Structural Design Calculations for: Lot 35 DP: Reliance Crescent, Beachlands, Auckland

Similar documents
3.4.2 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Stair cases

Lecture Retaining Wall Week 12

2016 DESIGN AND DRAWING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC One Way Spanning Slab XX

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

Contents. Foreword 1 Introduction 1

Advance Design of RC Structure Retaining Wall

7th task: Pad footing

Supervisor: Eng.Ibrahim mohammad. Prepared by:

DECK DAMAGE AND PENETRATIONS

Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Structural analysis

Analysis and Design of a Multi-storey Reinforced Concrete Building

STRENGTH EVALUATION OF A CRACKED SLAB REINFORCED WITH GROUTED TENDONS 1

Design of Reinforced Concrete Slabs

Multideck 146. Contents

6. Design of Portal Frames (For class held on 20 th, 26 th and 27 th March 07)

TCC Systems. Timber-Concrete Composite TIMBER IMAGINEERING INNOVATIVE TIMBER SOLUTIONS

DESIGN OF RC ELEMENTS UNIT 1 PART-A

Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)

FORMDECK. constructions. constructions

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

OCTOBER RibRaft TECHNICAL MANUAL CBI 3321/3323

System Assemblies & Load Tracing

Types of Foundations

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Reinforced Concrete Tilt-Up Wall Panel with Opening Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

SIDDHARTH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS :: PUTTUR Siddharth Nagar, Narayanavanam Road QUESTION BANK (DESCRIPTIVE)

Foundation or Footing Design: Part 1

CIVIL ENGINEERING YEAR QUESTION BANK

ADAPT-PT 2010 GETTING STARTED GUIDE

An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project 3D Analysis and Design of Al-Amal Hospital

Experimental study on the seismic performance of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed floor units.

System Assemblies & Load Tracing

Two-way slabs. Flat plate with or without drop panels / capitals

BOXSPAN RESIDENTIAL SPAN TABLES

Renovation of Buildings using Steel Technologies (ROBUST)

Foundation Design. π = pi ( radians or 180 ) ρ = reinforcement ratio in concrete beam design = A s /bd µ = coefficient of static friction

Austral Deck Design for Construction Loading. Permanent formwork and Span capability

ADAPT-PT 2012 GETTING STARTED GUIDE

Member Design - Timber Floor XX 20/08/2015 EC5 Ref Timber Material Properties

UNIT-1 RETAINING WALLS

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES PREPARED BY : SHAMILAH

Lysaght Bondek. Structural steel decking system Design and Construction Manual

MasterSeries Composite SlimFloor Beam Design Sample Output

CE2401-DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AND BRICK MASONRY QUESTION BANK

SIDDHARTH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS :: PUTTUR Siddharth Nagar, Narayanavanam Road QUESTION BANK (DESCRIPTIVE) UNIT-5 FOOTINGS & STAIRS

Basic notions and design code reccomendations Applications

7 Footings & Slabs 7.1 GENERAL

FEBRUARY RIBRAFT X-POD STRUCTURAL DESIGNERS GUIDE

SEPTEMBER RIBRAFT X-POD STRUCTURAL DESIGNERS GUIDE

STRUCTURAL ISSUES IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. Presented by: Susan L. Lasecki P.E., S.E.

By: DX Arquitectos + DEL SANTE Arquitectos

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

Structural Design of Pergola with Airfoil Louvers

DESIGN OF PREFAB RC BUILDING USING EPS FOR DISASTER RESISTANCE

V Slab Bridge Design Software, Version 4.0 Superstructure Design Check

The Steel Construction Institute

Project: Nationwide FLS Upgrades Canterbury Block Structural Calculations: Christchurch

R CODE CHANGE PROPOSAL FORM (See instructions on page 2)

DATA SHEET 3 Concrete Masonry Lintels MARCH 2013

LATTICE GIRDERS CONNECTING ELEMENTS BETWEEN PRECAST CONCRETE COMPONENTS AND IN-SITU CONCRETE

IZODOM 2000 POLSKA Zduńska Wola, ul. Ceramiczna 2. tel , , tel./fax

DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS

Combined footings A mat or raft or floating foundation Pile caps

Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

UNIT-I DESIGN CONCEPTS, DESIGN OF BEAMS Part - A (Short Answer Questions)

Dramix. Floors on piles. Introduction. General SF Theory Ground supported floors Jointless floors. Dramix. Tests Design Execution Advantages SSW

Software Verification

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1

EFFECT OF DEEP EXCAVATION SUPPORTED BY CONCRETE SOLIDER PILE WITH STEEL SHEET PILE LAGGING WALL ON ADJACENT EXISTING BUILDINGS

Better ZSOIL, Better Geotechnical Analysis

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements

Interaction between ductile RC perimeter frames and floor slabs containing precast units

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY USING SAP-2000

Fire Behaviour of Long Span Composite Floor

Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Building Subjected to Lateral Forces

UltraBond Composite Floor System. Installation Guidelines & Load Tables

Section 1: Summary and recommendations Volumes 1 3

Structural Design Course

UltraBond Composite Floor System. Installation Guidelines & Load Tables

Substructure systems, specifically retaining walls

Building Construction

DEFLECTION OF CONCRETE FLOOR SYSTEMS FOR SERVICEABILITY 1

ASSIGNMENT 1 ANALYSIS OF PRESTRESS AND BENDING STRESS BFS 40303

mortarless masonry Design Manual Part 1 (IS 456:2000) Section 1 Page 1 IS 456:2000 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

Talk to us, THE SMART DECKING PEOPLE Visit or Global Roofing Solutions Bond-Dek Composite Deck

1 Prepared By:Mr.A.Sathiyamoorthy, M.E., AP/Civil

KSK COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CE 2505-DESIGN OF RC ELEMENTS QUESTION BANK

Boyds Bear Country Pigeon Forge, TN

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab behavior. One-way slabs carry load in one direction. Two-way slabs carry load in two directions.

APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF PILED RAFT. Rameez Gahlot1, Roshni J John2

Example of a modelling review Roof truss

Shin Shin Apparels Ltd. (9615) Dag RS. 228, JL 73, Gorat, East Norshinghapur, Zirabo, Savar ( N, E) 27.MAY.2014

Session 5: Precast Concrete Floors. Rick Henry Courtesy of University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering

Transcription:

Structural Design Calculations for: Lot 35 DP: 449888 23 Reliance Crescent, Beachlands, Auckland Job #: 34541 May 2013

EDGE BEAM RAFT DESIGN - EDGE BEAM <Job No.>: 34541 Date: 21/05/2013 <Job Title>: 23 Reliance Crescent Designer: KT <Description>: Edge Beam Checker: AA Loadings WALLS Lower: = 38 kg/m 2 = 0.37 kpa Upper Wall must be Timber Upper: = 38 kg/m 2 = 0.37 kpa Height = 3.40 m Load/m = 1.27 kn/m S Other (Specify Wall Weight) Weight = 38 kg/m 2 = 0.37 kpa Height = 2.80 m Load = 1 kn/m L Tributary Roof and Floor Lengths SUSPENDED MID-FLOOR Tributary Length L/2 Unit/Floor = Topping = = 0.38 kpa Live Loading = 1.50 kpa Super Imposed Dead = kpa Tributary Span = 1.25 m Dead Load/m = 0.48 kn/m Live Load/m = 1.88 kn/m ROOF Tributary Length = S = 0.46 kpa Live Loading 2.00 kpa Tributary Span = 1.90 m Dead Load/m = 0.87 kn/m Live Loadings Summary Walls 2.31 kn/m Dead Mid Floors 0.48 kn/m Dead 1.88 kn/m Live Slab* 3.42 kn/m Dead+SDL 0.90 kn/m Live Roof 0.87 kn/m Dead kn/m Live^ Extra Dead kn/m Dead Extra Live kn/m Live * Includes Edge Beam Weight, SDL = 0.5 kpa LL = 1.5 kpa ^ Roof LL not added if midfloor exists else LL = 0.25 kpa Page 1

EDGE BEAM Job Details: 23 Reliance Crescent 34541 21/5/13 Working Loads Dead 7.08 kn/m Live 2.78 kn/m Ultimate Loads (1.2G + 1.5Q) Dead 8.50 kn/m Live 4.16 kn/m Total Ultimate Load on Edge w = 12.66 kn/m Wall Construction Type Edge Beam Details Beam Width = 300 mm Pod Depth = 220 mm Top slab Depth = 85 mm Self Weight = 2.20 kn/m Construction Type = Standard Raft Construction dependable bearing capacity: 150 kpa Bearing Check = OK! Working Pressure = 27 kpa Top Steel: 1HD12 2HD12 Continuous Piers (N.B. All Edge Beam Load in to 'strip' footing) Bearing Capacity under Piers: kpa Assume 100 kpa Bearing Under Edge Beam, unless a Soil Report indicates otherwise. Bearing Check = All Load Here Pressure = kpa 100 kpa min or as specified in Report under loadbearing areas. Top Steel: The prescribed Edge Beam design is: Standard Raft Contruction 300 mm wide edge beam with 1HD12 in top & 2HD12 in bottom Mesh 1HD12 Location (ie: which wall): Edge Beam 85 l 220 l l Polystyrene 300 2HD12 Page 2

Project: 23 Reliance Crescent Job Number: 34541 Cantilevered Raft Edge Cantilevered length: Load on edge beam: P = 9.844783 kn/m rib spacing = 1300 mm Multiply for rib spacing = 0.77 m 12.7982182 kn M* = 11.86799 knm Check cracking moment: Mcr = fr Ig yt Ig = 5.82E+08 mm4 yt = 67.82075 mm f'c = 20 MPa fr = 3.58 MPa ømcr = 26.1 knm Therefore ømcr > M* OK. ømu = øa s f y (d-a/2) Mesh = SE62 Area per m = 146 mm2 a = As fy mesh yield = 500 MPa 0.85 f'c b reinforcing diameter = mm spacing = 1300 mm reinforcing yield = 500 MPa As fy = 73 a = 42.94118 dmesh = 270 mm dbars = 275 mm ømu = 15.4 kn/m OK Check SLS SLS load = 7.172736 kn/m = 9.324557 kn per rib spacing Msls = 8.319943 knm Mcr greater than SLS moment, therefore OK

INTERNAL RIB RAFT DESIGN - INTERNAL RIB <Job No.>: 34541 Date: 21/05/2013 <Job Title>: 23 Reliance Crescent Designer: KT <Description>: Internal Rib Checker: AA Loadings WALLS Lower: = 400 kg/m 2 = 3.92 kpa Upper: = 400 kg/m 2 = 3.92 kpa S Other (Specify Wall Weight) Weight = 30 kg/m 2 = 0.29 kpa Height = 6.20 m Load = 2 kn/m SUSPENDED MID-FLOOR Tributary Length = (L 1 +L 2 )/2 L 1 L 2 Unit/Floor = Topping = = 0.38 kpa Live Loading = kpa Super Imposed Dead = kpa Tributary Roof and Floor Lengths Tributary Span = m Dead Live ROOF Tributary Length = S (Check if Rafter or Truss) = 0.46 kpa Live Loading 0.25 kpa Tributary Span = m Dead Live Loadings Summary Walls 1.82 kn/m Dead Mid Floors kn/m Dead kn/m Live Slab* 3.18 kn/m Dead+SDL 1.80 kn/m Live Roof kn/m Dead kn/m Live^ Extra Dead kn/m Dead Extra Live kn/m Live * Includes Internal Rib Weight, SDL = 0.5 kpa LL = 1.5 kpa ^ Roof LL not added if midfloor exists else LL = 0.25 kpa Page 4

INTERNAL RIB Job Details: 23 Reliance Crescent Job Number: 34541 21/5/13 Working Loads Dead 5.00 kn/m Live 1.80 kn/m Ultimate Loads (1.2G + 1.5Q) Dead 6.01 kn/m Live 2.70 kn/m Total Ultimate Load on Internal w = 8.71 kn/m Internal Rib Details Rib Width = 100 mm Pod Depth = 220 mm Top slab Depth = 85 mm Self Weight = 0.73 kn/m Construction Type Standard Raft Construction dependable bearing capacity: 150 kpa Bearing Check = OK! Working Pressure = 57 kpa 1HD12 Continuous Piers (N.B. All Interal Load in to 'strip' footing) Bearing Capacity: kpa Assume 100 kpa Bearing Under Loadbearing Rib, unless a Soil Report indicates otherwise. Bearing Check = All Load Here Pressure = kpa 100 kpa min or as specified in Report under loadbearing areas. The prescribed internal rib design is: Mesh 85 Standard Raft Contruction, 100 wide Rib required with 1HD12 in bottom Location (ie: which wall): Internal Rib 220 Polystyrene l Polystyrene 100 1HD12 Page 5

INTERNAL THICKENING RAFT DESIGN - INTERNAL LOADBEARING RIB <Job No.>: 34541 Date: 21/05/2013 <Job Title>: 23 Reliance Crescent Designer: KT <Description>: Internal Thickening Checker: AA Loadings WALLS Lower: = 400 kg/m 2 = 3.92 kpa Upper: = 400 kg/m 2 = 3.92 kpa S Other (Specify Wall Weight) Weight = 30 kg/m 2 = 0.29 kpa Height = 4.50 m Load = 1 kn/m SUSPENDED MID-FLOOR Tributary Length = (L 1 +L 2 )/2 L 1 L 2 Unit/Floor = Topping = = 0.38 kpa Live Loading = kpa Super Imposed Dead = kpa Tributary Roof and Floor Lengths Tributary Span = m Dead Live ROOF Tributary Length = S (Check if Rafter or Truss) = 0.46 kpa Live Loading 0.25 kpa Tributary Span = 3.70 m Dead Load/m = 1.70 kn/m Live Load/m = 0.93 kn/m Loadings Summary Walls 1.32 kn/m Dead Mid Floors kn/m Dead kn/m Live Slab* 4.64 kn/m Dead+SDL 1.80 kn/m Live Roof 1.70 kn/m Dead 0.93 kn/m Live^ Extra Dead kn/m Dead Extra Live kn/m Live * Includes Internal Rib Weight, SDL = 0.5 kpa LL = 1.5 kpa ^ Roof LL not added if midfloor exists else LL = 0.25 kpa Page 6

INTERNAL THICKENING Job Details: 23 Reliance Crescent Job Number: 34541 21/5/13 Working Loads Dead 7.67 kn/m Live 2.73 kn/m Ultimate Loads (1.2G + 1.5Q) Dead 9.20 kn/m Live 4.09 kn/m Total Ultimate Load on Internal w = 13.29 kn/m Internal Rib Details Rib Width = 300 mm Pod Depth = 220 mm Top slab Depth = 85 mm Self Weight = 2.20 kn/m Construction Type Standard Raft Construction dependable bearing capacity: 150 kpa Bearing Check = OK! Working Pressure = 29 kpa 2HD12 Continuous Piers (N.B. All Interal Load in to 'strip' footing) Bearing Capacity: kpa Assume 100 kpa Bearing Under Loadbearing Rib, unless a Soil Report indicates otherwise. Bearing Check = All Load Here Pressure = kpa 100 kpa min or as specified in Report under loadbearing areas. The prescribed internal rib design is: Mesh 85 Standard Raft Contruction, 300 wide Rib required with 2HD12 in bottom Location (ie: which wall): Internal Thickening 220 Polystyrene l l Polystyrene 300 2HD12 Page 7

Job No: 34541 Job Title: 23 Reliance Crescent Page: Job Description: Sliding resistance Date: By: Chkd: 21/05/2013 KT AA Calculation of Shear Pile Requirements Use AS1170 design philosphy of preventing damaging movement up to an SLS event,and thereafter accepting increasing levels of damage as the event increases. Assumed Class C soil: City/town: Auckland C(t) = Ch(t) Z R N(T,D) Ch(t) Z Rs (25 yr RP) Ru 500yr 2.36 0.13 0.25 1 Assume T1 = 0.4 N(T,D) 1 SLS ku = 1 + (u-1)t1/0.7 C(t) SLS 0.08 ku = 1.14 C(t) ULS 0.31 Cd(T1) = C(t) Sp/ku For base sliding Sp = 1.0 SLS Cd(T1) = 0.08 Note for Class D soil SLS Cd(t1) = 0.10 ULS Cd(T1) = 0.27 ULS Cd(t1) = 0.34 Testing by Dr McManus University of Canterbury (Geotechnical Society Symposium, 2003) found the friction coefficient of slab on polythene on sand had peak friction co-efficients of 0.42 for an unloaded slab and 0.53 for a loaded slab. Residual friction coefficient were 0.38 and 0.49 respectively. These values are some what lower than that published by other sources, normally 0.7 peak and 0.5 residual. Even using the lower values there will be no relative movement between the slab and the ground at SLS level event on either Class C or D soil Therefore, based on the above, shear key piles are unnecessary.