Introduction. Photo 1. A dung beetle tunnel located beneath a dung pat that has been removed.

Similar documents
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage 6 below. A Remarkable Beetle

SPRUCE CONE MAGGOT (Strobilomyia neanthracina)

Grass Grub and Porina. James Buckley Nufarm NZ

Forest and Timber Insects in New Zealand No. 43. Melolonthine Beetles In Forests Grass Grub and other Chafers. Based on J.

A survey of the dung beetles in cattle manure on pastures of an organic. and a conventional dairy farm in New York state.

USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry

Leopold Center. Use of planting date to avoid injury from soybean insect pests COMPETITIVE GRANT REPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

Lodgepole Pine Beetle

Natural Enemies (Farmers' Friends) Introduction

Protecting Your Trees What You Need to Know About the Emerald Ash Borer. presented by

State Forester Forum P I N E E N G R A V E R

Pasture and Alfalfa Insects. Dr. Wayne Bailey Extension / Research Entomologist Field and Forage Crops University of Missouri

by Elizabeth Dana Jaffe

University of California Cooperative Extension Rice Briefs May 2011

Perfect Pollinators: Who are they and why they matter in Washington County. Classroom Presentation Packet

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. NA-PR January 2004.

Ballantyne 1. Effects of Dung Beetle Functional Group Diversity on Dung Removal and Community Assembly

First Detector Training EMERALD ASH BORER MONITORING & MANAGEMENT

Dung Beetles - Their usefulness in the pasture ecosystem and what affects their populations

EC Integrated Pest Management : Insect Guide

Leaf miners. Leaf miner types. Leaf miner or Scorch? blotch. serpentine

Forest and Timber Insects in New Zealand No. 10. Eucalyptus tortoise beetle. Based on J. Bain 1977

FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH GROUPS AND SCHOOLS

Turf Insect Management. Diane Alston Utah State University Utah Pest Control & Lawn Care Assoc. Annual Convention February 10, 2006

Engraver Beetles in Southwestern Pines

SPRUCE SEEDWORM (Cydia strobilella)

Tamarisk Leaf Beetle Monitoring Protocol

Integrated Pest Management

April 1, 2009 David Baber Southern States Livestock Rep Mike Peacock Manager of Beef Feed Sales

By Susan Chan, M.Sc. nectary. ovary. Figure 1: Cucurbita Flowers. Synandrium loaded with pollen on a male pumpkin flower

EMERALD ASH BORER MANAGEMENT PLAN

The State of Queensland

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certifi cate of Education Ordinary Level

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

animal a living thing that needs air (oxygen), water, food, space, and shelter (SRB, IG)

WEEVIL PEA LEAF THE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Cow Herd Decisions for Future Tough Times

INCREASED FECUNDITY AND LARVAL GROWTH RATE OF AFRICAN FRUIT CHAFER, (PACHNODA SINUATA FLAVIVENTRIS) IN A NOVEL, FERMENTED SUBSTRATE.

Page # Effect of high adult mortality on amount of early reproduction: Effect of high adult mortality on larval development time:

How Did EAB Travel to North America?

DOUGLAS-FIR CONE MOTH Barbara colfaxiana adult

Town of Wasaga Beach Emerald Ash Borer Management Strategy

CONTROL OF! GREENHOUSE WHITEFLY PUBLICATION C212 P1469. (1974 print) c.2. agriculture. Canada

DOUGLAS-FIR CONE GALL MIDGE (Contarinia oregonensis)

Unit 11.1: The Science of Ecology

Wood Boring Insects of Ash Trees. Major Wood Borers of Ash

Sunlight. Air. The sun provides light, energy, and warmth. It also affects the weather on Earth.

EMERALD ASH BORER WHAT EVERY MUNICIPALITY SHOULD KNOW ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO.

These Bees Will Surprise You!

Western Spruce Budworm Management Strategies

Silkworm Carolina CareSheet

QUEENSLAND PINE BEETLE

Southern Nevada Regional Professional Development Program. Mealworm Observations

Identify the principles for managing and maintaining forages. 4. What methods of maintaining or renovating a forage system are available?

California Poultry Letter

Advanced Biology: Bahe & Deken. Agriculture & Nutrition. Chapter 9. Text Page

PESTS OF MULBERRY. Dr. Mahesha H B. Associate Professor and Head Department of Sericulture Yuvaraja scollege University of Mysore, Mysuru, India

Japanese beetles. Larvae are called grubs, and they are root feeders. The adult Japanese beetle is about 0.4 long.

Biology and Management of Mourning Doves

The Cattle and Chickens

PART II. Profiles of selected forest pests

Lecture Objectives. Introduction. Biological Monitoring. Water Quality TERMS AND CONCEPTS ADAPTATION TO HABITATS

Great Salt Lake Planktonic and Benthic Habitats

Center for Environmental Farming Systems

Wireworm Field Guide A guide to the identification and control of wireworms

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

ANTS ACROBAT ANTS. Acrobat Ants Argentine Ants Carpenter Ants Crazy Ants Odorous House Ants Payment Ants Pharaoh Ants Red Imported Fire Ants.

4-H FORESTRY JUDGING TEAM SECTION II FOREST ENTOMOLOGY

Tree Timeline. Tree story cards begin on page 3.

Creating. to Help Native Bees. Pollinator Nesting Boxes

Tamarisk- An overview of Grand County s biological control program. Grand County

Perfect Pollinators: Classroom Presentation Packet

Managing Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) Attacking Urban And Shelterbelt Trees In Montana. Signs And Symptoms Of Mountain Pine Beetle Attack

Bee Detective: Discover the Culprit Behind Declining Bee Populations

The Dashboard for Managers of Sterile Insect Technique Production Facilities. A Mass-Rearing Metrics and Monitoring Tool

Managing near Vernal Pools using Good Forestry in the Granite State

Interactions Within Ecosystems. Date: P. in ILL

What is Emerald Ash Borer?

Biology 2201 Populations. Unit 4

Hiving Bees from Packages

NATIONAL FOREST WEEK 2005 FOREST HEALTH

Look Out for the Pink Hibiscus Mealybug

COOLEY SPRUCE GALL APHID (ADELGES COOLEYI) AND OTHER ADELGID SPECIES IN B.C.

Kansas State University Extension Entomology Newsletter

Michelle Wang Department of Biology, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario Biology 206 (2008)

ADAPTATION TO HABITATS. Lecture Objectives. Introduction

(Total 5 marks) Khalid Mazhar Qureshi Haider Nawab

Investigating the Use of Buckwheat Strips To Attract Beneficial Insects for the Management of Colorado Potato Beetles

Manitoba Insect and Disease Update

Rain Beetle Grub Control in Orchards of the Mid-Columbia, Oregon, Area: Summary of Field Fumigation Tests

Population Biology. Biology 2201 Unit IV

Karner Blue Butterfly Conservation in NH

BIOLOGY OF SPOTTED BOLLWORM, EARIAS VITTELLA (FAB.) ON OKRA

DIAGNOSING 51100T-BORING INSECTS OF PINES

Pest Management in Canola

EMERALD ASH BORER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONROE

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES. This presentation is sponsored by the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program

Working Together British Columbia s Spruce Beetle Mitigation Strategy

LYON COUNTY AG NEWSLETTER

A Year in the Life of a. By: Buford the Mountain Pine Beetle

Transcription:

Investigating the Dung Beetle Population at the Beef Grazing Farm, UW Arlington Research Station Mack Daeda, B.S. Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dan Schaefer, UW-Madison Animal Sciences Department Dan Young, UW-Madison Entomology Department Introduction Dung beetles may sound like disgusting insects, but their value to the beef grazing and cattle production industry should not be overlooked. This project was conducted at the UW Arlington Agricultural Research Station (AARS) Beef Grazing farm during May-August, 2012. The objective was to identify the various dung beetle species represented in the existing dung beetle populations and observe their activity and behavior to determine potential positive impacts to pastures and cattle production. Pasture managers are interested in dung beetles because these insects serve beneficial roles in the microenvironment of a dung pat that positively impact the larger pasture ecosystem. Dung beetles may play a significant role in controlling horn fly populations. Horn flies also use dung to reproduce and the adults feed on the blood of cattle and other grazing livestock. Their pesky feeding behavior can greatly reduce cattle weight gains, reduce vitality, and may cause animal injuries as the cattle try to stop their annoying blood-sucking. An Australian study reported that the introduction of 23 dung beetle species in a particular area resulted in a 90% reduction of bush fly populations (a species similar to horn flies). By maneuvering around the dung pat and manipulating dung into brood balls, dung beetles can physically damage the eggs of horn flies. Evidence also exists that Sphaeridium scarabaeoides larvae may feed on fly larvae in the dung pat. Photo 1. A dung beetle tunnel located beneath a dung pat that has been removed. Dung beetle nesting activities assist in redistributing and recycling nutrients from the dung pat as well as improving soil structure and water absorption; activities that are important to pasture soil health. Photo 1 shows a hole that was found underneath a dung pat representing the beginning of a tunnel leading to a beetle larval development site. The hole in the picture had a measured depth of 6 inches and had a diameter about the size of a large pea.

Beetle Species Identified Dung beetles belong to the Order Coleoptera and most are members of the Family Scarabaeidae. The majority of species can be further grouped into the Subfamilies Scarabaeinae and Aphodiinae, with a few species representing various other beetle families. For the current study, dung beetles were sampled by digging through dung pats layer by layer and picking out beetles individually for later identification. Eight species were collected at the UW AARS Beef Grazing Farm (Table 1). Table 1. Identification and Brief Description of Dung Beetle Species Found at UW Arlington Agricultural Research Station Beef Grazing Farm Aphodius badipes ( big black beetle ) an all black scarab beetle greater than 1 cm long with fossorial legs Aphodius fimetarius ( red backs ) a mostly black, non-native scarab beetle of European origin with red elytra; less than 1 cm long, with fossorial legs Aphodius granarius ( small black beetle ) an all black, non-native scarab beetle of European origin; less than 5 mm long, with fossorial legs Aphodius rubripinnis ( brown backs ) a scarab beetle chararcterized by reddish-brown elytra, less than 1 cm long, with fossorial legs Onthophagous hecate an all black scarab beetle less than 1 cm long, with fossorial legs, exhibiting sexual polymorphism Onthophagous nuchicornis Non-native beetle of European origin characterized by yellow and black elytra, 5-8 mm long, with fossorial legs, exhibiting sexual polymorphism Sphaeridium scarabaeoides ( half brown backs ) beetle representing the family Hydrophilidae, characterized by brown, red and black elytra, and legs with spines; 5-7 mm long Xestipyge conjunctum ( headless beetle ) beetle representing the family Histeridae, an all black, flat, glossy beetle less than 1 cm long, with a strongly retracted head and fossorial legs

Life Cycle The life cycle of dung beetles is very interesting and unique with respect to most other beetles. Most dung beetle species spend 95% of their life in dung or in the soil beneath dung pats. The only time dung beetles may be observed outside this environment is when they are searching for a new dung pat to start preparing and laying their eggs. Since each dung beetle species exhibits different adaptations to their preferred microenvironment, they have somewhat specific life cycle characteristics. Figure 1. General life cycle of dung beetles. 4 5 1 3 2 processes of dung beetles, described as follows: Figure 1 shows the general life cycle 1. Male and female dung beetle pairs mate and create a nest environment that will provide their eggs the best probability of development and survival. 2. Eggs are laid. All dung beetles lay their eggs in dung, either in the dung pat itself or in a dung ball. A brood ball refers to dung ball in which an egg has been laid. Different beetle species utilize particular methods to lay their eggs. Some species lay their eggs so they remain attached to their backs. Once they partition a ball of dung from the pat, they place a single egg in that ball of dung and close it up. Other species lay their eggs and then individually wrap eggs in dung until it forms a ball shape. Usually, an egg hatches in 1 2 days, entering the larval stage. A typical female dung beetle can lay from 10 80 eggs in her lifetime. 3. A majority of the development occurs during the larval stage. Beetle larvae do not resemble the adult insect forms. Instead, the larva resembles a grub with six legs and a mouth and is C shaped. Entomologists call this form of larva scarabaeiform. The larva feeds on dung while it develops and grows. It normally consumes only about 40 55% of the dung ball, leaving the remaining particles behind. After 1 4 weeks, the larva pupates and moves into stage 4. 4. The transition from larva to adult form begins during pupation. The pupal stage may last from two weeks to several months and is the most variable stage among different dung beetle species. The pupal stage determines the population spikes seen among dung beetles. The pupa remains in a dung ball until it fully matures. At the conclusion of the pupal stage, the beetle emerges as an adult. 5. In the final stage of the dung beetle life cycle, adults are ready to relocate to a fresh dung pat to start the life cycle process over again. They must find a mate with which to pair bond and start preparing a new nesting environment. Even though dung beetles are modest-sized insects, they can fly up to 30 miles in search of fresh dung.

Beetle Nests Dwellers Rollers Tunnelers Figure 2. Dung beetle nesting behaviors. The most valuable trait of dung beetles in pasture ecosystems is in the way they prepare the nest environment and lay their eggs during stage 1 of their life cycle. Figure 2 illustrates three ways that different dung beetle species prepare the nest environment and lay their eggs to ensure successful development of the next generation of dung beetles. Dwellers do not penetrate the soil to dig out a chamber for their eggs. Instead, they dwell in the dung pat above the soil and lay their eggs directly in the dung pat. Eggs of dwellers are more prone to physical damage from fly larvae and other predators, but the larvae have an abundant food source for growth. In the current study at the UW Arlington Beef Grazing Farm, only Sphaeridium scarabaeoides is a dweller, and its larvae are primarily predators of the fly larvae that also inhabit the dung pat. Tunnelers get their name from their tunneling behavior underneath the dung pat. Male and female beetles work together to excavate egg chambers beneath the dung pat where they eventually place brood balls containing the eggs at the end of the tunnels. Different dung beetle species dig different types of tunnels. Some create branched tunnels while others create a single tunnel deep within the soil. Multiple brood balls may be packed into a single tunnel and once they are in place, the beetles secure them in their places with soil. This is the most common dung beetle nesting behavior observed at AARS Beef Grazing Farm because the remaining seven species of dung beetles identified are all considered tunnelers. The defining characteristic of these types of beetles compared to dwellers are their fossorial legs, which are specifically designed for digging. Rollers are dung beetles that roll their eggs into a dung ball and roll it some distance away from the dung pat. These beetles build underground nests away from the dung pat and roll their brood balls to this remote location. Aside from the rolling behavior, nest tunnels have the same general characteristics as those excavated by tunnelers. No rollers were identified during the AARS Beef Grazing Farm study. The most well-known roller species are native to Africa and Australia. These rollers tend to be larger in size and have longer legs than dwellers or tunnelers, and these defining characteristics give them the ability to efficiently maneuver their brood balls to their nest location.

Observations on Tunneling and Nesting Behaviors In order to gain a better understanding of each species tunneling behavior, we wanted to conduct several observational experiments to help us understand the ideal conditions for tunnel excavation and beetle development. Six beetle farms were constructed to compare and contrast environmental conditions that may affect larval development and tunneling behaviors. The first experiment attempted to address whether the beetle farms needed to be mechanically populated with dung beetles and what types of tunneling behaviors the different beetle species utilized. Two beetle farms were filled with soil and dung and placed, uncovered, near a corral of cattle (UNPF = unpopulated farms). The remaining four beetle farms were filled with soil and a dung layer and populated with 5 7 beetles of one species harvested from dung pats in a nearby pasture (POPF = Populated farms). Covers were placed on the farms and they were left outside in an area that would receive direct sunlight for only half a day. All of the soil used to fill the beetle farms was collected from a nearby ditch at one time. Due to extremely high temperatures and drought conditions, no beetle activity was recorded in this experiment. We observed that the dung in the UNPF lost all moisture within three days. Over a two-week period, we recorded soil temperatures and moisture diffusion into the soil from dung pats. Our results suggested that dung beetles may not be active in soil temperatures exceeding 90⁰F and moisture from dung was found to be absorbed into dry soil as much as 2.25 inches from the dung-soil interface. Concurrently, animals were removed from the pastures due to the extremely dry conditions. We observed that beetle populations severely declined when their source of fresh dung was removed. We conducted one additional experiment with the beetle farms using a lower temperature range and dark conditions. We compared two beetle species and two types of soil: potting soil in one farm and topsoil in the second farm for each species. All four beetle farms were filled with the same amount of dung, randomly seeded with 7 10 beetles and maintained in a cool dark room at 75⁰F for two weeks. At the end of this experiment, larval counts were conducted on all farms. Larvae developed in only the potting soil environments, even though both soil types had relatively similar moisture content (52 53%). Potting soil has a much higher organic matter content than top soil, which may have been a limiting factor. Dung beetles did not seem to need sunlight to build tunnels, lay eggs, and for larvae to develop. In summary, dung beetles can positively contribute to grazing farm ecosystems by minimizing horn fly populations that are a nuisance to cattle, put stress on them and possibly limit cattle weight gains. From observations at the Beef Grazing Farm at AARS, the community of beetles present during the study was not sufficient to significantly alter horn fly populations. The impact of heat on the dung pat environment may have caused a decrease in dung beetle numbers but this cannot be concluded since the cattle had to be relocated indoors at the same time. Consequently, the dung beetles food source was severely diminished. Horn flies use the dung pats to reproduce as well, and the dung pats on the farm were not used or mobilized enough by the dung beetles present to significantly damage horn fly eggs. In some of the Australian studies, many dung beetle species were known for their ability to mobilize dung quickly and efficiently. In the present study, only 2-3 dung beetle species exhibited significant tunneling behavior. These were the Onthophagus beetles and Aphodius badipes. It is possible that a much higher number of these beetles would be needed to mobilize the dung pats fast enough to produce an impact on horn fly populations.