Irrigation Criteria for Sweet Potato Production Using Drip Irrigation

Similar documents
INVESTIGATE SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS AND IRRIGATION CRITERIA FOR THE TREASURE VALLEY

HORTSCIENCE 50(7):

ONION VARIETY RESPONSE TO PLANT POPULATION AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Drip-Irrigated Onion More Responsive to Plant Population Than to Fertilizer Nitrogen

MANAGEMENT FACTORS ENHANCING THE FEASIBILITY OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION FOR POTATO

ONION RESPONSE TO LATE-SEASON WATER STRESS AT TWO PLANT POPULATIONS

PLANT POPULATION AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

Optimal practices for drip-irrigated onion differ based growers market opportunities.

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION AND PLANT POPULATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

PLANT POPULATION AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

IRRIGATION FREQUENCY, DRIP TAPE FLOW RATE, AND ONION PERFORMANCE

ONION RESPONSE TO LATE-SEASON WATER STRESS AND HIGH NITROGEN UNDER TWO PLANT POPULATIONS

ONION INTERNAL QUALITY IN RESPONSE TO ARTIFICIAL HEAT AND HEAT MITIGATION DURING BULB DEVELOPMENT

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND ADJUVANTS FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET

AUTOMATIC COLLECTION, RADIO TRANSMISSION, AND USE OF SOIL WATER DATA

Drip Irrigation Management Factors for 'Umatilla Russet' potato Production

IRRIGATION CRITERIA AND DRIP TAPE PLACEMENT FOR 'UMATILLA RUSSET' POTATO PRODUCTION

A ONE-YEAR STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OXAMYL (VYDATE L ) TO CONTROL THRIPS IN ONIONS WHEN INJECTED INTO A DRIP-IRRIGATION SYSTEM

EVALUATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND OUTLOOK USED PREEMERGENCE ON DIRECT-SEEDED DRY BULB ONIONS WITH ACTIVATED CHARCOAL

EVALUATION OF SUSTAIN ADJUVANT FOR IMPROVED HERBICIDE WEED EFFICACY IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

ONION INTERNAL QUALITY IN RESPONSE TO ARTIFICIAL HEAT AND HEAT MITIGATION DURING BULB DEVELOPMENT

MICRO-IRRIGATION ALTERNATIVES FOR HYBRID POPLAR PRODUCTION, 2000 TRIAL

PREVIOUS YEAR MID-SUMMER SOIL INCORPORATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND EPTAM TO CONTROL YELLOW NUTSEDGE IN ONION THE FOLLOWING YEAR

EVALUATION OF PYROXASULFONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT- SEEDED ONION

Clint Shock, Jan Trenkel, Daniel Burton, Monty Saunders, and Erik Feibert Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon.

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE CROP ROTATION SYSTEMS TO MANAGE YELLOW NUTSEDGE IN THE TREASURE VALLEY

EVALUATION OF DUAL MAGNUM AND OUTLOOK USED PRE-EMERGENCE ON DIRECT-SEEDED DRY BULB ONIONS WITH ACTIVATED CHARCOAL

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO. Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009.

IRRIGATION SCHEDULING IN LONG-TERM BURIED DRIP

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID POPLAR CLONES ON AN ALKALINE SOIL

CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS FOR ONIONS IN THE TREASURE VALLEY

COMPARISON OF CALENDAR DAYS AND GROWING DEGREE-DAYS FOR SCHEDULING HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS IN SUGAR BEET

NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION

MICRO-RATE HERBICIDE PROGRAMS FOR WEED CONTROL IN SUGAR BEETS

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WATER STRESS AND SEED YIELD OF TWO DRIP-IRRIGATED ALFALFA VARIETIES

WEED CONTROL IN ONION WITH POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

NITROGEN VALUE OF POTATO AND ONION SLUDGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WATER STRESS AND SEED YIELD OF TWO DRIP-IRRIGATED ALFALFA VARIETIES

Weed Control with Outlook Combinations Combinations of Outlook with herbicides currently registered for use in potatoes were evaluated for

DEVELOPMENT OF HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

DIRECT SEEDING STRATEGIES FOR NURSERY ESTABLISHMENT OF CORN LILY (Veratrum californicum)

EVALUATION OF THE AM400 SOIL MOISTURE DATA LOGGER TO AID IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

DEVELOPMENT OF NEW HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO PRODUCTION

SUGAR BEET VARIETY TESTING RESULTS. Eric Eldredge, Clint Shock, and Monty Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR

CONTROLLING E. COLI WITH IN-FIELD APPLICATION OF COPPER FUNGICIDES

EFFECT OF FUSILADE 2000 ON STORAGE AND SEED PERFORMANCE OF RUSSET BURBANK AND NORGOLD POTATOES. Steven R. James '

NITRATE AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN ONION PRODUCTION UNDER DRIP AND FURROW IRRIGATION

Introduction. Materials and Methods

Since 1992, the Oregon State University

Successful Onion Irrigation Scheduling

HORTSCIENCE 50(9):

2012 ONION VARIETY TRIALS

SUGAR BEET VARIETY 2003 TESTING RESULTS. Clint Shock, Eric Eldredge, and Monty Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR

DRIP-IRRIGATED RED AND RUSSET POTATO VARIETIES HARVESTED EARLY OR LATE

Snapbean and Sweet Corn Response to N Rate and Furrow-Placed Growplex Humate George J. Hochmuth 1

One of the most important tools we have

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FORB SEED PRODUCTION

WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH HERBICIDES APPLIED IN FIELD CORN

APPLICATION TIMING AND TANK MIXES WITH ROUNDUP ORIGINALMAX OVER-THE-TOP OF ROUNDUP READY SUGAR BEETS

WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH OPTION HERBICIDE APPLIED IN FIELD CORN

SECOND YEAR RESULTS OF THE DRIP IRRIGATED ALFALFA FORAGE VARIETY TRIAL

Response of Tomato to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK FOR ON FARM SOIL MOISTURE DATA ACQUISITION AND IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

AN EVALUATION OF MECHANICALLY APPLIED STRAW MULCH ON FURROW IRRIGATED ONIONS

Response of Pepper to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

EVALUATION OF POTATO INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

INSECTICIDE APPLICATIONS TO SUGAR BEETS FOR CROWN BORER CONTROL

DIRECT SEEDING STRATEGIES FOR NURSERY ESTABLISHMENT OF CORN LILY (VERATRUM CALIFORNICUM)

MICRO-RATE HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS, DUAL II MAGNUM, AND BAS H FOR WEED CONTROL IN SUGAR BEETS

Effect of Linex Application Rate and Timing on Sweetpotato Katie Jennings NC State University

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

IMPROVING ONION PRODUCTIVITY AND N USE EFFICIENCY WITH A POLYMER COATED NITROGEN SOURCE

Leaching fraction effects on salt management and nitrate losses in commercial lettuce production

Non sustainable irrigation practices Water and plants

EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY

NITROGEN AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN ONION PRODUCTION UNDER DRIP AND FURROW IRRIGATION

Drip irrigation management for optimizing N fertilizer use, yield, and quality of lettuce.

EVALUATION OF POTATO INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

Response of Mulched Lettuce, Cauliflower, and Tomato to Megafol Biostimulant George J. Hochmuth 1

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK FOR ON FARM SOIL MOISTURE DATA ACQUISITION AND IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

January/February 2013

IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEED PRODUCTION OF FIVE LOMATIUM SPECIES IN A SEMI-ARID ENVIRONMENT

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT FOR HYBRID POPLAR PRODUCTION,

I ntroduction. Oat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin, 1995 R.L. Dovel and G. Chilcote'

Development of Sweet Potato Cultivars and Production Techniques to Suit Maritime Growing Conditions

HORTSCIENCE 39(7):

YELLOW NUTSEDGE NUTLET PRODUCTION IN RESPONSE TO NUTLET PLANTING DEPTH

On-Farm Evaluation of Polymer Coated Urea Rates and Blends on Potato Yield and Quality

SOIL TEST N FOR PREDICTING ONION N REQUIREMENTS - AN IDAHO PERSPECTIVE. Brad Brown, University of Idaho Parma Research and Extension Center

Potato Variety Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Kenneth A. Rykbost and Brian A. Charlton 1

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

Additional index words. Virtually impermeable film, Telone C-35, InLine, plasticulture, soil fumigation, methyl bromide alternatives.

Response of Snapbean, Carrot, and Sweet Corn to Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Solutions George J. Hochmuth 1

PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN

Response of Mulched Tomato to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Brookdale Fruit Farm Inc

Transcription:

Irrigation Criteria for Sweet Potato Production Using Drip Irrigation Joel Felix, Assistant Professor Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 595 Onion Ave., Ontario, OR 97914 Clinton Shock, Professor and Superintendent Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 595 Onion Ave., Ontario, OR 97914 Joey Ishida, Bio Science Research Technician Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 595 Onion Ave., Ontario, OR 97914 Erik Feibert, Senior Faculty Research Assistant Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 595 Onion Ave., Ontario, OR 97914 Abstract. An irrigation criterion has not been established for sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) production in the Pacific Northwest. Four sweet potato varieties were planted at Ontario, Oregon, on silt loam. Slips were established for 30 days at 25 kpa and then subjected to four soil water tension (SWT) irrigation criteria (40, 60, 80, and 100 kpa) using drip irrigation. Vine growth, soil cover, water application, and sweet potato yield and grade were evaluated. Marketable (44.1 tons/acre) and US number 1 yield were greatest with a SWT irrigation criterion of 40 kpa, using 358 mm of water and the SWT averaged 28 kpa. Keywords. Ipomoea batatas, soil water tension, yield, Introduction Sweet potato is a versatile crop cultivated mainly for tuber production. It is a longseason crop grown mainly in the southeastern United States and in California. Research suggests that the availability of irrigation water together with high temperatures during summer favors production of high-quality sweet potatoes in eastern Oregon. Recently, growers have indicated interest in growing sweet potato as a new crop in eastern Oregon. The valley has a number of crop produce processors who are willing to buy sweet potatoes grown locally as a strategy to cut the costs associated with sweet potato trucking from California and the southeastern United States. Purchasing locally produced sweet potatoes could significantly reduce the carbon footprint of sweet 1

potato processors in the Treasure Valley. Also, growers would be able to develop niche marketing for a crop that is loved by most consumers. Newly developed sweet potato varieties will produce mature tubers in 80 to 90 days, suggesting that plants transplanted in early June will produce mature tubers that could be harvested during September or early October, around the time of the first vegetation killing frost. Critical factors for successful sweet potato production include irrigation scheduling and the amount of water to be applied. Irrigation scheduling options rely on the measurement of soil water content or soil water tension. Precise irrigation scheduling by soil water tension criteria is a powerful method to optimize plant performance. By utilizing the ideal soil water tension and adjusting irrigation duration and amount, it is possible to simultaneously achieve high productivity and meet environmental stewardship goals for water use and reduced leaching (Shock and Wang 2011). Objectives The overarching goal of this study was to assess the possibility of producing sweet potatoes in eastern Oregon. The specific objectives were to evaluate varieties and develop the irrigation criterion suitable for sweet potato production in eastern Oregon. Materials and Methods The field was plowed and disked during fall 2010 and fumigated on February 16, 2011 using metam sodium at 30 gal/acre through sprinklers. The beds (36 inches wide) were formed 3 weeks after fumigation followed by fertilizer to supply 100 lb nitrogen/acre that was shanked into beds. The study followed a split-plot design with irrigation criteria forming the main plots and varieties as subplots with treatments arranged in a randomized complete block. The study had three replications and drip tape was used to deliver irrigation water. Each subplot was 3 beds (9 ft wide) by 30 ft long. Sweet potato slips were transplanted by hand on June 3 on 30 cm (12-inch) spacing within the row using the drip tape emitter spacing on top of the bed as markers. The drip tape used was Toro Aqua-traxx 8-mil emitting 8,327 mm/min/30.5 m (0.22 gal/min/100 ft). Slips were transplanted 10 to 15 cm (4 to 6 inch) deep using a hand trowel. Plants were immediately irrigated for 5 hours (0.35 inch) in order to provide soil/transplant contact. Plots were irrigated again on June 4 for 2 hours (0.14 inch). Plants were irrigated again on June 10, 21 and July 5 to provide 0.5 inch of water each. Subsequent irrigations were automatically determined by the datalogger controller, depending on targeted criterion of soil water tension. The irrigation criteria were 40, 60, 80, and 100 kpa of moisture tension and water was delivered through drip tape. Sweet potato plants in each plot were irrigated automatically and independently when the soil water tension dropped below the targeted irrigation criterion. The irrigation duration was predetermined based on the drip tape capacity to deliver 1.25 cm (0.5 inch) of water in 7 hours and 5 min per incident. 2

Soil water tension was measured in each main plot with four granular matrix sensors (GMS, Watermark Soil Moisture Sensors Model 200SS, Irrometer Co., Riverside, CA) installed at 20-cm (8-inch) depth in the center of Beauregard rows. Sensors had been calibrated to local soil water tension (Shock et al. 1998). The sensors were connected to a datalogger (CR10X, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT) through a multiplexer (AM 410 multiplexer, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT). The datalogger read the sensors and recorded the hourly soil water tension. The datalogger was programmed to check the sensor readings in each main plot every 12 hours and irrigate the appropriate main plot if the average soil water tension was below the targeted criterion. The irrigations were controlled by the datalogger using a controller (SDM CD16AC controller, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT) connected to solenoid valves in each main plot. The irrigation water was supplied by a well that maintained a continuous and constant water pressure of 241 kpa (35 psi). The pressure in the drip lines was maintained at 69 kpa (10 psi) by pressure regulators in each main plot. The automated irrigation system was started on July 8 and was turned off on September 29, 2011. Integrated Pest Management Preplant herbicides were not used because of the field proximity to sensitive crops. All plots were sprayed with glyphosate 0.86 kg ae/ha (Roundup at 22 fl oz/acre) on May 26, 2011 to control all emerged weeds prior to transplanting. Sethoxydim (Poast ) at 0.214 kg ai/acre (16 fl oz/acre) plus nonionic surfactant (0.25% v/v) was applied on June 27, 2011 to control grassy weeds. Plots were hand-weeded on June 27 and July 28, 2011 to remove all broadleaf weeds. Later weed cohorts were sparsely distributed and were periodically removed by hand. Sweet potato vines were flailed on October 4 and roots were dug using a 2-row digger set at 45-cm (18-inch) depth. Roots were picked by hand from the center row and later graded following California standards (May and Scheuerman 1998). In summary, the roots were graded based on California standards: U.S. No.1 were of uniform size, 4.4 to 9 cm (1.75 to 3.5 inches) in diameter and 7.5 to 23 cm (3 to 9 inches) long; U.S. No. 2 (mediums) included misshapen tubers and with a minimum diameter of 4 cm (1.5 inches); Jumbo weighed more than 567 g (20 oz) and was true to type. The data were subjected to analysis of variance using PROCGLM procedure in Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) and means were compared using Fisher s protected least significant difference procedure at P 0.05. Results and Discussion The average soil water tension increased with the increase in the targeted irrigation criterion (Table 1). The total amount of water applied from transplanting to harvest includes the water used during the plant establishment phase (June 3 to July 8) and daily rainfall. Total amount of water decreased with the increase in the targeted soil water tension. Sweet potato irrigated at the 40 kpa criterion received a seasonal total of 3

357.8 mm (14.1 inches) of water compared to 146.1 mm (5.8 inches) at 100 kpa. The water use efficiency (ton/acre marketable yield per inch of water applied) reflected the total amount of water used, which was directly related to the irrigation frequency needed to maintain the targeted irrigation criterion (Fig. 1). Percent vegetative ground cover at 49 days after transplanting (July 22) was not influenced by the different irrigation criteria (Table 2). Differences in average percent ground cover were related to varietal characteristics. Ground cover for Covington and Diane averaged 80 and 83 percent, respectively, compared to 94 percent for Beauregard and Evangeline. These results are supported by the average runner length for different varieties on July 22 (Table 2). Covington and Diane had shorter runners (51 and 39 cm; 20 and 15 inches) compared to Beauregard and Evangeline, which averaged 89 cm (35 inches). The number of sweet potato runners per hill at 117 days after transplanting (September 28) was similar among irrigation criteria (Table 3); however, there were differences in the number of runners per hill that were attributed to varieties. Covington and Beauregard averaged 8 and 9 runners, compared to 11 and 12 for Evangeline and Diane, respectively. Beauregard had the longest average runner length at 379 cm (149 inches) and Diane had the shortest at 165 cm (65 inches). Sweet potato yield varied among irrigation criteria and varieties (Table 4). The highest marketable yields were obtained when plants were irrigated at 40 kpa of moisture tension. There was a gradual decline in root yield with the increase in the targeted soil water tension to trigger irrigation. All varieties produced much lower yield at 80 and 100 kpa. Previous studies by May and Scheuerman (1998) indicated improved yield when sweet potatoes were irrigated at 25 kpa throughout the season or 25 kpa during plant development and 100 kpa during the root bulking stage. It is important to note that the irrigation criterion will be influenced by the soil type. Because the varieties responded similarly to irrigation at 80 and 100 kpa, the irrigation criteria could be changed to 25, 40, 60, and 80 kpa in future studies. Conclusion The results indicated that sweet potatoes could be grown successfully in eastern Oregon. Varietal differences in terms of growth habits and yield in response to available moisture were noted. Subsequent studies could help to determine the best variety and irrigation criterion and confirm the preliminary results. We believe the positional placement of irrigation water with drip irrigation may have reduced the weed pressure that would be expected with furrow or overhead irrigation. References Shock, C.C., J.M. Barnum, and M. Seddigh. 1998. Calibration of watermark soil moisture sensors for irrigation management. pp. 139-146 In: Proc. International Irrigation Show, Irrigation Association, San Diego, CA. 4

Shock, C., and F. Wang. 2011. Soil water tension, a powerful measurement for productivity and stewardship. HortScience 46:178-185. May, D., and B. Scheuerman. 1998. Sweet potato production in California. Vegetable Research Information Center Vegetable Production Series, University of Calif., Division of Agricultural Natural Resources Publ:7237. Table 1. Average hourly soil water tension, total water applied, marketable yield, and water use efficiency (ton/ha marketable yield per mm of water applied) for sweet potato exposed to four irrigation treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2011. Soil water tension Hourly soil water tension Total water applied 1 Marketable yield 2 Water use efficiency kpa kpa mm ton/ha ton/mm 40 27.7 357.8 44.1 0.12 60 44.4 256.2 38.2 0.15 80 48.6 158.8 24.8 0.16 100 58.9 146.1 23.6 0.16 LSD (0.05) 4.2 40.3 3.1 0.02 1 Total applied water for each criterion includes the amount applied uniformly to all treatments during plant establishment phase (37.8 mm) and rainfall from June 3 to September 29, 2011 (27.9 mm). 25.4 mm = 1 in. 2 1 metric ton/ha is equivalent to 892 lb/acre. Table 2. Sweet potato vegetative percent ground cover and average runner length on July 22 (49 days after transplanting) in response to differential irrigation criteria at Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2011. Irrigation criterion Percent ground cover Average runner length Covington Beauregard Evangeline Diane Covington Beauregard Evangeline Diane (kpa) ------------------------- % ----------------------- ---------------------------- cm -------------------------- 40 88 95 94 83 56 107 91 43 60 75 93 94 83 48 84 79 33 80 82 93 93 83 51 81 86 38 100 75 94 93 80 48 89 86 41 LSD NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS (0.05) Average 1 80 b 94 a 94 a 83 b 51 b 91 a 86 a 39 b 1 Because there was no significant difference among irrigation criteria, the means among water tension were used to compare variety performance. Average values within a row and group followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to LSD 0.05%. 5

Table 3. Number of sweet potato runners per hill and average length (cm) on September 28 (117 days after transplanting) in response to differential irrigation criteria at Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2011. Irrigation criterion Number of runners/hill Average length/runner Covington Beauregard Evangeline Diane Covington Beauregard Evangeline Diane (kpa) ------------------------- Number ----------------------- ---------------------------- cm -------------------------- 40 6 9 9 11 224 452 358 198 60 6 9 10 12 213 399 340 175 80 13 10 12 12 145 348 262 158 100 5 8 11 12 175 315 226 130 LSD (0.05) NS NS NS NS 36 36 36 91 Average 1 8 b 9 b 11 a 12 a 191 c 379 a 297 b 165 c 1 Because there was no significant difference among irrigation criteria, the means among water tension were used to compare variety performance. Average values within a row and group followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to LSD 0.05%. 6

Table 4. Sweet potato yield and grade in response to differential irrigation criteria and variety at Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2011. Sweet potato yield 1 Irrigation criterion Total Marketable U.S. No. 2 U.S. No. 1 Jumbo Discard 2 (kpa) ---------------------------------------- (tons/ha) 3 ------------------------------------------ Beauregard 40 54.2 49.4 9.7 34.6 5.1 4.8 60 51.6 47.1 8.7 32.8 5.6 4.5 80 38.2 32.2 6.5 22.4 3.4 6.0 100 33.2 27.8 6.6 20.8 0.4 5.4 Average 44.3 39.1 7.9 27.6 3.6 5.2 Covington 40 53.6 41.4 15.9 24.5 1.0 12.2 60 42.2 31.1 13.0 17.7 0.4 11.1 80 31.8 16.8 9.5 7.3 0.0 15.1 100 30.4 15.0 6.4 8.6 0.0 15.4 Average 39.5 26.1 11.2 14.5 0.4 13.4 Diane 40 49.5 43.0 5.5 35.1 2.4 6.5 60 42.3 38.3 5.5 31.0 1.8 4.0 80 34.2 29.1 6.4 21.3 1.3 5.2 100 32.8 29.0 4.8 21.2 3.0 3.8 Average 39.7 34.8 5.6 27.2 2.1 4.9 Evangeline 40 48.6 42.6 7.5 32.0 3.1 6.0 60 41.3 36.5 6.9 27.9 1.7 4.9 80 27.1 21.3 5.7 14.1 1.5 5.9 100 28.5 22.7 5.5 14.4 2.7 8.3 Average 36.4 30.8 6.4 22.1 2.3 5.6 LSD (0.05) Irrigation 2.7 3.1 1.3 3.1 1.2 1.3 Variety 2.7 3.1 1.4 3.1 1.3 1.4 Irrigat. X Variety NS NS 2.2 NS NS NS 1 Sweet potato grades were based on California standards: U.S. No.1 were of uniform size, 4.4 to 9 cm (1.75 to 3.5 inches) in diameter and 7.5 to 23 cm (3 to 9 inches) long; U.S. No. 2 (mediums) included misshapen tubers and with a minimum diameter of 4 cm (1.5 inches); Jumbo weighed more than 567 g (20 oz) and were true to type. 2 Discarded roots were <3.8 cm (<1.5 inches) in diameter. 3 1 metric ton/ha is equivalent to 892 lb/acre. 7

60 50 40 30 20 10 40 kpa 60 kpa 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 190 193 196 200 203 207 210 214 217 220 224 227 231 234 237 241 244 248 251 255 258 261 265 268 190 193 197 201 205 208 212 216 220 223 227 231 235 238 242 246 250 253 257 261 265 268 Soil water tension (kpa) Soil water tension (kpa) Day of the year (Julian calendar) Day of the year (Julian calendar) 100 80 60 40 20 0 80 kpa Soil water tension (kpa) 190 193 197 201 205 208 212 216 220 223 227 231 235 238 242 246 250 253 257 261 265 268 Day of the year (Julian calendar) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 100 kpa 190 193 197 200 204 208 211 215 218 222 225 229 233 236 240 243 247 251 254 258 261 265 268 Soil water tension (kpa) Day of the year (Julian calendar) Figure 1. Soil water tension at 17.8-cm (7-inch) depth over time for sweet potato production at Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2011. Each peak represents 1.25 cm (0.5 inch) of water delivered by drip irrigation with different irrigation criteria.