SESSION 4: STRATEGIC COSTING FOR BROADBAND SERVICES

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION

Regulating oligopolies in telecoms: the new European Commission guidelines

EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/710/EU)

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of (Text with EEA relevance)

PURC Roundtable Tallahassee, Florida 29 September Real Competition and Real Regulation Lessons from Europe

BEREC Report on Oligopoly analysis and regulation. Questions to stakeholders

Price regulation of unbundled broadband services

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXPLANATORY NOTE. Accompanying document to the

Part I PRELIMINARY. Part II MARKET DEFINITION ASSESSING SIGNIFICANT MARKET POWER. Part IV IMPOSITION OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The proposed Code appears (inappropriately) to support incumbents investment models at the expense of competition

How to regulate next-generation access (if at all)?

Flowchart 1: Historical Example

Session 3: Competition Policy and European Regulation

BEREC views on Article 74 of the draft Code Co-investment and very high-capacity (VHC) networks

Table of Contents. About the Author. xvii. List of Tables N. List of Figures. List of Abbreviations. Preface... xxix.

BoR (17) 175. BEREC Strategy

BEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2013/1498

BEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/ :

Principles of implementation and best practice regarding the application of Retail Minus pricing methodologies IRG (05) 39

THE FUTURE OF REGULATORS

ETNO Comments on the BEREC report on the impact of premium content on ECS markets and the effect of devices on the open use of the Internet

GSM ASSOCIATION RESPONSE TO BEREC QUESTIONS TO STAKEHOLDERS BEREC REPORT ON OLIGOPOLY ANALYSIS AND REGULATION JANUARY 2015

Regional Seminar on Costs and Tariffs for SG3RG-AO Members. Session 2: Cost methodologies in Asia and Oceania. Beijing, 26 th March 2010 Jim Holmes

NOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for

6 Wholesale geographic market definition

Case AT Slovak Telekom Saint Martin's Conference, Brno, 11 November 2015

The Future of EU Access and Interconnection Regulation

Undue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly

Case SI/2009/0957: Wholesale (physical) network infrastructure access (including shared or fully unbundled access) at a fixed location

Embedding Regulation in an Industrial Policy Framework for Emerging Countries

Retail Bundling in Hull. KCOM Bundling of SMP and non-smp Products

The FTTH Council is concerned by a number of specific aspects of this consultation which it would like to set out at the outset.

Main conclusions of the broadband and superfast broadband market analyses

Oligopolies in electronic communications: more concentration, more regulation?

Response to the consultation on the Draft review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Michaelides,

BEREC Strategy

ETNO comments on the ERG draft common position on geographic aspects of market analysis

ITU-D Workshop for the Arab region on Interconnection and Next Generation Networks: Addressing the regulatory challenges Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain

Public Hearing. MTC Presentation as per Public Notice Nº62, 20 March Miguel Geraldes 11 May 2012

BEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case ES/2013/1466

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

BEREC views on the European Parliament first reading legislative resolution on the European Commission s proposal for a Connected Continent Regulation

TeliaSonera s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the revision of the Recommendation on relevant markets.

Effective market analysis carried out by national regulatory authorities under EU directives

CONSULTATION ON THE COMMISSION'S BROADBAND GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF EU STATE AID RULES TO PUBLIC FUNDING OF BROADBAND NETWORKS

CERRE CENTRE ON REGULATION IN EUROPE

Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential and nonresidential

Contents. Bitstream access: comments on the draft determination PUBLIC. Report for TelstraClear, 19 May Network Strategies Report Number 25013

Key principles of market regulation in telecommunications

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

Proposals for WBA charge control. Consultation document and draft notification of decisions on charge control in WBA Market 1

experience Principal, International Ofcom April 2008

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

S T R A T E G I C O B J E C T I V E S & W O R K P R O G R A M M E

SUMMARY NOTIFICATION FORM: RETAIL INTERNET ACCESS MARKET AND RELEVANT

VDSL within the analysis of the market 12

DCMS Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review Summary of findings

New approach to regulation of fixed and mobile networks

Mobile call termination market review

REPUBLIC OF IRAQ COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA COMMISSION

Mobile Money: Should NRAs be concerned? Abdul Musoke, Uganda Communications Commission

BEREC Guidance on the regulatory accounting approach to the economic replicability test

Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location

ABERTIS TELECOM COMMENTS ON THE REVISION OF THE COMMUNITY GUIDELINES FOR THE APPLICATION OF STATE AID RULES IN RELATION TO RAPID DEPLOYMENT OF

Regulatory challenges posed by next generation access networks Public discussion document

Subnational market approach

EUROPE NEEDS CHANGES

Margin squeeze: defining a reasonably efficient operator*

Vodafone s response to

Pricing & Price Regulation

BT Response to ERG NGN Consultation

Case AT/2009/0970: Wholesale broadband access in Austria. Opening of Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1

Thus, let s focus on 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10%

International Mobile Roaming (IMR) Setting the Scene

The new European Electronic Communications Code (EECC)

Fixed Narrowband Retail Services Market Review

COOPVOCE Response to BoR (14) 172. Questions to stakeholders related to the. BEREC Report on Oligopoly - Analysis and Regulation

CLEAN ENERGY FOR ALL EUROPEANS CLEAN ENERGY FOR ALL EUROPEANS

New Markets and Regulatory Forbearance

Investigation into Dispute between Cable & Wireless Jersey Limited and Jersey Telecom Limited regarding ADSL broadband takeover charges

Wholesale Broadband Access Markets

Contribution of Orange to BEREC Report on Oligopoly analysis and regulation

Market power and market definition in electronic communications

SWITCH OR TRANSFORM THE FUTURE OF THE RETAIL ENERGY MARKET

REPORT ON THE ITU REGIONAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL FORUM OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS/ICT FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC (REFF ASP)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC

Subject: COOPVOCE Response to BoR (5) 74 - BEREC Report on Oligopoly Analysis and Regulation

Strategic and Retail Market Review. 3 June 2008

Establishment of an Internal Postal Market Joint responsibility of all stakeholders

European Commission proposal for a Directive on payment accounts: comparability of fees, switching and access to payment accounts with basic features

Review of the 2002 SMP Guidelines. Anthony Whelan WIK workshop Revising the SMP Guidelines 27 March 2018

BoR (11) 20 final. BEREC monitoring report on Broadband Common Positions

The Abuse of a Dominant Market Position. Mihail Busu, PhD Romanian Competition Council

Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location

The three criteria test, the essential facilities doctrine and the theory of monopolistic bottlenecks

Draft Call Termination Regulations Explanatory Note. 05 September 2014

Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago

BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2017/1960

Transcription:

SESSION 4: STRATEGIC COSTING FOR BROADBAND SERVICES ITU-D REGIONAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL FORUM OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS/ICTS FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC Yangon, The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, 1 September 2014 Jim Holmes ITU Expert, Australia 1

Agenda Presentation aims National Broadband Plans Price Regulation State of Cost Modelling Regulatory risks and limitations Entry level service regulation Conclusions 2

Presentation aims The aim of this presentation is to examine the ways in which regulators might usefully approach the pricing of broadband services to achieve investment, coverage, service adoption and affordability goals while at the same time not distorting (or even retarding) broadband market development The sources contributing to the views in this presentation are: Regulating Broadband Prices a paper which I co-authored and which is part of the Broadband Series published on the ITU website in April 2012 (www.itu.int/broadband) Consulting to regulators on price regulation Providing expert advice on establishing and implementing effective national broadband policies and plans 3

National Broadband Plans All countries are seeking to develop and implement national broadband plans. Invariably these plans are concerned not only with new infrastructure investment but also availability, penetration and affordability of services Most national broadband policies look to the private sector to drive essential investment in new broadband infrastructure, although this may be assisted by Government funding of fibre access (e.g. Australia) and of fibre backbone infrastructure (e.g. Tanzania and Lesotho) Government has an important role in lead applications - such as those relating to e-government suites and in Health and Education service delivery 4

Price Regulation Governments and regulators are seeking high levels of service adoption at the earliest time on a mass basis including in provincial higher cost / lower income areas There is almost an automatic tendency to consider some form of price control to increase affordability and therefore levels of service subscription But this course has many complexities, dangers and pitfalls many of which are not fully appreciated by enthusiastic regulators eager to regulate 5

Wholesale v Retail (1) A conceptualisation of broadband services and markets 6

Wholesale v Retail (2) The mass market for broadband in developing economies will be served by mobile operators as they role out 3G and later generation technologies Although oligopolistic, mobile markets are generally competitive and that keeps prices down. This does not apply to retail fixed broadband markets Wholesale services that are essential inputs for both fixed and mobile retail broadband services are either non-existent or not competitive. This is where regulation is warranted to ensure fair and reasonable access by downstream retailers. Where that involves price control it should reflect efficient costs Price control is only justified when the 3 criteria test is satisfied 7

Three Criteria Test Under the EU three-criteria test a particular market will be considered susceptible to ex ante regulation (of which price control is an example) if: 1) it has high and continuing barriers to entry; 2) is not tending towards a sustainable competitive market; and 3) ex post regulatory controls are unlikely to be sufficient to address concerns associated with market dominance. However, even if a particular market fulfils all three criteria, it does not automatically mean that ex ante regulation is necessary in that market. The regulator may still forbear to intervene and instead monitor the way the market develops, particularly if there are other constraints that might discourage exercise of market power. 8

State of Cost Modelling Cost modelling for mobile networks is well established. Mobile networks are all sufficiently alike for generic models to be adaptable for specific market use. But mobile is not the problem, unless we are talking about call termination rates In fixed broadband networks fixed and overhead costs represent a very high proportion of total costs. This means that unit costing outcomes are less reliable. Determining unit costs depends on price strategy and elasticities of demand. These assumptions are difficult for regulators to work with and to model in practice 9

Regulatory risks and limitations wholesale price setting (1) There are many risks and limitations for price regulation of wholesale broadband services (mostly manageable): Regulatory models poorly reflect risk (which is normally reflected in the risk-adjusted cost of capital) and new capital investment is vital Broadband markets are not mature, still developing so demand is relatively volatile Access pricing is based on capacity and QoS. But the access costs do not increase proportionately to increased capacity. Models may not help Some input costs are beyond the regulator s control such as the base costs of submarine cable capacity 10

Regulatory risks and limitations wholesale price setting (2) NRAs should estimate investment risk inter alia by taking into account the following factors of uncertainty: (i) uncertainty relating to retail and wholesale demand; (ii) uncertainty relating to the costs of deployment, civil engineering works and managerial execution; (iii) uncertainty relating to technological progress; (iv) uncertainty relating to market dynamics and the evolving competitive situation, such as the degree of infrastructure-based and/or cable competition; and (v) macro-economic uncertainty. These factors may change over time, in particular due to the progressive increase of retail and wholesale demand met. NRAs should therefore review the situation at regular intervals and adjust the risk premium over time... European Commission 20 September 2010 11

Regulatory risks and limitations retail broadband price setting There are even more risks and dangers for regulatory intervention in retail broadband service pricing, such as Retail price strategies retail access is not a single commodity service. The risk is that innovation and service differentiation may be undermined Access and applications bundling drives penetration and usage but is not part of the modelling Usage patterns after initial service adoption increased usage and demand for more reliable service with increased data rates. Cost models poorly reflect innovative commercial pricing strategies 12

Entry level service regulation Some countries are now considering whether retail price regulation for affordability and to promote greater take-up by marginal customers might not be better served by focusing on identified entry level broadband access services This might be justified notwithstanding a degree of competition in the market because oligopolistic price competition tends to focus on short term and promotional offers and on encouraging switching. Lower value marginal customers may be overlooked Note that entry level services are not designed by the regulator they are ideally based on the current menu of offerings within the sector 13

How entry level regulation works Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Select entry level offering at minimum threshold data rate or better Confirm appropriateness of current price through benchmarks, cost studies, legacy pricing, etc Establish price cap and service obligation cap might be tighter if current price is too high Step 4 Review the appropriate entry level offering and the cap regularly 14

How the market is expected to respond to entry level price controls Over time regulator allows revisions of entry level offer Service provider upsells Current entry level offer New customer wants a better service New broadband subscriptions Service Provider is free to: a. Design and price all other broadband services b. Compete with other entry level services in the market c. Up-sell entry level customers to higher value services Entry level service might have lower profit margin but is not expected to be a loss service 15

Conclusions 1. The premise of this presentation is that regulators should refrain from regulating retail prices in broadband markets, particularly while those markets are still developing, further investment is still required, and demand remains uncertain and especially is competition is effective. 2. Wherever possible, reliance should be placed on the price clearance mechanism of competition, with ex post intervention if anti-competitive behaviour occurs. 16

Conclusions - continued 3. If some form of ex ante price regulation is necessary based on the identification of a specific market failure, that regulation should focus on relevant wholesale markets ideally markets for access to passive infrastructure as far upstream in the supply chain as practicable. 4. Retail price regulation might usefully focus on entry level broadband offerings thereby encouraging service take-up by marginal customers and leaving service providers free to innovate in price/service packaging and other ways with higher value broadband offerings. 17

I Thank U www.itu.int/en/itu-d/regulatory-market/pages/default.aspx 18