Potato Nitrogen Management by Monitoring Petiole Nitrate level

Similar documents
NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION

HIGHLAND RUSSET AGRONOMY NOTES. Highland Russet (A9045 7) Fertilization Total Yield Response to N Rate of Highland Russet vs.

Strategies for Reducing Nitrate Leaching from Irrigated Potato. Carl Rosen Department of Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

CENTRAL OREGON POTATO NITROGEN FERTILIZER TRIALS Progress Report. Alvin R. Mosley, Shelton C. Perrigan and Steven R. James'

CLEARWATER RUSSET AGRONOMY NOTES. Clearwater Russet (AOA ) Fertilization

Determining the Correct Nitrogen Rate for Cotton Following Soybeans Final report Objectives Introduction Research methods

Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Sources, Timing, and Rates On Tuber Specific Gravity

FACTORS AFFECTING CROP NEEDS FOR POTASSIUM WESTERN PERSPECTIVE TERRY A. TINDALL AND DALE WESTERMANN MANAGER OF AGRONOMY J.R

Tissue Testing Guidelines for Nitrogen Management in Malting Barley, Maricopa, 1998

Robert Hochmuth Regional Extension Agent and Assistant Center Director, NFREC- Suwannee Valley Live Oak, Florida

On-Farm Evaluation of Polymer Coated Urea Rates and Blends on Potato Yield and Quality

Evaluation of Nitrogen Source and Rate on Tuber Yield and Quality in Old and New Potato Fields

Using Nitrate-N Petiole Sap-Testing for Better Nitrogen Management in Vegetable Crops

In-Crop Application of Liquid Hog Manure in Irrigated Potato Production

Nitrogen Monitoring Techniques for Vegetable Crops

Strategies for Managing Nitrogen in Strawberry. Michael Cahn Irrigation and Water Resources Advisor UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey County

Late Nitrogen Applications and Potato Storage Quality. Sastry S. Jayanty, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Extension Specialist

Evaluation of FŪSN ( ) on Ranger Russet Potato Production

Evaluation of Several Controlled Release Fertilizers for Irrigated Potato Production

Evaluation of a Drip Vs. Furrow Irrigated Cotton Production System

gr4 Pur chased by fhe O. S. Departmenf of Agriceltuf$ For Official Use

The Effect of AmiSorb, a Nutrient Absorption Enhancing Polymer, on Pepper Plant Nutrient Status and Yield

EVALUATION OF 4R FERTILIZER STRATEGIES FOR POTATOES IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

Phosphorus Management

Add To Cart. Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use: Irrigated Potatoes

Northeast Oregon Potato Soil Fertility Studies

Fertility Management of Processing Tomato

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops

Effect of Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Potatoes in the. Willamette Valley AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Fertilizing Potato. in North Dakota. Potato production has been a part of North Dakota agriculture NDSU EXTENSION SERVICE

Soil fertility management for pepper production

Nitrogen management in annual vegetable crops

THE NACHURS HIGH YIELD POTATO PROGRAM PROVIDING POTATO GROWERS PREMIUM LIQUID STARTER AND FOLIAR NUTRIENTS SINCE

Nitrogen BMPs for horticultural crop production Tim Hartz UC Davis

BAND PLACEMENT FOR POTATOES IN CALCAREOUS SOIL ABSTRACT

GETTING THE MOST FROM N AND P APPLICATIONS ON PROCESSING CROPS. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

LIQUID PHOSPHORUS POTATO FERTILITY TRIALS. Final Report. January 2016

Estimating Nitrogen Mineralization in Organic Potato Production

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

Irrigation Management Decision Tools for Economic and Environmental Benefit in Fruit and Vegetable Production

EFFECTIVENESS OF AVAIL FOR IMPROVING POTATO YIELD. Matthew J. Repking and Carrie A.M. Laboski 1. Introduction

Nutrient Management Examination Competency Areas Individual Specialists

Tillage and Nitrogen Placement Effects on Nutrient Uptake by Potato

AVAIL / DAP Potatoes 11 Caribou, Maine Preplant DAP application 300lbs/ac Yields: average of two trials

National Sunflower Association of Canada Inc.

Nitrogen stewardship practices to reduce nitrate leaching and sustain profitability in an irrigated potato production system

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Nitrogen Management in Cole Crops and Leafy Greens

Pop-up and/or Starter Fertilizers for Corn

Improved Fertilizer use Efficiency with Controlled Release Sources on Sandy Soils in South Florida. FDACS Contract

University of California Cooperative Extension

Corn. Dewitt, MI Average Corn Yield. Field 1. Field 2. Location: Dewitt, MI (2015)

Watermelon Response to Soluble and Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizers

Efficient Nitrogen Management for Cool-Season Vegetables. T.K. Hartz Extension Vegetable Specialist University of California, Davis

Wine Grape Production. Quality

September done by the WREC except when mentioned otherwise. Total

Nitrogen Fertilizer Requirement of Feed and Malting Barley Compared to Wheat, 2011

From Soil Test Results to Practice: How to Develop and Implement a Fertility Plan

Enhancing Nitrogen & Irrigation Efficiency of Pecan. Lenny Wells UGA Horticulture

Use of the Late-Spring Soil Nitrate Test

Field Research in the. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station 1999

13 4III1 I Li, ULU EFFECT OF IRRIGATION METHOD AND LEACHING OF 1 NITRATE-NITROGEN ON SUCROSE PRODUCTION BY SUGARBEETS

Clain Jones

Fertilizing Young Almond Orchards. David Doll UCCE Merced 1/16/2015

Field Research in the. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station 1998

SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN FERTILIZER REGIMES FOR SNAP BEANS IN VIRGINIA

Managing fertilization and irrigation for water quality protection

SPECIFIC GRAVITY. Factors Influencing Specific Gravity in Prince Edward Island Potato Production. Ryan Barrett, M.Sc, P.Ag PEI Potato Board

NITROGEN REQUIREMENT FOR SUGAR BEETS: A SUMMARY OF PAST AND PRESENT RESEARCH FINDINGS. D. Tarkalson 1

Pepper Production Guide for Florida: Fertilization 1

Timing of Foliar Applications

Fertilizer Management for Plant Health and Environmental Water Quality Protection

Use of Chlorophyll Meters to Assess Nitrogen Fertilization Requirements for Optimum Wheat Grain and Silage Yield and Quality

Efficient nitrogen fertility and irrigation management in California processing tomato production

Potato Fertility Experiments

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

Mike Cahn, Laura Murphy, Richard Smith, Tim Hartz UCCE Monterey and UCD Plant Science

Nitrogen Dynamics Feeding the Crops that Feed Us

Management of Lettuce. UCCE, Monterey County Tim Hartz and Tom Bottoms, Plant Sciences, UC Davis

SIDEDRESSING NITROGEN: USEFUL ON ALL SOILS? Larry G. Bundy 1. Introduction

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

Nitrogen Management in Strawberries

Using Dairy Manure as a Fertilizer Source for Forage Crops. Workgroup. Marsha Campbell Mathews University of California Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

Response of Cucumber to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Water and Nitrogen BMPs for Tomato and Watermelon: Water Quality and Economics 1

Use of Chlorophyll Meters to Assess Nitrogen Fertilization Requirements for Optimum Wheat Grain and Silage Yield and Quality

Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solution Effects on Vegetable Production in Florida George J.

2012 Nitrogen Technology Evaluation Summary: Methods: Trial No. 1:

Response of Pepper to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Manure & Soil Sampling, Nutrient Analysis and Assessment

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

AGRONOMY OF NEW POTATO LINES

Nitrogen Management in Wheat

Nutrient Removal Estimates for Major Vegetables in S. Texas

Non-irrigated Irrigated Difference. Early 27.1 bushels per acre 33.8 bushels per acre 6.7 bushels per acre

Fertilizer Management

Water Use and Yield Response of Potatoes

Switchgrass and Sweet Sorghum Fertilization for Bioenergy Feedstocks Gene Stevens, Roland Holou, David Dunn, and Allen Wrather

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Transcription:

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 19(I0&11), 1405-1412 (I 996) Potato Nitrogen Management by Monitoring Petiole Nitrate level Hailin Zhang,a,l Dan Smeal,b R. N. Arnold,b and E. J. Gregoryb a Agricultural Testing and Research Laboratory, Navajo Agricultural Products Industry, Farmington, NM 87499 bnew Mexico State University, Agricultural Science Center, Farmington, NM 87499 ABSTRACT Petiole nitrate nitrogen (N03-N) concentrations have been successfully used in Northwestern New Mexico to make timely nitrogen (N) recommendations for irrigated potatoes. However, a quick test and consistent sampling time is needed to precisely determine fertigation and to prevent over fertilization, especially in sandy soils. This study examined the petiole N03-N dynamics during the growing season for both chipping and table stock varieties. Readings from a quick in-field sap N03-N meter were highly correlated with N03-N indications using the conventional laboratory method. The sap N03 N meter can significantly reduce testing turnaround time and has great potential for potato N management. Results showed that most consistent N03-N readings could be obtained by collecting tissue samples between 1100 and 1400 hours of the day. 'Department of Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 1405 Copyright 1996 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.

1406 ZHANG ET AL. INTRODUCTION Navajo Agricultural Products Industry (NAPI) in Farmington, New Mexico grows over 6,000 acres of potatoes annually. The yields and quality ofthe chipping and fresh pack potatoes are crucial to the company's financial success. Nitrogen fertilizer has a significant effect on potato quality and yield (Kleinkopf and Westermann, 1987). Excess levels of soil N at or before tuberization can delay tuber growth, reduce yields and lower tuber specific gravity (McDole et ai., 1992). Excess N in the late growing season can delay maturity of the tubers which can adversely affect potato storability and quality. Excessive N in some chipping varieties could result in poor chip color during processing. Poor N management also result in ground water contamination by N03 -N, especially under sandy soils. A complete soil test predicts what should be applied to the soil to ensure acceptable yields; however, a series of plant tissue tests are needed to determine how well the crop is doing nutritionally during the growing season. The objectives of this study were to fine tune N fertigation by monitoring potato petiole N03-N levels weekly during peak growing stage; to calibrate the newly developed Cardy sap N03-N meter for quick N03-N results; and to identify the ideal tissue sampling time of day for consistent testing results. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two fields were chosen for this study. Selected soil chemical and physical properties before planting are shown in Table 1. A chipping variety, Atlantic, was planted in Field 612 on March 31,1994. A table stock variety, Norkotah, was planted in Field 402 on April 12, 1994. The total N fertilizer recommended for both fields was 270 lbs/acre based on soil N03-N level and organic matter content, and on the yield goal of 550 hundred weight (cwt.) potatoes per acre. TABLE 0.53Sandy 0.58 OMTexture I. Loamy 10.4128 13.172 Variety Atlantic Norkotah PzOs-P K2O-K ppm Selected ph 8.8 7.2 N03-N loam 3.7 4.4 sandsoil ppm physical and chemical properties for the two fields used in this study. Field

POT ATO NITROGEN MANAGEMENT 1407 Because of the sandy texture, the recommended N was split into several applications. Nitrogen was broadcast before planting at 50 lbs N/acre with needed phosphorus and potassium. Liquid starter fertilizer (30-30-0) was also applied at 66 lbs N/acre during planting. Rest of the N was applied through irrigation water after emergence using 32-0-0. The rate for fertigation was based on weekly petiole NO]-N testing results to maintain a desired NO]-N concentration at different growing stages. Three representative tissue samples each containing 30 fully matured potato leaves (4th or 5th leaf from the growing terminal) were collected 55 to 60 days after planting from each field weekly for NO]-N determination. Samples were normally collected around the 1000 HR. To determine the NO]-N fluctuation during the day, additional samples were collected at the same location several times from early morning to mid afternoon. Leaflets were removed and half of the petioles were dried at 80 C and ground for NO]-N measurement using ion selective electrode. The remaining petioles were cut to small pieces with scissors and mixed thoroughly in a pile. A portion of the plant material was transferred to a garlic press. The sap was squeezed into a small container. The sap NO]-N was immediately read on a Cardy NO] meter (Figure 1). The meter was calibrated with a standard and checked with a slop solution. The calibration was checked after every five to six samples. FIGURE I. The sap nitrate meter (Cardy, from Spectrum Technologies, Inc.), plant sap press used for sap nitrate measurement.

1408 ZHANG ET AL. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Scheduling Nitrogen Application Petiole N03-N levels were monitored weekly during peak growing stages for both chipping and table stock varieties (Figure 2). Nitrate concentrations decreased as the crop matured and the season progressed. To maintain petiole N03-N in the sufficient ranges at each growth stage, eight to 43 lbs of nitrogen was applied through irrigation water each week based on the current petiole analysis. The amount of nitrogen applied was appropriate to maintain tissue N level within the published desirable N03-N zone. Results from a separate study indicated no significant amount ofn03-n was leached out of the root zone using this practice. Information from these two fields can be used as a base for other potato fields in this region. Optimum N application ensured high yields and good quality. The yields were 592 cwt. and 502 cwt. per acre for Atlantic and Norkotah, respectively. Both are 28000 - Z 20000 24000 z.e: -E o.. d, 16000 e- 12000 i 1 Norkotah --0- Atlantic 8000 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Days after Planting FIGURE 2. Weekly petiole nitrate-n levels measured by conventional laboratory procedure for Norkotah and Atlantic potatoes.

POTATO NITROGEN MANAGEMENT 1409 - Za. I Y., - a.. I 2000 Ba... Q)-CU U) cu 1500 A. I 1000 0 += -cu R"2 y = = 260.40 0.924 + 6.0446e-2x E.!!! B. a. Z 1000 ~ 1500 1.\ -111 tti 500 10000 1./' 15000 20000 25000 30000 Q. Q) RA2 = 0.952 += '01110 ~ y ~ 18.164 + 0.13768x 4.8245,, 6xA2 8.1479".11x1\3 eight base) J FIGURE 3. Correlation between petiole sap nitrate-n measured with the Cardy Nitrate Meter and dry-weight based nitrate-n obtained with the conventional laboratory procedures (A: linear fit, B: quadratic fit).

:J... Co 1410 Q) 75 10500i - B. 9500 ~95 ~ r100 90 Q) ZHANG ET AL..9: 10000 ~ 85 80 1ii z 8500 E I. 170 I- I --0- ------~... ~95 v....9: 90 21400 21200 N03-N 85 III :J Q) Co 21000 E20800 13 14 15 891011 Q) I- Q) Q) cii ~ The relationship 75 between --0- petiole nitrate-n 70 N03.N concentration 80 1100 and Temperature ---.- Temperature Etime of day when (A: Atlantic, the sampleb: was Norkotah). collected, and ambient air temperature r). considered excellent yields in the industry. Tubers in both varieties had high specific gravities and low defects. The Atlantic was shipped directly to chip manufacturers from the field. Majority of the shipments were premium grade. Good N management also helped to reduce storage problems for Norkotah.

POTATO NITROGEN MANAGEMENT 1411 Correlation between Sap and Dry Petiole Nitrate-Nitrogen There was a highly significant linear correlation between petiole sap N03-N measured with the Cardy NO) meter and dry-weight based N03-N obtained with the conventional laboratory procedures (Figure 3A). This finding agrees with that of a similar study conducted in Minnesota (Rosen and Errebhi, 1994), but the slopes and intercepts are different, possibly because of differences in climate and soil conditions. However, a quadratic equation (Figure 3B) better fits the data in the entire range (r=0.98). Since optimum ranges for petiole N03-N on a dry weight basis have been well documented, petiole sap N03-N readings can be used for guiding N fertigation using the equations in Figure 3. The sap N03-N meter reduces testing time from days to minutes. It not only saves critical time but also reduces analytical costs significantly. This fmding is consistent with those on other vegetable crops (Hochmuth, 1994; Vitosh and Silva, 1994). Ideal Time to Collect Petiole Sample for Nitrate Testing The relationship between petiole N03-N concentration and time of day when the sample was collected is shown in Figure 4. Nitrate increased linearly with time between 0800 and 1100 HR and then stabilized at the highest level of the day for the next three hours. This may be due to the translocation of N within the potato plant in the morning as transpiration rate increased with increasing temperature and solar radiation. Figure 4 also indicates that N03-N increased with air temperature. Research has shown that transpiration rate increases as air temperature and solar radiation increases. Transpiration will concentrate N03-N in the petioles. Identical trends were found on a different variety planted on a different field (Figure 4B). Since petiole N03-N readings vary with time, care must be taken in extrapolating plant N needs from petiole N03-N analysis unless the time of sampling is considered. We recommend collecting sample between 1100 and 1400 HR to provide the most consistent N03-N results, thus enabling more precise nitrogen scheduling. CONCLUSIONS Split applications of N through irrigation water during potato peak growing season helped maintain petiole NO)-N in the desirable ranges. Both potato yields and quality were improved by monitoring petiole N03-N levels. The time to get petiole N03-N results can be reduced from days to minutes by using a pocket size sap N03 meter. Use of this meter is particularly applicable to small farms. Consistent petiole N03-N readings can be obtained by collecting tissue samples between 1100 and 1400 HR, or when air temperature is stabilized.

1412 ZHANG ET AL. REFERENCES Hochmuth, G. 1994. Efficiency ranges for nitrate-nitrogen and potassium for vegetable petiole sap quick tests. HortTechnology 4:218-222. Kleinkopf, G.E. and D.T. Westermann. 1992. Scheduling nitrogen applications for Russet Burbank Potatoes. University of Idaho, College of Agriculture Current Information Series No. 637. McDole, D.T., D.T. Westermann, G.D. Kleinschmidt, G.E. Kleinkopf, and J.C. Ojala. 1987. Idaho fertilizer guide-potatoes. University ofidaho, College of Agriculture, Current Information Series No. 261. Rosen, C.J. and M. Errebhi. 1994. Interpretation of the petiole nitrate sap test for potato. Presentation made at the Valley Potato Expo Educational Program, February 17, 1994, Grand Forks, North Dakota. Vitosh, M.L. and G.H. Silva. 1994. A rapid petiole sap nitrate-nitrogen test for potatoes. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25:183-190.