NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Achieving 100% Cargo Screening on Passenger Aircraft

Similar documents
NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Achieving 100% Cargo Screening on Passenger Aircraft


WARNING: This record contains Sensitive Security Information that is controlled under 49 CFR parts 15 and No part of this record may be

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Statement of

Air Carrier Eligibility Requirements

Air Cargo Advance Screening Pilot Strategic Plan March 2012

MUTUAL RECOGNITION AIR CARGO SECURITY CANADA - US. Presentation to Border Commercial Consultative Committee February 12, 2014

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Minimum Security Criteria for Importers 03/25/2005

Air Cargo Newsletter

C-TPAT Partner Application for Importers Instructions

2012 ACC/TSA Security Capabilities Day

C-TPAT Security Standards. Importers

SAFETY Act. The Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002

ORIGINATING OFFICE: FO:TCF DISTRIBUTION: S-01 CBP DIRECTIVE NO A DATE: AUGUST 7, 2003 SUPERSEDES: ,1/7/88 REVIEW DATE: AUGUST 2006

C-TPAT Security Guidelines for Air Freight Consolidators, Ocean Transportation Intermediaries and Non-Vessel Operating Common Carriers (NVOCC)

Air Cargo Security Requirements Re: TSA Comments of BAX Global Inc.

Air Cargo Security: How to Keep Americans Secure without Harming the Economy

Rail Carrier Minimum-Security Criteria

Security Procedure - Participation / Certification in Foreign Customs Administrations Supply Chain Security Programs

Air Cargo Supply Chain Security- Airlines perspective on changing security requirements and secure freight

C-TPAT Minimum Security Criteria

TSA Innovation Task Force (ITF)

Importers: C-TPAT Minimum Security Requirements

Time & Temperature Logistics for Healthcare Products

Airport Security in Canada

C-TPAT Minimum Security Requirements Importers

Secure and Transparent Cargo Supply Chain: Enabling Chain-of-Custody with Economical and Privacy Respecting Biometrics, and Blockchain Technology

International Supply Chain Security. Sean Moon Office of Policy Development Cargo, Maritime & Trade

emanifest Making the border smarter and more secure

Colony Brands, Inc. Supply Chain Security Profile Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism Service Provider Questionnaire

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2018/117

PILLARS OF THE SECURE SUPPLY CHAIN. b) the secure movement and transfer of consignments from one entity to another; and

ICC Guidelines for Cross-Border Traders in Goods

OT:RR:RD:BS H CMS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION

United States House of Representatives. Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security

Xerox Supplier Security Requirements

Changes to Air Cargo Security Known Consignor scheme

Air Cargo & Air Supply Chain Security : Perspective From Integrators

The European Air Freight Security Regulations. Latest Updates on Fine Art Transportation

Foreign Manufacturer Eligibility Requirements

C-TPAT Security Criteria. Sea Carriers

A Message for Brokers Letter And Security Guidelines for Brokers

Page 2 Cargo Control and Release Capabilities Entry Summary Processing Capabilities Future ACE Features Entry Summary, Accounts and Revenue

Proactive Approaches. To Minimize. Supply Chain Security. Breaches in the Rail, Air, Ocean and Land Environment

Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism

IMPORTING & EXPORTING NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN OCEAN PRICING AND CUSTOMS SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY By: Andrew M. Danas, Esq. Grove, Jaskiewicz and Cobert, LLP

G LO S S A RY O F T E R M S

Terminal Flight Data Manager (TFDM) Environmental Impact Assessment

Supply Chain Security: Boeing's C-TPAT Program (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) & Commercial Invoices

Minimum-Security Criteria for C-TPAT Foreign Manufacturers

Introduction to Homeland Security

Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) International Supply Chain Security Risk Assessment Frequently Asked Questions

Maritime and inland waterways co-operation in the OSCE area: Increasing security and protecting the environment. Part 2 / Prague, May 2008

---Submitted Electronically---

ICAO WCO JOINT WORKSHOP AIR CARGO SECURITY AND FACILITATION

Supply Chain Security Management Systems The ISO Link

FDA FSMA Timeline. July 29, 2009 House version passed. Nov. 30, 2010 Senate version passed. Dec. 19, 2010 Senate revised version passed

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES Talking Points on Requiring 100% Container Scanning at Overseas Ports Updated: August 23, 2010

Lowe s Corporate Cargo Security Guidelines for Manufacturing and Warehouse Facilities

Advancing GDP Compliance Standards In Airline Transportation: Raising the QA Bar for Biopharma. Chris Fore Compliance Manager

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

C-TPAT Questionnaire. Type of Partner

AIR CARGO SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY

Cargo Security Track. Kindly Sponsored by:

SOLAS VGM FAQs Frequently asked questions about the new verified gross mass requirement from the Safety of Life at Sea convention

TRANSPORTATION & LOGISITICS COUNCIL ORLANDO CONFERENCE MARCH 24, Express Delivery and Logistics Association

New Resolution Consignment Security Declaration (CSD) and electronic Consignment Security Declaration (e-csd)

What are the documents commonly used in letter of credit transactions?

ANNEX 5 DRAFT MSC CIRCULAR DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST IN IDENTIFYING PROVIDERS OF CTU-RELATED SERVICES

AAPA. Terminal and Container Cargo Security. Mark Tierney Senior Director Security and Compliance Maersk Inc

Customs Concerns for the Motor Carrier and Transportation Intermediary

Federal Transportation Officer Training Program: Basic (Level 1)

A CASA Cabin Safety Inspector perspective for the Asia Pacific Cabin Safety Working Group Sue Rice School of Aviation UNSW 03 July 2012

Checked Baggage Technology Update. Rick Phillips Division Director (Acting), Checked Baggage Technologies Division

Trade Transformation. CBP Initiatives for 21 st Century Trade. September 2012

Securing the Air Cargo Supply Chain, Expediting the Flow of Commerce: a Collaborative Approach

SEC AIRPORT RESCUE AND FIREFIGHTING.

Maritime Security in Logistics From Japanese Shippers point of View

Perishable Transports and Airline Networks. Martin Schlingensiepen, Vice President Product Management, Lufthansa Cargo

Cargo and Mail ( )

Tenneco is a participant in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT). In the US,

Importer Security Filing ISF Program. Coppersmith Global Logistics Web based option to meet filing requirements

Products & Services Offered

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FILING OF ELECTRONIC EXPORT INFORMATION VIA THE AUTOMATED EXPORT SYSTEM

ICMI International Cyanide Management Code Transportation Summary Certification Audit Report. Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

Annex 6 Dangerous Goods Amendments

Supply Chain Security IGTLC

Foreign Factory Profile

Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements

Operator Dangerous Goods Inspections

REPORT 2014/056 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

Customs -Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) Vendor Participation Overview

SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY

Robert Pryor TSA/ACC Security Capabilities Workshop July 20, 2017

Mr Lok Hwee Chong Chair, Customs Facilitation Working Committee CAPEC WCO T& I Forum, KL, Malaysia

Please complete the questionnaire and fax it to

P12 Export Documents

Advance Commercial Information. Canadian International Freight Forwarders Association (CIFFA) June 14 th, 15 th & 16 th, 2006

Transcription:

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Achieving 100% Cargo Screening on Passenger Aircraft October 2008 Non-SSI Presentation

Agenda NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Opening Remarks 100% Screening Legislation Approach to 100% Screening Narrow Body Amendment Certified Cargo Screening Program Freight Forwarder (IAC) Screening Policy Details Looking Ahead Q&A 2

100% Screening Legislation NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Background President Bush approved Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 on August 3, 2007. The legislation mandates 100% screening by August 2010 and requires TSA to: Establish a system to screen 100% of cargo transported on passenger aircraft. Provide a level of security commensurate to that of passenger baggage. Meet inspection benchmarks. Congressionally Mandated Cargo Screening Benchmarks 9/11 Act 50% 100% August 2007 February 2009 August 2010 3

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 100% Screening Industry Impacts Impacts All cargo must be screened at the piece level by TSA-approved methods prior to being loaded on a passenger aircraft. Screening capacity at a single point in the supply chain is not sufficient enough to accomplish this requirement. Significant carrier delays, cargo backlogs, and transit time increases are expected. ~12 million pounds moves on PAX daily. Cargo must be broken down to piece level and screened by piece. August 2010 100% Screening Required by Congress 4

Piece Level Cargo NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Piece level cargo is the individual item within a shipment. The number of pieces is determined by the number of pieces identified by the shipper-level documentation. By February 3, 2009, all cargo must be broken down and 50% of the individual pieces must be screened prior to being loaded on a passenger aircraft. By August 3, 2010, cargo must be 100% screened at the piece level. 5

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 100% Screening Technology Tools Physical search with verification of manifest or other packing document AT X-ray* Explosives Trace Detection (ETD)* Explosives Detection System (EDS)* Decompression chamber TSA operated canines TSA Approved Screening Methods Any other detection equipment accepted in the future by TSA *All technologies must be on the current TSA Screening Technology List which will be made available to screening participants. 6

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Future Air Cargo Supply Chain Distributing screening technology and responsibility across the supply chain. Risk Assessment Freight Forwarder **Screening United States Air Cargo Distribution by Weight* Known Shipper **Screening 100% Screened All-Cargo Aircraft 88% Passenger Aircraft 12% CCSF: Freight Forwarder Air Carrier **Screening CCSF: Shipper / 3PL / Manufacturer (Known Shipper) Notes: **Screening must occur prior to consolidation. Screening methods: electronic, manual, and TSA canine. Ensure chain of custody Unscreened cargo Freight Forwarder 7

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TSA s Approach to 100% Screening TSA is pursuing the following initiatives to aid industry in achieving the 100% screening requirements and milestones: Narrow Body Screening Amendment Phased Rollout of the Certified Cargo Screening Program (CCSP) Shippers in 9 cities Freight Forwarders (IACs) in 18 cities IAC Screening Technology Pilot (STP) participants Non-Pilot applicants 8

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 100% Narrow Body Amendment TSA issued an amendment to the air carrier screening programs requiring 100% screening of cargo transported on all narrow bodied passenger aircraft: Released on August 1, 2008. Effective on October 1, 2008. Requirement applies to originating cargo tendered on narrow body passenger aircraft. i.e., B-737, B-757, A-320 (and smaller) Shrink-wrapped and banded exemptions are removed under the amendment. # of Flights 4% 96% Narrow Body Wide Body 96% of passenger flights are narrow body. More than 80% of the passengers and 25% of cargo are carried on these flights. 9

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Certified Cargo Screening Program

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Certified Cargo Screening Program Overview TSA developed the philosophy behind the CCSP by working closely with U.S. and international agencies and associations to incorporate key aspects of commensurate security programs: Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) The UK s Known Consignor Program CCSP was developed to: Allow screening of cargo early in the air cargo supply chain by a trusted, vetted, and audited facility. Establish the integrity of a shipment through enhanced physical and personnel security standards at Certified Cargo Screening Facilities (CCSFs). Maintain the integrity of a shipment throughout the supply chain by utilizing stringent chain of custody methods. Participation in CCSP is voluntary, but once in, CCSFs must: Adhere to increased TSA-directed security standards. Employ chain of custody. Permit onsite validations. Be subject to TSI-C inspections. 11

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Who can become a Certified Cargo Screening Facility? The CCSP is a facility based program. Facilities screening under the CCSP will be known as Certified Cargo Screening Facilities (CCSFs). Facilities currently applying to become CCSFs: Shipping Facilities Manufacturing Facilities Third Party Logistics Providers Warehouses/ Distribution Centers Contract Manufacturers Independent Cargo Screening Facilities Freight Forwarding Facilities Any entity with the desire to screen cargo must have a facility that can be secured. CCSFs must be no more than one node back from a currently regulated entity (freight forwarder/air carrier). Facilities that are not currently regulated by TSA will become regulated under the program. 12

What is a regulated entity? NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY A regulated entity is an entity that TSA has imposed mandatory requirements on through an order, regulation, or other means to impose binding and enforceable requirements. Regulations are first published in the Federal Register and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Currently Regulated Entities Indirect Air Carriers (IACs) Air Carriers (ACs) Airports Certified Cargo Screening Facilities will need to be regulated: To count CCSF cargo as screened. To enable compliance to be enforced. Newly Regulated Entities: CCSFs Shippers, Manufacturers, Warehouses, Third Party Logistic Companies 13

CCSP Phased Approach NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Phased deployment allowed program deployment and development to occur in parallel. Phase One deployment began January 1, 2008. More: Phase One Facility Progress Determine airport & shipper facilities Initiate simple scenarios Evaluate & Refine Program Introduce Complexity Evaluate & Refine Program Expand Program Full Rollout Phase One Deployment 9 airport markets selected 10 to 15 shipper sites per airport 9 TSA experienced field staff deployed Gradually introduce cargo complexities Former Outreach Schedule Initial Discovery: September 2007- Facilities identified in SFO, ORD, and PHL Formal Outreach: March - April 2008- Forums held in LAX, DFW, JFK, and EWR Utilize 3PVs to conduct facility assessments Open to all cities in the US Air carries may count cargo screened by a CCSF towards the 50 and 100 percent mandate Formal Outreach Continued: April - May 2008 - Formal outreach forums held in SEA, MIA, and ATL 14

CCSP Phase One Progress NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TSA has worked collaboratively with participants throughout the supply chain to learn best practices and refine overall CCSP standards for full rollout. September 07 Conduct Outreach to Identify Participants January 08 Initial Site Visits & Meetings September 08 TSA Issues Final Order Exploratory/Implementation Period Finalize Order Facility Audits CCSP Screening Issue Draft Order & AP to Participants Refine Facility Standards & Application Mock Cargo Moving Facility Audits Conducted TSA Issues Certification Compliance Begins Facilities in the exploratory phase are working with TSA to provide feedback on their ability to uphold facility standards, mock screen cargo, employ chain of custody, and tender/receive cargo as screened. Feedback on all aspects of the program should be provided to TSA. 15

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TSA-Approved Validation Firms TSA-Approved Validation Firms are necessary due to the limited resources TSA has to validate facilities. These firms will act as third party validators (3PVs) to perform assessments of CCSF-applicants. Validators will provide TSA an assessment report along with a recommendation of adheres to or does not adhere to standards. TSA-Approved Validation Firms TSA will issue final certifications to qualified facilities. Facility assessment fees will be contractual between the CCSF-applicant and the 3PV. 16

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Freight Forwarder Screening IAC Screening Technology Pilot (STP) CCSFs IAC Screening Technology Pilot (STP) CCSFs IAC CCSFs

Screening Location Data NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Over 65% of all passenger air cargo originates from 18 airports/major gateways: 100.0% Percentage of All Passeng ger Aircraft Cargo 75.0% 65.9% 50.0% 43.1% 25.0% 0.0% JFK LAX ORD ATL MIA Top 6 Airports SFO IAD HNL EWR DFW IAH BOS SEA PHL Next 12 Airports DTW DEN SJU MCO 100% 93.9% 66.6% 61.3% 33.3% 0.0% Percentage of All Pass senger Aircraft Wide Body Cargo (Tons) Indicates city where shipper facilities are targeted during Phase One Deployment in parallel with freight forwarding facilities. 18

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY IAC Screening Technology Pilot Overview As part of the Certified Cargo Screening Program, TSA is conducting an IAC Screening Technology Pilot (STP). TSA s objectives for the STP are: To assist industry in achieving the screening requirements of the Act by creating screening capacity at the IACs To measure the effectiveness of select screening technologies on various commodity classes To evaluate chain-of-custody procedures for screened cargo as it moves from the IAC to the air carrier. IACs participating in the STP must: Have a facility located in one of the 18 major gateways Have a minimum annual volume of 200 consolidations (ULDs) tendered to passenger aircraft Sign an Other Transactional Agreement (OTA) to receive funding from TSA Provide detailed reporting on cargo volumes screened and screening technology data Additional Information 19

IAC STP Timeline NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Late Summer 2008 Fall 2008 Winter 2009 Review Screening Proposals Receive Alternate Procedure (AP) Complete CCSP Certification and Sign OTA Order Screening Equipment Screening Equipment Installed Screening & Reporting Begins Current Participants: Have drafted their screening proposals and submitted them to TSA for review Are reviewing the Technology List issued by TSA in Spring 2008 to determine which technologies best their security needs Will sign an Other Transactional Agreement (OTA) in order to receive funding for the purchase of screening technology Future Participants: TSA is preparing a second Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) that will be open to non-iacs or coalition screening groups that: Have minimum volume of 200 annual consolidations (ULDs per location) tendered to passenger aircraft Are not current STP participants Are in the same 18 gateway cities 20

Differences between IAC STP and Non-STP Applicants During Phase One, other IACs may apply to become CCSFs if they are operating in the 18 major gateway cities. Non-STP CCSF IACs: Will not receive TSA funding Have no minimum volume requirements Must report screening volumes, but not screening technology data Must be certified under the IACSSP Amendment, but no OTA is required 21

CCSP Phase One Locations SEA BOS SFO DEN ORD DTW PHL IAD JFK EWR LAX DFW ATL Key IAC Screening Locations HNL IAH MCO MIA Shipper Screening Locations Application Numbers for IACs SJU 22

IAC CCSF Applicants and IAC STP Applicants SEA 7 Non-Pilot 3 Pilot SFO SEA 97 IAC CCSF Applicants 64 IAC STP Applicants 7 Non-Pilot 9 Pilot 2 Non-Pilot 1 Pilot BOS 2 Non-Pilot 3 Pilot 5 Non-Pilot 21 Non-Pilot 9 Pilot 6 Pilot ORD DTW BOS JFK/EWR LAX 19 Non-Pilot 9 Pilot SFO DTW WEST ORD DEN CENTRAL EAST LAX ATL DFW IAD PHL EWR JFK PHL 2 Non-Pilot IAD 1 Pilot 2 Non-Pilot 1 Pilot 1 Non-Pilot 2 Non-Pilot 6 Non-Pilot 1 Pilot 4 Pilot HNL DEN HNL DFW IAH IAH 2 Non-Pilot 1 Pilot ATL 6 Non-Pilot 8 Pilot MCO MIA SJU MCO SJU 1 Non-Pilot 1 Pilot 1 Non-Pilot MIA 8 Non-Pilot 6 Pilot

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program and Policy Details

Facility Requirements NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY All facilities must adhere to the following requirements prior to validation: Facility Security Identify Designated Screening Area (DSA) and implement required access controls, etc. Employee Training All employees and authorized representatives must be trained as outlined in the Order/AP Personnel Security Submit Security Threat Assessments (STAs) for required direct employees and authorized representatives Screening Follow screening measures that meet TSA s standards Chain of Custody 25

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Controlling Access to the CCSF Overview Maintaining access controls at facilities is a key requirement of the CCSP. Both physical and personnel security (i.e. STA, ID media) measures must be in place. The CCSF must identify a designated screening area (DSA) and ensure that unauthorized access is prevented at all access points. 26

Designated Screening Area The CCSF must identify at least one designated screening area (DSA) within its facility where cargo is screened, and after screening, is stored. A CCSF must only screen or store screened cargo inside the DSA. The DSA may be one or more designated areas within the CCSF, or it may be the entire facility. During non-operational periods the CCSF must ensure that the DSA is locked or monitored (constant in-person surveillance). Prior to removing any screened cargo from the DSA, the CCSF must initiate chain of custody measures. NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Overview 27

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Security Threat Assessments (STAs) STA requirements apply to all CCSFs. Overview A facility cannot be validated until the appropriate employees have successfully completed STAs. All employees and authorized representatives who perform one of the following must complete an STA: Conducts air cargo screening, supervises screening, or has unescorted access to screened cargo or to the designated screening area Acts as a Facility Security Coordinator, Principal Security Coordinator or designated alternate Locks, seals, or monitors any conveyance of screened cargo Has access to tamper evident technology TSA accepts the following in lieu of STAs: CDL with HAZMAT endorsement Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Free and Secure Trade (FAST) card 28

Training NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY All facilities will be required to train anyone who screens, handles screened cargo, or has unescorted access to the DSA. Training materials and costs are the responsibility of the CCSF. Overview TSA is planning to develop a standard training curriculum for all CCSF participants in the future. 29

Screening NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Overview All cargo must be screened on the piece level. If the CCSF screens a shipment, the CCSF must screen 100% of the pieces in that shipment. Approved Screening Methods Physical search with verification of manifest or other packing document AT X-ray* Explosives Trace Detection (ETD)* Explosives Detection System (EDS)* Decompression chamber determined by TSA to be effective for the intended flight time and altitude Any other detection equipment accepted by TSA. *All technologies must be on the current TSA Screening Technology List. Screener Requirements All persons conducting screening must be: U.S citizens or Permanent Resident Card holders Able to follow notification procedures Able to read, write, and understand English well enough to carry out instructions regarding screening duties, or must be under the constant in-person observation of someone who has this ability 30

Chain of Custody Overview NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The CCSF must initiate the Chain of Custody Process immediately following screening, before the screened cargo leaves the DSA The CCSF must adhere to chain of custody requirements until the screened cargo is accepted by an IAC, Air Carrier, or another CCSF Chain of Custody Process Documentation Requirements Methods Acceptance Documentation Technology Procedures Acceptance CCSF must indicate that a shipment was screened on shipping documentation (e.g. bill of lading, air waybill) and tender a CCSP screening certification with it. Tamper-evident tapes and locks Tamper-evident numbered seals Other technologies approved by TSA OR Escorts (constant in-person escort) Other TSAapproved procedures The accepting entity must verify that: The documentation is complete. CoC methods have been followed. Examples 31

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Tamper Evident Technology Examples Application of Tamper Evident Technology is one part of the chain of custody process Tamper Evident Technology shows evidence of tampering if broken, manipulated or opened Tamper Evident Tape When tape is removed, the adhesive remains on the box, indicating the package has been tampered with. Tamper Resistant Tape Tape is high quality 1.8 mil clear polypropylene printed in red with TAMPER RESISTANT every 1/8 inch. All tape must clearly be able to demonstrate evidence of tampering Custom Printed Fiber Tape Corporate logos could be used to show tamper evidence, as approved by TSA ABC Quality logo ABC Quality logo ABC Quality uality logo ABC Quality logo ABC Quality logo Tamper-evident Numbered Seal A broken seal is evidence of potential tampering. Note: TSA may issue standards in the future 32

Tendering Screened Cargo NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1. Cargo must be physically identified as screened before tender. TSA will issue size and sticker specifications, but will not work with a vendor to supply screening identification methods. CCSF Freight Cargo must be visibly identified as screened. Tamper evident methods must be applied at the piece level method may vary for different package types (e.g. box v. crate). Once all cargo pieces have been screened, they can be shrink-wrapped, etc. 2. CCSFs must tender a certification statement that the cargo has been screened and is from a TSA-approved CCSF. HAWB Certificate Screened CCSF # Compliance verification 33

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Joining the Program

CCSP Benefits NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The benefits of participating in the Certified Cargo Screening Program may outweigh costs carried by the facility in meeting program guidelines. CCSF Benefits CCSP: Decreased log jams (carrier delays) and expedited supply chain flow. Ability to build bulk configurations. Ability to continue to ship certain cargo types without potential invasive screening later on in the chain. Ability to maintain in-house packaging integrity. Phase One: Provide feedback on the structure and content of the program. Facility assessments will be conducted by TSA at no cost to the participating facility. There are no fees associated with Security Threat Assessments (STAs) for shippers. CCSF Costs Implement facility and chain of custody standards*. Facility assessments. *Facility Standards include physical access controls, personnel, procedural, physical, information technology security, and equipment as needed. 35

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY CCSP Participation during Phase One Steps to join the CCSP 1. Contact CCSP@dhs.gov for a CCSF application. 2. Submit application and all applicable Sensitive Security Information Handling Requirements. 3. Undergo CCSP assessment: During Phase One, TSA performs assessments at no charge. After Phase One, TSA-Approved Validation Firms will perform this function. 4. TSA reviews facility assessment and makes final certification decision. 5. Shippers Sign Order and IACs comply with Alternate Procedure. 6. Receive Facility Certification from TSA HQ. 36

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Looking Ahead

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY CCSP Policy Development Standards During Phase One: Non-regulated entities will operate under a regulatory Order issued by TSA. Freight forwarders and air carriers will operate under an Alternate Procedure (AP) to their standard security programs (SSPs). Upon publication of the Interim Final Rule (IFR), all IAC, Shipper, and Independent CCSFs will operate under the Certified Cargo Screening Standard Security Program (CCSSP). 38

Program Milestones NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY September December January May June July August September October 2007 2008 Completed Initial Outreach to Shippers and IACs Drafted Initial AP/Order Conducted Outreach in nine major cities - Shippers - IACs - Air Carriers Encouraged Feedback on Program Elements Modified AP/Order Issued IAC STP Technology List Comments on Narrow Body Amendment Received Received DHS SAFETY ACT Approval for program Incorporated Phase One Changes to Program Documents Published Narrow Body Amendment; Effective 10/1/08 Released SSP Program Revisions to meet 9/11 Requirements Effective February 1, 2009 for industry comment Released IAC and Carrier Alternate Procedures Finalizing Shipper and 3PV Orders Released BAA for STP 39

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Screening Liability and the SAFETY Act The Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act) provides important legal liability protections for providers of qualified antiterrorism products (eg. technologies) and services (eg. processes) The Department of Homeland Security Office of SAFETY Act Implementation (OSAI) has approved pre-qualification coverage of the CCSP as a service (process) In addition, manufacturers and validated facilities can apply and obtain SAFETY Act coverage for a screening product (technology) SAFETY Act protections extend to users of qualified anti-terrorism technologies For more information visit www.safetyact.gov 40

TSA s Strategy to Secure International Inbound Cargo International inbound cargo will be effected by the 9/11 Act. February 2009, 50% of inbound cargo will be required to be screened. The April 2007 GAO Report on inbound air cargo presented several recommendations to improve security, including: A risk-based strategy that is articulated in a Strategic Plan Collaboration with CBP and other foreign stakeholders Assessing vulnerabilities and cargo exemptions Compliance performance measurements TSA responded by articulating a risk-based approach that collaborates with CBP to target high-risk cargo through their Automated Targeting System (ATS) TSA s overall strategy also includes: Developing policy specific to international inbound cargo Harmonizing with foreign governments, such as convening with the Quad Members (U.S., Canada, EU, Australia) to have open dialogue on the vulnerabilities of the international aviation system TSA is currently evaluating the impact of removing exemptions for inbound cargo. WARNING: This record contains Sensitive Security Information that is controlled under 49 C.F.R. Parts 15 AND 1520. No part of this record may be disclosed to persons without a Need to Know, as defined in 49 C.F.R. parts 15 AND 1520, except with the writtenpermission of the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration or the Secretary of Transportation. Unauthorized release may result in civil penalties or other action. For U.S. Government Agencies, public disclosure governed by 5 U.S.C. 552 and 49 C.F.R. parts 15 and 1520. 41

100% Screening Looking Ahead October November December January February 10/1 100% Narrow Body Screening Required Narrow Body Amendment February 1, 2009 10/1 10/15 IACs 50% Screening Required Screening Proposal IACs Order Site Visits Technology CCSP Outreach Begin nationwide rollout 10/5 11/1 IAC/AC Tendering Screened Cargo Workshops Begin Continued Outreach and Validations of Facilities Bring 3PVs online 10/1 11/15 12/15 1/1 3PV Order Released 3PV Companies selected 3PVs Conduct Training 3PVs Begin Validations 42

In Summary NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The 50% and 100% milestones are fast approaching, congressionally mandated, and therefore not flexible. TSA will enable secure, audited, and certified facilities to screen cargo further upstream in the air cargo supply chain. Collaboration has been essential and effective through Phase One Deployment for CCSP CCSP Phase One presents an opportunity to get into the program early. Tamper evident technologies and chain of custody are critical elements of CCSP. CCSP is a voluntary program and may not appropriate for some entities. Your participation will help ensure security in the air cargo supply chain. 43

NOTIONAL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Q & A For more information write to CCSP@dhs.gov