Water Availability and Use in the Great Lakes Region

Similar documents
National Strategy for the Assessment of Water Availability and Use in the United States

Investigation of the Coastal Lowlands Aquifer System

Context for Central Sands Water Use Trends and Impacts

NOAA, Mantua (2010) NOAA (2010) Modified from McCabe et al., s Dust Bowl. 1950s drought

Steven M. Peterson, PG, J.S. Stanton, N.A. Houston, S.L. Qi, A.T. Flynn, and D.W. Ryter U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.

Comments on a Need for Improved Data on Water Use

Virtual Water Accounting: A New Framework for Managing Great Lakes Water Resources

USGS Virginia Water Science Center: Scientific Support to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Groundwater Withdrawal Permitting Program

Characterizing Groundwater and Surface- Water Interactions in Selected Northeast Twin Cities Lakes

Predicting Groundwater Sustainability: What Tools, Models and Data are Available?

Streamflow Depletion by Pumping Wells and the Michigan Water- Withdrawal Assessment Process

Role of NHD/NHDPlus for environmental-flow based legislation in Michigan and environmental-flow framework for the US Great Lakes Basin

Western Groundwater: A Status Report and a Look Ahead

Groundwater in the Santa Rosa Plain

What s New in Groundwater at the USGS: Data, Tools, Assessments, and Integrated Modeling

Overview of Water Resources (Part 2): Groundwater in Sonoma Valley

Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska

groundwater/surface-water interactions Evan Christianson, PG Barr Engineering Company

Using Your Computer for Water Withdrawal Planning and Groundwater Mapping

STRAWMAN OUTLINE March 21, 2008 ISWS/ISGS REPORT ON THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF MEETING WATER DEMAND IN NORTH-EAST ILLINOIS

Analysis and Simulation of Conjunctive Water Use for Agricultural Settings with the Farm Process for MODLFOW

Groundwater Resources Program Regional Groundwater Evaluation

A Roadmap for the Scientific Assessment of Maryland s Coastal Plain Groundwater Resources

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Water Supply Planning Program Update. Focus on Alternative and Preliminary Recommended Plans

NAWQA Cycle 3 Groundwater Studies in the Glacial Aquifer Paul Juckem, USGS-WiWSC Contributions from: Sandy Eberts, Ken Belitz, Daniel Feinstein, Mike

Hydroinformatics to Assess Management Regimes: Using Directed Networks and a Groundwater Decision Support System to Span Science and Policy

Chippewa County Groundwater Study 3 rd Public outreach meeting

The DNR is charged with managing waters resources to assure an adequate and sustainable supply for multiple uses.

MEMORANDUM. RAI Responses Related to East Lake Road Wellfield Drawdown Analysis, WUP No SDI Project No. PCF-180.

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Water Supply Planning Program Update. Focus on Alternative and Preliminary Recommended Plans

WATER RESOURCES SUSTAINABILITY AND HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED IN THE STATE OF KANSAS, USA

1. Concept: A single groundwater flow system occurs throughout the central sands

ALABAMA S FUTURE WITHOUT SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES? NOT ON OUR WATCH. Marlon Cook

Georgia s Aquifers. USGS Fact Sheet

Effect of Conjunctive Use of Water for Paddy Field Irrigation on Groundwater Budget in an Alluvial Fan ABSTRACT

Groundwater in the Eel River Valley: Responding to the New State Groundwater Legislation

Climate Change and Drought Scenarios for Water Supply Planning

A Wed-based Spatial Decision Support System for Potomac Basin Consumptive Water-use. Jan Ducnuigeen Advisor: Patrick Reed

Indicators of Hydrologic Stress in Massachusetts

Water for All, Now and Into the Future: Water Quantity in Wisconsin. A report by the Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter

USGS Water Quantity Studies in Nevada

Optimal management of groundwater pumping of the cache critical groundwater area, Arkansas

Rockland County s Water Resources -Selected Findings from the USGS Study- Paul M. Heisig, Hydrologist New York USGS Water Science Center Troy, NY

Associate Groundwater Resources Engineer Principal Hydrogeologist

LAKE LABELLE DEWATERING MODEL. AUTHOR Gail Murray Doyle, P.G. September Murray Consultants, Inc 769 Skyview Dr Hayesville, NC

Hydrology in Western Colorado: Planning for Resilience

DROUGHT IN ILLINOIS: IMPACTS TO WATER SUPPLY

Irrigation modeling in Prairie Ronde Township, Kalamazoo County. SW Michigan Water Resources Council meeting May 15, 2012

Municipal Groundwater Flow Modelling Study. Town of Torbay, NL

The Corning Primary Aquifer -One of 18. NYSDEC Primary Aquifers in New York

Water Sustainability: Toward A Common Understanding Michigan Case Study

U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow data in Michigan Using the USGS NWIS database MDOT Bridge Scour Conference October 5, 2017

Hydrology models (Hydrology)

Vermont Groundwater Monitoring Network: A real-time tool for assessing climatic drought

DOE s Net-Zero Energy Commercial Building Initiative

Aquifer Characterization and Drought Assessment Ocheyedan River Alluvial Aquifer

NGWA INFORMATION BRIEF

USGS Groundwater Resources Program Regional Groundwater Evaluations

Mapping Groundwater Recharge Rates Under Multiple Future Climate Scenarios in Southwest Michigan

How Groundwater Interacts with Lakes and Streams

Comparison of Surface- Groundwater Interaction Model Approaches to Establish Surface Water Protection Zones in Stanislaus County

Dynamic groundwater-river interaction model for planning water allocation in a narrow valley aquifer system of the Upper Motueka catchment

Science supporting the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: Groundwater and Climate Change Information Needs and Gaps

Memorandum. Introduction. Carl Einberger Joe Morrice. Figures 1 through 7

Is it time for us to go to fully integrated models for stream-aquifer management?

Purpose. Utilize groundwater modeling software to forecast the pumping drawdown in a regional aquifer for public drinking water supply

PUBLIC POLICY FORUM February 22, 2005

WATER SUPPLY ISSUES IN SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN: TECHNICAL AND POLICY NEEDS AND CHALLENGES

Pilot area reference WP. Varde Pilot Area. + Varde: 14,000 inhabitants + Lerpøtvej Waterworks: 1,3 mill m3/year

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in SPARROW Models Richard B. Alexander

Water Use in Minnesota

A Time Series Approach to Instream Flow Mitigation Forecasting. Presented by Alan Keizur

Water Supply in Coastal Georgia Meeting Water Demand Using Alternative Water Sources to the Upper Floridan Aquifer

USGS LAKE STUDIES CASE STUDY: SILVER LAKE (OCEANA COUNTY, MI) Angela Brennan, Hydrologist - US Geological Survey Upper Midwest Water Science Center,

Ottawa County Water Resources Study Phase 2

USGS Hydrologic Monitoring and Research in the Barnegat Bay Watershed

Perspectives on the Nation s Ground- Water Availability. William M. Alley Sioux Falls October 30, 2007

GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY MODELING OF THE WEST NISHNABOTNA AQUIFER IN IOWA. Iowa Geological Survey Water Resource Investigation Report 3

Climate Change and Sea Level Rise

Temporal and Spatial Variability. Natural Groundwater Recharge

Daniel R. Hadley, PG and Daniel B. Abrams, PhD

Simulating hydrologic and biologic response to land use and climate change

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS GUELPH/GUELPH-ERAMOSA TIER 3 WATER BUDGET AND LOCAL AREA RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY

RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT GROUNDWATER WORKSHOP. Groundwater Production History and Outlook for the Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin

AN INTEGRATED GROUNDWATER RECHARGE AND FLOW MODEL TO PREDICT BASE FLOW

Subject: Groundwater Model Update and Scope for Fiscal Year

Christopher Fields, PhD Candidate Drs. Lynn Johnson and John Labadie Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering Cooperative Institute for Research on

Kane County Water Resources Investigations: Simulation of Groundwater Flow in Kane County and Northeastern Illinois

DRAFT. APPENDIX F Groundwater Flow Model Proposed El Segundo Desalination Facility

Regional Aquifer Recharge to Support San Pedro River Baseflows, Flood Flows and Groundwater

Nitrate Tracking in the Lower Yakima Basin

Identifying domestic well locations and populations served in the contiguous United States

Development of Groundwater Model for GMA-12 Using a Participatory Framework for Data Collection and Model Calibration

February 7 th, Background

USGS National Assessment of Groundwater Quality and the Utility of State Groundwater Data Sandra M. Eberts & Ken Belitz U.S.

Investigation of sustainable development potential for Ulubey Aquifer System, Turkey

Assessing Effects of Intraborehole Flow in Deep Monitoring Wells on Estimates of Aquifer Salinity Profiles

6.0 USGS MODEL. 6.1 Background

While requirements to leave water in

Assessing Water Use and Availability Trends in New Hampshire

Transcription:

Water Availability and Use in the Great Lakes Region Howard W. Reeves, USGS Michigan Water Science Center Michigan Chapter Soil and Water Conservation Society Seminar A Matter of Balance: Energy, Water and Working Lands March 7, 2012

Hossain, Faisal; Niyogi, Dev; Adegoke, Jimmy; Kallos, George; and Pielke, Roger, 2011, Making sense of the water resources that will be available for future use: EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, v. 92, no. 17, pg. 144, doi: 10.1029/2011EO170005

Based on observations Understand and account for uncertainty

Water use in the U.S. Hutson, S.S., Barber, N.L., Kenny, J.F., Linsey, K.S., Lumia, D.S., and Maupin, M.A., 2004, Estimated use of water in the United States in 2000: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268, 46 p.

Hutson and others, 2004.

Hutson and others, 2004.

Maupin, M.A., and Barber, N.L., 2005, Estimated withdrawals from principal aquifers in the United States, 2000: U.S.Geological Survey Circular 1279, 46 p.

Maupin and Barber, 2005.

Regional Groundwater Availability Studies Status of groundwater resources for the nation Response of groundwater systems to development Potential response to future development and climate change

USGS Groundwater Resources Program regional groundwater availability studies (http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/gwrp/activities/regional.html)

Faunt, C.C. ed., 2009, Groundwater Availability of the Central Valley Aquifer: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1766, 225 p. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1766/.

Faunt, Chapter B, 2009.

Clark, B.R., Hart, R.M., and Gurdak, J.J., 2011, Groundwater availability of the Mississippi embayment: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1785, 62 p.

Clark and others, 2011

Drawdown in Mississippi River Alluvial Aquifer in 2007 from Clark and others, 2011

Water Availability and Use Great Lakes Basin Pilot Funded in 2005, five-year project Groundwater, surface water, water use Develop methods for national program Respond to Great Lakes issues including development of the Great Lakes Compact Image from NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, AVHRR satellite imagery, 1995

Overview Great Lakes water availability characterized by regional abundance with potential for local shortages.

Many Factors Affect Water Availability Water Quantity Water Works Infrastructure And Existing Water Use Water Quality Water Availability Economic Factors Ecology, Recreation, and Instream Use Water Law And Regulations

Surface Water Analysis What are current streamflows and how have they changed over time? How will new withdrawals affect streamflow?

Surface Water Analysis Streamgage data are not available everywhere Developed a new method to: Estimate streamflow for any stream Integrate water use and streamflow data Account for trends in time

Streamgage data Result of the new method

Water Use How much water is withdrawn and how much water is used in the Great Lakes Basin? How does use vary in time and space across the basin? Future water availability depends on groundwater, surface water, and current water use

Mills, P.C., and Sharpe, J.B., 2010, Estimated withdrawals and other elements of water use in the Great Lakes Basin of the United States in 2005: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010 5031, 95 p.

Mills, P.C., and Sharpe, J.B., 2010.

Public-supply withdrawals 3,800 million gallons per day 17.7 million people Groundwater 12% Surface Water 88% Mills, P.C., and Sharpe, J.B., 2010. Self-supply domestic withdrawals 410 million gallons per day 5.2 million people Surface Water < 1% Groundwater 99%

Mills, P.C., and Sharpe, J.B., 2010.

Groundwater availability How much groundwater is in storage? What are groundwater divides? How has development changed groundwater levels and availability? What are potential constraints limiting groundwater availability?

Groundwater flow model SEAWAT density dependent MODFLOW 20 layers ~ 2 million cells 1864-2005 in 1 steadystate and 12 transient stress periods Heterogeneous properties

Water use, up to 1.1 billion gallons per day; 13,300 wells total across all stress periods (+ Milwaukee deep tunnel, 270 nodes) Buchwald, Luukkonen, and Rachol, USGS 1941-1950

Water use, up to 1.1 billion gallons per day; 13,300 wells total across all stress periods (+ Milwaukee deep tunnel, 270 nodes) Buchwald, Luukkonen, and Rachol, USGS 2001-2005

Recharge Westenbroek, S.M., Kelson, V.A., Dripps, W.R., Hunt, R.J., and Bradbury,K.R., 2009, SWB A modified Thornthwaite-Mather Soil-Water Balance code for estimating ground-water recharge: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A31, 65 p. Calibrated to be consistent with baseflow estimates

Properties of glacial deposits 3 model layers ~ 1200 ft thick Water well records and regional geological maps: (Arihood, USGS)

RESULTS. Water levels and drawdown Water budgets Sources of water to wells Indicators of sustainability Inset model

Water Budget by Stress Period for Lake Michigan Basin 1 2 3 4 5 Flux, in million gallons per day 25,000 6 7 Stress Period 8 9 10 11 12 13 20,000 15,000 Lateral Flow In (net) 10,000 Storage Source Surface Water In 5,000 Recharge In 0-5,000 Wells Out -10,000 Lake Michigan Out -15,000 Storage Sink Inland Lakes Out -20,000 Streams Out -25,000 P redev 1864-1900 1901-1920 1921-1940 1941-1950 1951-1960 1961-1970 1971-1975 1976-1980 Water Budget Changes from Previous Stress Period for Lake Michigan Basin 1 10,000 Flux, in million gallons per day 8,000 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Stress Period 6,000 Lateral Flow In (net) 4,000 Storage Source Surface Water In 2,000 Recharge In 0 Wells Out -2,000 Lake Michigan Out -4,000 Storage Sink -6,000 Inland Lakes Out -8,000 Streams Out P redev 1864-1900 1901-1920 1921-1940 1981-1985 1986-1990 1991-2000 2001-2005 1941-1950 1951-1960 1961-1970 1971-1975 1976-1980

Source of water to wells, 2005, shallow

Source of water to wells, 2005, deep

Water Table

St. Peter drawdown: 1864-2005

Indicators DEMAND TO SUPPLY RATI0 for a given area at given time= (Pumping Injection)t ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Sum of natural inflows)t, no pumping BASEFLOW REDUCTION INDEX for a given area at given time= (Net Baseflowt Net Baseflowt, no pumping) ----------------------------------------------------------------(Net Baseflowt, no pumping) Where net baseflow = SWout - SWin x 100 Weiskel and others, 2007 Cherkauer, 2009 Great Lakes Pilot, 2010

Indicators for Focus Areas Demand relative to natural supply: big range Focus Areas Lansing area in SLP_MI (4 counties) Green Bay area in NE_WI (2 counties) Baseflow Reduction relative to natural flow: greater than 5%

Ground-Water-Flow Model: Regional to Local Scales Scale Regional Intermediate Local Area (mi2) Cells per layer Cell size (ft) 180962.6 102051 * 5000 x 5000 453.7 50600 500 x 500 21.6 118336 71.5 x 71.5 * Smallest cells in non-uniform grid near field

(Hoard, 2010)

(Hoard, 2010)

Climate variability and change simulation Climate input from a downscaled atmosphere-ocean couple general circulation model (Hayoe and others, 2008) A1 fi scenario (high global greenhouse gas emission) AOGCM input to soil-water-balance model to estimate recharge Hayhoe, K., C. Wake, B. Anderson, X.-L. Liang, E. Maurer, J. Zhu, J. Bradbury, A. DeGaetano, A. Stoner and D. Wuebbles. 2008. Regional Climate Change Projections for the Northeast USA: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 13, No. 5-6, p. 425-436

(Hoard, 2010)

Relation to the Great Lakes Compact.. Strengthen the scientific basis for sound water management (Section 1.4) Role of groundwater (Section 1.4) Water use and development of the required cumulative impact assessment (Section 4.15).. Consider adaptive management principles and approaches recognizing, considering, and providing adjustments for the uncertainties in, and evolution of, science concerning the Basin s water resources, watersheds and ecosystems (Section 4.15)

Great Lakes Pilot Regional abundance does not mean water will always be available where and when it is needed. Regional study provides information that local stakeholders can build on to make decisions. http://water.usgs.gov/wateravailability/greatlakes/index.html