Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

Similar documents
Release Notes MERLIN DASH

How Loads Are Distributed

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrDR Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tutorial PS15 - Two Span PS Adjacent Box With Straight Strands

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

Prestress Superstructure Tutorial

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

Elevation. Typical Section

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

PENNDOT e-notification

AASHTOWare BrD/BrR Prestress Tutorial 1 Simple Span Prestressed I Beam Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial 2016 BrDR User Requested Enhancements

VERIFICATION MANUAL. for. MERLIN-DASH (LFD and LRFD Steel)

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

Proposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings

AASHTOWare BrDR D FEM Analysis Tutorial. Curved Steel Multi-Span 3D Example

Appendix D.1. Redundancy Analysis of Composite Spread Box Girder Superstructures under Vertical Loads

Appendix D.2. Redundancy Analysis of Prestressed Box Girder Superstructures under Vertical Loads

Flexure Design Sequence

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example

Dead Loads. Load Resistance ηγ i Q i ΦR n. Design Criteria. EGCE 406 Bridge Design III. Loads on Bridge Summary of Concepts.

Chapter 13 Bridge Load Rating

MDOT Camelback Bridge Example

CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler

Superstructure Guidelines

LRFD Bridge Design Manual. Bridge Office MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MANUAL

For Two Steel Bridges

2010 STATE BRIDGE ENGINEERS QUESTIONNAIRE

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Tool Getting Started

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Parapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure.

Potential for high-performance steel in a long span truss bridge

Chapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.03 Loads and Load Factors. Introduction. Load Modifying Factors

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

STRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL

Design of Short Span Steel Bridges

Structural Analysis Models and Their Advancing Technologies

ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

STRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL

CURVED STEEL I GIRDER BRIDGES RAMP GH OVER THE ERIE CANAL INTRODUCTION BEHAVIOR OF CURVED BRIDGES DIFFERENCES FROM STRAIGHT BRIDGES

Cross Frame Design for Curved and Skewed Bridges

The use of 0.5 and 0.6 in. (13 and 15 mm) diameter

Case Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed.

Modjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY COMPOSITE BUILDING

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN EXAMPLES NOTATION 9.0 INTRODUCTION

V Slab Bridge Design Software, Version 4.0 Superstructure Design Check

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOAD RATING REPORT GENERAL SULLIVAN BRIDGE - DOVER 200/023 OVER THE LITTLE BAY

Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems

AREMA 2008 Annual Conference. LOW PROFILE RAILROAD BRIDGE Steve K. Jacobsen, PE NNW, Inc. Rochester, Minnesota

7.3 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND DESIGN METHODS Standard Specifications LRFD Specifications

Analysis of a Severely Skewed Prestressed Concrete Beam Bridge

CE I-10 Bridge Across Lake Pontchartrain Twin Spans. Group 5 Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler. Introduction to Bridge Design

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

Release Note DESIGN OF CIVIL STRUCTURES. Release Date : SEP. 1, 2015 Product Ver. : Civil 2016 (v1.1)

Effect of a Time Dependent Concrete Modulus of Elasticity on Prestress Losses in Bridge Girders

Copyright 2015 American Institute of Steel Construction. All rights reserved.

MIDAS Civil 2016 v2.1 Release Webinar. PSC Composite Design Check / Load rating

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4)

Highway Bridge Superstructure

Live-load Distribution Factors: A Parametric Study

Figure 1 shows a typical composite beam for reference. The beam shown is a rolled beam section from the built-in section database.

LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR HORIZONTALLY CURVED CONCRETE BOX GIRDER BRIDGES

Moving Load Analysis for Bridge Structures

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1

Transactions on the Built Environment vol 13, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN

Composite Beam Design Manual. AISC-ASD89 Specification

SHEAR STRENGTH OF DETERIORATED STEEL GIRDERS IN MULTI-GIRDER BRIDGES

LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes

Table of Contents. July

CONTINUOUS SLAB BRIDGE COMPARITIVE STUDY

COUNTRY MUSIC HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

ADAPT Floor Pro 2009/2010 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT PT or ADAPT RC

VOL I: Bridge Design & Load Rating

Nonlinear Redundancy Analysis of Truss Bridges

Project Objective. Strengthening Bridges by Developing Composite Action in Existing Non-Composite Bridge Girders

T4 Floor Truss Example. AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial

Load capacity rating of an existing curved steel box girder bridge through field test

Effect of Edge-Stiffening and Diaphragms on the Reliability of Bridge Girders

Stress-Laminated / Steel T-Beam Bridge System

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

Length (ft) At 2. Penthouse At 3 (roof) : DL = 30 psf

Bridge Superstructure Design

BENCHMARK PROBLEMS TASK 7 REPORT. Prepared for NCHRP Transportation Research Board of The National Academies. Project No. NCHRP COPY NO.

Whose responsibility is it? Design Responsibility. Steel Joist Institute. Standard Assumptions. Common Pitfalls in Steel Joist Specification

Composite Beam Design Manual AISC

IMPACT OF AASHTO LRFD SPECIFICATIONS ON THE DESIGN OF PRECAST, PRETENSIONED U-BEAM BRIDGES

CIVE 7351 Behavior of Steel Structures Fall Semester 2018 Project #5 PLATE GIRDERS

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8. Truss Tutorial. T5 - Truss Enhancements

Numerical Modeling of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction in Bridges with HP Driven Piles

Transcription:

LRFD Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2) July 2017 1. Removed double count of skew effect for reaction. 2. Mor justified fatigue stress categories E & F report. 3. Fixed prestressed beam reportg maximum moments for LRFD non AASHTO truck + lane loadg. 4. Fixed splice design for rolled beam splice plate with shim plate. 5. Modified algorithm for the put of distribution factors to allow multi le DF defition. 6. Modified default values for N1 and N2 the put to be consistent with user s manual and Help menu. 7. Fixed Service II Inventory and Operatg Ratg values. LFD 1. Fixed the LFD fatigue report. 2. Fixed reportg overload moments and shears. Input (see attachment item 1) LRFD July 2016 1. Data Type 03012: Add Exterior Left & Exterior Right option for different left & right overhang and curb distances. 2. Data Type 06012: Allow AASHTO loadg designation blank. Other live loadg, such as sidewalk or non AASHTO loadg will still be used. 3. Data Type 11022: Add pop up wdow for quick calculation and auto fillg of lateral bendg stress (for demonstration see attachment item 2) 4. Data Type 12012: Add put for filler plate area 1. Remove multiple presence factors from LRFD live load deflection results Tables 1.2.6.2 and 1.2.34.1. 2. The C b value reported correctly for cases of prismatic section with splice. It has been fixed. 3. The shear distribution factors with skew angle did not apply correctly to only Table 1.2.22.17 shear capacity values. It has been corrected. 4. The shear skew correction factors for both terior and exterior girders with a special vehicle were applied twice Tables 1.2.6.3, 1.2.7.1 and 1.2.7.2. It has been fixed. 5. The Z value of G formula (AASHTO Eq. 4.6.2.2.4 1) has been changed back from 1.2 to 1.0 when the lever rule used for a sgle lane live load distribution factor.

6. The maximum moments and shears did not show consistent values for the option Included maximum design load case Data Type 06032 on some tables. It has been corrected to make it consistent. 7. Follow algorithms are used the program and have been verified for different combations: a. For Service II without the option Included maximum design load case, the maximum values (moment or shear) are selected from HL 93, D, M, and G vehicles. b. For Service II with the option, the maximum values are picked up from HL 93, D, M + Lane load, and G + Lane Load. c. For Strength II without the option, the maximum values are chosen from HL 93, M, and HL 93 & G side by side. d. For Strength II with the option, the maximum value is selectg from HL 93, M + Lane Load, or HL 93 & G + Lane load side by side. e. For Strength I or Service I with or without the option, the maximum values are always chosen from HL 93. 8. Fix Q & I values the negative moment area to exclude concrete and clude reforcement, if any, Tables 1.2.6.3B & C LFD/WSD 1. The LL moments appear correct Table 1.2.5.3 for a non-composite hged girder. It has been fixed.

ATTACHMENT 1. Addendum to Merl-DASH User s Manual and Onle Help Menu Data Type 03012 (Replace the figure with the followg two figures) DATA TYPE INPUT ITEM/DESCRIPTION UNITS MODE / 03012 Position: NONE INT. 1 = Interior (Default) 2 = Exterior (Left) 3 = Exterior (Right) REF Right Overhang Width: the distance from the centerle of a right exterior beam or girder to the outside edge of the bridge. ft (m) Right Edge of the Slab to Curb: the distance from the right outside edge of the bridge to the curb le. ft (m) Data Type 06012 (Insert at the end of NOTE: for H, HS and LL Loadg Designation)

If both fields are blank, no AASHTO loadg is applied. Other live loadg, such as sidewalk or non AASHTO loadg will still be used. Data Type 11022 For the Pop up wdow DATA TYPE 11022 (Pop up Wdows) INPUT ITEM/DESCRIPTION UNITS MODE / Top FL Width: the width of top flange Top FL Thick: the thickness of top flange Top FL Section Mod: the section modulus of top flange calculated by the program automatically. Bottom FL Width: the width of bottom flange Bottom FL Thick: the thickness of bottom flange Bottom FL Section Mod: the section modulus of bottom flange calculated by the program automatically. 3 3 REF Web Height: The clear distance between top flange and bottom flange Bracket Width: the distance from the center of the web to the end of the bracket

Unbraced Length: lateral unbraced length between load range from and to Load Range From/Load Range To: put the same value for the concentrated load Load Type: 2 Fishg Mache 3 Overhang Construction Loads 4 Overhang Weight NONE INT. Overhang Weight: put required only for load type 4 Construction Loads: put required only for load type 3 Fishg Mache: put required only for load type 2 kips/ft kips/ft kips kip ft Moment: calculated by the program automatically. ksi Top Lateral Stress/Bottom Lateral Stress: calculated by the program automatically. Save Stresses: click on this button will save the top and bottom lateral stresses to the correspondg put fields. Close: click on this button will close the pop up wdow. Data Type 12012 DAAT TYPE INPUT ITEM/DESCRIPTION UNITS MODE / 12012 Filler Plate area: Total filler plate area of top and bottom flanges. In 2 REF

2. Demonstration of Lateral Bendg Stress Calculation based on FHWA-NHI-08-048 The concrete deck overhang loads are usually supported by cantilever bracket spaced at 3 to 4 feet along the exterior girder durg the construction of steel girder bridges. The bracket loads clude either uniformed loads (overhang weight, overhang deck forms, screed rail, railg, and walkway) or concentrated load (fishg mache). A typical deck overhang bracket is shown the followg figure. The torsional moments apply on the exterior girder due to the eccentricity of the overhang weight and other loads which generate the lateral bendg stresses for the top and bottom flanges. The example to calculate the lateral bendg stresses due to overhang weight and other load can be found pages 2-137 to 2-146 of FHWA-NHI- 08-048. This example is a three span contuous I-girder steel bridge and the cross section is shown the figure below.

The DASH program has a pop up utility to help calculatg the lateral bendg stresses of the top and bottom flanges with the unbraced length Data Type 11022 put screen. In Data Type 11022, the user can put the entire row manually if all the put stresses and distances are known. Alternatively, the stress calculation utility may be used if the user needs to simplify the stress calculation processes. By pressg the calculate stresses button on this screen, the user can pop up the wdow utility to calculate the needed stresses. In this popup utility, the user should put the width and thickness for the top and bottom flanges. The required section modulus for the stresses will be calculated by the utility automatically. The user also needs to put web height, bracket width, unbraced length, load range from, and load range to. For concentrated load, the load range from and to should put the same value. There are three types of loads (fishg mache, overhang construction load, and overhang weight) can be selected for this utility. The correspondg put for these three types of loads is right underneath the put for the load type. The rest of the formation will be calculated by the utility automatically. Please check all the put formation before click the save stresses button which will save the calculated stresses to all the fields of this row. The user can put all the needed rows before close this utility. For uniformed load F, the moment (M) is equal to F*L b 2 /12 and stress of top and bottom flanges can be calculated by usg moment divided by section modulus (S). The L b is the lateral bracg distance. For concentrated load P, the moment is equal to P*L b /8 and the stress of top and bottom flanges should be M/S.

The calculation of the lateral bendg stresses of top and bottom flanges for this example along the entire bridge is listed the followg Spread sheet. Lateral Bendg Stress Input Calculation Dead load Deck Overhang Weight 255.00 lbs/ft Construction Loads except Fishg Mache Overhang Deck Forms 40.00 lbs/ft Screed Rail 85.00 lbs/ft Construction Loads Railg 25.00 lbs/ft Walkway 125.00 lbs/ft 275.00 lbs/ft Fishg Mache 3000.00 lbs 0' 42' & 413' 455' 42' 100' & 355' 413' 100' 125' & 330' 355' 125' 155' & 300' 330' 155' 182' & 273' 300' 182' 273' Top Flange Width () 16.00 16.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 16.00 Thickness () 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 2.0000 1.0000 0.8750 Bottom Flange Width () 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 Thickness () 0.8750 1.3750 1.0000 2.0000 1.0000 1.3750 L b (ft) 24.00 24.00 20.00 20.00 27.00 27.00 Dead Load P (lbs/ft) 255.00 255.00 255.00 255.00 255.00 255.00 F l (lbs/ft) 155.04 155.04 155.04 155.04 155.04 155.04 M l (kip ft) 7.44 7.44 5.17 5.17 9.42 9.42 Stress Top Flange (ksi) 2.093 2.093 1.148 0.574 2.093 3.027 Stress Bot Flange (ksi) 1.890 1.203 0.930 0.465 1.695 1.927 Construction Loads P (lbs/ft) 275.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 Fl (lbs/ft) 167.20 167.20 167.20 167.20 167.20 167.20 Ml (kip ft) 8.03 8.03 5.57 5.57 10.16 10.16 Stress Top Flange (ksi) 2.257 2.257 1.239 0.619 2.257 3.265 Stress Bot Flange (ksi) 2.038 1.297 1.003 0.502 1.828 2.078 Fishg Mache P (lbs) @56' 3000.00 Fl (lbs) 1824.03 Ml (kip ft) 5.47 Stress Top Flange (ksi) 1.539 Stress Bot Flange (ksi) 0.884