FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK-AND-RIDE DEMAND ESTIMATION STUDY

Similar documents
Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

WELCOME. Schedule. Contact Information. Please Provide Written Comments

Regional Bus Rapid Transit

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Long Range Transportation Plan Project Status Update

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transit Projects: Current Practice and Methodological Advances

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management

Transportation and Utilities

SUMMARY REPORT September 11, 2012 DRAFT

Database and Travel Demand Model

Final Land Use and Development Opportunities Report 5.0 Environmental Impact/Environmental Consequences

TransAction Plan October 2017

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

MARC Brunswick/Frederick Line Improvement Proposal

TransAction Plan Draft for Public Comment Spring/Summer 2017

and Unmet Need: Methodology and Results

Purpose of the Public Hearing

MEMORANDUM EXAMPLES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES NEXT STEPS. Item 3 Long-Range Plan Task Force May 17, 2017

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Virginia s Long-Range Multimodal Transportation Plan Transportation and Land Use: Challenges and Opportunities

Process to Identify High Priority Corridors for Access Management Near Large Urban Areas in Iowa Using Spatial Data

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

Fairfax County Comments on the 1-66 Inside the Beltway Multimodal Improvement Project

The Alliance Vision/Purpose

FCEDA MarComm Session SWOT Workshop. September 18, 2012

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

GDOT-Office of Planning Update

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor

Traffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

HB 599 Study Overview A detailed evaluation framework and methodology to evaluate regionally significant projects and their impact on congestion

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

City of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports

Regional Transit System Plan

VDOT and DRPT MPO and PDC Winter Meeting Amy Inman Planning & Mobility Programs Administrator Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

Transit Service Guidelines

Airports in the Region Case Study

Connecting the Nation's Capital Transportation System

EXAMPLES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES HOW TO ESTIMATE THE BENEFITS OF THE CTR PROGRAM

Fairfax Transportation Committee I-66 Multimodal Improvements Inside the Beltway. January 20, 2015

Appendix B2: Factors Affecting Transit Choice

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Dec 20, 2007 Operations Performance Measures Conference Call

SECTION III - REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM. The Regional Arterial System is a subcomponent of a broader regional thoroughfare system.

Regional Evaluation Decision tool for Smart Growth

TPB Scenario Study Task Force: Proposal for Development and Analysis of Two New Scenarios

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor (G)

Regional Transit Framework Study

I-95 / I-395 Integrated Corridor Management. Hari Sripathi, P.E. Regional Operations Director

Investigating ITS Concepts for the Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project

Creating a Transit Supply Index. Andrew Keller Regional Transportation Authority and University of Illinois at Chicago

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Metropolitan sustainability and the Interstate System: A new professional paradigm. Eric Sundquist Future of the Interstate Study March 27, 2017

CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

Utilizing Transportation Data for Low Cost Safety Improvements

BUSINESSES CHOOSE TO BE NEAR TRANSIT

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional Classification System. Briefing to MPOs, PDCs, and Local Governments

STAFF REPORT. Planning Commission. Anjanette Simon, Associate Planner

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Safety and Operations Committee. Information Item IV-A. December 13, 2018

Chapter 14 Public Services and Utilities

Jeff Gulden, PE, TE, JP Goates, MCMP, and Reid Ewing, Ph.D. Page 1 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION MODEL

Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

COFFEE WITH THE MAYOR. September 10, 2010

State Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. National Conference of State Legislatures November, 2007

KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

REPORT. Freight Physical Infrastructure Profile May 11, Submitted to: Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission (RRRC)

Modeling Traffic Flow under Emergency Evacuation Situations: Current Practice and Future Direction

CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study: Transit Ridership Forecasting Analysis Technical Memorandum Submitted By

Commonwealth Transportation Board I-66 Corridor Briefing Outside the Beltway Route 15 to I-495

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Project Appraisal Using PRISM Simon Hubbard 28 th September 2004

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

Transportation Planning Methods for Improving Mobility in Developing Activity Centers in Orange County, California

SOUTHWEST CONNECTS: Southwest Region Transportation Plan

Flexible Transit Service Provision

Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons. Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013

NEPA and Design Public Hearings

Currituck County Moyock Mega-Site Market Feasibility Study March 28, 2016

APPENDIX H- ALTERNATIVES PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED

Chapter Five: Transportation

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION

Grottoes. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

April 12, Dear Chairman Wojahn and Members of the Transportation Planning Board:

Transcription:

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK-AND-RIDE DEMAND ESTIMATION STUDY Michael Demmon GIS Spatial Analyst Fairfax County, DOT Fairfax, VA Scudder Wagg Planner Michael Baker Jr, Inc. Richmond, VA Additional support from: Caijun Luo, Transportation Planner, Fairfax County DOT Virginia Dept. of Transportation, Multi-Modal Planning Office Peggy Malone and Associates March 28, 2011 GIS-T Symposium GIS Analysis using Network Analyst

Outline Introduction Study Area Current Park & Ride Development techniques Goals of a Park & Ride Problem Definition Data Collection Application Design First Response Challenges of modeling real-world scenarios Examples Future Considerations & Conclusions

Study Area Fairfax County & the Washington D.C. Area Washington D.C. MSA Fairfax County, Virginia 22 Jurisdictions included covering 3 states (6 cities, 15 counties, 1 district) 395 Square Miles in area 1.1 Million residents 8.2 Million residents Worst congestion in the nation* 70+ Hours wasted due to commute delays* 2 nd highest Median Household Income in the Nation Most populous jurisdiction in Virginia and the Washington Metro area 7 Transit organizations operating in, or passing through Fairfax County *(The 2010 Urban Mobility Study By TTI)

Existing Methodology Planners observe existing conditions, review development plans and make educated guesses of Park & Ride demand Currently, Site typically drives specifics Area/location Size Ease of Access (commuter, pedestrian, bike, etc) General understanding that transit service options greatly effect usage of Park & Ride facility Optimal utilization ranges between 70-85% capacity

Park & Ride Facilities in Fairfax County 39 Park & Ride lots 7 Lots at Metro rail stations 4 along I-66, 3 along I-95 & I-495 4 Lots at Virginia Rail Express (VRE) stations 9 Lots along I-95 corridor 10 Lots along I-66 corridor 4 Lots along VA 267 (Dulles Toll Rd) corridor 6 Lots along other highvolume corridors 28,394 Total Capacity

Commuter Intercept Approaches & Goals Intercept Fairfax county Residents Goal: Eliminate vehicle all together Requirements: provide transit services from origin to destination Strategically place P&R facilities near high-density residential Intercept Non-Fairfax County Residents Goal: Reduce through traffic & overall congestion Requirements: Place large P&R facilities along major corridors Provide express transit service to Metrorail terminal stations

Study Areas by Primary Transit Corridor Fairfax County is the largest commuter-origin jurisdiction in the DC area Commuter Corridors Major I-66 from West I-95 from South VA-267 from Northwest* Minor US 1 from South VA 7 from Northwest* US 50 from West* VA 7100 cross county *These routes connect to major arterials & interstates and act as primary collectors.

Purpose of Analysis & Development Identify Existing Trends Develop a Park and Ride Demand Analysis application to estimate usage at potential, future Park & Ride locations throughout Fairfax County Provide calculated predictions of usage Automate the process of, and increase the accuracy of determining potential usage of Park & Ride facilities Considerations Available transit services Proximity to regional arterial highways

Fairfax Park-and-Ride Facilities and Markets

Data Collected and Geocoding Summary of Data Collected Park-and-Ride Facilities Counted 36 Vehicles Counted 22,954 Vehicle Plate Numbers Collected 20,435 Addresses Returned from DMV 19,887 Addresses within Virginia 19,344 Successfully Geocoded Addresses 18,296 89% of all vehicles had VA plates. 79.7% of all counted vehicles successfully geocoded.

Individual Lot Analysis

Market Area Analysis: Orange Line Median Distance (mi) Park and Ride Lot Spaces Vehicles Straight line Driving East Falls Church 422 428 2.08 2.51 West Falls Church 2,025 1,911 2.05 3.47 Dunn Loring 1,319 1,313 2.82 3.53 Vienna 5,849 5,253 5.58 6.68

Market Area Analysis: Southern Fairfax Metro Median Distance (mi) Park and Ride Lot Spaces Vehicles Straight line Driving Van Dorn Street 361 361 1.34 2.22 Franconia- Springfield 5,069 4,584 4.16 4.27 Huntington 3,090 2,986 3.07 5.69

Market Analysis Results Lots differentiated by service and location. MetroRail Service VRE Service Express Bus within 2 miles of freeway Express Bus beyond 2 miles of freeway Local Bus within 2 miles of freeway Local Bus beyond 2 miles of freeway No Transit Service (Car or Vanpool Only) Coefficients for population, households and work trips developed for each lot type.

Park-and-Ride Demand Estimation Toolbar Step-by-step process 1. Add, Edit, Delete, Move PnR Locations 2. Change PnR Attributes 3. Create Market Buffers 4. Edit Buffers 5. Calculate Demand Estimates

Initiating Analysis

Adding, Editing, Deleting PnR Facilities

Creating and Editing Market Areas

Calculating Demand

Calculation Process Developed using Model Builder Adjusts for overlapping market areas through spatial join and join count.

Calculation in Progress

Example Tabular Output Name Estimated Demand Population within Market Area Households within Market Area AM Work Trips within Market Area Population Basis for Demand Estimate Household Basis for Demand Estimate Trip Basis for Demand Estimate Metro1 49 39,204 15,211 31,070 8,730 3,374 7,022 Target 146 42,580 15,403 34,221 8,971 3,261 7,597 Chantilly 62 21,019 6,972 14,096 4,409 1,464 2,876 Tysons Corner 1,083 24,019 9,863 21,138 3,931 1,609 3,413

New Park & Ride Lots Old Keene Mill P&R Opened November, 2011 Baron Cameron Park P&R Opened January, 2011 Sunset Hills P&R Opens 4/4/2011 Temporary lot during Reston East Metrorail construction Reston East Metrorail Existing lot Closes 4/3 Scheduled to re-open Fall of 2013 Estimated parking capacity of 2300

Old Keene Mill Close-up Old Keene Mill P&R 4 PnRs adjacent to each other SLUG line effect Estimated Demand of 334 OKM actual observed usage in first 120 days Averaged 249 Drop at AmL. from avg. 100+ to avg. of 30 Drop at SUMC from avg. 52 to avg. of 34 Average Usage of 3 south lots is 72% Explanation for difference Proximity of other lots Realignment of commuter parking habits

Reston East Closure Rest East closing 4/3/2011 820 spaces Served by 10 routes Sunset Hills P&R Opens 4/4/2011 602 spaces Serviced by 2 routes Estimated Demand of 404 (with RE removed) Baron Cameron Park P&R Opened January, 2011 Created as overflow for closing of Reston East 50 spaces (no observed usage yet) Estimated Demand of 11 (with RE removed)

Future Tool Improvements Develop more service options within tool Collect, analyze, and predict more quantitative data relevant to Park & Ride usage More consideration for direction of flow for commuter traffic Incorporate forecast demographics for an understanding of future usage

Large-scale regional Park & Ride studies needed Develop more thorough quantitative methods for analyzing regional data Maximize transit options for maximum utilization of Park & Ride facilities CONCLUSIONS