Dallas ICM & 511 System. 87 th Annual Transportation Short Course

Similar documents
Dallas Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Update

Maximize Transportation System Capacity

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management System Using Technology and Partnership to Maximize Transportation System Capacity

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management

Developing a Successful ICM Project. Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Director Texas A&M Transportation Institute

NCTCOG Existing and Planned Systems/Deployments NATALIE BETTGER NOVEMBER 27, 2018

From Integrated Corridor Management to Integrated Regional Management Dallas Experience. September 22, 2015

Integrated Corridor Management --An Overview --

From Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) to Integrated Journey Management (IJM) and Successful Connected Automated Vehicles (CAV)

TMC of the Future. Dr. Bob Edelstein, PE, PTOE Senior Vice President

The path to a Smarter City

Dynamic Corridor Congestion Management (DCCM) Project Streets and Freeways Subcommittee Meeting

Summary of Recent Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Development Efforts in the United States

South Bay Corridor Study and Evaluation for Dynamic Corridor Congestion Management (DCCM) Metro Streets and Freeways Subcommittee Meeting

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

CONNECTED CORRIDORS ICM CALIFORNIA AND THE NEXT 20 YEARS

ITS Multimodal Initiatives in Virginia HRTO Subcommittee Meeting Hampton, VA, June 11, 2013

Third AASHTO SSOM Webinar on Integrated Corridor Management. March 27, 2014

SAN DIEGO SITE: I-15 ICM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. TRB Joint Operations Committees Midyear Meeting Integrated Corridor Management July 18-21, 2011

I-95 / I-395 Integrated Corridor Management. Hari Sripathi, P.E. Regional Operations Director

AMS and DSS concepts in the Connected Corridors Program

Changing to an Operations-Based Approach of Managing ITS. Bob Edelstein and Dan Corey

INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT Enhancing personal mobility for all travelers

Policy Research CENTER

Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study

Baltimore-Washington Integrated Corridor Management Pilot Project

Connected Corridors. I-210 Pilot Project. Advancing Traffic Control through Big Data & Connectivity. IPAM Program UCLA.

DART Integrated Operations Systems/Deployment. Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) November 26, 2018

North Central Texas Council of Governments. Workshop TxDOT Dallas

Regional Transit Framework Study

Chapter 10. Intelligent Transportation Systems. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

KDOT + MARC. Project Update

DOCUMENT CONTROL PANEL

ITS: Now and the Future

S203: The Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) An Introduction to PeMS and a Demonstration of its Multimodal Tools

Decision Support Systems for FDOT District 4 TSM&O

Intelligent Movement of Goods Will Trucks/Trains be able to Operate More Efficiently?

Using Parallel Arterials for Freeway Diversion

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016

Integrated.. combining or coordinating separate agencies so as to provide a harmonious, interrelated whole...

Integrated Corridor Management. Integrated Corridor Management Concept Development and Foundational Research

Active Direction to Managing Transportation ATDM: Ohio s Perspective

San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (SF FCMS)

Priority Connected Vehicle Applications for Bus and Paratransit

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

ITS Architecture Workshop

TRB Workshop 174: What Are the Decision Support Subsystem Requirements for the Next Generation Traffic Management Systems and Centers (TMCs)?

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Nashville Area. Regional ITS Architecture. Regional ITS Deployment Plan. June Prepared by:

Integrated Corridor Management: Implementation Guide and Lessons Learned. Version 1.1 February 2012 FHWA-JPO

Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity. Regional Operations Forum Managing a Corridor

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE I 76 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROJECT TO THE CONNECTIONS 2040 PLAN FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Traffic/Mobility Analytics

Brendon Hemily, PhD

by Melisa D. Finley, P.E. Transportation Short Course October 11, 2017

Chicago s Transportation Infrastructure: Integrating and Managing Transportation and Emergency Services

Perspectives on Intelligent Transportation and Telematics

VALIDATION AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF THE SAN DIEGO I-15 ICM AIMSUN ONLINE REAL-TIME SIMULATION MODEL

NYMTC PFAC PRESENTATION 6/19/2014 USDOT INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT (ICM) DEPLOYMENT PLANNING GRANT PROCESS

Connected Corridors I-210 Pilot Project. California Highway Patrol

Executive Summary. October 27, Prepared by: Copyright 2003 by Texas Department of Transportation. All rights reserved.

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas. Regional Transportation Council Chad McKeown, AICP January 14, 2016

Transportation Management 2025 and Beyond

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

11. Contract or Grant No. Austin, TX

Comparison of I-210 and I-710 as Potential ICM Corridors

The I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project

Appendix A: Equipment Packages for St. Louis Regional ITS Architecture

Variable Speed Warnings on DMS

III. Regional TSM&O Overview from the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (Jessica Josselyn, Kittelson & Associates, Inc.)

Executive Summary. March 24, Prepared by: Copyright 2005 by Texas Department of Transportation. All rights reserved.

Truck Parking Information Management System (TPIMS) Glossary

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Meeting Round 1

ITS Plan Update Kickoff Meeting

Technical Briefing Report

Puget Sound Regional ITS Architecture Update. Why does the region need an ITS Architecture?

Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study. Public Meeting March 20, 2014 Fletcher Warren Civic Center Greenville, TX

UNIT V TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Executive Summary. February 28, Prepared by: Copyright 2005 by Texas Department of Transportation. All rights reserved.

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

: value pricing. application of the 10 criteria for the long-term consideration of 5.1 THE UNIVERSE OF FACILITIES IN THE DALLAS- FORT WORTH REGION

Lee Biernbaum Volpe Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Economist Cambridge, Massachusetts

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

I-90 Smart Road: Operational Features. October 18th, 2017 Scott Lee, P.E., TIMS Project Manager, Parsons Amarpal Matharu, P.E.

Houston TranStar Annual Report 2003

I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP)

SR 99 Incident Response After- Action Plan

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Connected Corridors I-210 Pilot Project. User Needs Workshop

Preparing our Roadways for Connected and Automated Vehicles. 70th Annual Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Bob Edelstein

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

I-880 Integrated Corridor Management: Building on Existing Planning Efforts

North Texas Tollway Authority

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

SECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES

NYSDOT s Active Transportation and Demand Management (ATDM) Program. Supporting Regional Mobility in a Rapidly Changing Marketplace

10.0 Congestion Management Process

Transcription:

Dallas ICM & 511 System 87 th Annual Transportation Short Course October 16, 2013

Agenda Introduction ICM Overview 511 Overview Next Steps / Schedule Q&A

What is ICM? The integrated management of freeway, arterial, transit, and parking systems within a corridor Management of the corridor as a system, rather than the more traditional approach of managing individual assets

US DOT ICM Pioneer Sites Seattle Minneapolis Oakland San Diego Montgomery County 3 Stages for the Pioneer Sites: Stage 1 Concept of Operations, Sample Data, and Requirements Stage 2 Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation Stage 3 Demonstration and Evaluation Dallas San Antonio Houston

Dallas-US 75 ICM Vision Operate the US 75 Corridor in a true multimodal, integrated, efficient, and safe fashion where the focus is on the transportation customer

Why ICM is needed in Dallas-US 75? DFW is the 5 th most congested region in US #1 worst region for growth in congestion Population is over 6 million, adding 1 million every 7-8 years US 75 is a critical, regional corridor Travel demand and congestion continues to grow No ability to expand freeway, arterials, or alternate routes Other freeways are scheduled for construction Significant employers in corridor Numerous special events throughout year Showcase for ITS integration in the region

How can ICM help? Individual agencies are operating their systems well Opportunities for advancement are in coordinated management Need alternatives for travelers, especially transit Need common, reliable data platforms for decision making Building on existing institutional arrangements was a key to building consensus Need to build trust with the public on accuracy and reliability of information

US 75 Corridor Networks Freeway with continuous Frontage Roads Managed HOV lanes Dallas North Tollway 167 Miles of Arterials DART Bus Network DART Light Rail 900 Signals Multiple TMCs Regional ATIS

ICM Strategies Advanced Traveler Information (all scenarios) Better pre-trip, en-route, and multi-modal information Route Diversion Strategy (minor incident) Diverts traffic to parallel frontage roads Route Diversion Strategy (major incident) Diverts traffic to frontage road and strategic arterials Mode Diversion Strategy (major incident) Diverts travelers to DART Red Line Combined Route and Mode Diversion Strategy Diverts travelers to frontage roads, strategic arterials, and DART Red Line

Benefits of ICM Annual Travel Time Savings (Person-Hours) Improvement in Travel Time Reliability (Reduction in Travel Time Variance) San Diego Dallas Minneapolis 246,000 740,000 132,000 10.6% 3% 4.4% Gallons of Fuel Saved Annually 323,000 981,000 17,600 Tons of Mobile Emissions Saved Annually 3,100 9,400 175 10-Year Net Benefit $104M $264M $82M 10-Year Cost $12M $14M $4M Benefit-Cost Ratio 10:1 20:1 22:1

Elements of Dallas ICM SmartNET & SmartFusion Decision Support System 511 System Freeway Management HOV Lane Monitoring Arterial Street Monitoring Responsive Traffic Signal Transit Signal Priority Parking Management Real Time Transit Vehicle Info Regional Trip Planner Weather Integration DART Data Portal Video Sharing Network External Data Sources Training O&M Marketing AMS & Evaluation Support

ICMS Concept 511 Mobile Social Media My511 Interactive Trip Planning Systems XML Data Feed (Events, Link Data) ICM System - 1 DFW 511 Public Web DSS 1.1 SmartFusion 1.2 Model Operator ICM Coordinator (Agency User) Agency User DART Ops DART LRV Ops DART Bus Ops TxTDOT Ops Plano Ops Richardson Ops City of Dallas Ops NTTA Ops ICM Coordinator Expert Rules 1.1.1 Evaluation 1.1.2 Prediction 1.1.3 SmartNET 1.3 Plan Decision Dialogue 1.3.1 SmartNET GUI 1.3.2 Plan Decision 1.2.1 Data Store 1.2.5 Data Dissemination 1.2.2 Data Fusion 1.2.3 Data Collection 1.2.4 DFW 511 IVR C2C TxDOT XML Parking Info Navteq Data Weather Info C2C Data Publishers/ Consumers TxDOT Dallas ATMS TxDOT Ft. Worth ATMS Arterial Street Monitoring Regional Data Warehouse NTTA ATMS System LEGEND SubSystem SubSubSystem Info Source Internet E-Mail Administrative User DART Events DART GTFS DART AVL & APC Data Info Receiver End User

SmartNET Subsystem

Freeway Management Diversion Plan: Minor Incidents 1-lane and shoulder blocked, <2-mile queue Divert US 75 traffic to Frontage Rd Major Incidents 2-lanes or more blocked, 2 to 4-mile queue Divert US 75 traffic to (any or all): Frontage Road Greenville Ave Red Line light rail transit

Arterial Street Monitoring Proven Bluetooth Technology Have deployed about 40 detectors along diversion routes DSS will use Travel Time and Speeds on diversion routes to select recommended plan External Data Sources

Real Time Transit Vehicle Information Install APC on all Red Line cars. Transmit and integrate real time AVL and APC data to ICM System.

Parking Management 5 Park & Ride lots along LRT Red Line Monitor availability at each Park & Ride lot Publish to 511 System P P P P P Publish to TxDOT DMS

511 DFW Multimodal Traffic and Transit Information disseminated through: A Public Web Site Interactive Voice Response (IVR) A Mobile Web Site and Mobile Application My511 (Web, IVR, Alerts) Social Media

Recent Dallas Ice Storm

Cost Funded by the US DOT $5.31M Local Share by project partners (over $3M) DART share from existing expenses Total project value $8.38M Additional federal funds ($0.9M)

Schedule 511 Go-Live (Soft Launch): April 2013 511 Go-Live (Hard Launch): October 2013 1 Year demonstration ends October 2014

For More Information Ravi Gundimeda Project Manager Mobility Programs Development Dallas Area Rapid Transit (214) 749 3685 rgundimeda@dart.org

Next Steps Continue thinning out pylons Continue Signing Improvements Determine access/egress type including full split access/egress Update and Complete the Report TxDOT will call a Meeting after August 15