Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) Traffic Safety Conference College Station, June 2016

Similar documents
Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP)

Assembling MIRE Data. The Vermont Experience. Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) Mapping Section

Model Inventory of Roadway Elements (MIRE) GIS-T Annual Conference March 30, Robert Pollack FHWA

RIDOT S Statewide Roadway and Asset Data Collection Project

RIDOT S Statewide Roadway and Asset Data Collection Project

USING GIS TO DEVELOP AN INTERSECTION INVENTORY FOR SAFETY

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 21, 2009

An Introduction to the. Safety Manual

The sections below include examples of HSM implementation activities undertaken by various transportation agencies.

TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION. Using the Highway Safety Manual and the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. I 15 Dry Lakes Design Exception

Status of Highway Safety Manual Implementation. October 2015

GIS-BASED NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DATA INVENTORY TOOL TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC SAFETY

Esri Roads and Highways An Introduction. Nathan Easley Rahul Rakshit

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Traffic Records Forum Biloxi, MS October 28,

FDOT State Safety Office History, Accomplishments & Planned FHWA Funded Efforts. Presenters: Kathryn Waters & Joseph Santos July 29, 2015

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

OPEN DATA & PROJECT TRACKER. Michael Chamberlain TPP, Data Management

REQUIREMENTS WEBINAR FEBRUARY 20, :00 2:30 P.M.

SafetyAnalyst: The Georgia Experience

Data-Driven Safety Analysis (DDSA) Implementing Safety Innovations Every Day Counts 3

LOCATED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY LAND AREA: 8.75 SQ. MI. POPULATION: 14, C/L MILES ODOT DISTRICT 10 CONTAINS 5 STATE ROUTES 1ST SETTLEMENT IN THE

GIS USE IN PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGN MANAGEMENT: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH

WELCOME. Public Meeting for I-35 / I-44 Interchange. October 6, 2015

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

Process to Identify High Priority Corridors for Access Management Near Large Urban Areas in Iowa Using Spatial Data

Performance Based Practical Design (PBPD)

HSM APPLICATION USING IHSDM (I-12 TO BUSH) April Renard, P.E. LADOTD Highway Safety

Role and Application of Accident Modification Factors (AMFs) within the Highway Design Process

2017 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call

PERFORMANCE BASED PRACTICAL DESIGN

SafetyAnalyst. Introduction

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

Final Report 2014 Addendum

Wall Asset Management Implementation at Colorado Department of Transportation. Bryant Walters, Collins Engineers Mark Vessely, Shannon & Wilson

Engineering Design Services for Safety Improvements along CR 476 from the Hernando County Line to US 301 (SR 35) Sumter County, Florida

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 1. Tuesday, February 27, :00-4:00 PM ET

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

Utilizing Transportation Data for Low Cost Safety Improvements

Presented by John Hudler Geospatial Group Leader Office of Transportation Data Georgia Department of Transportation

All Roads Do Not End at the State Line: Methodologies for Enabling Geodata Sharing Across Boundaries

A three-stage process was implemented in order to develop and evaluate the project concepts and provide recommendations for the project.

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

Building West Virginia DOT s Geospatial Capabilities:

Adaptation of HERS-ST Models for the South Carolina Interactive Interstate Management System

By Andrew Lindsay Government of Manitoba Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation (MIT) Highway Planning and Design

TxDOT s NEW ACCESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Bill Frawley Texas Transportation Institute Access Management Conference August 31, 2004

South Carolina DOT Data Driven Intersection Safety Improvements

Annual CSAH Needs Update for 2017

NYSDOT Roadway Inventory. Both On and Off the State System

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

The Role of PMS in the DOTD Decision Making Process

Annual CSAH Needs Update for 2018

Evaluating Design Alternatives using Crash Prediction Methods from the Highway Safety Manual

US 14 EIS (New Ulm to N. Mankato) Interchange and Intersection Type Comparison

500 Interchange Design

AASHTO Transportation Safety Information Management System (TSIMS) Phase 1 Summary

Esri Roads and Highways An Introduction

Between existing Interstate 70 in St. Louis, MO to west of the IL 203 Interchange on existing I-55/70 in Madison, IL

State Highway 10A Improvements (from the SH-10 junction extending 6.18 miles east to the SH-100 junction, Muskogee and Sequoyah Counties, Oklahoma)

NCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing

STATEWIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND REPORTING SYSTEM (STARS II)

Using ArcGIS Online to Support Transportation Engineering. ESRI Southeast User Conference May 2, 2016 Daniel R. Mellott, GISP Sain Associates

Highway Safety Manual Implementation. Priscilla Tobias, P.E. State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation

500 Interchange Design

One Maryland One Centerline. GIS-T 2014 May 7, 2014

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 12/31/2013

Crash Analysis Tools 5/12/2011. Overview. Crash Reporting. Crash Data Crash Analysis High Crash Location Prioritization

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Upgrading The Tennessee DOT TRIMS Application To A New GIS Platform

Urban Street Safety, Operation, and Reliability

100 Design Controls and Exceptions

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

NCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing

Roundabouts at Interchanges and High Speed Approaches

New Analytical Tools for Safety Management of Urban and Suburban Arterials. Douglas W. Harwood Midwest Research Institute Kansas City, MO

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ALL PUBLIC ROAD GEOSPATIAL REPRESENTATIVE STUDY

Washington State DOT: Pavement and Bridge Performance NPRM Comments for federal docket,

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Utilization of ArcPad and Mobile Technology to Update Street Signs in Local Government

Traffic Solutions. MUTCD Compliance Dates & Systematic Upgrades. John Nisbet State Traffic Engineer. Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation

Transportation Connectivity, Accessibility and Economic Opportunity Study

FINAL PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PLAN FOR THE NM 599 CORRIDOR

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Land Use and Transportation Modeling for Regional Problem Solving

100 Introduction Functional Classification Traffic Data Terrain & Locale Design & Legal Speed...

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PERMIT

Application of Road Safety Audits to Urban Streets

Table of Contents PERMIAN BASIN MPO TIP 2

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

report final Decennial Model Update Executive Summary Contra Costa Transportation Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

MPO Member Communities:

Automated Statewide Highway Intersection Safety Data Collection and Evaluation Strategy

RESOLUTION NO

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION REPORT (IJR) FOR INTERSTATE 75 AT OVERPASS ROAD

Automated Permitting and Routing for OS/OW. GIS-T, 2010 Session Jay Adams - Oklahoma DOT

PERFORMANCE-BASED ANALYSIS OF GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS SUPPLEMENTAL RESEARCH MATERIALS REPORT

Transportation Model Report

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Transcription:

Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) Traffic Safety Conference College Station, June 2016

Overview Project motivation and objectives MIRE-MIS Program RDETAP Project Overview of Data Extraction Tool Summary of TxDOT proof-of-concept Overview of pilot studies Live demo of Data Extraction Tool using WSDOT roadway inventory data Q&A 2

Project Motivation Highway safety data are vital to making sound decisions on the safe design and operation of roadways MAP-21 Guidance State safety data systems must support performance measures Collection, integration, improvement, and analysis of safety data Required identification of Fundamental Data Elements, a subset of MIRE elements Bottom line: access to a reliable inventory of roadway features and crash data will help agencies develop strategies that address deficiencies, using a focused and organized approach 3

MIRE Model Inventory of Roadway Elements Roadway Segment Intersection Intersection Leg Ramp Interchange Horizontal Curve Vertical Grade Segment Identifier Route Number Route/street Name Federal Aid/ Route Type Rural/Urban Designation Surface Type Begin Point Segment Descriptor End Point Segment Descriptor Segment Length Direction of Inventory Functional Class Median Type Unique Junction Identifier Location Identifier for Road 1 Crossing Point Location Identifier for Road 2 Crossing Point Intersection/Junction Geometry Intersection/Junction Traffic Control AADT [for Each Intersecting Road] AADT Year [for Each Intersecting Road] Unique Approach Identifier Intersection Identifier Unique Approach Identifier Approach AADT Quantity Approach AADT Year Date Approach Mode Type Approach Directional Flow Type Approach Through Lane Quantity Approach Left Turn Lane Type Approach Traffic Control Type Unique Ramp Identifier Location Identifier for Roadway at Beginning Ramp Terminal Location Identifier for Roadway at Ending Ramp Terminal Ramp Length Roadway Type at Beginning Ramp Terminal Roadway Type at Ending Ramp Terminal Ramp AADT Unique Interchange Identifier Road1 Crossing Point Location Identifier Road2 Crossing Point Location Identifier Additional Road Crossing Point Location Identifier Interchange Type Interchange Lighting Type Interchange Entering Traffic Volume Quantity Horizontal Curve ID Horizontal Curve Feature Type Horizontal Curve Degree Measurement Horizontal Curve Length Measurement Curve Superelevation Measurement Horizontal Transition Curve Type Horizontal Curve Deflection Angle Horizontal Curve Direction Type Grade Identifier Vertical Alignment Feature Type Gradient Percent Grade Length Measurement Vertical Curve Length Measurement 4

Fundamental Data Elements Non-Local Paved Roads Roadway Segment Intersection Interchange/Ramp Segment Identifier Route Number Route/street Name Federal Aid/ Route Type Rural/Urban Designation Surface Type Begin Point Segment Descriptor End Point Segment Descriptor Segment Length Direction of Inventory Functional Class Median Type Access Control One/Two-Way Operations Number of Through Lanes Location Identifier for Roadway at Beginning Ramp Terminal Location Identifier for Roadway at Ending Ramp Terminal Average Annual Daily Traffic AADT Year Type of Governmental Ownership Unique Junction Identifier Location Identifier for Road 1 Crossing Point Location Identifier for Road 2 Crossing Point Intersection/Junction Geometry Intersection/Junction Traffic Control AADT [for Each Intersecting Road] AADT Year [for Each Intersecting Road] Unique Approach Identifier Guidance on State Safety Data Systems, Table 1, dated April 14, 2016 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legidlslationandpolicy/fast/ssds_guidance.cfm Unique Interchange Identifier Location Identifier for Roadway at Beginning Ramp Terminal Ramp Length Roadway Type at Beginning Ramp Terminal Roadway Type at Ending Ramp Terminal Interchange Type Ramp AADT Year of Ramp AADT Functional Class Type of Governmental Ownership 5

MIRE-MIS MIRE Management Information System Development of two prototype data extraction tools: Tool 1 Runs on ArcGIS platform Scope is intersections and related intersection legs Tool 2 Requires proprietary software Incorporates intersection, traffic, geometry, route, speed limit, and turning movements data 6

MIRE-MIS OVERVIEW OF DATA EXTRACTION TOOL 7

Tool Purpose Process and integrate roadway inventory data from multiple, diverse sources Attach non-spatial attribute data to spatial roadway elements Intersections Intersection legs (intersection approach) Roadway segments Ramps Store data in geodatabase Export data for safety analysis 8

MIRE-MIS IHSDM Sources: FHWA, Google Street View, Utah DOT, TxDOT, WSDOT 9

Inputs and Outputs Input: GIS Data Layers Roadway network Roadway inventory Asset nodes MPO boundaries District boundaries County boundaries Local roadway data Output: Data for SafetyAnalyst Intersections Intersection legs Ramps Segments 10

Inputs and Outputs 11

Tool Components ArcGIS custom toolbar 6 ArcGIS ArcToolBox models ArcGIS custom data entry interfaces 12

Toolbar Buttons Edit intersection or leg (Manually) create intersection from node Delete intersection Export intersection and leg data Update all intersections and legs Update new intersections and legs 13

MIRE-MIS TXDOT PROOF-OF-CONCEPT 14

TxDOT Proof-of-Concept Can tools be adapted to data from other states? Objectives Use tool to generate intersection legs and attach spatial and non-spatial data to intersections and intersection legs Use TxDOT layers as-is adapt models and templates to TxDOT datasets and naming convention adapt attribute names and datatypes remove NH specific code, datasets, and hardcoded values 15

Data Processing Overview Roadway Inventory Roadway Nodes Other Data Initial Intersections Processed Intersections Tool 1 Processed Intersection Legs SafetyAnalyst 16

TxDOT Tool Adaptation TxDOT Roadway Inventory Sample Roadway Nodes Manual/QA Sample Initial Intersections Processed Intersections Generic Tool TxDOT Other Data Processed Intersection Legs SafetyAnalyst 17

Tool Adaptation: Data Inputs Use TxDOT input feature classes Roadway Inventory TxDOT Roadways MPO Boundaries County District Create new input feature classes Asset Nodes Intersections 18

TxDOT Preliminary Data Processing 19

TxDOT Preliminary Data Processing 1.Create sample roadway node feature class using TxDOT Roadways All crossing and intersecting roadway features regardless of functional classifications 2.Create sample initial intersection feature class Physical intersections on all state roads (state-state and statelocal) Manual process 20

TxDOT ArcGIS Models Modified existing 6 models Added two new models 0. Prep roadway (add unique ID attribute to Roadway Inventory layer) 1.a. Optional (add county name to intersection layer) 21

TxDOT Proof-of-Concept Intersection Legs Intersections Asset Nodes TxDOT Roadway Inventory Texas Roadways 22

MIRE-MIS PILOT STUDIES 23

Pilot Studies Pilot implementation at WSDOT Focus on FDEs plus additional state data Focus on intersections, intersection legs, and ramps Pilot implementation at MODOT Focus on FDEs Focus on intersections, intersection legs, and ramps Special interest in local data integration 24

Process Adapt tool to create generic version for implementation at other states Created MIRE data model Developed extensive documentation Conduct implementation meetings Modify tools, submit, collect feedback 25

WSDOT Implementation Start: August 2015, End: June 2016 Main issues Multiple intersection data layers, multiple intersection features per intersection Spatial inaccuracies of intersection features Continuous routes, breaking at intersection needed Determination of major/minor route 26

WSDOT Implementation Tool upgrades Compatibility with non-breaking routes at intersections Calculation of intersection offset Calculation of intersection skew angle Compatibility with divided highways (highways represented by two route features instead of one) 27

WSDOT Implementation 28

RDETAP Future Steps Complete MODOT pilot implementation Complete additional pilot implementation at state DOT Develop and distribute two guides Programmer guide focused on implementation User guide focused on tool usage and features Consider potential tool enhancements Interchange, horizontal curve, vertical grade 29

RDETAP Team Contact Information Role Name Agency Phone Email FHWA COTM Bob Pollack FHWA (202) 366-5019 robert.pollack@dot.gov PI Edgar Kraus TTI (210) 321-1240 e-kraus@tti.tamu.edu Task Manager Brett Graves Leidos (703) 318-4273 brett.o.graves@leidos.com Additional Team Members TTI: Jerry Le CTRE: Omar Smadi, Zachary Hans Leidos: Brian Chandler 30

Thank You! 31