USE OF RPO MODELING TO MEET REGIONAL HAZE AND NAAQS REQUIREMENTS

Similar documents
USE OF RPO MODELING TO MEET REGIONAL HAZE AND NAAQS REQUIREMENTS

RPO Modeling and NAAQS SIP Modeling

MANE-VU Technical Overview. National Technical RPO Meeting June 9, 2005 Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM

Selection of States for MANE-VU Regional Haze Consultation (2018)

Comparison of CAIR and CAIR Plus Proposal using the Integrated Planning Model (IPM ) Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA)

Meeting Summary National RPO Modeling Meeting May 25 and 26, 2004 Denver, Colorado

SEMAP 2018 Ozone Projections and Sensitivity to NO x & VOC Emissions

MANE-VU Technical Support Committee. OTC/MANE-VU Committees Meeting September 21, 2018

MANE VU Technical Support Committee. OTC/MANE VU Spring Meeting June 6 7, 2018 Baltimore, MD

The Pyrogeographyof Wildfires in the Western U.S.

MANE-VU Technical Support Committee Update. OTC/MANE-VU Fall Meeting: April 10, 2018 Washington, DC

STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HEMP INDUSTRY IN THE U.S. Hawaii Representative Cynthia Henry Thielen

Farm Radio Habits Wave 1, Winter Conducted by Millennium Research, Inc.

Modeling Committee Update

Fiscal Year 2010 Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics

Association of Air Pollution Control Agencies 2019 Spring Meeting Southeastern VISTAS II Regional Haze Analysis Project Update

State of the Air in Arkansas

The Future of Coal-fired Generation: Challenging the EPA

A Goal of the Regional Haze Rule

Radiology Staffing Survey 2010

Born on a Bike, Kitchen Crafted, Family and Employee-owned BRUCE LYMBURN GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY

Farms and Land in Farms

Permit & Photochemical Modeling Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD Air Protection Branch Unit Coordinator, Data and Modeling Unit

Contributions to Regional Haze in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States: Preliminary Update Through 2007

U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2014 U.S. Wind Industry First Quarter 2016 Market Report Market Report

Modeling Committee Update

Indiana Energy Status

Analysis of NBI Data for California Bridges

QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR SHRP2 R06C TECHNOLOGIES

American Wind Energy Association U.S. Wind Industry Second Quarter U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter Market Report Market Report

An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for Ozone/PM2.5/Regional Haze

American Wind Energy Association. U.S. Wind Industry Second Fourth Quarter Market Report

Watershed Plan Implementation in Oklahoma: What We Do and What We ve Learned

EPA Carbon Regulations Stakeholder Meeting

Indiana Energy Landscape

American Wind Energy Association. U.S. Wind Industry Third Quarter 2014 Market Report

VISTAS Highlights. November 10, 2005

MID-ATLANTIC/NORTHEAST VISIBILITY UNION (MANE-VU) REGIONAL HAZE PLANNING -- YEAR 3 February 1, 2002 January 31, 2003

PUBLIC POWER = + + LOCAL CONTROL LOW RATES HIGH RELIABILITY

1. Audited Media Platforms. 2. Publication Information

Emissions and Modeling Update

FHWA Cooperative Agreement Subtask. Longitudinal Joints Intelligent Compaction

INDUSTRY ISSUES AND UPDATE JEFFREY L. LEITER, ESQ.

The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI): An Infrastructure Model for Evaluating Tobacco Control Programs

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF U.S. FARM OPERATORS

American Wind Energy Association. U.S. Wind Industry First Quarter 2017 Market Report. American Wind Energy Association

Developing a Framework for Integrated Energy Network Planning

The American Clean Energy Security Act (ACES) Creates More American Jobs and Saves Americans Money

REGIONAL ENERGY BASELINES AND MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PROTOCOLS

IPNI North American Soil Test Summaries. Tom Jensen, Director in North America Program Cell:

U.S. Wind Industry: Market & Policy Update

Educating and Training Tomorrow s Workforce

State of the Network. EN2014 February 25, 2014

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

WESTAR - WRAP Regional Analysis and Planning. Tom Moore WESTAR - WRAP

Cattle. January 1 Cattle Inventory Down 1 Percent. Other class estimates on January 1, 2004 and the change from January 1, 2003, are as follows:

Update on MERPs Guidance. Tyler Fox/Kirk Baker US EPA/OAQPS/Air Quality Modeling Group June 5, 2018

CYNTHIA F. LOOMIS SENIOR SCIENTIST ALPINE GEOPHYSICS, LLC. B.S. Mathematics and Computer Science, California State University, Sacramento, 1987.

OF PIPEDREAMS AND PIPELINES

The story of renewable energy

Future Opportunities for Coal Power. Science, Regulations, & Technology

Capacity of Refrigerated Warehouses

The Oklahoma First Energy Plan: A Pragmatic Path Forward

Agricultural Land Values

Bridge Management Questionnaire Report

Today s Propane. National Propane Gas Association

Construction & Materials Outlook. March 9, 2009 Ken Simonson, Chief Economist AGC of America USA

The Bee Informed Partnership Management Survey Results (2011) Respondent Profile. BeeInformed.org

Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Program. American Association of Port Authorities 2013 Security Seminar July 17, 2013

Laws are like. better not to see. made.

U.S. Wind Industry Third Quarter 2016 U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2014 Market Report

Prepared for Greenpeace. September 25, 2009

CALPUFF Ambient SO4 Modeling

A Comparison of In-Service Statistical Test Programs

Technical Support Document for the Minnesota State Implementation Plan for Regional Haze

Energy and Water: Emerging Issues and Challenges. Mike Hightower Water for Energy Project Lead Sandia National Laboratories

How to Develop Reasonable Progress, BART, and Consultation Submissions (and what tools can help)

Goal Setting: Nutrient Pollution Standards and Technology. October 29, Ephraim King OST

Iowa Farm Outlook. June 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Regional Hay-Pasture Situation and Outlook. Percent of National All Hay Stocks

Infrared Technology: Its Application and Benefit

Potential Damage from Asian Longhorned Beetle

Modeling Committee Update

NCHRP 20 68A U.S. Domestic Scan Program. Domestic Scan 13 03

Sarah Doll, Safer States BizNGO December 2014

Assessing the Potential Economic and Distributional Impacts of a Tighter Ozone NAAQS

CALPUFF PT-Source Modeling

OTC 2007 Modeling Platform

Winter Wheat Seedings

Destination for Education? Your Facility. Bring Us to You!

2011 State Average Electricity Prices (cents/kwh)

Dairy in the West: A Fast Forward

Sage Accpac ERP U.S. Payroll 6.0 Quarterly Wage on Disk(ette)

Pittsburgh Modeling for the PM 2.5 NAAQS EPA Regional/State/Local Modelers Workshop. May 2, 2012

The importance of grid and domain size. Comparing 12 km Grid to Counties

The Impact of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits on Pesticide Use

Toward Zero Deaths (TZD): a National Strategy on Highway Safety. Priscilla Tobias, P.E. State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation

Subcommittee on Maintenance Update. Des Moines, Iowa July 20, 2015

FUNDING SYSTEM RE-DESIGN FOR EMPLOYMENT AND DAY SERVICES. Where Are We Now and How Will We Move Forward?

Mary. E. Torrence DVM, Ph.D., DACVPM National Program Leader, Food Safety

Air Quality Screening Modeling. Emissions and Photochemical Modeling. OTC Modeling Committee Meeting September 16, 2010 Baltimore, MD

Transcription:

USE OF RPO MODELING TO MEET REGIONAL HAZE AND NAAQS REQUIREMENTS James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources (Chair for Inter-RPO Modeling Workgroup) 2005 CMAS Models-3 Conference Chapel Hill, NC September 28, 2005

Outline What is regional haze? What are the modeling requirements under the Regional Haze Rule? What are RPOs? How are RPOs helping with regional haze, ozone and PM2.5 modeling? NO MODELING RESULTS WILL BE PRESENTED HERE.

Background

Regional Haze Regional haze is the impairment of visibility caused by the presence of particulate matter in the atmosphere that scatter and absorb light Visibility is a measure of the clearness of the atmosphere and can be expressed in terms of: Light Extinction (b ext ) b ext (Mm -1 ) = 3*f(RH)*[SO 4 ] + 3*f(RH)*[NO 3 ] + 4*[ORG] + 10*[EC] + 1*[Soils] + 0.6*[PMC] + b rayleigh b rayleigh = 10 Mm -1 Deciview dv=10*ln(b ext /b rayleigh )

b ext on 20% Haziest Days (2002) http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/

Regional Haze Rule Objectives of Regional Haze Rule Achieve natural (no man-made impairment) visibility conditions at federal mandated Class I areas by 2064 for worst 20% visibility days No worsening in visibility at Class I areas for best 20% visibility days First progress SIPs due December 2007 demonstrating reasonable progress toward natural conditions between 2000-2004 and 2018

Evaluation of Reasonable Progress 20% Haziest Days dv 20% Cleanest Days Natural Background 2000 2018 Year 2064 Reasonable Progress must be demonstrated every 10 years

RPOs: created by EPA to initiate and coordinate activities associated with the management of regional haze at federally mandated Class I areas.

VISTAS

VISTAS Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast SESARM AL, GA, MS, FL, SC, NC, TN, KY, VA, WV Modeling Approach 2002, 2009, and 2018 annual simulations at 36 and 12 km MM5 Meteorology and SMOKE Emissions CMAQ (primary model) and CAMx (corroborative model) Modeling Contractors Baron Advanced Meteorological Systems (MM5) Environ (CMAQ, CAMx) Alpine Geophysics (SMOKE, CMAQ, CAMx) University of California - Riverside (CMAQ) Georgia Tech (episodic emission sensitivities with CMAQ)

VISTAS 36 km Grid

VISTAS 12 km Grid

VISTAS NAAQS SIP Modeling PM2.5 Non-Attainment Areas AL, GA, KY, NC, TN, VA, WV All NAA states will use VISTAS modeling for PM2.5 modeling Annual 36 and 12 km modeling for 2002 and 2009 8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment Areas AL, GA, KY, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV Most NAA states will use VISTAS modeling for 8-hr ozone modeling Seasonal 36 and 12 km modeling for 2002 and 2009 Association for Southeastern Integrated Planning (ASIP) Seasonal 12 km modeling for 2008 (Basic areas)

Additional Modeling Some states will do additional modeling beyond VISTAS Annual simulations on smaller 36/12 km domains Modeling on 4 km grids Improvement to specific emission categories e.g., updated mobile source emissions Pollutant and source specific emission sensitivities

VISTAS 12 km ALGA 12 km GA 4 km

Additional Information http://www.vistas-sesarm.org/tech/ http://www.baronams.com/projects/vistas/ http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/vistas/vistas2/ http://www.ce.gatech.edu/research/vistas

MRPO

MRPO Midwest Regional Planning Organization LADCO Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin Modeling Approach 2001, 2002, 2003, 2009, and 2018 annual simulations at 36 km for Regional Haze and PM2.5 2002, 2008, and 2012 on a 12 km grid for ozone MM5 Meteorology and EMS-2004 Emissions CAMx (primary model) and CMAQ (corroborative model) Most modeling work done in-house Model (photochemical and emissions) development and emission inventory development contracted out

MRPO 12 km Modeling Domain

MRPO NAAQS SIP Modeling PM2.5 and Ozone Non-Attainment Areas Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin Additional Modeling OSAT and PSAT to perform ozone and PM2.5 source apportionment Each state has in-house modeling capability Local scale assessments to help determine local/regional culpability http://www.ladco.org/

WRAP

WRAP Western Regional Air Partnership AK, AZ, CA, CO, ID, MT, ND, NM, NV, OR, SD, UT, WA, WY Modeling Approach 2002 and 2018 annual simulations at 36 and 12 km MM5 Meteorology and SMOKE Emissions CMAQ and CAMx Models Modeling Contractors Carolina Environmental Program (SMOKE) Environ (MM5, CMAQ, CAMx) University of California - Riverside (CMAQ)

WRAP NAAQS SIP Modeling PM2.5 Non-Attainment Areas California and Libby, MT (wood smoke?) California ARB performing CA NAAQS SIP Modeling 8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment Areas California, Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Denver Some NAA and EAC areas using 2002 MM5 and SMOKE files (36 and 12 km) WRAP does not plan to perform any 2008/2009 air quality modeling http://www.wrapair.org/ and http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/

CENRAP

CENRAP Central Regional Air Planning Association CenSARA Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana Modeling Approach 2002 and 2018 at 36 km (annual) and 12 km (episodic) MM5 Meteorology (Iowa DNR) and SMOKE Emissions CMAQ and CAMx Models Modeling Contractors Environ (CMAQ, CAMx) University of California - Riverside (SMOKE, CMAQ)

CENRAP NAAQS SIP Modeling PM2.5 Non-Attainment Areas St. Louis (MO) 8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment Areas Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri Some states will use CENRAP s model input files and information on model science options in their PM2.5 and 8-hour ozone modeling CENRAP does not plan to perform any 2008/2009 modeling http://cenrap.org/ and http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/cenrap/

MANE-VU

MANE-VU Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union NESCAUM, MARAMA, OTC CT, DE, DC, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT Modeling Approach 2002, 2009, and 2018 annual simulations at 36 and 12 km MM5 Meteorology and SMOKE Emissions CMAQ and REMSAD Modeling conducted by: NESCAUM (CMAQ and REMSAD) MARAMA (SMOKE) New York DEC (CMAQ) University of Maryland (MM5)

CMAQ & REMSAD Grids 36 km Grid 12 km Grid

MANE-VU NAAQS SIP Modeling PM2.5 Non-Attainment Areas NY, NJ, CT, PA, DC, MD, DE States will use MANE-VU modeling as starting point for PM2.5 modeling 8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment Areas NY, NJ, CT, PA, DC, MD, DE, MA, RI, CT, NH, ME OTC modeling committee is coordinating 8-hour ozone modeling as a regional activity Additional modeling using REMSAD with tagged sulfur species to help perform source apportionment http://www.manevu.org/

Summary RPOs are using CMAQ, CAMx, and REMSAD to model regional haze, PM2.5, and ozone. Multiple years, domains, and grid resolutions RPO efforts have resulted in: Model enhancements Accurate emission inventories SIP quality modeling results

Acknowledgements Pat Brewer (VISTAS) Kirk Baker (MRPO/LADCO) Tom Moore (WRAP) Lee Warden (Oklahoma DEQ) Calvin Ku (Missouri DNR) Gary Kleiman (NESCAUM)