Modeling Dynamic Soil Properties in APEX for U.S. Soil Survey

Similar documents
Part I. Ecological Sites and Soil Survey. Part II. A Framework for Soil and Vegetation Dynamics

History of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold

Rapid National Model Assessments to Support US Conservation Policy Planning Mike White

USDA-NRCS Palouse Soil Carbon Project. The Earth Partners, LP Applied Ecological Services, Inc.

Coupling Bioenergy Production and. Distributed Modeling Approach

Soil Changes Covered by Grass and Grazed by Cattle MD

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 7, 2012

Simulating Crop Rotations in the Coastal Plain with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2

Simulating Crop Rotations in the Piedmont with Revised UniversalSoil LossEquation 2

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 28, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, September 4, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, July 31, 2012

Phosphorus Risk Assessment Index Evaluation Using Runoff Measurements

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 14, 2012

SOIL QUALITY AND CROP PRODUCTION. Dick Wolkowski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Cover Crop Effects on Soil Health

Multi-site evaluation of APEX for crop and grazing land in the Heartland region of the US

USE DEPENDENT SOIL PROPERTIES: RESULTS FROM SOME STUDIES IN NJ & NYC. Richard K Shaw USDA-NRCS

Soil Health Research Landscape Tool, v Data Dictionary Soil Health Institute 12/21/2016

Optimal distribution of conservation practices in the Upper Washita River basin, Oklahoma. Edward Osei 1

Carbon Sequestration in Agro-Ecosystems

NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL

U.S. Drought Monitor, October 2, 2012

Chapter 9: Soil and Agriculture

Tools and Methods to Manage Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry

A soil health analysis of the Nathan Stecklein home farm. Nicole Stecklein

Utilizing LEAF to Increase Biomass Feedstock Supplies from Agricultural Land

Agriculture and Society: Part II. PA E & E Standards 4.4

Soil Compaction. By: Kelly Patches Soils 401 April 8, 2009

Indiana Soil and Water

Limited Water Options For Tough Times. Joel P. Schneekloth Regional Water Specialist Colorado State University

Hydrologic Soil Group Knowledge Matrix

Estimating the Overall Impact of A Change In Agricultural Practices on Atmospheric CO 2

Nebraska- MCCC State Report 2014

COMET-FARM and COMET-Planner Updates

Improving the physical conditions of the paddy fields with irrigated paddy rice and upland crop rotation by no-till and no-puddled rice culture

Soil Quality Assessment

Regional Changes in Water Quality Associated with Switchgrass Feedstock

system that supports soil and crop water management.

Soil Health and Crop Productivity. Brian Wienhold USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE

HEALTH SOIL MEANS Healthy Farms and Cleaner Water!

BMP Performance under a Changing Climate Evaluating Resilience

The Understanding around Soil Compaction in Crop Production

Manag Mana in g g Soil Carbon to Imp to Im rove Water Qualit Douglas L. Douglas L Karlen USDA USDA--ARS National ARS National Soil Tilth Lab REAP

Trends With Cover Crops: Results of Two National Cover Crop Surveys

Considerations for Corn Residue Harvest in Minnesota

ECOLOGICAL SITES A DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY OF KEY CONCEPTS. Joel Brown USDA NRCS Jornada Experimental Range Las Cruces NM

Research and Conservation Opportunities Arising from a High Resolution LiDAR Mission for the Long Point Biosphere Reserve and Surrounding Region

Modeling soil P. Case study focusing on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and ongoing research. Margaret Kalcic, Grey Evenson, Rebecca Muenich

Manure Land Application and Soil Health Indicators

Weekly Farm Economics: Geographical Acreage Changes between 2006 and 2012 in Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Cotton

Sequestering Carbon in Cropping and Pasture Systems

LESSON TEN: What Is an Ecological Site and What Causes Plant Community Change?

Tillage and Cover Crops

Effects of Different Land Use on Soil Hydraulic Properties

Soil health has three main components Sustained biological productivity Environmental quality Plant and animal health

Introduction. Manure Management Facts Prioritization and Rotation of Fields for Manure Application. July 2014

Conservation Agriculture and Ecosystem Services

Biao Zhong and Y. Jun Xu

Strip Tillage. Increased nutrient and water storage capacity

Production of Biofuels Feedstock on Agriculture Land and Grasslands

NRCS s Soil Health Initiative

Types of Natural Resources? Renewable aka Perpetual. Nonrenewable. Potentially Renewable. Some important points to Review: Au Cu SnO 2. Gabbro.

Fluids: The Keystone Of All Fertility Programs. Dale Leikam

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering. Michael R. Burchell II - Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist

Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study

Types of Natural Resources? Renewable aka Perpetual Nonrenewable Potentially Renewable. Some important points to Review: Au Cu SnO 2. Gabbro.

Farming with Crop Residues

Hydrological Threats to Ecosystem Services Provided by USDA Forest Service

Assessing Benefits of Winter Crops

Energy Issues Affecting Corn/Soybean Systems: Challenges for Sustainable Production

The National Cooperative Soil Survey Program when complete. will have produced soil survey reports for all counties in the

WEPP Simulated Tillage Effects on Runoff and Sediment Losses in a Corn-Soybean Rotation

SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL COVER CROPS WORKSHOP Jonesboro, AR July 24-25, 2013

Soils, Resilience and Stateand-Transition

Oklahoma Carbon Program

Tropical Agro-Ecosystem Function

Overview of the EPRI-MSU Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Offsets Methodology

Modernizing the Soil Survey of the United States

Advances in Dryland Farming in the Inland Pacific Northwest

Climate Change Policy and Economics: Implications and Opportunities for Agriculture. KSU Extension Conference Global Climate Change Session

WHAT'S HAPPENING TO SOILS IN CENTRAL SOUTH DAKOTA AN EXAMINATION OF SOIL QUALITY

Preserving Dairy Farm Economies and Environmental Quality: A Comparative Study of Tools From New York, Wisconsin, and Elsewhere

Soil Health. National Science Teachers Association Los Angeles, California March 31, Sidney W. Davis Assistant State Soil Scientist - California

DNDC Modeling to Quantify Mitigation Potential N2O from CA Agricultural Soils plus a follow up on OpTIS

Nutrient Reduction Strategy and Best Management Practices

M.J. Kaurmann 2001

MODELING CARBON CHANGES IN AGRICULTURAL SOILS

Biophysical, Environmental and Economic Aspects of Rapid Land-Use Change in the Northern Great Plains

Cover Crop Economics. The green behind the green. Jim Stute Rock County UWEX

BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes

Managing Climate Risk to NC Farms and Forests

Table S1. Partial budgets for stover collection scenarios modeled Stover harvest 8.42

MANURE MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOSS WITH SURFACE RUNOFF AND ON-FARM PHOSPHORUS INDEX IMPLEMENTATION. AN OVERVIEW OF ONGOING RESEARCH

2016 Project Report. Benchmarking soybean production system in the North-central USA

NC-EM TITLE/LOCATION: Soil Compaction Effects on Site Productivity and Organic Matter Storage in Aspen Stands of the Great Lakes States

COVER CROPS- A CLOSER LOOK STEPHANIE MCLAIN NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE; WORTHINGTON FIELD OFFICE

CLIMATE AND ENERGY PLANNING

Climate, Water, and Ecosystems: A Future of Surprises

Setting the Table Cover Cropping Expectations

Transcription:

Modeling Dynamic Soil Properties in APEX for U.S. Soil Survey Candiss Williams and Skye Wills NRCS - National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE Evelyn Steghlich NRCS Blackland Research Station, Temple, TX Photo credit: Skye Wills

103 103 What is U.S. Soil Survey? 103 250 103 Soil Survey is an inventory of soil which contains the distribution and extent of soils in an area Provides an interpretation concerning the use and management of each soil for uses such as farming, recreation, buildings, forestry, etc.

What are the Soil Survey Products?

Who Uses Soil Survey Products? Researchers Engineers (i.e. roads) City Planners Insurance Companies Modelers

EPIC/APEX for U.S. Soil Survey 103 Soil survey products do no reflect the effects of management 250 103 103 103 Historically, soil survey products described inherent soil properties for an entire soil profile under common land use.

Soil Survey Mission: Keeping soil survey relevant to ever-changing needs and providing technical assistance.

EPIC/APEX for U.S. Soil Survey The National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) has recognized the need to provide enhanced information about soil change in response to land use, management and climate change. Soil survey studies have been initiated to collect and aggregate dynamic soil properties (DSPs) focusing on surface layers that respond most rapidly to changes in management or land use.

Dynamic Soil Properties Properties that can change over the course of months and years in response to land use or management practice changes, natural disturbances, or climate change. Changes in dynamic properties depend both on land management practices and the inherent properties of the soil.

EPIC/APEX for U.S. Soil Survey While changes in DSPs have been traditionally measured over time through long-term studies and monitoring, potential changes in DSPs can be estimated using soil survey methods by careful space-for-time substitution comparing land use or management conditions (i.e. vegetation, tillage, climate) on the same soil. To provide comprehensive information about a range of soil and management conditions, soil survey projects must be supplemented using predictive models (i.e. APEX). A combination of data collection and modeling will allow Soil Survey to quickly populate a DSPs database and inform conservation tools.

Soil Systems : Characteristic Landscapes within an MLRA (C. Hibner, A. Miller; SGI, 2008)

Why use APEX to populate DSPs for Soil Survey? Agricultural Policy Environmental extender Model APEX s unique feature to Soil Survey is the ability to subdivide farms or fields by soil type, landscape position, surface hydrology or management configuration to represent crop diversity and landscape characteristics within a field or farm.

Why use APEX to populate DSPs for Soil Survey? Minnesota MLRA 103 DSP Study Crooksford - Crooksford- Swankle - Louris 1-3% Flats Flats/Rims Leen-Okoboji - Calcousta- Okoboji 0-1% - Calciaqolls/ Vertic Endoaquolls Endoaquolls Vertic Endoaquolls

Use of APEX for Soil Survey To Assess soil condition Compare measured/observed values to those expected for similar or alternative management systems To predict and scale soil condition Aggregate observations and link to layers with relevant soil and management information Knowledge of alternative states/systems and predictive models can be used to predict change under different conditions Modelers can build and improve models using point data for specific soils and specific management systems.

Soil Survey Procedures Soil Survey has chosen the comparison study approach to document the effects of land management over time. A study is conducted for an important or extensive soil (i.e. benchmark soil) within an important crop management zone. Data (management history and soil properties) collected from study sites is then used to initialize a predictive model.

DSP Study Design Choose a study area (Benchmark) Choose a set of soils (soil map units) Choose 2 or more management conditions within that map unit Choose 3 or more sites per management condition At each site A central pedon is fully characterized (2 m depth) 4 to 8 additional satellites pedons (0-5 cm, 5-10 cm, 10 cm-bottom of A horizon)

Minimum Data Set (Soil Change Guide) Properties should be sensitive to disturbances or management Relationships between properties and processes they reflect should be clear Relatively insensitive to daily or seasonal fluctuations Organic C ph Electrical Conductivity Bulk density Soil porosity Aggregate stability Total N

Additional Properties Collected for Interpretation Soil horizon thickness Particle size distribution Field moisture content Infiltration (highly variable) CEC Extractable bases Rock fragments Clay mineralogy (as needed) Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat)

Verifying and Validating APEX Soil Survey study sites are located on land with a history of management (10-15 years). Crop yields Soil fertility reports (C and N) Soil survey reports For each management scenario: Evaluate the sensitivity of APEX input parameters and adjust to closely match measured data (i.e. crop yield, C, N). Validate to test the accuracy of an APEX simulation with independent measured data.

Populating Dynamic Soil Properties using APEX The validated model would then be used to evaluate alternative management scenarios. Document change in organic C, total N, bulk density, soil loss, infiltration, and soil moisture.

DYNAMIC SOIL PROPERTIES Interpretations The use of predictive models to populate DSPs can then be used to ask: What is the condition of the soil? If degraded, can it be restored? Soil Organic C kg ha -1 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Houston Black Soil Series 20 years corn-soybean rotation in APEX Initial Conventional No-Till How long will it take? Aggrading What land uses are at risk of irreversible change? Sustaining How will soil changes impact future management options? T 0 TIME Degrading

Interpretations Improve accuracy of databases and provide reference values for soil quality indicators. Soil Organic Matter Soil SSURGO Estimate Grassland- Measured Cultivated- Measured Askarben 2-4% 6.0 3.0 Monona 2-4% 3.6 2.9 Grossman, Unpublished

Where we are In 2014, 6 DSP field studies began (Nebraska, Oklahoma, Michigan, Georgia, Kansas and California) Samples are currently being analyzed at the KSSL We are working with soil survey business operations to include management information in SSURGO (i.e. practice and time in practice). Planning to begin first APEX model runs Winter 2015

Summary Soil change on the human time scale is an emerging concept for soil survey. Field studies are underway. Dynamic soil property data will help meet customer needs for assessing soil quality, soil functions, and ecosystem services. Data from these studies will help planners improve conservation practices, show benefits of these conservation practices, and identify lands at risk of irreversible change. APEX will assist the soil survey in quantifying the impact of management on soil change.

Feedback.. Candiss.Williams@lin.usda.gov