CCAC Animal Data Report

Similar documents
Categories of invasiveness A precautionary approach

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE CCAC ANIMAL USE DATA FORM

University Council on Animal Care

Annual statistical report for animals used in Ireland under scientific animal protection legislation

Annual statistical report for animals used in Ireland under scientific animal protection legislation

1. STUDY TEAM - ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEE

Animals in Research and Teaching at McGill

Explanatory notes on the annual report on laboratory animal facility (Form CH)

A Scientist s Perspective How to Apply the Three Rs in Real Life. Eileen Denovan-Wright

Animal Experiment Statistics

Date: Monday, June 01, :55:40 PM 1. STUDY TEAM - ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEE * 1.1.

Animal Experimentation

This training module covers the following animals housed in vivaria: rodents rabbits birds amphibians reptiles non-human primates other mammals

Laws and regulations related to animal experiments in Japan

Animal Use Protocol Form (AUPF) Instructions

Consideration of Alternatives to the Use of Live Animals For Research and Teaching

LESSON 5.3 WORKBOOK. Should animals be used in scientific research?

ANIMAL ETHICS APPLICATION GUIDANCE FOR FASTER ANIMAL ETHICS APPROVAL

Exploring the Scientific and Laboratory Animals Industry

An Overview of Laboratory Animal Transportation

Policy on the use of Animals in Research

A. Purpose and applicability B. Legal principles and formal aspects of the reports... 2

Animal Use Return Guidelines

Expanding US Laboratory Animal Laws to Other Species

Canadian Council on Animal Care. Five-Year Plan

University of California, Berkeley Animal Care and Use Program

Vertebrate Animal Research

2. Starting Date: Completion Date: 3. Principal Investigator: Name: Mailing Address: Position: Department/Organization: Region/Institution:

Section A Background

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL USER TRAINING PROGRAM Online Courses and Hands-On Workshops Outline

Animal Research at UTHSCH

Clinical studies. BARBORA VLKOVÁ INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOMEDICINE

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL TO USE ANIMALS IN A RESEARCH OR TEACHING PROJECT

The Code Governing principles

APPLICATION FOR EDUCATIONAL USE OF WILD ANIMALS IN OR FROM NATURAL SETTINGS

List the names of all students authorized to conduct procedures involving animals under this proposal

The revised European Directive 2010/63/EU: a guide for UK institutions

Protocol Form Update 2016

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE ANIMAL ETHICS APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH AND TEACHING

I) Background information. 1. Age

RAPAMYCIN. activity 2C. ACTIVITY 2C: Organisms in Research - Card Sort Activity. Organisms in Research (Card Sort) TEACHER SECTION 1.

PACUC Newsletter. PACUC Personnel Changes. Vol. 18, No. 1, March ~ ~ ~ ~ Brown Bag Seminars for Animal Users

Policy on Housing and Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Animals

Who We Are/What We Do:

NIH Adopts 8 th Edition of the Guide: A Discussion

Continuing Review of Vertebrate Animal Use Protocol for Research, Testing, or Teaching

Support of refinement by the NC3Rs: Experiences and recommendations. Mark Prescott, PhD BfR-Forum, 13 December 2011

Section A Background

ANIMAL ETHICS APPLICATIONS

Frequently Asked Questions for CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of fish in research, teaching and testing

Working with Animals. Walter Jeske, PhD Professor, Thoracic & CV Surgery, Pathology, Physiology Vice-chair, IACUC 02/27/14

ANIMAL UTILIZATION PROJECT PROPOSAL

CITI Certificates

The institutional animal care committee: Keystone of international harmonization

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

INTRODUCTION CANADIAN PORK EXCELLENCE

Preclinical study. Assist.Prof. Witthawat Wiriyarat Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University

National Unit Specification: general information. UNIT Animal Care: Neo Natal Care (SCQF level 5) CODE F6T7 11 SUMMARY OUTCOMES RECOMMENDED ENTRY

Content Map For Career & Technology

Content Map For Technology Career

NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY ANIMAL STUDY PROPOSAL

AEAI 38 EERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON DC HU04AN RESOUR--ETC Ff6 6/5 ALTERNATIVES TO USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH. CU) MAR Ga 6 1 AHART

International Harmonization of Guidelines on the Ethical Review of Proposals to Use Animals in Science

Guidelines to the project licence application form

Animal Science II PRECISION EXAMS

International Agreements Governing Animal Use

GO TO NEXT PAGE TO FILL OUT APPLICATION FORM

GO TO NEXT PAGE TO FILL OUT APPLICATION FORM

Need of strengthening the well defined in- vivo Systems for pre-clinical evaluation of vaccines in India

Transgenic / Chimeric NHP Neuroscience Opportunities and Challenges

Future Improvements and Implementation of Animal Care Practices Within the Animal Testing Regulatory Environment

INTERNATIONAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INVOLVING ANIMALS (1985) INTRODUCTION

The development of a national guideline to promote the wellbeing of animals used for scientific purposes

General Tips For IACUC Protocol Submissions. Diana Li IACUC Senior Analyst University of California, Irvine

Sunday, August 21, 2011


PACUC Newsletter. NEW! Changes to Serology and Parasitology Charges for Incoming Mice and Rats

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

Research Ethics and Biorisk Management Policy (MPF1341)

ANIMAL SCIENCE II (123)

Animal Use Protocol. Name: Signature: Date:

Animal Care Matters. An IACUC and ARF Newsletter SPRING The University s Institutional. Change in Investigator All requests for change in the

The ethics of research involving animals

Guide to DSI s. Telemetry Devices. Continuous, real-time In Vivo Physiologic Monitoring Solutions for Animal Models

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL ETHICS COMMITTEE SUMMARY SHEET (TO BE FILLED BY INVESTIGATOR)

Appendix A CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN LUIS OBISPO INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY TACOMA, WA PHONE: (253) FAX: (253)

Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network Portfolio Eligibility Criteria and Guidelines

to life, liberty, and security of a person (Browning). If humans are capable of getting

Provost and Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs

PETITION FOR RULEMAKING

ANIMAL SCIENCE II (123)

The purpose of these Procedures is to set forth the specific actions that will be taken to implement the Animal Care Policy.

Chapters 15,16,17. Mandy Leber RVT, RLATG Training and Outreach Coordinator

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION FOR HEALTH RESEARCH. Prof. M. C. Sharma Director Indian Veterinary Research Institute IZATNAGAR (UP)

This training module covers the following animals housed in vivaria: rodents rabbits birds amphibians reptiles non-human primates other mammals

CALL FOR LETTERS OF INTENT BEEF CATTLE INDUSTRY SCIENCE CLUSTER III ( )

Rural Species Identification and Habitats - Scotland

Regulation on Animal Experimentation

Transcription:

2016 CCAC Animal Data Report Canadian Council on Animal Care Conseil canadien de protection des animaux

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) extends our sincere thanks to all those responsible for submitting annual animal data for 2016. Without the work and dedication of animal care committee members, investigators, and teachers, this report would not be possible. We also acknowledge our funders, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The CCAC could not continue to deliver on our current mandate without their support. Canadian Council on Animal Care, 2017 190 O Connor St., Suite 800 Ottawa, ON K2P 2R3 www.ccac.ca

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1 Summary of Animal Data for 2016...2 Number and Type of Animals in Science...3 Purpose of Animal Use...5 Category of Invasiveness...6 Changes to the CCAC Animal Data Report and Data Management...8 Glossary...9 i

ii

INTRODUCTION As part of our accountability to the Canadian public and our commitment to transparency, the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) publishes an annual report on the number of animals included in Canadian science for the purposes of research, teaching, and testing. CCAC certification is a condition for Canadian institutions to receive research funding from Canada s major national funding agencies (Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council) and other research funding bodies. Other CCAC-certified institutions may not receive this funding but choose to participate in the CCAC program for public accountability and to ensure they meet national standards of animal ethics and care. CCAC-certified institutions are required to report annually on metrics related to animal research, teaching, and testing conducted at their institutions, and provide specific information regarding the types of animal-based science conducted, and the invasiveness of the procedures undertaken. Among other things, these data help the CCAC, CCAC-certified institutions, and their animal care committees make informed decisions on the allocation of additional care to animals in procedures where there is the potential for pain and distress. For more detailed data, a comprehensive breakdown of the 2016 animal data is available on the CCAC website in sortable and downloadable Excel files. Data Limitations In reviewing the information in this report, it is important to note the following: The CCAC only collects animal data from CCAC-certified institutions. As such, some animals studied in Canadian science will not be accounted for in the CCAC s annual animal data report. Furthermore, these numbers reflect all animals that were involved in research, teaching, and testing conducted by people working at CCAC-certified institutions, regardless of where the research activities take place. Therefore, these numbers include animals that live outside of Canada, and are also comprised of animals that live in laboratories, on farms, or in the wild. There are many external factors that may influence the numbers of animals from year to year, and therefore caution should be used when comparing numbers of animals over time or when tracking progress towards the Three Rs. Factors that may affect animal numbers include: changes in government funding priorities; regulatory changes; development and implementation of new technologies; changes in scientific interests; numbers and types of institutions certified by the CCAC; etc. Finally, the information gathered for this report relies on the process described in Instructions for Completion of the CCAC Animal Use Data Form (AUDF). Although extensive validation of the data sets was carried out, it is difficult to determine accurately the extent of potential errors, which may have occurred at any stage in the process. 1

SUMMARY OF ANIMAL DATA FOR 2016 In 2016, there were 4,308,921 animals used in research, teaching, and testing reported to the CCAC (see Figure 1 and Table 1). The three animal types most often used in 2016 were fish (37.2%), mice (34.8%), and cattle (12.2%) (see Figure 1). The majority of animals (57.3%) were used in studies of a fundamental nature/basic research or Purpose of Animal Use (PAU) 1, representing 2,556,438 animals (see Table 2). The benefit of assigning a Category of Invasiveness (CI) to protocols prospectively is that it allows animal care committees to signal to the scientific staff, veterinarians, and animal care staff the type of care a cohort of animals should receive. In the highest Category of Invasiveness, CI E, 97,455 (2.2%) animals were counted (see Table 3). The three types of animals most frequently used in CI E were fish, mice, and guinea pigs. 2

NUMBER AND TYPE OF ANIMALS IN SCIENCE Figure 1: Percentage of Animals Used in Science at CCAC-Certified Institutions by Animal Type in 2016 40 37.2% 35 34.8% PERCENT 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Mice Fish 12.2% Birds Rats Cattle 5.5% 4.7% Other animals Pigs Amphibians 2.2% Rabbits Reptiles Nonhuman primates Cats Other rodents Dogs Guinea pigs 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% ANIMAL TYPE Note: Source: The percentages in this graph total 99.9% due to rounding. The data for this figure were derived from Excel File 1. These represent the number of animals used for research, teaching, and testing in 2016. 3

Table 1: Number of Animals Used in Science at CCAC-Certified Institutions by Animal Type in 2016 ANIMAL TYPE NUMBER OF ANIMALS Fish 1,602,547 Mice 1,500,156 Cattle 526,249 Rats 236,952 Birds 204,374 Amphibians 95,820 Pigs 35,063 Other animals 27,142 Guinea pigs 22,423 Dogs 15,093 Other rodents 13,866 Cats 8,526 Nonhuman primates 7,556 Reptiles 7,257 Rabbits 5,897 Total 4,308,921 Source: The data for this table were derived from Excel File 1. These represent the number of animals used for research, teaching, and testing in 2016. 4

PURPOSE OF ANIMAL USE Purpose of Animal Use (PAU) refers to the reason why an animal was included in a scientific study. Each animal used in an animal-based protocol at a CCAC-certified institution is prospectively assigned to a single PAU. The CCAC collects and publishes data for PAU 1 through 5. For more information on PAUs, refer to the Instructions for Completion of the CCAC Animal Use Data Form (AUDF). The purposes of animal use are: PAU 1 PAU 2 PAU 3 PAU 4 PAU 5 Studies of a fundamental nature in science relating to essential structures or functions Studies for medical purposes, including veterinary medicine, that relate to human or animal diseases or disorders Studies for regulatory testing of products for the protection of humans, animals, or the environment Studies for the development of products or appliances for human or veterinary medicine Education and training of individuals in post-secondary institutions or facilities Table 2: Number of Animals Used in Science at CCAC-Certified Institutions by Purpose of Animal Use (PAU) in 2016 PAU NUMBER OF ANIMALS 1 2,556,438 2 572,557 3 273,764 4 627,768 5 431,742 Total 4,462,269 Source: The data for this table were derived from Excel File 2. Animals can be used in more than one protocol provided that they have not been previously subjected to pain and distress. Some animals have been counted more than once in this dataset. These data cannot be compared accurately to animal data reports prior to 2012. 5

CATEGORY OF INVASIVENESS Category of Invasiveness (CI) describes the level of pain and/or distress that an animal could potentially be exposed to while in a scientific study. In Canada, CIs are assigned prospectively to animal-based protocols for scientific purposes. A precautionary approach is taken by animal care committees in assigning the highest CI indicative of the potential level of pain and distress to be experienced by any of the animals within the protocol. The benefit of assigning CIs prospectively is that it allows animal care committees to signal to the scientific staff, veterinarians, and animal care staff the type of care a cohort of animals should receive. Staff place more emphasis on animals used in protocols with higher CIs to ensure that these animals receive appropriate care to mitigate (as much as possible) any pain or distress they might experience. Examples of enhanced care could include analgesia, more bedding, increased warmth, or softer food. In 2016, only 2.2% of animals were assigned to the most invasive category of protocols, CI E. Of these, more than half of the animals (63.9%) were used for testing purposes, which are required by the federal government to ensure that new drugs, vaccines, and products are safe and efficacious for use in humans and animals. Since 1997, protocols involving the generation of genetically modified animals must be assigned to CI D as a precaution against any unforeseen, negative consequences of the modification. Animal care committees are asked to re-classify the protocol (generally to a lower CI), once the welfare status of the new animal lines has been confirmed; however, this precautionary period can be long term and will often exceed the reporting period. As a consequence, the rise in CI D protocols in recent years is most likely a direct reflection of the increasing number of genetically modified animals involved in scientific studies. The categories of invasiveness are: CI A CI B CI C CI D CI E Experiments on most invertebrates or on live isolates Experiments which cause little or no discomfort or stress Experiments which cause minor stress or pain of short duration Experiments which cause moderate to severe distress or discomfort Procedures which cause severe pain near, at, or above the pain tolerance threshold of unanesthetized conscious animals The CCAC collects and publishes data for CI B through E. For more information about CIs, refer to the CCAC policy statement on: categories of invasiveness in animal experiments and, for protocols using wildlife, the CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of wildlife. 6

Table 3: Number of Animals in Science at CCAC-Certified Institutions by Category of Invasiveness (CI) in 2016 CI NUMBER OF ANIMALS B 1,719,208 C 1,376,031 D 1,269,575 E 97,455 Total 4,462,269 Source: The data for this table were derived from Excel File 2. Animals can be used in more than one protocol provided that they have not been previously subjected to pain and distress. Some animals have been counted more than once in this dataset. These data cannot be compared accurately to animal data reports prior to 2012. 7

CHANGES TO THE CCAC ANIMAL DATA REPORT AND DATA MANAGEMENT CCAC-certified institutions are required to report annually on metrics related to animal research, teaching, and testing conducted at their institutions, including the number of animals in the studies, the purpose of those studies, and the categories of invasiveness. Annual animal data reports have been published by the CCAC since 1975. The process for data collection and publication has undergone several major reviews, most notably in 1996 and, more recently, in 2011, when the process and tools used to collect the data were refined. Notable changes to the process include: improvements to data management, collection and validation; revisions to the publication format; and publication of sortable, Excel spreadsheet files of the data. CCAC-certified institutions are now asked to submit animal data using an Excel spreadsheet template and to follow the revised Instructions for Completion of the CCAC Animal Use Data Form (AUDF). Due to these differences in data management and reporting, however, it is not possible to make accurate comparisons with PAU and CI data prior to 2012. 8

GLOSSARY Animals: All vertebrates and cephalopods used for research, teaching or testing, or for display purposes or eventual use in research, teaching or testing that are subjects of a written animal use protocol. Not all animals are included in the annual animal data reports (for example, breeding colony animals). Refer to the Instructions for Completion of the CCAC Animal Use Data Form (AUDF) for the full list of animals that are included. Animal types: The labels used to describe broad categories of animals. It includes common animal names such as cats, dogs, guinea pigs, pigs, mice, and rats as well as broader labels such as amphibians, birds, fish, reptiles, other rodents, and other animals. Animal use: The use of an animal in research, teaching or testing, or for display purposes or eventual use in research, teaching or testing, as described in a written animal protocol and approved by the institutional animal care committee. CCAC-certified institution: A Canadian institution conducting animal-based science that earns a CCAC Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice. The CCAC only collects animal data from institutions that participate in this program. Category of invasiveness (CI): The level of pain and/or distress that an animal could potentially be exposed to while undergoing a scientific study. Each animal used in science at a CCAC-certified institution will be assigned prospectively to one CI (there are five levels). For more information about CIs, refer to the CCAC policy statement on: categories of invasiveness in animal experiments and, for protocols studying wildlife, the CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of wildlife. Number of animals used: The number of animals used for research, teaching and testing during a calendar year (reported by species). Other animals: An animal type category used to describe animal species that do not fit under any other animal type heading (for example, ferrets). Typically, these are species that are used in science less frequently. Other rodents: An animal type category used to describe rodent animal species that are not mice, rats or guinea pigs (for example, hamsters). Protocol: A written description of a scientific study using animals. At CCAC-certified institutions protocols must be reviewed and approved by the institutional animal care committee before animal use can occur. Purpose of animal use (PAU): A category used to describe the reason why an animal was used in science. Each animal used in scientific studies at CCAC-certified institutions is assigned prospectively to a single PAU (there are six PAUs). For more information on PAUs, refer to the Instructions for Completion of the CCAC Animal Use Data Form (AUDF). 9