Interpretation Case 1 O O O Case 2 O Simplex Method I Proposed Simplex-like Method Detailed algorithm description is too mathematical to be included in this short presentation, but can be found in: Fangxing Li and Rui Bo, "Congestion and Price Prediction under Load Variation," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 911-922, May 2009. 22 11

Case Study Marginal Units and Congestions versus Load 23 Performance Speedup Binary Search Average-case performance: O log(n) DCOPF runs 24 12

Overview Introduction to power industry de-regulation Locational marginal pricing (LMP) Critical Load Levels: observation and solution algorithm Applications of the CLL concept Concluding Remarks 25 Probabilistic LMP: load uncertainty Problem description 40 LMP at Five Buses 35 LMP ($/MWh) 30 25 20 15 10 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Load (MW) A B C D E How to quantify the risk associated with a forecasted LMP? 26 13

Probability Mass Function of Probabilistic LMP LMP t is a discrete random variable Named Probabilistic LMP Probabilistic LMP at a specific (mean) load level is not a single deterministic value. Instead, it represents a set of discrete values at a number of load intervals. Each value has an associated probability. 27 Alignment Probability (AP) Probability that the deterministically calculated LMP (based on the deterministic, forecasted load) and the actual LMP are the same. Deterministically forecasted LMP Alignment Probability tolerance 28 14

Cast Study Results PJM 5-bus system 40 LMP at Five Buses 35 LMP ($/MWh) 30 25 20 15 10 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Load (MW) B C A D E 730 MW 900 MW 29 Alignment Probability Curve Alignment Probability of LMP at Bus B No tolerance Tolerance = 10% 30 15

Expected Value of Probabilistic LMP versus Forecasted Load 40 LMP at Five Buses 35 LMP ($/MWh) 30 25 20 15 10 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Load (MW) B C A D E Deterministic LMP Curve Expected Value of Probabilistic LMP 31 Impact of LMP from wind uncertainty Objective: understand the impact from high-penetration wind power on various aspects in power system operation LMP ($/MWh) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 1250 1350 Load (MW) A B C D E The step-change characteristics of LMP versus load D C B A E The wind power forecast versus wind speed forecast Using Correlation Model W s ~ N(, ) 1 (w s1,w s2 ) 2 ws1 ws2 1 exp[ z ws 2 ws 2(1 2 ws ) ] (Ws 2 ws2) 2 z (Ws 1 ws1 ) 2 2 ws(ws 1 ws1 )(Ws 2 ws2 ) ws 2 ws1 ws1 ws2 2 ws2 ( ws1, ws2 ) 2 ws1 ws ws1 ws2 ws ws1 ws2 2 ws2 ws cov(w s1,w s2 ) E (W )(W ) s1 ws1 s2 ws2 ws1 ws2 ws1 ws2 32 16

Controllable Loads With the expected large-scale deployment of smart meters, it is interesting to model residential load response and its impact to the price volatility and system security. We may want to increase/decrease the load just right (i.e., right before/after a transmission congestion occurs.) Feedback control framework is proposed. 33 Overview Introduction to power industry de-regulation Locational marginal pricing (LMP) Critical Load Levels: observation and solution algorithm Applications of the CLL concept Concluding Remarks 34 17

Conclusions In this seminar, the power industry deregulation and market operation is briefly introduced. Locational marginal pricing, the key to market operation, is introduced. Critical load level (CLL): where the step changes in LMP versus load occur. CLL can be used for various applications in market-based studies: probabilistic LMP concept, renewable energy impact, controllable loads, etc. 35 Related Publications 1. F. Li and R. Bo, DCOPF-Based LMP Simulation: Algorithm, Comparison with ACOPF, and Sensitivity, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1475-1485, November 2007. (ranked 2 nd in the best paper award competition in 2011 by the IEEE System Economics committee) 2. F. Li, "Continuous Locational Marginal Pricing (CLMP)," IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1638-1646, November 2007. 3. R. Bo and F. Li, Probabilistic LMP Forecasting Considering Load Uncertainty, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1279-1289, August 2009. (2nd Place Prize at the Student Poster Contest at PSCE 2009). 4. F. Li and R. Bo, Congestion and Price Prediction under Load Variation, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 911-922, May 2009. 5. F. Li, Y. Wei, and S. Adhikari, "Improving an Unjustified Common Practice in Ex Post LMP Calculation," IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1195-1197, May 2010. 6. F. Li, Fully Reference-Independent LMP Decomposition Using Reference-Independent Loss Factors, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1995-2004, Nov. 2011. 7. R. Bo and F. Li, Efficient Estimation of Critical Load Levels Using Variable Substitution Method, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2472-2482, Nov. 2011. 8. Y. Wei, F. Li, and K. Tomsovic, "Measuring the Volatility of Wholesale Electricity Prices Caused by the Wind Power Uncertainty with a Correlation Model," IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 6, no. 5, pp.315-323, September 2012. 9. X. Fang, Q. Hu, F. Li, et al, "Coupon-Based Demand Response Considering Wind Power Uncertainty: A Strategic Bidding Model for Load Serving Entities," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no.2, pp. 1025-1037, Mar. 2016. 10. X. Fang, Y. Wei, F. Li, "Evaluation of LMP Intervals Considering Wind Uncertainty," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 2495-2496, May 2016. 36 18

Thank you! Questions and Answers? 37 19

CURENT Course HW Assignment, by Dr. Fran Li, UTK $15/MWh Up to 300MW G LMP=$15/MWh Nashville 120 Limit=80MW 80 40 40 Chattanooga Knoxville 30 150 G L $20/MWh Up to 300MW 150MWh LMP=$20/MWh Question: What s the LMP at the Chattanooga bus? Hint: Assume 1 MWh load at Chattanooga. How to dispatch additional MWh from the Nashville Generator and the Knoxville Generator to supply this 1MWh load at Chattanooga, without violating the 80MW flow limit? 1