CONCRETE SPLICED GIRDERS IN TEXAS. Nicholas Nemec, P.E. TxDOT-BRG

Similar documents
PHASING CONSIDERATIONS FOR BRIDGES

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

STRUCTURAL STEEL INSPECTION

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

MIDAS Civil 2016 v2.1 Release Webinar. PSC Composite Design Check / Load rating

Florida DOT efforts toward improving Post Tension Durability

ERECTION PLANS UT-BRIDGE & UT-LIFT. Kevin R. Pruski, PE July 27, 2017

BRIDGE STANDARDS UPDATES. Amy Smith, Bridge Standards Engineer

DEMOLITION PLANS. Aaron Garza, P.E.

RELEASE STRENGTHS. Prestressed Girder Deterioration. March 2018 Date. Footer Text

DESIGNING TWIN TUB GIRDER BRIDGES TO BE NON-FRACTURE CRITICAL. Twin Tub Task Group (T3) Texas Steel Quality Council

PIER PROTECTION (VEHICLE COLLISION) September 13, 2018

Proposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings

The Hashemite University Department of Civil Engineering. Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Dr. Hazim Dwairi 1

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR POST TENSIONING. Leon Flournoy, P.E. Bridge Division

Copyright 2015 American Institute of Steel Construction. All rights reserved.

PARTIAL-DEPTH PRECAST DECK PANEL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS

2016 ACEC/PA ANNUAL MEETING

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

MARTA Rapid Transit Bridges

SINGLE STEEL BOX GIRDER BRIDGES FOR THE TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT TORONTO PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Srdjan Brasic, M.Sc., P.Eng.

SUMMARY SHEETS OF INTEGRAL CONNECTIONS

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4584 Segmental Concrete Bridge Unit

Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

Don Theobald, V.P., Gulf Coast Pre-Stress. Standardizing Existing Spliced Girder Systems

A New Precast Concrete Deck System for Accelerated Bridge Construction

PROPOSED BEAM STABILITY SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS March 3, 2017

STANDARDIZED CONCRETE BRIDGES IN TEXAS. John Holt, PE, Texas Department of Transportation Ronald Medlock, PE, Texas Department of Transportation

Bonner Bridge Replacement Update:

Presented by: Taya Retterer BRG Webinar July 30, 2012

Lecture 13: Practical Design, The Future of Prestressed Concrete, and Concluding Thoughts...

Connections between precast girders and cap beam

For Two Steel Bridges

USE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE STEEL IN TEXAS BRIDGES

MIDAS Training Series

Superstructure Guidelines

CURVED STEEL I GIRDER BRIDGES RAMP GH OVER THE ERIE CANAL INTRODUCTION BEHAVIOR OF CURVED BRIDGES DIFFERENCES FROM STRAIGHT BRIDGES

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Appendix A Proposed LRFD Specifications and Commentary

14. Structural Concrete

Release Note DESIGN OF CIVIL STRUCTURES. Release Date : SEP. 1, 2015 Product Ver. : Civil 2016 (v1.1)

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

KANSAS. Crossover. The Kansas Department of Transportation finds a new solution for stream crossings.

US 34 Over the Missouri River Philip Rossbach, PE - HDR

Miami Marlins Baseball Park

The use of 0.5 and 0.6 in. (13 and 15 mm) diameter

VIADUCTS BY PUSHING: INCREMENTALLY LAUNCHED BRIDGES

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

Applications of Ultra High Performance Concrete and Prefabricated Concrete Elements in Accelerated Bridge Construction

by Dr. Mark A. Ketchum, OPAC Consulting Engineers for the EERI 100 th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, April 17, 2006

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

SUMMARY SHEETS OF HYBRID CONNECTIONS

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

Modjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS. Michael D. Hyzak, PE 1 Gregg A. Freeby, PE 2 Lloyd M. Wolf, PE 3 David P. Hohmann, PE 4 John M.

BRIDGE GIRDERS TECHNICAL GUIDE

Influence of Depth in Single Cell & Twin Cell Box Girder

OXFORD ENGINEERING COLLEGE (NAAC Accredited with B Grade) Department of Civil Engineering LIST OF QUESTIONS

SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE

SIBLEY POND DESIGN-BUILD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROUTE 2 CANAAN/PITTSFIELD, MAINE

Results you can rely on

CONCRETE RIPRAP VERSUS STONE PROTECTION RIPRAP. John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

Innovations in Tied Arch Bridges

Steel-concrete Composite Bridges Designing with Eurocodes

Experimental Investigation and Modelling of Spread Slab Beam Bridges

STANDARD BWL-1: NOTES TO DESIGNER

Continuous for Live Load: A Texas Historical Perspective

CSU GUIDELINES. April 27, 2018 FOR POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE STRUCTURES.

Long Key Bridge, a spectacular example. Design Features and Prestressing Aspects of Long Key Bridge

ST7008 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

Concrete Bridge Design and Construction series

TxDOT Superheavy Bridge Report Requirements. Bridge Division

FEBRUARY 2019 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGES IN AREAS OF HIGH OR MODERATE SEISMICITY

Spliced Segmental Prestressed Concrete 1-Beams for Shelby Creek Bridge

CASE STUDY OF LONG SPAN STEEL BRIDGE STABILITY DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

BS EN :2004 EN :2004 (E)

Flexure Design Sequence

DESIGN OF CAMPBELL ROAD OVERPASS IN KELOWNA. Yulin Gao, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc. Samson Chan, M.Eng., P. Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc.

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

Bridge Design Guide. Bridge Division

Analysis of Girder Bridge with IRC and IRS Loadings A Comparative Study

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

New Development in Accelerated Bridge Design and Construction in WA

Prestressed Concrete

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 1, January ISSN

1/26/2015 DETAILS CIP DETAIL EXAMPLES WHY SIMPLIFY DETAILS? CIP DETAIL EXAMPLES DETAILING FOR SIMPLICITY

Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Construction

Analytical Investigations and Design Implications of Seismic Response of a 2-Span ABC Bridge System

ERRATA for G12.1, Guidelines to Design for Constructability, 2016 Edition

Lecture 13 CONCRETE WORKS

Principal Bridge Engineer Middle East & India Atkins Abu Dhabi, UAE

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION: TECHNIQUES. Kevin Pruski TxDOT Bridge Division 2018 Transportation Planning Conference

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

Transcription:

CONCRETE SPLICED GIRDERS IN TEXAS Nicholas Nemec, P.E. TxDOT-BRG October 15, 2014

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? 2

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? What it is NOT : Continuous For Live Load 3

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? Hybrid of 2 existing structure types Prestressed Beam Span Lengths 50 to 150 Segmental Span Lengths > 300 4

Similarities to Prestressed Beam Precast Sections Prestressed (strands or tendons) Similar shapes Similar deck construction (PCP and CIP top) 5

Differences to Prestressed Beam Post Tensioning Tendons in the web Continuous over multiple spans Both flanges (top and bottom) experience tension and compression 6

Similarities to Segmental Precast Sections Continuity Tendons Continuous over multiple spans 7

Differences to Segmental Longer Precast Sections Fewer Precast Sections Includes multiple girder lines (structural redundancy) Replaceable deck 8

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? 2 or more precast concrete beam sections Cast in place splices Post tensioned with full length continuity tendons Final Condition Fully Continuous Concrete Girder 9

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? 10

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? Precast Sections 11

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? Precast Sections Cast in Place Splices 12

What is a Concrete Spliced Girder? Precast Sections Cast in Place Splices Continuity Tendons 13

APPLICABILITY AND ADVANTAGES: Provide an option for spans in the 150 to 300 range Provide an alternative to steel Straight or horizontally curved alignments Fast Uses (combines) current construction techniques 14

TYPICAL SECTIONS: 15

TYPICAL SECTIONS: I-Section U-Section 16

I-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 300 to 325 (Haunched) 300 to 325 17

I-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 300 to 325 (Haunched) 300 to 325 Max Span(Main Span) Length 225 to 275 (Constant Depth) 225 to 275 18

I-SECTION: Uses Horizontally Straight Alignments 19

I-SECTION: Uses Horizontally Straight Alignments Skewed or Normal Bents Limit skew angle if possible. Same issues with skew as with any other superstructure type 20

I-SECTION: Uses Horizontally Straight Alignments Skewed or Normal Bents Limit skew angle if possible. Same issues with skew as with any other superstructure type Phased Construction 21

I-SECTION: Uses Horizontally Straight Alignments Skewed or Normal Bents Limit skew angle if possible. Same issues with skew as with any other superstructure type Phased Construction Useful on projects that do not allow for shore towers in the main span 22

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections 23

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Step 2: Set Pier Sections 24

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Step 2: Set Pier Sections Step 3: Cast Anchorage Blocks, Splices, and Diaphragms. 25

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Step 2: Set Pier Sections Step 3: Cast Anchorage Blocks, Splices, and Diaphragms. Step 4: Set Drop In Span Section 26

I-SECTION: Drop In Span Section 27

I-SECTION: Drop In Span Section Strong Back Advantage: Simple Disadvantage: Additional Weight fhwa.gov 28

I-SECTION: Drop In Span Section Hanger System Advantage: No Additional Weight Disadvantage: Complicates Details, Larger Moment Arm fhwa.gov 29

I-SECTION: Drop In Span Section From a DESIGN STANDPOINT Preference is to specify a Strong Back fhwa.gov 30

I-SECTION: Drop In Span Section From a DESIGN STANDPOINT Preference is to specify a Strong Back Allow contractor to develop details to incorporate a hanger system if he/she chooses. fhwa.gov 31

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Step 2: Set Pier Sections Step 3: Cast Anchorage Blocks, Splices, and Diaphragms. Step 4: Set Drop In Span Section 32

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Step 2: Set Pier Sections Step 3: Cast Anchorage Blocks, Splices, and Diaphragms. Step 4: Set Drop In Span Section Step 5: Cast 2 nd Splices and Stress Continuity Tendons 33

I-SECTION: Construction Process Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Step 2: Set Pier Sections Step 3: Cast Anchorage Blocks, Splices, and Diaphragms. Step 4: Set Drop In Span Section Step 5: Cast 2 nd Splices and Stress Continuity Tendons Step 6: Place Precast Concrete Panels (PCP) and Cast Deck 34

Place PCP s across entire I-SECTION: Construction Process unit prior to casting deck. Step 1: Set Back Span Sections Helps to reduce deck stresses due to staged Step 2: Set Pier Sections pouring. Step 3: Cast Anchorage Blocks, Splices, and Diaphragms. Step 4: Set Drop In Span Section Step 5: Cast 2 nd Splices and Stress Continuity Tendons Step 6: Place Precast Concrete Panels (PCP) and Cast Deck 35

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 36

10 Web I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 37

10 Web I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 4 Top Flange (Depth) 38

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 10 Web 4 Top Flange (Depth) 60 Top Flange (Width) 39

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 10 Web 4 Top Flange (Depth) 60 Top Flange (Width) 40 Bottom Flange (Width) 40

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 10 Web 4 Top Flange (Depth) 60 Top Flange (Width) 40 Bottom Flange (Width) 80 Pretensioning Strands Available Debond as needed 41

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 10 Web 4 Top Flange (Depth) 60 Top Flange (Width) 40 Bottom Flange (Width) 80 Pretensioning Strands Available Debond as needed 4 Continuity Ducts 19 ~ 0.6 Strand Tendons 42

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) 10 Web 4 Top Flange (Depth) 60 Top Flange (Width) 40 Bottom Flange (Width) 80 Pretensioning Strands Available Debond as needed 4 Continuity Ducts 19 ~ 0.6 Strand Tendons Depth Varies 7 Ft, 8 Ft, 9 Ft 43

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) Section weight between 1,500 lbs/ft 1,850 lbs/ft Segment Length = 140 Segment weight 105 Tons - 130 Tons 44

I-SECTION (Constant Depth) Section weight between 1,500 lbs/ft 1,850 lbs/ft Segment Length = 140 Segment weight 105 Tons - 130 Tons Max Span Length is the result of the shipping, lifting, shore tower availability, site conditions. 45

I-SECTION (Haunched) Dimensions are same as Constant Depth 46

I-SECTION (Haunched) Dimensions are same as Constant Depth Overall Height varies linearly Max height is 16 47

I-SECTION (Haunched) Dimensions are same as Constant Depth Overall Height varies linearly Max height is 16 Bottom Flange Thickness varies 48

I-SECTION (Haunched) Dimensions are same as Constant Depth Overall Height varies linearly Max height is 16 Bottom Flange Thickness varies Max Segment Length is 90 to 120 (weight governs) 49

I-SECTION (Splice) 50

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section fhwa.gov 51

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Disadvantages: More detailed form work fhwa.gov 52

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Disadvantages: More detailed form work Small tolerance for duct misalignment fhwa.gov 53

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Disadvantages: More detailed form work Small tolerance for duct misalignment Less clearance for plastic duct couplers fhwa.gov 54

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Disadvantages: More detailed form work Small tolerance for duct misalignment Less clearance for plastic duct couplers Potential for poor consolidation in bottom flange fhwa.gov 55

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Disadvantages: More detailed form work Small tolerance for duct misalignment Less clearance for plastic duct couplers Potential for poor consolidation in bottom flange Using a stinger is difficult, could easily damage ducts fhwa.gov 56

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Advantages : fhwa.gov 57

I-SECTION (Splice) Uniform Cross Section Advantages : Smooth appearance fhwa.gov 58

I-SECTION (Splice) Tapered Web Width PLAN ELEVATION 59

I-SECTION (Splice) Tapered Web Width Advantages: Simple form work More room for alignment errors Stinger can be used (with care) More room for plastic couplers PLAN ELEVATION 60

I-SECTION (Splice) Tapered Web Width Advantages: Simple form work More room for alignment errors Stinger can be used (with care) More room for plastic couplers Higher probability of a quality splice PLAN ELEVATION 61

I-SECTION (Splice) Tapered Web Width Disadvantages: Increased lifting weight on precast section More detailed forming in the precast yard PLAN ELEVATION 62

I-SECTION (Splice) Tapered Web Width Disadvantages: Increased lifting weight on precast section More detailed forming in the precast yard Produces a visible knuckle 63

U-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 265 to 280 265 to 280 64

U-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 265 to 280 265 to 280 Can be used on Horizontally Curved Alignments 65

U-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 265 to 280 265 to 280 Can be used on Horizontally Curved Alignments Larger girder spacing (>20 ) resulting in fewer girder lines 66

U-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 265 to 280 265 to 280 Can be used on Horizontally Curved Alignments Larger girder spacing (>20 ) resulting in fewer girder lines Require (typically) shore towers in the main span 67

U-SECTION: Uses Max Span (Main Span) Length 265 to 280 265 to 280 Can be used on Horizontally Curved Alignments Larger girder spacing (>20 ) resulting in fewer girder lines Require (typically) shore towers in the main span May require additional construction steps, compared to I-Section 68

U-SECTION: Construction Process Potential Additional Steps 69

U-SECTION: Construction Process Potential Additional Steps Additional Post Tensioning Stages Splices located away from inflection points (due to shorter precast lengths) Additional Bottom Tendons Constant section depth, requires post tensioning above piers Additional Top Tendons 70

U-SECTION: Construction Process Potential Additional Steps Cast a Lid Slab prior to stressing Continuity Tendons Required when used on horizontal alignment Creates a closed box, which can handle the torsion induced by the curvature 71

U-SECTION: Construction Process Potential Additional Steps Requires an Internal Diaphragm Diaphragm is constructed with an access hole for future (potentially) internal inspections 72

U-SECTION (Typical) 73

10 Web U-SECTION (Typical) 74

10 Web U-SECTION (Typical) 8 Continuity Tendons 75

U-SECTION (Typical) 10 Web 8 Continuity Tendons Bottom Tendons (could be pretension strands) 76

U-SECTION (Typical) 10 Web 8 Continuity Tendons Bottom Tendons (could be pretension strands) 6, 7 and 8 depths 77

U-SECTION (Typical) Section weight between 2,100 lbs/ft 2,800 lbs/ft Segment Length = 90 Segment weight 95 Tons - 130 Tons 78

U-SECTION (Splice) 79

U-SECTION (Splice) Increased Web Width 80

U-SECTION (Splice) Increased Web Width Increased Bottom Flange Thickness 81

U-SECTION (Splice) Increased Web Width Increased Bottom Flange Thickness Continuous Top Flange 82

U-SECTION (Splice) Increased Web Width Increased Bottom Flange Thickness Continuous Top Flange Shear Keys in Webs 83

RESEARCH 0-6651, Continuous Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges, TTI 0-6652, Spliced Texas Girder Bridges, CTR 84

RESEARCH 0-6651, Continuous Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges, TTI Synthesis study of industry practice, casting, transportation and construction Analysis of the modified Tx70 and U54 girders for a range of main span lengths Practical limits for the girders Failure mechanisms for splices at various moment/shear combinations 85

RESEARCH 0-6652, Spliced Texas Girder Bridges, CTR Comparison of steel vs plastic duct on shear capacity Shear capacity of the cast in place splice with the presence of the plastic couplers 86

ENGINEERING SOFTWARE Stage construction, removal/addition of supports, composite properties, pretensioning/post tensioning modeling, time dependent effects (ADAPT, RMBRIDGE, MIDAS, etc) 87

Nicholas Nemec, P.E. TxDOT--Bridge Division Nicholas.Nemec@txdot.gov 512-416-2280 Copyright 2014 Texas Department of Transportation All Rights Reserved Entities or individuals that copy and present state agency information must identify the source of the content, including the date the content was copied. Entities or individuals that copy and present state agency information on their websites must accompany that information with a statement that neither the entity or individual nor the information, as it is presented on its website, is endorsed by the State of Texas or any state agency. To protect the intellectual property of state agencies, copied information must reflect the copyright, trademark, service mark, or other intellectual property rights of the state agency whose protected information is being used by the entity or individual. Entities or individuals may not copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, or transmit, in any way this content for commercial purposes. This presentation is distributed without profit and is being made available solely for educational purposes. The use of any copyrighted material included in this presentation is intended to be a fair use of such material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. 88