A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR

Similar documents
Bio-Lair for Water Remediation

Volume: 2: Issue-3: July-Sept ISSN EFFECT OF NITROGEN SOURCES ON MICROBIAL PRODUCTION OF XYLITOL. K. Srivani 1 and Y.

Evaluating the Performance of Spouted Bed Bio- Reactor (SBBR) during Aerobic Biodegradation of 2, 4 Dichlorophenol (DCP)

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Continuous bioremediation of phenol polluted air in an external loop airlift bioreactor with packed bed Hossein Nikakhtari 1 and Gordon A.

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FLUSHED DAIRY MANURE

New Developments in BioWin 5.3

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING SATURATED UPFLOW WOODY FIBER MEDIA. Larry D. Stephens, P.E. 1

General Information on Nitrogen

Bioreactor System ERT 314. Sidang /2012

LITERATURE REVIEW CHAPTER Introduction. 2.2 Substrate removal in attached growth treatment process

Technical overview and benefits

CE 421/521 Environmental Biotechnology - Sample Exam 2

WASTEWATER FROM CARBON CAPTURE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Biological Treatment of Groundwater Containing Perchlorate Using Fluidized Bed Reactors

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 3, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

Problems and profit with waste. Standard Grade Biology Biotechnology

Module 11 : Water Quality And Estimation Of Organic Content. Lecture 13 : Water Quality And Estimation Of Organic Content

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Figure Trickling Filter

Rubber Processing Industry Effluent Treatment and Electricity Production Using Microbial Fuel Cell Technology

Denitrification: Mass Transfer and Kinetic Studies

Chapter ANAEROBIC TREATMENT BY METHANOGENESIS

Test Method of Specified Requirements of Antibacterial Textiles for Medical Use FTTS-FA-002

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

BIODEGRADATION OF DE-ICING COM- POUNDS IN COLUMNS SIMULATING A RANGE OF NATURAL CONDITIONS

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AND ELECTRICITY GENERATION USING MICROBIAL FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY

A Comparative Study On The Performance Of Four Novel Membrane Bioreactors (EMBR, MABR, RMBR, MSBR) For Wastewater Treatment

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Performance of upflow anoxic bioreactor for wastewater treatment

USE OF A ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Disposal of Sludge with Solid Wastes in Aerobic and Anaerobic Landfill Areas

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

2.4 TYPES OF MICROBIAL CULTURE

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Biodegradation of phenolic wastewater in a bubble column bioreactor with internal draft tube

Study on Effect of Soy sauce wastewater by SBR process Jinlong Zuo1, Xiaoyue Wang1, Xinguo Yang1,Daxiang Chen1,Xuming Wang2*

MICROBIAL DEGRADATION AND NUTRIENT OPTIMIZATION OF PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY WASTE WATER.

Membrane Biofilm Reactor (MBfR): A New Approach to Denitrification in Wastewater Setting

Wastewater Treatment clarifier

FARM MICROBIOLOGY 2008 PART 7: WATER & WASTEWATER MICROBIOLOGY. B. The water supply and the hydrologic cycle.

Combined Optimization of the Biological Nitrogen Removal in Activated Sludge-Biofilm Wastewater Treatment Systems

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT TECHNOLOGY BY COMPLETE WATER SOLUTION BHALERAO HEIGHTS, AKURDI, PUNE

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Water quality Determination of inhibition of gas production of anaerobic bacteria Part 1: General test

3 8 COLIFORM BACTERIA AS INDICATOR ORGANISMS Laboratory tests for disease-producing bacteria, viruses, and protozoa are difficult to perform

Case History: Removal of Perchlorate from Groundwater at the Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant. Presented at the

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

/ Marley MARPAK Modular Biomedia /

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Document No. FTTS-FA-001. Specified Requirements of Antibacterial Textiles for General Use

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

American Water College 2010

Sludge Management EENV 5--- Chapter 4 Sludge Stabilisation

TREATMENT OF HOSPITAL WASTEWATER USING ACTIVATED SLUDGE COMBINED WITH BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR

Industrial Waste Water Treatment. Unit 5

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Anaerobic reactor development for complex organic wastewater

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN REDUCING THIS TOXIC ELEMENT TO SAFE LEVELS

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

J.-J. Su, B.-Y. Liu and Y.-C. Chang Division of Applied Biology, Animal Technology Institute Taiwan, Chunan, Miaoli, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Supplemental Information for

Wastewater Treatment in a Hybrid Biological Reactor (HBR) : Nitrification Characteristics 1

Water Technologies. The AGAR Process: Make Your Plant Bigger Without Making it Bigger

Managing Diseases In Bivalve Hatcheries Through Bacterial Monitoring

Anaerobic Degradation of Organics

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

When this process occurs in water, the oxygen consumed is dissolved oxygen.

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. Chemical Engineering department

Protocol for the determination of potential biogas production

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS AND NITOGEN REMOVAL IN A SQUENCHING BATCH MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

ENVE 424 Anaerobic Treatment. Review Lecture Fall Assist. Prof. A. Evren Tugtas

The High-Tech of a Creek. The Biofilm Technology for Large Wastewater Treatment Plants.

Biological Wastewater Denitrification by Thermophilic Bacteria

ScienceDirect. Treatment of Wastewater in Fluidized Bed Bioreactor Using Low Density Biosupport

Biofertilizer production from gas refinery wastewater

Waste water treatment Biological treatment

336098: DYNAMIC MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTER FOR HIGH ORGANIC STRENGTH WASTE

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

New Developments in BioWin 4.0

Wastewater Terms for Permit Applications

INTRODUCTION OF THE IC REACTOR IN THE PAPER INDUSTRY

A Study on the Removal of COD Using Laboratory Scale Fluidized Bed Bioreactor

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

BIODESULPHURIZATION WITHIN NATURAL GAS IN OIL AND GAS FIELD

Transcription:

Refereed Proceedings The 13th International Conference on Fluidization - New Paradigm in Fluidization Engineering Engineering Conferences International Year 2010 A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR L. Prasanna Lakshmi Y. Pydi Setty K. Vimala National Institute of Technology, Warangal National Institute of Technology, Warangal, psetty@nitw.ac.in National Institute of Technology, Warangal This paper is posted at ECI Digital Archives. http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization xiii/38

Lakshmi et al.: A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR K. Vimala, L. Prasanna Lakshmi and Y. Pydi Setty *, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India. Abstract: The work involves experimental investigation on biological denitrification in a fluidized bed reactor under anaerobic conditions using the microorganism Pseudomonas Stutzeri and plastic beads as fluidizing medium. The influence of various parameters like ph, initial nitrate concentration, Carbon/Nitrogen ratio, hydraulic retention time on nitrate-nitrogen removal rate from synthetic effluent prepared at the laboratory were studied in detail. The optimum operating conditions of ph, initial nitrate concentration, Carbon/Nitrogen ratio and flow rate obtained are 7.0 7.5, 15 mg/l, 1.5 2.0 and 4.41 x 10-5 m 3 /s respectively. Key words: Denitrification, microorganism, fluidized bed bioreactor, biological waste water treatment, Pseudomonas Stutzeri, attached fermentation, immobilization. INTRODUCTION Biological denitrification has been studied extensively for several reasons. Denitrification is a major natural mechanism for loss of fertilizer and can remove nitrogen from such high nitrogen waste materials as animal residues. Drinking water resources also are facing major nitrate contamination that may cause methemoglobinemia. Excess concentration in drinking water is considered hazardous to human beings, particularly, infants. There are various methods of removing nitrogen, each with advantages and disadvantages. However, the biological treatment method is used most commonly. With this method, organic nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen are converted into nitrous and nitrate nitrogen in an aerobic environment and is dispersed into the atmosphere primarily as anaerobic nitrogen gas. The removal of nitrate nitrogen by conversion to nitrogen gas can be accomplished biologically under anoxic conditions. The conversion process is identified as anaerobic denitrification. The reactions for nitrate reduction are: NO 3 - NO 2 - NO N 2 O N 2 A broad range of bacteria, including many in the genera Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, Anchromobacter, Thiobacillus and Bacillus can reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas either in aerobic or in anaerobic or in both conditions thus causing denitrification. The fluidized bed bioreactor has been used to carry out biological denitrification by a number of investigators. Here the waste water is sent upward with a velocity higher *Corresponding author: Phone: 091-870-2611, Fax: 091-870-2459547, e-mail: psetty@nitw.ac.in 1 Published by ECI Digital Archives, 2010 1

The 13th International Conference on Fluidization - New Paradigm in Fluidization Engineering, Art. 38 [2010] than the minimum fluidization velocity of solids and the intensive organism growth on the carrier particle consumes the biodegradable waste contaminants present in waste water. Particles used for fluidization can be of uniformly sized sand, expanded clay, activated carbon or plastic bead. Fluidized bed reactors have much larger surface area per unit volume to support microorganisms, which increases the reactor micro-organism concentration. The larger surface area allows shorter hydraulic residence times for the same degree of treatment in a given volume. Each media particle eventually gets covered with biofilm and vast surface area available results in a high biomass concentration. The fluidized bed bioreactors have been effective for both aerobic and anaerobic treatment of domestic and industrial waste water. Hence time required for treatment is reduced as compared to that in conventional processes such as trickling filters or activated sludge processes. The superior performance of fluidized bed bioreactors is because of the following factors: 1. They offer higher productivity than stirred tank fermenters as the liquid approximates plug flow. 2. Due to immobilization of cells onto the surface of the solid particles, very high biomass concentration can be achieved. So it is possible to have high cell density and thus it reduces the treatment time. 3. The high level of mixing of solids helps in overcoming diffusion limitations in the liquid phase. 4. We can achieve intimate contact between the liquid and solid phase as a result of fluidization. 5. Washout of microbes can be prevented as a result of immobilization. 6. Since the size of the solid particles is less than that in the packed bed reactors, they offer large surface area per unit volume. Hence the volume of the reaction mixture is larger than that in other biological reactors. 7. The bed expands to accommodate the cells produced, which prevents the problem of clogging which is often encountered in a packed bed reactor. 8. We can get high heat and mass transfer rates. 9. More over higher volumetric reaction rates, lower space requirements and low investment costs add to the main advantages. These characteristics make the fluidized bed bioreactor a good choice for large scale waste water treatment also. But increased agitation caused at higher flow rates greatly increases the particleparticle contact and creates a significant shear force, which can result in shredding of the attached biofilm. Thus liquid velocities in bioreactors must be carefully controlled to maintain adequate bed expansion and solid liquid mass transfer that minimizes shear and particle elutriation. 2 http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization_xiii/38 2

Lakshmi et al.: A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR LITERATURE REVIEW Sreekrishnan et al. (1) studied the effect of operating variables on biofilm formation and performance of an anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor. Various operating variables such as initial inoculum circulation rate, dilution rate, COD, loading rate and quantity and quality of inoculum on the process of film formation on sand surface and reactor performance were studied using synthetic glucose based waste water. They found that a high dilution rate, a large quantity of inoculum having high methane producing capacity favor the film formation process. Experimental observations indicate that methanogenic bacteria initiate the biofilm formation process. Jaap et al. (2) have studied the influence of volatile fatty acids on nitrite accumulation by a Pseudomonas Stutzeri strain isolated from a denitrifying fluidized bed reactor and denitrification characteristic of Pseudomonas Stutzeri with acetate as carbon and electron donor. Fraucese and Carles (3) presented a number of advantages of fluidized bed reactors that make them an attractive alternative in process involving biocatalysts. The application of fluidized bed bioreactors to different kinds of processes is also discussed. Nirjari et al. (4) studied the effects of superficial velocity on the removal of nitrates as well as on the growth of the biofilm. They have shown that there exists an optimum velocity at which both nitrate removal and biofilm growth are at maximum. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Biological denitrification is studied in a liquid-solid fluidized bed bioreactor under anaerobic conditions using Pseudomonas Stutzeri microorganism (5). The schematic diagram of the experimental setup and the experimental procedure are given elsewhere (6). The parameters measured were nitrate concentration of the treated water, ph of the treated water, flow rate. The nitrate concentration was measured using UV- Spectrophotometric method. The culture Pseudomonas Stutzeri obtained from National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India was preserved in a refrigerator at a temperature of 4 o C by periodic subculture on nutrient agar. Slant Preparation: The bacterium is subcultured once in a month by preparing slants using nutrient agar. The following chemicals are required per 100 ml of distilled water, for slant preparation: Peptone: 0.5 g ; beef extract: 0.3 g ; NaCl: 0.5 g ; Agar-agar: 2.5 g 3 Published by ECI Digital Archives, 2010 3

The 13th International Conference on Fluidization - New Paradigm in Fluidization Engineering, Art. 38 [2010] ph was adjusted at 7.0 with NaOH and HCl. All the chemicals were mixed and sterilized in an autoclave for 15 minutes at a temperature of 120 o C and a pressure of 15 psi. The bacterium was poured upto one-third of the test tube and kept at an angle of 30 degrees and cooled to solidify agar-agar. This provides more surface area of nutrient for the micro-organism to grow. Then the slants were exposed to UV light for 30-40 minutes, which enables the total destruction of any other bacterium that is undesirable for denitrification. Then the slants were inoculated with the strain of bacterium. The slants were kept at room temperature for a period of 5 days. After the colonies were observed the slants were stored at 4 o C. Preparation of Inoculum: The bacterium from the slants was inoculated into liquid broth having the composition as reported in earlier work (6). Before an experimental run was begun, the bed was seeded with a culture of denitrifying bacteria. As the reaction was carried out in anaerobic conditions, to keep the dissolved oxygen low during the reaction, Sodium Sulfite (100 mg/l) was added to the storage tank. After the ph was adjusted the broth was sterilized in an autoclave for 15 minutes at 15 psi pressure and 120 o C temperature to kill the undesirable micro-organisms. The broth was cooled to room temperature and then colonies of Pseudomonas Stutzeri were introduced into the broth. After inoculating, the culture was kept for growth in an incubator for 24 hours. The temperature of the incubator was maintained at 30 o C and speed at 60 rpm. Nitrate concentration is obtained using UV Spectrophotometer at a wave length of 220 nm to obtain the nitrate reading and a wave length of 275 nm to obtain the interference due to dissolved organic matter. The reading from UVspectrophotometer is corrected for dissolved organic matter and the concentration of nitrates is obtained from a calibration chart prepared earlier. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Effect of various parameters on the removal of nitrate-nitrogen was studied in detail to find out the optimum conditions where the nitrate removal efficiency of the given micro-organism is maximum. The parameters like initial substrate concentration, hydraulic retention time (flow rate), ph, C/N ratio were studied in detail. Initial Nitrate concentration: The effect of initial nitrate concentration on the nitrate removal capability of Pseudomonas Stutzeri was studied in detail as these micro-organisms are capable of modifying their metabolism to utilize nitrates as the source of O 2 and there by cause denitrification and also to see the effect of substrate inhibition.. 4 http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization_xiii/38 4

Lakshmi et al.: A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR The experiments were conducted at a constant flow rate of 0.7 gal/min with different initial nitrate concentrations ie. 25, 20, 15, 13, 10 mg/l with initial ph of 7.0. The results shown in Fig. 1 clearly show that as the initial nitrate in the feed is decreasing, there is depletion in effluent nitrate concentration. But from the figure, it is clear that when initial concentration was at 15 mg/l, the concentration of effluent after running for 10 hours has gone as low as 0.7 mg/l. If we see in terms of amount of nitrate removed, it is at 96 %. When the initial nitrate concentration is 20 mg/l, the concentration of nitrate in the effluent stream is not reducing much compared to other cases. This may be because of the substrate inhibition effect at higher concentrations of nitrate. When initial nitrate concentration is at 10 ppm and 13 ppm, the amount of nitrate removed is less when compared to the initial concentration of 15 ppm. This may be because of more C/N ratio since the amount of methanol taken was same for all the experiments. Time, h Fig. 1 Effect of initial nitrate concentration on nitrate removal Fig 2. Effect of flow rate on nitrate removal Effect of flow rate Flow rate plays an important role in the removal of nitrate from the given effluent. As flow rate to the reactor changes, the residence time of the fluid in the reactor varies. The expansion in bed height also changes with flow rate, which affects the voidage of the solid particles within the reactor. As the bed expands it gives more space for the organism to grow on the particles, which results in more conversion, but at the same time the residence time of the fluid in the reactor will decrease which may result in the low conversion of nitrate to nitrogen. Hence the effect of flow rate on nitrate removal plays an important role. Experiments were conducted to study the effect of flow rate on nitrate removing capability. Four different flow rates were studied viz. 0.9, 0.85, 0.8, 0.7 gal/min. with initial nitrate concentration of 15 mg/l. From the data shown in Fig. 2, it is clear that the concentration of nitrate is decreasing with time. 5 Published by ECI Digital Archives, 2010 5

The 13th International Conference on Fluidization - New Paradigm in Fluidization Engineering, Art. 38 [2010] As the flow rate is increasing, concentration of nitrates in the effluent stream is increasing at any particular time with respect to lower flow rates. This may be due to the fact that increasing flow rate decreases the residence time of the fluid in the reactor. Hence it is noticed that at the highest value of flow rate (0.9 gal/min) in the present work, the nitrate concentration is found to reduce very slowly compared o other flow rates. Amount of nitrate in the effluent stream is minimum (1.1 mg/l) when the flow rate is maintained at its lowest ie. 0.7 gal/min. This may be also due to decrease in mass transfer coefficient across the biofilm with increase in flow rate (6) Effect of ph ph plays a vital role in all biological reactions. This is because, the activity of intracellular enzyme of micro-organism causes the biological reaction to take and will be active in a particular ph range only. Thus ph will affect the rate of reaction a lot in all biological reactions. In denitrification, alkalinity is produced during the conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas resulting in an increase in ph as nitrate acts as an electron acceptor in the metabolism for generation of energy. From the literature, it may be seen that Pseudomonas Stutzeri organisms are active around neutral ph conditions. From Fig. 3 it is clear that the optimum ph range is between 7.0 7.5. When ph is deviating from neutral, ie. at a ph of 6.5 and 8.0, the capability of organism is decreasing, may be because of the inhibitory effect of super acidity or super alkalinity on the activity of intracellular enzyme of the bacteria. When the ph is going towards alkalinity at 8.0, the concentration of nitrate in effluent stream is almost equal to 13 mg/l and the nitrate removed is 35 % only. This may be because as the reaction proceeds the alkalinity of the reaction mixture increases and maintaining alkaline conditions initially may further reduce the activity of the microorganism. Additionally, the NO 2 N accumulation occurs when the ph value is higher than 8.0 and higher the ph values, more is the accumulation of NO 2 N. This is probably due to the fact that the activity of nitrite reductase was inhibited. Fig. 3 Effect of ph on nitrate removal 6 http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization_xiii/38 6

Lakshmi et al.: A STUDY ON DENITRIFICATION IN A FLUIDIZED BED BIOREACTOR Fig.4 Effect of ph (when ph was maintained constant throughout) Effect of ph (when ph was maintained constant throughout) ph exerts remarkable influence on biological denitrification. The influence of ph values on removal rate of NO x N were shown in Fig. 4 at room temperature, flow rate of 0.7 gal/min and initial nitrate concentration of 20 mg/l and ph values of 6.5, 7.0, 7.5 and 8.0. From Fig. 4, it is clear that the optimum ph range is between 7 7.5, when we maintain the ph constant throughout the experimental run. As the ph was maintained constant, it was observed that the reduction of nitrates was more when compared to the conditions where ph was not maintained constant. This may be because, the alkalinity of the reaction mixture is increasing as the reaction proceeds when the ph is not maintained constant throughout, which inhibits the rate of reaction. Effect of C/N ratio : The amount of carbon plays a vital role in the growth of micro-organism. Organic matter is most required for the growth of any micro-organism. Methanol has been used as the carbon source for the present process. The influence of C/N ratio on the removal of nitrate-nitrogen at the room temperature, ph value of 7.0, flow rate of 0.7 gal/min and initial nitrate concentration of 20 mg/l is as shown in Fig. 5. It can be seen that, as the methanol concentration is increasing as carbon source, the concentration of nitrates in the effluent stream is decreasing. But when C/N ratio exceeds 2, the effluent concentration is more when compared with lower C/N ratios. This may be because of excess amount of methanol as carbon source results in waste and makes the effluent nitrate concentration more. It can be easily observed that the optimum C/N ratio range is 1.5 2.0. Fig. 5 Effect of C / N ratio on Denitrification 7 Published by ECI Digital Archives, 2010 7

The 13th International Conference on Fluidization - New Paradigm in Fluidization Engineering, Art. 38 [2010] CONCLUSIONS It is observed that the microorganism, Pseudomonas Stutzeri is able to denitrify the synthetic wastewater successfully under anaerobic conditions with plastic beads as a fluidizing medium. The effect of various parameters like ph, initial nitrate concentration, C/N ratio and flow rate on removal of nitrate-nitrogen were studied in detail. It is noticed that by taking less dense particles as a solid supporting medium for the growth of the micro-organism, the denitrification capability of the micro-organism is increased when compared with the type of dense particles used as a support as reported by Nirjari et al. (4). It is seen from the results that the degradation of nitrates in the present work is faster compared to earlier work (4), where a feed with 20 mg/l took several days to degrade to a very low concentration. In the present work feed of 15 mg/l nitrate concentration degraded to 0.7 mg/l in 10 h. These results indicate a definite advantage of using less dense plastic particles as supporting media for biofilm growth compared to dense solids. Using plastic media also reduces fluidization velocities thus increasing the retention time of the fluid in the reactor resulting in increased degradation of nitrates (6). From the experiments it is also clear that alkalinity is produced during the conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas resulting in an increase ph. The optimum operating conditions are obtained as ph value of 7.0 7.5, initial nitrate concentration of 15 mg/l, C/N ratio of 1.5 2 and flow rate of 0.7 gal/min. REFERENCES 1. Sreekrishnan, T.R., Ramachandran, K.B and Ghosh, P (1991), Effect of Operating Variables on Biofilm formation and performance of an anaerobic Fluidized Bed Bioreactor, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 37, 557-566. 2. Jaap V. R., Yossi T and Yoran B (1996), Influence of Volatile Fatty acids on Nitrite accumulation by a Pseudomonas Stutzeri Strain isolated from a Denitrifying Fluidized Bed Reactor, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 62, 2615-2620. 3. Francese G and Cales S (1995), Fluidized Bed Bioreactors, Biotechnology Progress, Vol. 11, 479-497 4. Nirjari, N.K., Karthik, C.K and Mahajan, S.P (1984), Biological Denitrification in a Fluidized Bed, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 26, 1445-1448. 5. Vimala, K (2004), Parametric Studies on Biological Denitrification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor, M. Tech Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Warangal. 6. Prasanna Lakshmi, L and Pydi Setty, Y (2008) Liquid-solid mass transfer in a two phase fluidized bed bioreactor, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol.135,135-140. 8 http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization_xiii/38 8