U.S. Beef Production Practices ---

Similar documents
56% 64% of farms are owned by the same family for 3 generations

Animal Protein Production Impacts and Trends Dr. Judith L. Capper

Why Do They Discount My Heifers So Much? T.A. Thrift and J. Savell University of Florida

2

The Cattle Feeding Industry

Montgomery County Beef Improvement Association Members

A Refresher Course on Finishing Cattle in Tennessee. Genetics, Quality and Efficient Production for Marketing

Residual feed intake and greenhouse gas emissions in beef cattle

Corn Silage for Beef Cattle

Is Marbling Important

How State/Provincial Policy Makers Can Support Producers and Communities: Dispelling Animal Agriculture Myths

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Jane Parish Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Western Canadian Cow-Calf Survey Findings: Production Benchmarks

US ranchers face a big challenge in the years

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

Absolute emissions 1 (million tonnes CO 2 -eq) Average emission intensity (kg CO 2 -eq/kg product) Milk 2 Meat 2 Milk Meat Milk 2 Meat 2

BEEF. Pre-harvest Production Systems. Purpose. Natural 4/26/12. Natural, Grassfed and Organic. Natural. Describe production specifications for:

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves

Forage Systems for Pasture Finishing Beef

Relationship of Cow Size, Requirements, and Production Issues. Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

Investigating New Marketing Options to Increase Beef Production in Ontario

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Alabama Beef Cattle Strategic Plan

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

Market Outlook For 2002 And Beyond

TIMELY INFORMATION. Agriculture & Natural Resources AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND RURAL SOCIOLOGY, AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL

Characteristics of beef cattle operations in the West. C. Alan Rotz,* Senorpe Asem-Hiablie,* Robert Stout,* and Kathleen Fisher

Finishing Beef Cattle on Grass Supplemented with Self-fed By-Products

Challenges and Incentives of Traceability of Programs for Cattle/Beef Products

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

Market Outlook for 2003 and Beyond

American Shorthorn Association

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

Reduction of Yield Gaps to Increase Productivity and Sustainability

Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle and Sheep Production. Fall Final examination. December 12, 2000

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Corn, Hay, Wheat & Cattle Outlook

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Forage-Livestock Research Progress Report

Beef Cattle Management Update

Making Beef Out of Dairy

Controlling the Cost of Beef Production through Improving Feed Efficiency

Strategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids

Cattle and Hay Outlook

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves

Herd Management Method

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

Beef and Dairy Market Outlook

What Value Looks Like to a Feedyard. By Tom Brink

Nancy M. Hodur F. Larry Leistritz. HREC Beef Research Review January 10, 2008

Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis

Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center

HOW DO I PROFIT FROM REPRODUCTION? HITTING THE TARGET FOR HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCT. L.R. Corah. Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS.

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Beef Cattle Energetics

PERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS. D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland

Is There Life After High Grain Prices for the Cattle Industry?

Proceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska BEEF PRODUCTION WITHOUT MATURE COWS

How High Fuel, Fertilizer and Commodity Prices Affect Manure Management Decisions

CHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CALF CROP

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

An Agriculture and AgriFood Canada funded Agriculture BioProducts Innovation Program (ABIP) grant.

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

TIMELY INFORMATION. DAERS 08-4 August Making Adjustments To The Cattle Herd Due To Higher Production Costs

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

2018 Thousand Hills Lifetime Grazed 100% Grass Fed Beef Program Producer Protocol Requirements

University of Florida Presentation. By: Jerry Bohn

co-products ethanol for cattle Distillers Grains for Beef Cows

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Dairy Sustainability: Past, Present & Future Directions

Carbon Credit Potential from Intensive Rotational Grazing under Carbon Credit. Certification Protocols

A Discussion Where We Have Been Where We Are Where We Are Going

4-H Dairy Project Record Dairy Cow

Is Profitability in Cow-Calf Industry Really Possible???

Five Essentials for Profitable Ranch Management

Key Points. Introduction. Materials and Methods. Sides G, PhD * ; Swingle S, PhD ** January 2008

Winter Cow Feeding Strategies. Why is this Important?

Adaptations to Climate Change

Intensified Cow/Calf Production Systems in the Southern Great Plains

3. Total revenue 80,605 1,622

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Cattle & Beef Outlook

The Value of Trace-ability

Managing the Beef Cattle Herd through the Cattle Cycle

Transcription:

Sustainable Livestock Development: Closing the Efficiency Gap --- U.S. Beef Production Practices --- by Tamara McCann Thies National Cattlemen s Beef Association U.S.A. --- April 2, 2012

Overview of U.S. Beef Industry Largest food and fiber sector Own/manage 670 million acres of land in US $73 billion in U.S. consumer spending on beef annually 742,000 beef herds (90% < 100 head); 67,000 dairy herds 30.9M beef cows; 9.3M dairy cows; 26.7M feeder calves 2,140 feedyards with at least 1000 head capacity With formidable impact, great responsibility Industry acceptance through history Enhance environmental stewardship/food safety Improve efficiencies throughout Rely on fewer inputs to produce more beef Increase economic contributions to Rural America Preserve open spaces Contribute time, talent, treasure to communities Cattle/beef industry segments largely independent of eachother Equity, management, financial

Calving Weaning Stockers 80% of steers + 65% of heifers Harvest - Fabrication 6-866- mo. 30-35% of heifers kept as replacement breeding stock Harvest 13-18 mo. Retail Sales 20% of steers 150-210 days on feed Feedyard 100-150 days on feed Food Service 3-9 mos.

What Do Cattle Eat? The U.S. beef cattle herd consumes approximately 80% of its nutrients in the form of forages and 20% in the form of concentrates. Forages grasses, herbs, browse, hay Concentrates corn, corn milling by-product, ethanol production by-product, silage, cotton byproduct, food manufacturing by-product such as broken cookies, potato slurry, citrus pulp, etc.

Typical U.S. Beef Cattle Production Systems Weaned Calves 180 days old + 30 days 450 600 lbs. Dry Lot Program ADG: 1.0; +175 lbs 175 days Wheat Pasture ADG: 2.0; +240 lbs 120 days Background Yard ADG: 2.25; +325 lbs 144 days Background Yard ADG: 2.5; +300 lbs 120 days Grass ADG: 1.5; = 240 lbs 160 days Grass ADG: 1.35; + 175 lbs 129 days Feedlot Feedlot Feedlot Feedlot Feedlot Feedlot ADG: 3.2; + 385 lbs ADG: 3.2; + 360 lbs ADG: 3.1; +435 lbs ADG: 3.0; + 400 lbs ADG: 3.2; + 375 lbs ADG: 3.0; +575 lbs 120 days 112 days 140 days 133 days 117 days 192 days Slaughter Age 21 Months, + 1 Slaughter Age 19 Months, + 1 Slaughter Age 16 Months + 1 Slaughter Age 15 Months + 1 Slaughter Age 14 Months, + 1 Slaughter Age 12 Months, + 1 1250 1400 lbs. 1225 1375 lbs. 1125 1275 lbs. 1150 1300 lbs. 1125 1275 lbs. 1025 1175 lbs.

Why the various options for weaned calves? 1. Spread production across the entire year to allow consistent beef supply across seasons. 2. Take advantage of the growth and maturity patterns of cattle of varying genetic backgrounds. 3. Optimize grazing opportunities.

Environmental Footprint of U.S. Beef Production (1977 vs. 2007) Improvement over time Management Genetic selection Ration formulation Growth-enhancing technologies What has this meant for the U.S. beef industry? Improved productivity Beef carcass yield increased 22% Time to slaughter reduced 21% (609 days vs 485 days) Total beef production increased 11% Slaughter pop. decreased 5 million head Source: Capper, J.L. (2011). The Environmental Impact of U.S. Beef Production: 1977 compared with 2007. J. Animal Science

In 1977, it took five animals (3,030 animal days) to produce the same amount of beef as four animals (1,928 animal days) in 2007 Improved productivity means fewer resources required to produce the same amount of beef Beef per animal increased 31% 30% fewer animals 19% less feed 12% less water 33% less land 18% less manure 18% less methane 12% less nitrous oxide 16% lower carbon footprint Source: Capper, J.L. (2011). The Environmental Impact of U.S. Beef Production: 1977 compared with 2007. J. Animal Science

Consumers Have Three Production System Choices When Buying Beef Conventional: Pasture-based system until weaning (7 mo) Animals enter feedlot either at weaning or 12 mo old Production-enhancing technology* used in each sector Natural: Identical to conventional system but productionenhancing technologies are not used Grass-fed: Pasture-based system from birth to slaughter Production-enhancing technologies are not used * Technologies included: ionophores, implants, MGA, beta-agonists Source: Capper, J.L. Producing Greener Beef: Past, Present and Future - Drovers Webinar March 2012

Removing Technology from Beef Production Requires Increase in Animal Numbers Animals required to produce 26.1B lb beef (millions) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 800 lb carcass wt 444 d to slaughter + 14.4 million head 714 lb carcass wt 464 d to slaughter + 64.6 million head 615 lb carcass wt 679 d to slaughter Conventional Natural Grass-fed Source: Capper, J.L. Producing Greener Beef: Past, Present and Future - Drovers Webinar March 2012

Environmental Consequences of Removing Technology from Beef Production If all U.S. beef was grass-fed: Land use would increase by 131 million acres (75% of land area of Texas) GHG emissions would increase by 134.5 million tons CO2 eq. (equal to annual emissions from 26.6 million cars) Water use would increase by 468 billion gallons (equal to annual usage by 53.1 million U.S. households) Source: Capper, J.L. Producing Greener Beef: Past, Present and Future - Drovers Webinar March 2012

Water Use in the U.S. Beef Industry Water Footprint Network U.S. Average Boneless beef yield (lb.) 441 605 Dressed carcass weight (lb) 588 806 Slaughter weight (lb) 948 1,300 Days to slaughter 1,095 415 Overall growth rate (lb/d) Water (gal) per lb boneless beef 0.80 2.95 1,857 367* Source: Capper, J.L. Producing Greener Beef: Past, Present and Future - Drovers Webinar March 2012, including reference to study by *Beckett & Oltgen (1994)

U.S. Beef Industry Works for Continuous Improvement Over Time Sustainability Assessment Holistic approach Environment Social Economic Sustainability is a journey, not a destination Continuous improvement over time NCBA has partnered with BASF Corporation Methodology is certified by NSF, TUV

BASF s assessment (S.E.T. Sustainability, Eco- Efficiency, Traceability) comprised of four parts Hot spot analysis Eco-Efficiency Analysis, SEEBALANCE (baseline sustainability analysis) On-line tool for individual producer use Certification by Det Norske Veritas (DNV Prosustain Standard for more sustainable goods)

Opportunities for Continuous Improvement Reduce time to reach target weights across all systems Increase growth rate and feed efficiency Improve performance technologies Optimize diets Minimize losses Reduce morbidity and mortality Improve reproductive efficiency Currently, only 88% of cows have one live calf/yr Increase land carrying capacity Improve pastures/better forage varieties Reduce post-harvest resource use and emissions Source: Capper, J.L. Producing Greener Beef: Past, Present and Future - Drovers Webinar March 2012

Questions?