CEQA BASICS. The California Environmental Quality Act. Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education. Prepared by:

Similar documents
An Overview of the California Environmental Quality Act

Environmental Quality Act. October 19, 2016

Neighborhood Advisory Committee. EIR Process Overview. Chapman University April 20, 2016

California Environmental Quality Act Part 1: CEQA Basics

2016 CEQA Workshop April 16, 2016

Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. August 2000

Section 2.0 Introduction and Purpose

The California Environmental Quality Act

2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan

CEQA FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS BUILDING PROJECT, LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY

Rules and Regulations For the Implementation of The California Environmental Quality Act

CEQA Overview. History. Intent. Laura Jones 5/27/2014. CEQA Overview & Basics 1

Purpose of the EIR. Chapter 1 Introduction

CEQA and its Role in Historic Preservation. Darcy Kremin, AICP Bay Area Environmental Practice Leader Michael Baker International, Oakland, CA

2. Introduction. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code Section et seq.)

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENDED USES OF THIS DRAFT EIR

Better Market Street Public Scoping Meeting. February 4, 2015

California State University Stanislaus Physical Master Plan Update. Program Environmental Impact Report

1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Project Background

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 EIR REQUIREMENT

Scoping Meeting for Vista Del Agua Project Environmental Impact Report

NEPA THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT CEQA THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

CONTINUING THE DISCUSSION ON-LINE

2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE

UC CEQA CHECKLIST TEMPLATE INSTRUCTIONS & GLOSSARY

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

Public EIR Scoping Meeting South Shoreline Specific Plan. October 16, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers

Introduction CHAPTER Project Overview

THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS

I. CONSIDERATION OF 2020 LRDP FEIR (1/05) AND ADDENDUM #8 1

County of El Dorado Notice of Preparation Tilden Park Project

National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ) 2013 Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter

CEQA Implementation Policy

You Can t Build Without CEQA!

Making CEQA Work for You

CHAPTER 11 Climate Change Considerations

2035 General Plan Update, Belmont Village Specific Plan, and Climate Action Plan

Newly Proposed CEQA Guidelines Are Coming to Your Town!

CEQA Topic Paper. Effective Preliminary Review - Avoiding Ready, Fire, Aim

Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

Article 20. Definitions

RE-ISSUED NOTICE OF PREPARATION SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Public Scoping Meeting September 24, 2008

CHP Truckee Area Office Replacement Project

... Noes: Supervisors:-N_o_n&...

CEQA Scoping Meeting. West Desert Hot Springs Master Drainage Plan Program Environmental Impact Report

General Plan EIR Scoping Meeting

Planning Commission 101: The Nuts and Bolts of Planning

Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Environmental Impact Report Public Information Meetings

Chapter 1. Introduction

Bay Fair Transit-Oriented Development Specific Plan EIR Public Scoping Meeting. March 16, 2017 Planning Commission

RESOLUTION NO.15- The Planning Commission of the City of La Habra does hereby resolve as follows:

6. Cumulative Impacts

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO REVELLE COLLEGE APARTMENTS AND COMMONS DINING RENOVATION PROJECT

Commerce Park. Draft Environmental Impact Report. CITY OF FONTANA Citrus Commerce Park SCH SEPTEMBER 2014 VOLUME 1. Project Applicant:

Preliminary Project Assessment

APPENDIX M CEQA Initial Study Checklist

INDEX FOR UNIFORM FILE SYSTEM, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

CEQA and Climate Change

NEPA OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE SEGUNDO INFILL HOUSING PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS

ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CHAPTER 5.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

Notice of Preparation of Initial Study

Addendum to Diablo Grande Specific Plan EIR and Water Resources Plan Supplemental EIR Diablo Grande Specific Plan, Phase I Page i.

Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

Compliance with NEPA

Fresno COG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR)

The following sections from the CEQA Guidelines define the role and purpose of an EIR:

CEQA and Health Effects

Ruby Maldonado Project Manager, Planning, OC Development Services

Responses to Comments

Energy and Climate Action Plan. County Planning Commission Hearing September 3, 2014 County of Santa Barbara

The following findings are hereby adopted by The Regents in conjunction with the approval of the Project which is set forth in Section III, below.

1.0 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT EIR 1-1

National Environmental Policy. Act (NEPA)

Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report

APPENDIX H Summary of Changes in the Recirculated Draft EIR

Practical CEQA for Trail Projects

Subsequent or Supplemental Impact Report; Conditions.

Lead Agency, Responsible Agencies, and Trustee Agencies

CEQA STREAMLINING SAN FRANCISCO s PRACTICE

Whisper Ridge Golf Resort

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. May State Clearinghouse No Prepared for: Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists

CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS

q,ied, L/01013 OcToDER 3 6, 2-0 I 3

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR 1.0 I NTRODUCTION

2019 Update to the CEQA Deskbook, 3 rd edition

Lorelei H. Oviatt, Director, AICP Kern County Planning and Community Development Department

2 Executive Summary 2.1 Project Location

MEETING MINUTES January 15, 2008

ATTACHMENT C: CEQA EXEMPTION

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting

Staff Report for the Board of Directors of December 14, 2016

GRAPEVINE SPECIFIC & COMMUNITY PLAN. KERN COUNTY PLANNING & NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT June 28, 2016

Transcription:

The California Environmental Quality Act CEQA BASICS Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education Prepared by: Contact: DWAYNE MEARS, AICP Principal 714.966.9220 dmears@planningcenter.com

The Beginning 1969: President Nixon signs National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 1970: Governor Reagan signs California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

Applicability CEQA applies to all projects subject to public agency discretionary action

Objectives of CEQA Protect the Environment Seek ways to avoid or minimize environmental damage Generally, through mitigation measures and alternatives Public Disclosure Inform decision makers about the environmental consequences Disclose to the public why decisions were made

The Rules The Statute Public Resources Code 21000-21178 The Guidelines California Code of Regulations Title 14, 15000 et seq. The Courts Ongoing case law CEQA Statute and Guidelines available online for free: http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/

Agency Roles Lead Agency has primary approval authority over the project Responsible Agency has approval authority over some aspect of project Trustee Agency has authority over some resources (e.g., CA Department of Fish & Game)

Four Phases of CEQA 1.Preliminary Review 2.Initial Study (IS) 3.Negative Declaration (ND) / Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) / Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 4.Project Consideration/Approval

The CEQA Process

Part I: Preliminary Review

Exempt from CEQA? Three Types of Exemptions: 1. Statutorial blanket exemptions given by Legislature 2. Categorical types or classes of projects determined by Secretary of Resources Agency not to have significant impact 3. Common Sense Rule CEQA applies only to projects with potential for significant impact on environment

Exempt from CEQA? Statutorial Exemptions Ongoing g projects Emergency Repairs Feasibility and Planning Studies Ministerial Approvals (absence of discretion) School closures (where actions at receiving schools are exempt) Others

Exempt from CEQA? Categorical Exemptions Class 1: Existing Facilities Class 2: Replacement or Reconstruction Class 3: New construction/minor conversion of small structures Class 4: Minor alterations to land Class 14: Minor additions to schools, but limited to: 10 classrooms, or 25% net capacity increase, whichever is less A total of 30+ categories

Exempt from CEQA? Categorical Exemptions Even where project falls within one of the exemption classes, the exemption is not permitted if one of these exceptions is triggered: Sensitive location Cumulative impact Significant impact Scenic highways Hazardous waste sites Historic resources

Part II: Prepare Initial Study

CEQA Checklist Topics Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality

CEQA Checklist Topics Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance

CEQA Checklist Topics This is the first page of the CEQA Checklist. The appropriate box must be checked and supporting documentation justifying the determination must be provided. If any significant impact is identified and cannot be mitigated, an EIR must be prepared. If all impacts are not significant or mitigated to a less than significant level, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared.

Determining Significant Impacts Significant Impact a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in physical conditions Less than Significant ifi Impact a change in physical conditions that is not substantial

Determining Significant Impacts No Significant Impacts: Negative Declaration (ND) Significant Impacts Can be Mitigated to Less than Significant: Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Some impacts cannot be avoided or mitigated: Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

Determining Significance of Cumulative Impacts Considerable Contribution to Cumulative Impact Not Cumulatively Considerable if: Project s contribution substantially reduced Project would comply with mitigation program

Part III: Prepare ND or EIR

Contents of Negative Declaration or MND Brief Description of project, location, proponent s name Proposed finding that the project will have No Significant Impact Initial Study (IS) documenting basis for finding Mitigation Measures (MND only) Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Plan (MND only)

Major Steps for an ND/MND Where no significant impacts will occur: Negative Declaration Circulate ND and IS Short review (20-30 days) No significant impacts Mitigated Negative Declaration Circulate MND and IS Short review (20-30 days) Impacts mitigated to Less than Significant impact

Contents of an Environmental Impact Report Where significant impacts are possible: Table of Contents Summary Project Description Environmental Setting Consideration and discussion of Impacts Significance Thresholds Significant Effects Mitigation Measures Alternatives Cumulative Impacts Significant Irreversible Changes Growth-Inducing Impacts Effects Found Not to be Significant Organizations/Persons Consulted

Major Steps with an Environmental Impact Report Notice of Preparation for 30 days (typically y circulated with IS) Scoping meeting required under certain circumstances Draft EIR circulated for 45 days with Notice of Completion and Notice of Availability Public Hearings on Draft EIR are discretionary

Major Steps with an Environmental Impact Report (continued) Proposed responses to comments sent to responding public agencies 10 days prior to certification Public hearing generally held for discretionary approval EIR certification, project approval, CEQA findings, statement of overriding considerations Notice of Determination is filed, which starts 30-day statute of limitations

Part IV: Decision Making

Final Steps for an ND/MND Public hearing ggenerally held for discretionary approval ND or MND is approved Mitigation monitoring and reporting plan is approved (for MND only) Notice of Determination is filed, which begins the 30- day statute of limitations

Final Steps for an EIR Findings Mitigation Monitoring Plan Statement of Overriding Considerations Project Approval File Notice of Determination 30-Day Statute of Limitations