Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

Similar documents
ITM Oxygen Development for Advanced Oxygen Supply

Integration of Ion Transport Membrane Technology with Oxy-Combustion Power Generation Systems

ITM Oxygen: The New Oxygen Supply for the New IGCC Market

Ceramic Membranes for Oxygen Production in Vision 21 Gasification Systems

The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results

The Electric Power Research Institute s Large-Scale Demonstration ti Program for a Low-Carbon Future

Oxy-Fuel Combustion Using OTM For CO 2 Capture from Coal Power Plants

SYNGAS-FIRED ALLAM CYCLE PROJECT UPDATE

WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design

A Novel Integrated Oxy- Combustion and Flue Gas Purification Technology: A Near Zero Emissions Pathway

Power Plant Water Usage and Loss

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

EPRI Advanced Coal with CCS Industry Technology Demonstration Projects

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Integration of Indirect-Fired Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles with Coal-Based Heaters

A Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion System for Carbon Capture. Ben Kumfer

MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs

Advanced Oxyfuel Combus4on Concepts for CO2 Capture

New Recovery Act Funding Boosts Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Research and Development

Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems

NOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

Process Systems Engineering

Kevin Fogash Air Products and Chemicals

Compact Gasification Integration Studies

Advanced Ultra Supercritical (A-USC) Technology Developments and Update on the US DOE-funded A-USC ComTest Project

Overview of Alstom s Chemical Looping Programs

CO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal

Total Fossil Generation Mix CO 2 Forecast

Fossil Energy Cost and Performance Western Coal Baseline Study

A Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion System for Carbon Capture. Ben Kumfer

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

Affordable, Low-Carbon Diesel Fuel from Domestic Coal and Biomass

CO 2. Capture: Comparison of Cost & Performance of Gasification and Combustion-based Plants

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Flexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation

Advanced Coal Technology 101

3ii. io.e/pc/ COMMERCIAL DEMONSTRATION OF THE NOXSO SOJNO, REMOVAL FLUE GAS CLEANUP SYSTEM 7 U Quarterly Technical Progress Report No.

Furnace Injection of Alkaline Sorbents for Sulfuric Acid Control. Semi-Annual Technical Progress Report. October 1, 2002 March 31, 2003

Task 6.3/ Silicon Carbide Joining

FutureGen The Right Project at the Right Time

Simulation-Based Optimization Framework with Heat Integration

SO 3 Emissions From a Tangentially- Fired Pilot Scale Boiler Operating Under Oxy-Combustion Conditions

Clean coal technology required for the future and development of IGCC technology.

International Conference CO 2 Summit: Technology and Opportunity Vail, Colorado - June 6-10, 2010

MONTHLY TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT. Product Design Improvement

Steady State and Transient Modeling for the 10 MWe SCO 2 Test Facility Program

Inventors: Paul L. Micheli Mark C. Williams Edward L. Parsons

Advanced Hydrogen and CO 2 Capture Technology for Sour Syngas

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Purification of oxy-combustion flue gas for SOx/NOx removal and high CO 2 recovery

Fossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)

Integrated Membrane Reactor for Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture

Office of Fossil Energy Overview of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Technology Effort

Future Gen An Interested Party s Perspective

CO 2 Capture and Storage for Coal-Based Power Generation

GE Global Research Rahul Bidkar Doug Hofer Andrew Mann Max Peter Rajkeshar Singh Edip Sevincer Azam Thatte

CO 2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers: Commercial Scale Demonstration Project

Commercial Viability of Near-Zero Emissions Oxy-Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coal Power Plants

OXYGEN ENHANCED COMBUSTION FOR NOx CONTROL

Fire-Side Corrosion Rates of Heat Transfer Surface Materials for Air- and Oxy-coal Combustion

Progress in NAKOSO 250 MW Air-Blown IGCC Demonstration Project

What Nuclear Reactor Companies Need

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL

Geostatistical Analysis of the Bakken Petroleum System: Oil and Water Production ESRI Petroleum GIS Conference Houston, Texas April 27, 2016

Vitrification of Three Low-Activity Radioactive Waste Streams from Hanford

Gasification to meet refinery hydrogen, electricity and steam demands: Availability vs Costs

New Nuclear: Small Modular Reactors and Opportunities for Kansas

Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology

DOE Perspective on Advanced Energy Materials

Siemens Carbon Capture Technology

HEALY CLEAN COAL PROJECT. QUARTERLY TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT No. 21 FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1996 THROUGH MARCH 31, 1996

Sweeny Gasification Project February 8, 2010

Oxycombustion for carbon capture on coal power plants: advantages, innovative solutions and key projects

NET Power. Truly Clean, Cheaper Energy. California Energy Commission CO 2 Capture Technology Workshop. April 16, April NET Power

NuScale Small Modular Reactors:

GASIFICATION for COMBINED PRODUCTION OF ELECTRIC POWER AND CHEMICALS

EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE FOSSIL CYCLES INCORPORATING CO 2 REMOVAL

OxyCoal Combustion Technology for CO 2 Capture

Oxy-Coal for Electric Power Generation: Status and Prospects

EPRI s R&D Program for Reducing CO 2 Emissions from the Electric Power Sector

GTC Conference. Advanced IGCC with Partial Carbon Capture. October Jacobs. Presented at:

GE Energy. IGCC vs. Carbon

Conference: Advanced Coal-Fired Power Systems '96 Review Meeting

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

2. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

Technical and Economic Evaluation of a 70 MWe Biomass IGCC Using Emery Energy s Gasification Technology

Development Of The sco 2 Allam Cycle

Development in the Air Separation Unit Addressing the Need of Increased Oxygen Demand from the Oxy-Blast Furnace

What resources do we have?

California Hydrogen Infrastructure Project

APPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION

Biomass Reburning: Modeling/Engineering Studies. Quarterly Report October 1 - December 31, By Vladimir M. Zamansky

A Technology in Transition. John Topper

Clean Coal Technology

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

Transcription:

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production Rob Steele EPRI (rsteele@epri.com) Phil Armstrong - Air Products and Chemicals Inc. Arun Bose DOE NETL Gasification Technologies Conference Washington, D.C. November 3, 2010

Project Overview and Update A ceramic membrane to separate oxygen from air A Phase 3 U.S. DOE Cooperative Agreement - to develop the ITM Oxygen technology at the intermediate scale though 2013 U.S. DOE NETL, Air Products (AP), EPRI, and others Planned Intermediate-Scale Test Unit (ISTU) 100 ton-o 2 /day integrated with 5 15 MW e turbomachinery system A Phase 4 DOE award, $71.7 million, to accelerate Development of ITM module fabrication scale-up 2000 ton-o 2 /day pre-commercial scale facility (110MWe oxycoal or 250MWe IGCC) EPRI formed seven member power industry collaboration in 2009 Additional members are welcome to join 2

ITM Oxygen Membranes Single-stage high purity oxygen Extremely selective and very fast transport for oxygen Very compact Dense membrane Hot Compressed Air Oxygen flowing from air through dense membrane One Membrane in Module Porous membrane support Dense, slotted backbone Spacer 0.5 ton/day module Images courtesy Air Products. Air Products. All rights reserved. 800-900 o C (1500-1650 o F) 14+ bara (200+ psia) 3 High Purity Oxygen Product

ITM Oxygen Wafers and Module Scaled-up to Commercial Size 1.0 ton/day Stack Progression to commercial size wafers 0.5 ton/day Stack Images courtesy Air Products. Air Products. All rights reserved. 4

ITM Oxygen Process Design options for ITM Oxygen process: Power co-production Minimum fuel consumption Minimum CO 2 emissions Nitrogen Images courtesy Air Products. Air Products. All rights reserved. Flue Gas to CO 2 Purification Ambient Air Fuel ITM Oxygen Process 99.5% Oxygen Cooling Water Electric Power, Steam 5

Expansion of Ceramic Processing Infrastructure at Ceramatec, Inc. (Salt Lake City, Utah, US) New equipment in operation All wafers for planned 100 ton/day test Continuous Tapecaster Lamination Press High Speed Laser Cutter Sintering Furnace Slide courtesy Air Products. Air Products. 2009. All rights reserved. Modified with permission. 6

Ceramic Manufacturing Process at Ceramatec Continues to Improve and Scale-up Slide courtesy Air Products. Air Products. 2009. All rights reserved. Modified with permission. Large-scale wafer sintering kiln for use in current Phase 3 Capacity: > 25 ton/day per load Currently: Undergoing qualification trials 7

Multiple Visits to the Subscale Engineering Prototype (SEP) Site Project progress to date: Initial testing of 0.5 ton/day modules started in 2006 Over 600 days of cumulative operation in multiple runs Initial testing of 1.0 ton/day modules began in February 2010 Subscale Engineering Prototype Air Products. All rights reserved. Modified with permission. 0.5 ton/day 1.0 ton/day Air Products. All rights reserved. Modified with permission. Air Products. All rights reserved. Modified with permission. 8

Intermediate-Scale Test Unit (ISTU) Block Flow Diagram 100 ton/day Oxygen Design features of IGCC and Oxycombustion Front-End Engineering Design completed Project execution underway Fired Heater Oxygen Air TSA Exhaust main air circuit fuel line or hot equipment O 2 line or equipment ambient temperature equipment Hot Gas Expander Combustor Fuel Fuel Fan Combustion Air ITM 9

Advanced Gas Turbines Firing Temperature Evolution of Gas Turbines F-Class GT: ~2500 F [1370 C] (GE 7F and Siemens 5000F) G/H-Class GT: ~2600 F [1430 C] (GE, Siemens, MHI) J-Class GT: ~2700 F [1480 C] (MHI) Increased air extraction Higher output Higher net plant efficiency U08-102701 Image provided by Siemens. Used with permission. All rights reserved. 10

Advanced IGCC with CCS Process Flow Diagram: IGCC w/ ITM, G-Frame GT w/ CO 2 Removal ITM Steam Tail Gas Sulfur Recovery Unit Acid Gas Sulfur Oxygen Coal Gasification Island Water Gas Shift Syngas Cooling & Hg Removal H 2 S Acid Gas Removal Unit CO 2 Acid Gas Removal Unit Fired Heater Sulfur Polishing Slag Syngas Diluent (N 2 ) CO 2 Comp. CO 2 To Pipeline Boost Comp. Extraction Air Syngas Conditioning HRSG Air Gas Turbine Steam Turbine 11

EPRI Due Diligence (TU Report # 1020202) Cryo ASU vs. ITM in IGCC w/ CCS (G-Frame GT) Cryo Reference Case ITM Case Gas Turbine Power 1.00 1.00 Steam Turbine Power 1.00 1.02 Gross Power 1.00 1.01 ASU Auxiliary Power 1.00 0.81 Total Auxiliary Power 1.00 0.94 Net Power Output 1.00 1.03 Thermal Input 1.00 1.01 Net Plant Heat Rate, Btu/kWhr Base -230 Net Plant Efficiency, HHV Base +0.8% point - 20% Full air-side integration of GT and ASU Reduction in Auxiliary Load Positive ITM results warrant further investigation Further detailed analyses to be conducted through current project 12

IGCC Improvement Potential Net Plant Efficiency Base Plant(%, HHV Basis) EPRI Roadmap: Future Potential 40 38 36 34 32 30 + Full CCS + G Frame GT (1) + ITM + CO2 Slurry + Adv. CCS DOE and EPRI support similar IGCC roadmaps Notes: 1. G Frame GT case includes full air-side GT-ASU integration 2. Efficiency Improvements are cumulative 13

EPRI Tasks Plant-wide performance and cost analyses ITM operating envelope and design Test unit performance evaluation Requirements for ITM-based power plants Formulation of future development activities 14

EPRI to Evaluate IGCC with CCS Cases Air Comp. Cryogenic ASU F-Class CT Advanced CT ITM Oxygen F-Class CT Advanced CT 15

One ITM-Based Approach to Low-Carbon Oxygen/Power Generation Options for ITM system design: Power co-production Minimum fuel consumption Minimum CO 2 emissions A portion of the heat from the ITM process is retained in the oxygen Images courtesy Air Products. Air Products. All rights reserved. 16

Summary of Technical Program Status SEP tests conducted in 2010: 1 ton/day ITM modules Getter for contaminant control Advanced module components and automatic shutoff valve proceeding through qualification Early tests indicate the designs are very robust 100 ton/day ISTU project fully underway Construction to be complete by Q4 2011 Significant advances in ceramic processing capability at Ceramatec Current oxycombustion study indicates ITM yields significant specific capital cost advantage over cryogenic air separation IGCC-CCS study in progress 17

ITM Oxygen Development Schedule Capacity (ton/day) Oxygen 2000 500 100 5 Commercial Power Demonstration Phase 4, Large-scale Test** Phase 2 Phase 3, ISTU Commercialization (large plants for clean energy etc., 1000s TPD) Commercialization (small plants, <800 TPD) 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year On-stream **Pre-commercial scale facility (equivalent 110MWe oxycombustion or 250MWe IGCC) 18

Acknowledgment and Disclaimer Acknowledgment This technology development has been supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-FC26-98FT40343. The U.S. Government reserves for itself and others acting on its behalf a royalty-free, nonexclusive, irrevocable, worldwide license for Governmental purposes to publish, distribute, translate, duplicate, exhibit and perform this copyrighted paper. Disclaimer Neither Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. nor any of its contractors or subcontractors nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any person acting on behalf of either: 1. Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or 2. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Department of Energy. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Department of Energy. 19

Questions? Images courtesy Air Products. Air Products. All rights reserved. Together Shaping the Future of Electricity 20