The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

Similar documents
STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Restoration:

Reducing Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Pollution Progress Update. Jeff Corbin, Senior Advisor to the EPA Administrator

Bay Barometer Spotlight on Health and Restoration in the. Chesapeake Bayand its Watershed

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

BAY BAROMETER. Health and Restoration. in the Chesapeake Watershed

The State of the Bay Restoration The Moment In Time. Beth McGee Senior Scientist Chesapeake Bay Foundation

Board of Trustees C/O Carolyn Mitchell, Honors & Awards Coordinator American Society of Landscape Architects 636 Eye St. NW Washington, DC 20001

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Final draft January 29, 2014

Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Challenges & Opportunities

The Chesapeake Bay Program Biennial Strategy Review System: A Guide to Your Quarterly Progress Meeting

CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION Save the Bay

Chesapeake Bay Program in Pennsylvania. Karl G. Brown Executive Secretary PA State Conservation Commission

State of the Bay 2006

Chesapeake Bay Updates. Agricultural Advisory Board June 18, 2014 Andy Zemba Interstate Waters Office

Fact Sheet. Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Goals for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL

Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2016

Guiding the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay: The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership. Keely Clifford U.S. Embassy Paris

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA

Factoring in the Influence of the Conowingo Reservoir on State Allocations

the ability to manage for a stable and among the jurisdictions, and productive crab population and fishery by implement accountable monitoring

Protecting & Restoring Local Waters and the Chesapeake Bay

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

STATE. of the BAY MARK REGAN

Parts Per Million. Vocabulary: MCL, MCLG, ppm (parts per million), dilution

2017 Revised Guide for Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Two-year Milestones

Fishing and Boating: Past, Present, and Restoration Thoughts

Marel King, Pennsylvania Director Chesapeake Bay Commission

2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement:

Student Data Sheet 1

Osher Course. What Lies Beneath the Inland Bays?

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting

THE STATE CHESAPEAKE BAY. A Report to the Citizens of the Bay Region OF THE

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Jointly developed by C-AGG and Chesapeake Bay Foundation December 2015

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Planning Targets. For WQGIT Review Draft November 7, 2017

Chesapeake Bay Restoration -- Phase III JULY 13, 2018

BACKGROUND. David Everett

Fish Habitat Management Strategy Outline

Water Quality Trading and Offsets in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Beth McGee Chesapeake Bay Foundation

Water Monitoring in Spa Creek: A Summary

COG Region s Potomac Water Quality & Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet (current draft, as of 7/28/09)

Chesapeake Bay Strategy Goals Framework

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Reducing Pollution Indicators Updated May 2018

Chesapeake Bay Foundation 101. Robert Jennings

Water Quality Standards Attainment

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM BAY BAROMETER HEALTH & RESTORATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN - UPDATE. Update to Chesapeake Bay Program STAR January 25, 2018

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

Integrating Air and Water Environmental Management in the Chesapeake Bay Program: An Encouraging Tale

Restoring a National Treasure: Chesapeake Bay. Presented by Dan Nees, Director Environmental Finance Center University of Maryland April 27, 2007

Bay Barometer. The Chesapeake Bay watershed is. A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2009

Decision Rationale. Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus for the Sassafras River, Cecil and Kent Counties, Maryland 4/1/2002

Putting the 17 Million Chesapeake Bay Watershed Residents on a Regulatory Pollution Diet

CHESAPEAKE BAY. A Report to the Citizens of the Bay Region CBP/TRS 283/ Health & Restoration Assessment. PART ONE: Ecosystem Health

Understanding the Influence of the Conowingo Reservoir Infill on Expectations for States Nutrient and Sediment Pollutant Load Reductions

The Chesapeake Bay TMDL

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

SCIENCE PRIORITIES OF THE

Wakefield Lake TMDL Public Meeting 3/17/2014. Jen Koehler, PE Barr Engineering

The Dead Zone. Use the notes provided (attached to this sheet) to answer the following questions.

PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS

Anthony Moore Assistant Secretary for Chesapeake Bay Restoration

Stay Strong on Stormwater

CBF Water Quality Interactive Map

STATE OF THE BAY HEALTH INDEX 32. cbf.org

Indicator Framework SUPPORTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM INTO THE FUTURE. Management Board Meeting September 30, 2015

Content Overview of the next Chesapeake Bay Ambient Water Quality Criteria Technical Addendum

Funding, Progress, and Other Issues Regarding Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution

OUR MISSION: To preserve, protect, and restore Delaware s Inland Bays the water that flows into them and the watershed around them.

Strategy to Accelerate the Protection and Restoration of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay

Renewing the Water Industry. March 23, 2017 Karen Pallansch, CEO Alexandria Renew Enterprises

The Choice is Ours... Let s choose clean water

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Coastal Bays. report card. Modeling nutrients, assessing climate vulnerabilities, and promoting environmental justice

Lake Washington. Water Quality Assessment Report. Copyright 2012 PLM Lake & Land Management Corp.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting (STAR) Team Briefing and Options Paper:

Murky Waters. More Accountability Needed for Agricultural Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Fish Habitat

The Importance of Riparian Forests

The Chesapeake Bay Program

Coastal Bays. report card. Gold stars for partnerships

Proposed Approach to Developing Maryland s Phase III WIP

Countywide Action Plans

Chesapeake Bay. report card

From My Backyard to Our Bay It s the 911 for the Chesapeake Bay

Countywide Action Plans

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

Jefferson County & The Chesapeake Bay Initiative

MARK TWAIN LAKE 2002 WATER QUALITY

Fact Sheet Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

State of the Lake Environment Report December Clayton Lake

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 3/27/18. MEDIA CONTACTS Jerry White, Jr. Spokane Riverkeeper, (509)

MARK TWAIN LAKE 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT

Climate Change Impacts of Most Concern for CB Agreement Goal & Outcome Attainment

Environmental ClientAlert

Transcription:

PHASE II The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint: THE BEST HOPE FOR RESTORING CLEAN WATER THIS NATION HAS EVER SEEN Peter McGowan/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Strategic Plan 2016-2020

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation s Strategic Plan Phase II: Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint THE BEST HOPE FOR RESTORING CLEAN WATER THIS NATION HAS EVER SEEN 2016 2020 Mission: Save the Bay, and keep it saved, as defined by reaching a 70 on CBF s Health Index. (See Appendix.) Vision: The Chesapeake Bay and its tributary rivers, broadly recognized as a national treasure, will be highly productive and in good health as measured by established water-quality standards. (See Appendix.) The result will be clear water, free of damaging impacts from toxic contaminants, and with healthy oxygen levels. Natural filters on both the land and in the water will provide resilience to the entire Chesapeake Bay system. Human and natural systems will thrive as a result of significantly improved water quality throughout the watershed. Goal: Federal, state, and local governments will fully enforce the Clean Water Act and all other clean water laws and regulations. The Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint, the precedent-setting program for pollution reduction, will be defended from powerful opposition forces trying to derail it and will be on track to meet its 2025 deadline. When fully implemented, the Blueprint will result in the delisting of the Bay. This will achieve the equivalent of a 40 on CBF s Health Index, due to the resulting reduction of nitrogen loads to 186 million pounds per year and phosphorus loads to 12.5 million pounds per year. 2016 2020 Strategic Plan 1

Outcomes: 1. There is broad recognition among the public, media, elected and appointed officials and others that the Bay is a national treasure and that saving the Bay is a national priority; 2. All states and the District of Columbia are on track to meet 2025 Blueprint goals; 3. Virginia and Maryland are halfway to achieving and maintaining their goal of 10 billion additional adult oysters by 2025; 4. There is broad recognition that Blueprint pollution limits are a cap and that new loads must be offset; and 5. CBF s board, staff, and supporting constituency are diverse, reflecting the demographic profile of the region, and our programs reflect the interests of a diverse constituency. Strategies: While CBF will continue to defend and implement the Blueprint across the watershed, a special emphasis will be focused on Pennsylvania. Pollution flowing down the Susquehanna is overwhelming progress made thus far by Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Unless Pennsylvania dramatically increases its pollution reduction efforts, the Bay will continue to be polluted. CBF will rebrand its operations to reflect the benefit of clean water in Pennsylvania, accelerate all of its operations in the state, and seek broad partnerships with sporting interests focused on fresh water fisheries. Throughout the entire watershed, CBF will: Educate strategic and diverse stakeholders, opinion leaders, elected and appointed officials, school administrators, teachers, and students about the imperative of clean water. Education will serve as a means to student and citizen engagement and behavior change. Advocate for the defense and implementation of the Blueprint. Drawing on the beneficial results of CBF educational efforts, we will engage adults and young people in efforts to ensure that good laws and regulations are developed, introduced, passed, retained, and enforced. Litigate to ensure Blueprint implementation, and to expose and rectify the most egregious cases of non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations. CBF will intervene in litigation brought by Blueprint opponents to derail it. Restore natural filters in order to demonstrate the feasibility of Blueprint implementation to achieve demonstrable, specific, on-the-ground water-quality improvements. Restoration work on private land will strive to have every landowner actively advocate for Blueprint implementation. Diversify our staff, and board, as a means to connect with and engage the diverse coalition of stakeholders necessary to save the Bay. Consistent with our mission, CBF will seek to work on issues which reflect the interests of diverse constituencies. 2 Chesapeake Bay Foundation

APPENDIX 1. CBF S HEALTH INDEX Since 1998, CBF has attempted to answer the question How is the Bay doing? by publishing an annual State of the Bay report. Now published biannually, this report examines the best available science and other information about 13 indicators of Bay health in three categories: pollution, habitat, and fisheries. We measure the current state of the Bay against the healthiest Chesapeake we can describe the Bay Captain John Smith depicted in the early 1600s, a theoretical score of 100. We say the Bay will be stable when its health index score is 50 and saved when it is 70. 2. CHESAPEAKE CLEAN WATER BLUEPRINT The Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint comprises what is known legally as the Bay s Total Maximum Daily Load (or TMDL) science-based pollution reduction targets and Bay jurisdictions Watershed Implementation Plans (or WIPs) to meet those targets by 2025. 3. POLLUTION LEVELS Far too much nitrogen and phosphorus pollution enters local rivers, streams, and the Chesapeake Bay each year. Bay scientists estimate that the Bay can tolerate, on average, roughly 187 million pounds of nitrogen pollution and 12.5 million pounds of phosphorus pollution annually. In addition, scientists have established a sediment pollution maximum of about 6.5 billion pounds. In 2013, more than 243 million pounds of nitrogen pollution and 17 million pounds of phosphorus pollution poured into local rivers, streams, and the Chesapeake Bay. On average, more than 8 billion pounds of sediment enters the system annually. 2016 2020 Strategic Plan 3

4. WATER-QUALITY STANDARDS Clean water is essential for all Bay life. Nitrogen and phosphorus pollution are the Bay s largest problems, causing dead zones, algal blooms, and murky water. Bay scientists have set water-quality standards that are required for a healthy Bay. CBF will measure against the following: a. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Scientists generally agree that dissolved oxygen concentrations of 5.0 mg/l (milligrams per liter) or greater will allow the Chesapeake Bay s aquatic creatures to live and thrive. However, because oxygen requirements differ from species to species, the water-quality standard for oxygen varies across the Bay. In the deepest parts of the Bay, where worms and small clams live and where oxygen levels are naturally low, DO concentrations of at least 1 mg/l are required. Fish, crabs, and oysters that live or feed along the bottom require oxygen concentrations of 3 mg/l and greater. Spawning migratory fish and their eggs and larvae need up to 6 mg/l during these sensitive life stages. In 2010 (the most recent year for which data are readily available), 38 percent of the Bay s waters met water-quality standards for DO. b. Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll is one way to measure algae in the Bay. High amounts of Chlorophyll a are an indicator of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, which fuels the growth of algae. Algal blooms block sunlight from reaching underwater grasses, which are an important habitat for fish, crabs, and other Bay life. When algae die, they decay in a process that depletes deeper waters of oxygen. In those areas of the Bay where Chlorophyll a serves as an indicator of water quality, attainment of numeric standards between 10 and 23 ug/l (micrograms per liter) during spring and summer months must be met. In 2009, only 29 percent of the Bay met Chlorophyll a standards. c. Water Clarity Water clarity is the measure of the amount of sunlight that can penetrate through the water. It is the single most important factor determining the growth and survival of underwater grasses, which fish and crabs need for food and habitat. The restoration goal for underwater grasses is 185,000 acres. In 2010, there were 79,675 acres of grasses Baywide or 43 percent of the goal. 4 Chesapeake Bay Foundation