clarity terc.ucdavis.edu 11

Similar documents
NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

nutrients and particles terc.ucdavis.edu 9

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 9

BIOLOGY TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

2012 Range Ponds Water Quality Report

Water Quality Analysis of Lakewood Lakes

Arrow Lakes Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Program Measurements

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

2015 Range Ponds Water Quality Report

Nathan Whalen, Water Resources Specialist, Portland Water District February, 2010

What is Hydrologic Optics? Optics Attentuation Inherent properties Scatter Absorption Apparent properties

Using A Satellite to Help Us Evaluate the Impacts of Oyster Restoration: A Perspective From Above

SITES. Bull Shoals Lake. Seasonal Analysis

Understanding Lake Data

Water Monitoring in Spa Creek: A Summary

Report on the Health of Thompson Lake 2015

REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE MONO BASIN PM-10 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. September 2004

White Lake 2017 Water Quality Report

Module 2, Add on Lesson Turbidity Sensor. Student. 90 minutes

l ake Biology terc.ucdavis.edu

2018 Sebago Lake Assessment

Trends in Illinois River Streamflow and Flooding

Lower Bolton Lake Status Up-Date

Sources for Bottom Water Phosphates and Suspended Sediments in Southern Cayuga Lake, New York

calendar year periods. The nutrient thresholds for streams set forth by FDEP are listed in table below along with the map showing zones.

Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem

Interpreting Lake Data

calendar year periods. The nutrient thresholds for streams set forth by FDEP are listed in table below along with the map showing zones.

GREAT BASIN UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 157 Short Street, Bishop, California Fax:

BIOLOGY TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Groundwater level fluctuations caused by surface hydrologic pulsing of a wetland

Practical Limnology: A Primer Series by John Hains Clemson University Chapter 1

RECENT RESEARCH UPDATES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU 6

Illinois in Drought. June 19, 2012, Updated June 21, 2012

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

Light and the Aquatic Ecosystem

Ground Survey in Weld County for Methane Anomalies

Population and Ecosystem Attribute Trends of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates

Sebago Lake STATE OF THE LAKE REPORT 2015

Long Pond Post-Treatment Summary Report through 2013

Water Resources Engineering. Prof. R. Srivastava. Department of Water Resources Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur.

General Groundwater Concepts

DRAFT. DRAFT July 9, 2013 Lake-Wide Survey (No. 8) Page 1 of Cayuga Lake. Lake-Wide Seabird Profiles

Module 2, Add on Lesson Turbidity Sensor. Teacher. 90 minutes

ECONOMICS OF IRRIGATION ENDING DATE FOR CORN: USING FIELD DEMONSTRATION RESULTS

Economics of Irrigation Ending Date for Corn 1

Sediment Trapping and Inflow/Outflow Phosphorus Turnover

Fig. 1. Map for location

September 7, Precipitation and Temperature

2.f. Two Parameter Comparisons

Name. Your Handbook and Journal of. Lake name. Lake Water Quality

Leesville Lake Water Quality Monitoring Program Report

Watersheds and Cayuga Lake, David Bouldin, Emeritus Professor Seminar for Crop and Soil Science August 28, 2014

Factors affecting evaporation 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology. Several factors affect the rate of evaporation from surfaces:

LAKEWATCH Report for Weeki Wachee-1 in Hernando County Using Data Downloaded 10/17/2016 Introduction Streams

Michael Cahn and Barry Farrara, UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Tom Bottoms and Tim Hartz, UC Davis

ASSESSMENT OF WATER LEVEL DECLINE RATES WITHIN THE OGALLALA AQUIFER KANSAS

Recent changes in Lake Erie Trophic Status? Jan J.H. Ciborowski University of Windsor & Gerald Matisoff Case Western Reserve University

Learning from Lake of the Woods

BACKGROUND: The following is adapted from the Watershed Cruzin Guide:

Water Use and Yield Response of Potatoes

Water intake for hatchery on Chattahoochee River

Nutrients, Algal Blooms and Red Tides in Hong Kong Waters. Paul J. Harrison and Jie XU

State of the Lake Environment Report December Clayton Lake

2009 Regional Haze & Visibility Summary

REPORT. Executive Summary

Interpreting Lake Data

CHERRY CREEK RESERVOIR DESTRATIFICATION SYSTEM

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION.

Global Biogeochemical cycles and Ocean Productivity

California Drought Update. The 2016 CALAFCO Annual Conference Program. Water Status Update: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?

The Sustainability of Floods Pond

Water Temperature Protocol

* Horseshoe Lake. Fall 2017 Hybrid Water-milfoil High Density Area

INFILTRATION OF FECAL BACTERIA THROUGH SOILS: TIMING AND TILLAGE EFFECTS by M.S. Coyne, C.S. Stoddard, J. H. Grove, and W.O. Thom

PROJECT SCREENING MATRIX: A User s Guide

Requirements and Irrigation Scheduling

Funding provided by NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Project ALTERING CLIMATE. Basic Climatology Oklahoma Climatological Survey

CYANOBACTERIA MODELING SWIMMING RIVER RESERVOIR

State of the Lake Environment Report December Mackavoy Lake

Mono Lake, Walker, Parker, Lee Vining and Rush Creek, and the LA Aqueduct:

Sand Lake ( ) Carnelian - Marine - St. Croix Watershed District

Water Quality Sampling Presentation Ministry of the Environment. Presented by Dana Cruikshank Surface Water Specialist October 2009

CALIBRATION OF PVR METHOD. Kenneth E. Tand, P.E.

Mapping and Understanding YOUR LAKE S WATERSHED By: Tony Groves, Pam Tyning, and Tory Meyers Water Resources Group, Progressive AE

CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS FOR YUKON FLATS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, ALASKA

WWTP Protection Memo INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND ALTERNATIVES. August 31, PROJECT: TO: FROM: Re:

Effectiveness and ecological effects of pre-fire fuel treatments in California yellow pine and mixed conifer forests

Science 8 Chapter 1 Section 1

2017 Data Report for Lake Tahoe, Oceana County

APPENDIXG FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN

Table 1. Water quality on July 26, 2014 at the deepest point in Lake Garfield.

Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price Mar Mar 2017

Groundwater Status Report, WY 2015

Climate Vulnerability Assessment: Wild Rice. Wild rice, known as Manoomin by the Ojibwe of northern Wisconsin, is a cultural

Resilient Waters, Resilient Cities Climate Change in the Great Lakes

Site Development for Hoop Barns. Richard R. Brunke P. Eng. Regional Agricultural Engineer Manitoba Agriculture and Food

Transcription:

clarity 11

Annual average Secchi depth Yearly since 1968 The Secchi depth is the depth at which a 10-inch white disk, called a Secchi disk, remains visible when lowered into the water. In 2015, the annual average Secchi depth was 73.1 feet (22.3 m), a 4.8 foot decrease from the previous year but still over 9 feet greater than the lowest average of 64.1 feet (19.5 m) recorded in 1997. The annual average clarity in the past decade has been better than the prior decade. The highest individual value recorded in 2015 was 86.6 feet on April 22, and the lowest was 59.9 feet on February 3. The decline this year is part of the year-to-year variability that has always characterized conditions at the lake. While the average annual clarity is now better than in preceding decades, it is still short of the clarity restoration target of 97.4 feet set by federal and state regulators, a goal agencies and the Tahoe Basin community continue to work toward. 11.1

Winter Secchi depth Yearly since 1968 Annual winter (December-March) Secchi depth measurements from 1968 to the present indicate that winter clarity at Lake Tahoe is showing definite improvement. In 2015, winter clarity declined by 7.6 feet. The winter average of 71.5 feet (21.8 m) was still well above the worst winter average, 65.6 feet (20.0 m), seen in 1997. The low level of snowfall compared to rain this year caused the water entering the lake to be warmer in 2015, and this introduced fine particles closer to the surface impacting clarity. 11.2

Summer Secchi depth Yearly since 1968 Summer (June-September) clarity in Lake Tahoe in 2015 was 73.0 feet (22.3 m), a 3.7 foot decline from 2014. A contributing factor may have been the very low water levels in the lake, which exposed muddy shelves around the periphery of the lake. The summer trend is dominated by a consistent long-term degradation but with a noticeable 10-15 year cyclic pattern. The red dashed lines are linear regressions for the periods: a) 1976 to 1983, b) 1987-1998, and c) 2001 to 2011. The most recent improvement may be a continuation of this cyclical trend. The reasons behind this periodicity are being investigated. 11.3

Individual Secchi depths 2013, 2014, 2015 Here, the individual Secchi depth reading from the Index station on the west side of the lake for 2013, 2014 and 2015 are plotted. For 2013, there is a distinct seasonality Secchi depth is generally higher in the fall and winter months, and lowest in the spring and summer. The maximum Secchi depth often occurs around the time of deepest mixing (March). 2014 and 2015 represented a departure from this long established pattern. In 2015 some of the lowest Secchi depths occurred in winter. Secchi values can be seen to sometimes vary considerably over short time intervals. This is evident in February and October, 2015, where Secchi depth changed 19.5 feet and 15 feet respectively between consecutive readings. Such shortterm variability is common in lakes. In these cases the sudden change is due to episodes of strong wind. 11.4

Light transmission In 2015 A light transmissometer instrument emits a specific wavelength of light and measures the percentage of that light transmitted over a 10 inch path. Clearer water results in a higher percentage of light transmission. Here, the light transmission measured at every depth in the lake is shown at three times in 2015. The first two panels, taken either side of the time of maximum vertical mixing, indicate that the lake has not fully mixed. In all three panels the less clear water (lower percent transmission) is toward the surface, whereas the deeper water is much clearer (higher percent transmission). The reason for the high light transmission in deep water is that fine particles aggregate into larger particles that rapidly settle out in the deep water. Large particles do not scatter light as much as fine particles. 11.5