Spring Hill Suites Marriott

Similar documents
Date: 'Comments' b Steel Quantity Takeoff. 'Quantities' b Design Loads and Parameters

THE PARKING STRUCTURE PROTOTYPE II

structural STEEL Your connection to the healthcare structure prototype iii Exploring Seismic Load Resisting Systems

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Design Criteria. Analysis and Design of a High Rise Steel Braced Frame Core 22

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Pro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #1

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

Structural Redesign Gravity System

Technical Report #1. Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA. Cody A. Scheller. Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Report

90% Design Submittal Structural Calculations Parking Garage CDRL

Structural Comparison between Pan Joist Concrete and Steel Frame Systems for UMCP Student Housing Building B

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1

TECHNICAL REPORT II STRUCTURAL STUDY OF ALTERNATE FLOOR SYSTEMS

AISC Steel & Timber Research for High-Rise Residential Buildings

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Point Pleasant Apartments Point Pleasant, NJ Ryan P. Flynn Structural Option Faculty Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Thesis Proposal. Matthew R Peyton

Corporate Headquarters

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

Kaleida Health Global Heart and Vascular Institute University at Buffalo CTRC/Incubator. Buffalo, New York. Technical Report #2

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

1000 CONNECTICUT AVENUE

Executive Summary. Non-Composite Steel system 2- Way Flat Concrete Slab Wood Beam with Form Deck Pre-Cast Hollow Core Plank

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Jonathan R. Torch Technical Report 2 Columbia University. Technical Report 2. Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Belmont Executive Center; Building A

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

Technical Report #3. Matthew R Peyton

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

Design Guidev1.2 A REVOLUTIONARY STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR MID AND HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION.

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

HOTEL NORTHEAST U.S. JORDAN RUTHERFORD STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY ADVISOR DR. THOMAS BOOTHBY AE SENIOR THESIS APRIL 8, 2013

1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE

Crossroads at Westfields Building II

Trump Taj Mahal Hotel

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

GEN*NY*SIS CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN CANCER GENOMICS Rensselaer, NY

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #2 October 31,

Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Dr. Boothby, AE Faculty Consultant. Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel

Technical Report 1. Residence Inn By Marriott. Structural Option September 29, Existing Conditions / Structural Concepts.

Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium

The designer shall also submit additional information required by the University as described and underlined below.

Technical Report 2: Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER HAMILTON BOULEVARD AT 9 TH STREET - ALLENTOWN, PA

Technical Report 1. Kingstowne Section 36A 5680 King Center Drive Kingstowne, VA James Chavanic. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr.

Justin Raducha Structural Option Professor M. Kevin Parfitt 101 Eola Dr, Orlando, FL Final Report Spring 2008

Totaling approximately 617,000

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Dead Loads (psf): Concrete Floor Slab on Metal Deck 45 psf Mechanical and Ceiling 7 psf Miscellaneous 5 psf Exterior Wall 80 psf

Structural Design Engineers 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410 San Francisco, California / Fax 415/

ECMC Skilled Nursing Facility

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

Hyatt Place North Shore. Pittsburgh, PA T. Technical Assignment #1. Kyle Tennant. Kyle Tenn. Structural (IP) [Type the document subtitle]

111 MORGAN ST. CHICAGO, IL

This report investigates alternative floor systems for the building. A brief summary of each system is as follows:

OF THREE NEW BUILDINGS BEING CONSTRUCTED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING COMPLEX. THE FLOOR SYSTEM OF GEORGE READ HALL IS A HAMBRO COMPOSITE SYSTEM

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

CBD Chemical. Production Building Virginia, USA. Christina DiPaolo Structural Option

Eric Alwine Structural Option George Read Hall The University of Delaware Dr. Boothby Technical Assignment #2 October 31, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The College of Business Administration

The College of Business Administration

Technical Assignment #3 November 15, 2004 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

House of Sweden. Structural Study of Alternative Floor Systems K St. NW Washington, DC 20007

Butler Memorial Hospital Butler, PA. Architects Rendering. James D. Rotunno. Thesis Proposal. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr.

Aubert Ndjolba Structural Option PENN COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems. Faculty advisor: Dr.

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

Structural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA

Composite Steel/Concrete

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER HAMILTON BOULEVARD AT 9 TH STREET - ALLENTOWN, PA

Technical Report 1. Hakuna Resort Swift Water, Pennsylvania. Image Courtesy of LMN Development LLC

Letter of Transmittal

Farquhar Park Aquatic Center. York, PA

Technical Report 1 Bed Tower Addition at Appleton Medical Center Appleton, WI

STEEL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

RETHINKING MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

Thesis Proposal. Office Building. Sayre, PA. Faculty Advisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby Revised: January 9, 2013

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Thesis Proposal. Office Building. Sayre, PA. Faculty Advisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby Revised: April 1, 2013

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #2

TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Hyatt Place North Shore. Pittsburgh, PA T. Technical Assignment #2. Kyle Tennant. Kyle Tenn. Structural (IP) [Type the document subtitle]

Transcription:

Spring Hill Suites Marriott Project Location: Amarillo, TX Prepared for: Girder Slab Technologies Contact: Daniel Fisher, Sr. January 15, 2008 Prepared by: Monica Stockmann Regional Engineer: Erika Winters-Downey This Package Includes: Comments on Provided Solution Steel Quantity Takeoff Building Code Criteria 2nd Floor Framing Plan 3rd-4th Floor Framing Plan Roof Framing Plan Column and Frame Layout Plan Column Schedule Frame Elevations 866.ASK.AISC (866.275.2472) solutions@aisc.org Trademarks licensed from AISC There's always a solution in steel AISC Marketing, LLC One East Wacker Drive, Suite 700 Chicago, Illinois 60601 312.67032400 www.aisc.org

866.ask.aisc solutions@aisc.org COMMENTS ON PROVIDED SOLUTION Spring Hill Suites Marriott January 15, 2008 The information contained in this document is not intended as a basis for structural design for this or any project. Rather, it is a conceptual approach to the project that demonstrates the viability of the steel system for project requirements, budget, and schedule. 1) The Conceptual Solution and estimates for this project are based on parameters defined through architectural drawings and project criteria received on January 7, 2008. 2) The steel quantities and geometry based on this investigation are provided on floor framing plans, a column and frame layout plan, a column schedule, and frame elevations on the following pages. 3) The design criteria per the 2006 International Building Code (IBC 2006) is summarized and included in the following pages. 4) Based on the available options, the Girder Slab system best fits the needs of the project. The benefits of this system are low floor to floor heights and speed of construction. 5) The Girder-Slab system is a patented, but non-proprietary, system comprised of an interior girder known as an openweb dissymmetric beam, or D-Beam, which supports precast, prestressed hollow-core slabs on its bottom flange. Upon grouting, the system develops composite action, enabling it to support residential loads. Consult the Girder- Slab Technologies website (www.girder-slab.com) for licensing, design, connections, fabrication, and erection information. 6) The application and use of the Girder-Slab System technology requires design by your registered professional engineer or architect. A registered professional engineer is engaged to design the superstructure according to customary practice, incorporating the Design-Guide information much the same as for other products, such as metal deck or bar joists. 7) See the Girder-Slab Design Guide (found on the Girder Slab Technologies website www.girder-slab.com) for information on "Tree" column as indicated on the sketches included in this document. The trees consist of a WT with a flat bar welded to the leg of the WT. 8) The lateral force-resisting system consists of steel concentrically braced frames in one direction and steel moment frames in the other. 9) The typical floor framing is 10 in precast hollow core plank supported by Girder Slab D-beams. 10) In areas where the precast plank spans parallel to the exterior of the building, the precast plank may be designed and detailed to support the façade. Therefore, structural steel beams may not required in these locations in the finished building. For this study, the steel quantity takeoff does include the quantities of the exterior steel beams. 11) Structural steel beams may be required for temporary erection bracing, however this investigation does not include an evaluation of means and methods of construction and no member sizes are provided for these beams. The weight of any such erection members are NOT included in the provided quantities. 12) The precast hollow-core plank is not cambered and is assumed to have no structural topping. Non-structural topping used to level the top of the plank may be applied. Shear studs are assumed to be provided every 24 in. along all girders supporting precast plank. 13) The non-structural topping provided is due to the balcony configurations of the floor plate. At all balcony locations, the topping tapers to provide slope for drainage and exterior waterproofing. 14) Custom-cast solid plank may be required to form the balconies and provide the required slope for drainage and exterior waterproofing. This document has been prepared in accordance with information made available to the American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., AISC Marketing, LLC, and the Steel Solutions Center, LLC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC, AISCM, and SSC disclaim any liability arising from information provided by others or from the unauthorized use of the information contained in this document.

866.ask.aisc solutions@aisc.org Suspended Steel Floor Areas: 61,350 ft 2 10 in precast hollow core plank Estimated Steel Quantities: STEEL QUANTITY TAKEOFF: Structure Total Spring Hill Suites Marriott January 15, 2008 Gravity Columns W12s 36 tons 1.17 psf 82 pieces Beams (gravity) D-beams 44 tons 1.4 psf 122 pieces Wide Flange 34 tons 1.1 psf 126 pieces 1,300 studs Braced Frames Beams 12 tons 0.39 psf 44 pieces Columns 32 tons 1.04 psf 64 pieces Braces (HSS) 3 tons 0.10 psf 24 pieces Steel not indicated in sketches 5% 8 tons 0.26 psf 169 tons 5.5 psf 462 pieces * The quantities are based on centerline dimensions ** Steel not indicated in sketches accounts for framing not included in the estimate such as framing for openings or various members eliminated for simplification. It does not include connection material, slab edge material or façade attachments. Material Specification Wide flange shapes are A992, Gr. 50 Rectangular HSS sections are A500 Gr. B This document has been prepared in accordance with information made available to the American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., AISC Marketing, LLC, and the Steel Solutions Center, LLC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC, AISCM, and SSC disclaim any liability arising from information provided by others or from the unauthorized use of the information contained in this document.

866.ask.aisc solutions@aisc.org BUILDING CODE CRITERIA IBC 2006 Spring Hill Suites Marriott January 15, 2008 This investigation is based on the following criteria. The Steel Solutions Center does not assert that these are the criteria that apply to this project. The criteria are chosen based on the project location and the widely adopted model building code, the 2006 International Building Code. Requirements by local and state jurisdictions have not been considered. If actual project criteria differ significantly from those listed, the results presented may no longer be valid. Gravity Loads Dead Loads Typical Residential Floor Slab 70 psf (10 inch precast hollow core plank) Live Loads Residential 60 psf (includes 20 psf for partition loads) Roof Live 20 psf Superimposed Dead Loads Typical Residential 10 psf (CMEP, plank topping, etc) Roof 20 psf (MEP, misc) Cladding Loads Typical 500 plf Wind Load Parameters Basic Wind Speed = 90 mph Wind Importance Factor, I W = 1.00 Exposure Category = B Topographical Factor = 1.00 Drift Limit = H/500 Basic Seismic-Force-Resisting System Steel concentrically braced frames Seismic Design Parameters X-axis Y-axis Seismic Use Group = II Building Period Coefficient, C T = 0.020 0.020 Seismic Importance Factor, I E = 1.00 Response Modification Coefficient, R = 3.0 3.0 Seismic Design Category = B System Overstrength Factor, Ωo = 3.0 3.0 Site Class = D Deflection Amplification Factor, C d = 3.0 3.0 Spectral Response Acceleration at Note: The requirements of the AISC Seismic Short Periods (0.2s), S s = Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.175 g Provisions WERE NOT used in determining the quantity estimate for this project. Whether or not the One Second Period, S 1 = 0.043 g special seismic requiements must be taken into account in the design is based on the applicable building code and local requirements. This document has been prepared in accordance with information made available to the American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., AISC Marketing, LLC, and the Steel Solutions Center, LLC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC, AISCM, and SSC disclaim any liability arising from information provided by others or from the unauthorized use of the information contained in this document.