BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS

Similar documents
The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 2 MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS CE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT 1

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT -1 SITE INVESTIGATION & SELECTION OF FOUNDATION 1. What are components of total foundation settlement?


Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

CHAPTER 8 BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSES FOR EARTHQUAKES

Chapter 14 Lateral Earth Pressure

Foundation Design. π = pi ( radians or 180 ) ρ = reinforcement ratio in concrete beam design = A s /bd µ = coefficient of static friction

geopier Lateral resistance

An Introduction to Bearing Capacity Analysis

twenty six concrete construction: foundation design ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2013

twenty four foundations and retaining walls Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

twenty seven concrete construction: foundation design Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

PE Exam Review - Geotechnical

An Introduction to Retaining Walls and Excavation Support Systems

Brooks/Cole Thomson LearningiM. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering. Braja M. Das. California State University, Sacramento

Chapter 13: Retaining Walls

Foundation or Footing Design: Part 1

Types of Foundations

Client Project Job # Wall Loc. SBWall Report deg 120 pcf 950 psf deg 0.0 ft. 6.0 ft 6.0 ft 2.0 ft. W16x50.

An Introduction To Bearing Capacity Analysis

Compressibility of Soil. Chapter 11

Determination of Bearing Capacity of Circular Footing by a Computer Program Using Meyerhof s Analysis

UNIT-1 RETAINING WALLS

Footing Bearing Capacity on Elastic-Plastic Soil

Design Illustrations on the Use of Soil Nails to Upgrade Loose Fill Slopes

Bearing Capacity of Geosynthetic Reinforced Foundation Beds on Compressible Clay

b e a r i n g c a p a c i t y o f g e o p i e r - s u p p o r t e d f o u n d a t i o n s y s t e m s

Settlement Settlements at working loads must not cause damage, nor adversely affect the serviceability of the structure.

Design of Semi gravity Retaining Walls

Combined footings A mat or raft or floating foundation Pile caps

Foundation Engineering

Lecture Retaining Wall Week 12

Behaviour of Raft Foundation with Vertical Skirt Using Plaxis 2d

Seismic bearing capacity factors for strip footings

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT III FOOTINGS AND RAFTS

COURSE ON COMPUTATIONAL GEOTECHNICS A Geotechnical Design Tool. Faculty of Civil Engineering UiTM, Malaysia

Advance Design of RC Structure Retaining Wall

EFFECT OF DEEP EXCAVATION SUPPORTED BY CONCRETE SOLIDER PILE WITH STEEL SHEET PILE LAGGING WALL ON ADJACENT EXISTING BUILDINGS

Footing Bearing Capacity on Elastic-Plastic Soil

Design of Gravity Flow Pipes 121 = UNIT WT OF SOIL. P d = H H. D = 2r. P x LIVE LOAD PIPE WALLS ARE CLADDING FOR THE SOIL COLUMN SOIL SECTION AA

Typical set up for Plate Load test assembly

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Design Data 6. Loads and Supporting Strengths Elliptical and Arch Pipe. Values of B d

Analysis of Buried Arch Structures; Performance Versus Prediction

Geotechnical Analysis of Stepped Gravity Walls

1. limit equilibrium bearing capacity failure modes

An Introduction to Spread Footings and Mat Foundations

The use of flexible flaps in improving the settlement resistent behaviour of raft foundations

Evaluation on Bearing Capacity of Ring Foundations on two-layered Soil

Chapter 11 Compressibility of Soil

THE EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FAILURE MECHANISM AND BEARING CAPACITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS

Numerical Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing on Reinforced Soil Slope

Retaining Wall Design

CEX6230 GEOTECHNICS Dear Student:

Bearing capacity of foundation on slope

BEARING CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT USING MICROPILES A CASE STUDY

Ground Improvement Prof. G.L. Shivakumar Babu Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Blade Pile Technical Design Manual 27 June Forward... x

THE EFFECT OF LATERAL CONFINEMENT ON THE SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON SAND

Gambit Centrum Oprogramowania i Szkoleń Sp. z o.o. Mathcad 14 Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain

Finite Element Analysis of Flexible Anchored Sheet Pile Walls: Effect of Mode of Construction and Dewatering Naveen Kumar 1, Arindam Dey 2*

4.6 Procedures for Connections

System Assemblies & Load Tracing

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION RESTING ON SANDY SOIL BASED ON SHEAR CRITERIA AND SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

Rewa Engineering College, Rewa. Rewa

Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Prof. K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

ARCH 331. Study Guide for Final Examination

Building Construction

Effect of Cavities on the Behaviour of Strip Footing Subjected to Inclined Load

Stability of a Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF RETAINING WALLS

Principles of STRUCTURAL DESIGN. Wood, Steel, and Concrete SECOND EDITION RAM S. GUPTA. CRC Press. Taylor& Francis Group

GEOTECHNICAL RESISTANCE FACTORS

Foundations. Foundations form the major part of a buildings substructure (along with the rising walls, hardcore and ground floors)

DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS

Research Paper PERFORMANCE OF STRIP FOOTING ON SANDY SOIL DUE TO TUNNELING S.Hariswaran 1, K.Premalatha 2, K.Raja 3

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations

DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF T-WALL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

5. Report Date May Work Unit No.

PARAMETRIC STUDY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION BEARING CAPACITY IN CLAYEY SOIL

BEHAVIOUR OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED CIRCULAR FOOTING ON GRANULAR SOIL MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY IN (GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING) SUBMITTED BY SARITA JENA

mortarless masonry Design Manual Part 1 (IS 456:2000) Section 1 Page 1 IS 456:2000 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

CHAPTER 10: GENERAL STRUCTURAL DETAILS

Misan University - College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department

CHAPTER 2. Design Formulae for Bending

Integral Bridges and the. Modeling of Soil-Structure Interaction

APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF PILED RAFT. Rameez Gahlot1, Roshni J John2

Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls of Varying Heights using Relieving Platforms

Strip Footing - Ultimate Bearing Capacity

Analysis of T-Shape Footing On Layered Sandy Soil

SETTLEMENTS DUE TO TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION

GATE SOLVED PAPER - CE

Application Note - Cantilever Stem Wall Analysis

(Refer Slide Time: 04:08)

Evaluation of negative skin friction on sheet pile walls at the Rio Grande dry dock, Brazil

Design of a non-anchored retaining wall

10-COLUMNS: 10.1 Introduction.

Transcription:

BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Introduction A foundation, often constructed from concrete, steel or wood, is a structure designed to transfer loads from a superstructure to the soil underneath the superstructure. In general, foundations are categorized into two groups, namely, shallow and deep foundations. Shallow foundations are comprised of footings, while deep foundations include piles that are used when the soil near the ground surface has no enough strength to stand the applied loading. The ultimate bearing capacity, qu,(in kpa) is the load that causes the shear failure of the soil underneath and adjacent to the footing. In this chapter, we will discuss equations used to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of soils. Bearing Failure Modes (a) (b) (c) Figure 1: Modes of bearing failures (a) General shear (b) Local shear and (c) Punching shear. 1

Relative density of the soil and size of the foundation are among the major factors that affect the mode of bearing failure likely to occur. The modes of bearing failure are generally separated into three categories: The general shear failure (Fig. 1a) is usually associated with soils of low compressibility such as dense sand and stiff cohesive soils. In this case, if load is gradually applied to the foundation, settlement will increase. At a certain point when the applied load per unit area equals to the ultimate load qu, the footing undergoes a large settlement without further increase of q and a sudden failure in the soil supporting the foundation will take place. When the foundation settles under the application of a load, a triangular wedge-shaped zone of soil (marked I) is pushed down, and, in turn, it presses the zones marked II and III sideways and then upward. At the ultimate pressure, qu, the soil passes into a state of plastic equilibrium and failure occurs by sliding. For the local shear failure (Fig. 1b), which is common in sands and clays of medium compaction, the failure surface will gradually extend outward from the foundation but will not reach the ground surface as shown by the solid segment in Fig. 1b. The shear resistance is fully developed over only part of the failure surface (solid segment of the line). The triangular wedge-shaped zone (marked I) below the footing moves downward, but unlike general shear failure, the slip surfaces end somewhere inside the soil. Some signs of soil bulging are seen, however. In the case of punching shear failure, a condition common in loose and very compressible soils, considerable vertical settlement may take place with the failure surfaces restricted to vertical planes immediately adjacent to the sides of the foundation; the ground surface may be dragged down. After the first yield has occurred the load-settlement curve will be steep slightly, but remain fairly flat. Basic definitions: Bearing capacity: It is the load carrying capacity of the soil. Ultimate bearing capacity or Gross bearing capacity (qu): It is the maximum pressure that a foundation soil can withstand without undergoing shear failure. Net ultimate bearing capacity (qun): It is the net pressure that can be applied to the footing by external loads that will just initiate failure in the underlying soil. It is equal to ultimate bearing capacity minus the stress due to the weight of the footing and any soil or surcharge directly above it. Assuming the density of the footing (concrete) and soil (γ) are close enough to be considered equal, then where, qu(net)= qu - γdf Df = is the depth of the footing, 2

Safe bearing capacity: It is the bearing capacity after applying the factor of safety (FS). These are of two types, Safe net bearing capacity (qns): It is the net soil pressure which can be safety applied to the soil considering only shear failure. It is given by, Safe gross bearing capacity (qs ): It is the maximum gross pressure which the soil can carry safely without shear failure. It is given by, qs = qns + γdf Allowable Bearing Pressure: It is the maximum soil pressure without any shear failure or settlement failure Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory: Fig. 2 Bearing capacity of footing Assumptions Depth of foundation is less than or equal to its width. Base of the footing is rough. Soil above bottom of foundation has no shear strength; is only a surcharge load against the overturning load Surcharge upto the base of footing is considered. Load applied is vertical and non-eccentric. The soil is homogenous and isotropic. L/B ratio is infinite. 3

Figure 3: Failure mechanism for Terzhagi s Analysis. The shapes of the failure surfaces under ultimate loading conditions are given in Figure 03. The zones of plastic equilibrium represented in this figure by the area gedcf may be subdivided into 1) Zone I of Elastic Equilibrium 2) Zones II of Radial Shear State 3) Zones III of Rankine Passive State Mechanism of Failure: The sinking of Zone I creates two zones of plastic equilibrium, II and III, on either side of the footing. Zone II is the radial shear zone whose remote boundaries bd and af meet the horizontal surface at angles (45 -ϕ/2), whereas Zone III is a passive Rankine zone. The boundaries de and fg of those zones are straight lines and they meet the surface at angles of (45 -ϕ/2). The curved parts cd and cf in Zone are parts of logarithmic spirals whose centers are located at b and a respectively. The first term in the equation is related to cohesion of the soil. The second term is related to the depth of the footing and overburden pressure. The third term is related to the width of the footing and the length of shear stress area. The bearing capacity factors, Nc, Nq, Nγ, are function of internal friction angle, φ. 4

Terzaghi's Bearing capacity equations: qu = qc + qq + qγ qu = c Nc + q Nq + 0.5 γ B Nγ qu = c Nc + γ D Nq + 0.5 γ B Nγ Strip footings: Square footings: Circular footings: Rectangular footing: qu = c Nc + γ D Nq + 0.5 γ B Nγ qu = 1.3 c Nc + γ D Nq + 0.4 γ B Nγ qu = 1.3 c Nc + γ D Nq + 0.3 γ B Nγ qu = c Nc (1+0.3 B/L) + γ D Nq + 0.5 γ B Nγ (1-0.2 B/L) Where: c = Cohesion of soil, γ = unit weight of soil, D = depth of footing, B = width of footing Nc, Nq and Nγ are called the bearing capacity factors and are obtained as follows: 5

6

Effects of Groundwater Table on Bearing Capacity 7

Factor of Safety: Generally, a factor of safety, Fs, of about 3 or more is applied to the ultimate soilbearing capacity to arrive at the value of the allowable bearing capacity. An Fs of 3 or more is not considered too conservative. In nature, soils are neither homogeneous nor isotropic. Much uncertainty is involved in evaluating the basic shear strength parameters of soil. There are two basic definitions of the allowable bearing capacity of shallow foundations. They are gross allowable bearing capacity, and net allowable bearing capacity. The gross allowable bearing capacity can be calculated as As defined by Eq. qall is the allowable load per unit area to which the soil under the foundation should be subjected to avoid any chance of bearing capacity failure. It includes the contribution of (a) the dead and live loads above the ground surface, W(DL ); (b) the self-weight of the foundation, WF; and (c) the weight of the soil located immediately above foundation, WS. Thus, where A area of the foundation. The net allowable bearing capacity is the allowable load per unit area of the foundation in excess of the existing vertical effective stress at the level of the foundation. The vertical effective stress at the foundation level is equal to q gdf. So, the net ultimate load is If we assume that the weight of the soil and the weight of the concrete from which the foundation is made are approximately the same, then 8

9

10

Example 16.3 A continuous footing is shown in Figure 16.19. Using Terzaghi s bearing capacity factors, determine the gross allowable load per unit area (qall) that the footing can carry. Assume general shear failure. Given: γ= 115 lb/ft3, cʹ = 600 lb/ft2, ϕʹ=25, Df = 3.5 ft, B =4 ft, and factor of safety 3. Solution: Example 16.4 A square footing is shown in Figure 16.20. Determine the gross allowable load, Qall, that the footing can carry. Use Terzaghi s equation for general shear failure (Fs= 3). Given: γ = 105 lb/ft3, γsat = 118 lb/ft3, cʹ=0, ϕʹ= 35, B= 5 ft, Df = 4 ft, and h = 2 ft. 11

Solution: Example 16.5 A square footing (B B) must carry a gross allowable load of 42,260 lb. The base of the footing is to be located at a depth of 3 ft below the ground surface. For the soil, we are given that γ= 110 lb/ft3, cʹ= 200 lb/ft 2, and ϕʹ=20. If the required factor of safety is 3, determine the size of the footing. Use Terzaghi s bearing capacity factors and general shear failure of soil. Solution: 12

13

Ultimate Load for Shallow Foundations Under Eccentric Load 14

15

16

17

18

Plate-Load Test 19

20

21

Modes of Shear Failure (Summary) General Local Punching Relative Settlement Less Large Large Bulging Significant Less No Tilting of Footing Expected Not expected Not expected Ultimate Load Well defined Not well defined Not well defined Wedge + Wedge + Failure Pattern Slip Surface + Slip Surface + Not well defined Bulging Bulging(no or less) Occurs in (Soil Type) Dense Less compressible Highly Compressible 22