Section 500 Rainfall Table of Contents

Similar documents
Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

Engineering Hydrology Class 3

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

Engineering Hydrology. Class 16: Direct Runoff (DRO) and Unit Hydrographs

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

Table of Contents. Overview... 1

Streamflow of 2013 Water Year Summary

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Estimating the 100-year Peak Flow for Ungagged Middle Creek Watershed in Northern California, USA

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

ATTACHMENT C Design Analysis for Erosion Protection Cover for Piñon Ridge Tailing Cells

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

Table of Contents. Overview... 1

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

The Impact of Climate Change: Projected Adaptation Costs for Boulder County, Colorado

SOUTHEAST TEXAS CONTINUING EDUCATION

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Peak discharge computation

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

HYDROLOGY WORKSHEET 1 PRECIPITATION

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

DERIVATION AND CALIBRATION OF VOLUME-BASED RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR DENVER AREA, COLORADO

Technical Memorandum

IMPROVED MODELING OF THE GREAT PEE DEE RIVER: DOCUMENTATION IN SUPPORT OF FEMA APPEAL. Horry County, South Carolina

Introduction to Hydrology, Part 2. Notes, Handouts

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP Chapter 290: WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article IV: Stormwater Management

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment. MidAmerican Energy Company

New Flood Risk Products for Flood Forecasting and Warning Systems in Colorado

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Determination of watershed historic peak flow rates as the basis for detention basin design

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC TABLES AND CURVES

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Technical Memorandum Mine Plan of Operations Stormwater Assessment

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Plant McDonough-Atkinson Ash Pond 3 (AP-3) and Ash Pond 4 (AP-4)

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Watershed Chemical Signaling and Endocrine Disruption A Modeling Opportunity

HERPIC County Storm Drainage Manual

Prior Lake Stormwater Management & Flood Mitigation Study

Chapter 4 "Hydrology"

Planning for Variability & Uncertainty: Climate Change and

CUHP 2005 USER MANUAL

Atlas 14: The New Rainfall Atlas

SUMMARY REPORT. Brik Zivkovich, M.S., EIT Graduate Engineering Intern, Master Planning Program

Examination of PRZM5.0 Storm Rainfall Depth and Distribution Algorithms Compared to Current U.S. Storm Trends

Flood Control Planning Below Alluvial Fans

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Stormwater: Too Simple?

LARIMER COUNTY STORMWATER DESIGN STANDARDS (ADDENDUM TO THE URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUALS- VOLUMES 1, 2 AND 3)

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

EFFECT OF RAINGAGE DENSITY ON RUNOFF SIMULATION MODELING by ABSTRACT

Urban Stormwater Hydrology

Stream hydrographs. Stream hydrographs. Baseflow. Graphs of river stage or discharge at a single location as a function of time

CONSISTENCY BETWEEN CUHP AND RATIONAL METHODS James C.Y. Guo, PhD, P.E., and Ben Urbonas, P.E., D.WRD 08/04/2008

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Belle River Power Plant East China, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:

DETENTION BASIN DESIGN USING RATIONAL HYDROGRAPHS

Engineering Bulletin 11-02

5/11/2007. WinTR-55 for Plan Reviews Small Watershed Hydrology Overview

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND POLICIES FOR STORMWATER AND SEDIMENT PONDS IN SOUTH CAROLINA

JD 14 Project Area Project Team Meeting

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 14, 2012

Adjusting NRCS Curve Number for Rainfall Durations Less Than 24 Hours

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1

DESIGN HYDROLOGY MANUAL

Figure 1: Overview of all AutoCAD generated cross-sections.

EPA Stormwater Update

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 28, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, September 4, 2012

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC ASPECTS of the Walnut Street Bridge over the Schuylkill River Philadelphia, PA

U.S. Drought Monitor, July 31, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, October 2, 2012

Clean water we need it to survive. What you do makes a difference! Look for alternatives. Not all pollution is intentional

Boulder Creek Hydrologic Analysis

Little Thompson River Hydrologic Analysis

Exploring Changing Precipitation s Impact on Stormwater Runoff

Example 3. Elementary HEC-HMS Model. Purpose. Illustrate the steps to create a functioning precipitation-runoff model in HEC-HMS.

Review Budget and Timeline for XP-SWMM Phase II Project and Determine Next Steps

Calibration of Hydrologic Design Inputs for a Small Urban Watershed

Colorado Division of Water Resources

MIDAS CREEK PROJECT. FINAL DESIGN REPORT SKR Hydrotech 4/11/2012

Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

The Drainage Basin System

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

Activity Calculating Property Drainage

The Day of and Beyond: Lessons from an Historic Storm (and How to Plan for the Next One) September 11, 2014

Boulder Creek Hydrologic Analysis

UPDATE OF ARC TP108 RUN-OFF CALCULATION GUIDELINE

NRCS Hydrology methodology review Minnesota NRCS recommendation MnDOT recommendation Using Atlas 14 with HydroCAD

SMALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (LESS THAN FIVE ACRES)

Transcription:

Boulder Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Section 5 Rainfall Table of Contents 51 INTRODCTION... 5-1 52 INTENSITY-DRATION CRES FOR RATIONAL METHOD... 5-1 53 COLORADO RBAN HYDROGRAPH PROCEDRE RAINFALL HYETOGRAPHS... 5-2 54 WATERSHED SIZE RAINFALL DISTRIBTION ADJSTMENTS... 5-2 55 REFERENCES... 5-3 List of Figures 5-1 Boulder 5-Year 1-Hour Point Rainfall Depths... End of Section 5-2 Boulder 5-Year 6-Hour Point Rainfall Depths... End of Section 5-3 Boulder 1-Year 1-Hour Point Rainfall Depths... End of Section 5-4 Boulder 1-Year 6-Hour Point Rainfall Depths... End of Section November 216 5-i

Boulder Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Section 5 Rainfall 5. Rainfall 51 INTRODCTION The criteria for rainfall design presented in this section shall be used to calculate runoff using the accepted methodologies in Section 6. All detailed hydrologic analysis shall use the rainfall data presented herein for calculating storm runoff. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA) published the NOAA Atlas 2, olume 3 Atlas 2) in 1973 NOAA, 1973). Atlas 2 was officially superseded by NOAA Atlas 14 Atlas 14) NOAA, 213) on April 19, 213, for Colorado. The DFCD then conducted a detailed evaluation of Atlas 14. While the point rainfall values in Atlas 14 are lower than those in Atlas 2, the Atlas 14 values were determined not to be statistically significantly different from the Atlas 2 values. Furthermore, nearly all infrastructure built in the last 4 years was based on the Atlas 2 values and has performed very well during flood events. The DFCD ultimately determined continuing using point rainfall depths from Atlas 2 for hydrologic analysis in the Denver metro area was preferred. The DFCD published a memorandum that details their findings MacKenzie, 213), which can be found on their website http://udfcd.org/wp-content/uploads/uploads/resources/position%2papers/dfcd_position_on_the 213_NOAA_Precipitation-Frequency_Atlas.pdf) or via an internet search for DFCD Atlas 14. Boulder agrees with the assessment by the DFCD, and Atlas 2 was used to develop 1-hour and 6-hour point rainfall maps for the 5- and 1-year return periods in the county. These point rainfall maps are presented in Figures 5-1 through 5-4, which is located at the end of this section. These maps are more detailed than those in the SDCM DFCD, 216) and shall be used as long as the DFCD continues to prefer Atlas 2 to Atlas 14. Equations for intensity and depth were taken from the SDCM. If revisions to these equations are included in future versions of the SDCM, those revisions shall apply. 52 INTENSITY-DRATION CRES FOR RATIONAL METHOD To develop depth-duration curves or intensity-duration curves for use with the Rational Method, the 1-hour point rainfall depths for the design storm shall be obtained from Figures 5-1 and 5-3, which are located at the end of this Section. Rainfall intensity can be calculated for a given duration using Equation 5.1. Equation 5.2 can be used to calculate total rainfall depths for durations less than one hour. I 28.5P 1 Td 1.786 28.5 P1 Td / 6 D.786 1 T d 5.1) 5.2) November 216 5-1

Boulder Storm Drainage Criteria Manual where I D 1 d rainfall intensity inches/hour rainfall depth inches P 1-hour point rainfall depth inches T storm duration or time of concentration minu tes. 53 COLORADO RBAN HYDROGRAPH PROCEDRE RAINFALL HYETOGRAPHS The Colorado rban Hydrograph Procedure CHP) requires 2-hour rainfall hyetographs to calculate stormwater runoff. The program will automatically create the necessary hyetographs using methodology calibrated to the metro Denver area. Hyetographs creation of requires the 1-hour point rainfall depth, which are available in Figures 5-1 through 5-4, located at the end of this section, as well as the return period for the design storm. CHP will also create area-corrected hyetographs for project areas with a watershed greater than 1 square miles see Section 54). The 6-hour point rainfall and watershed area in square miles are required to calculate an area-corrected hyetograph. Hyetographs with durations longer than 2 hours are automatically generated as required for area correction. Hyetographs generated by CHP are recommended for most projects, but a user-defined hyetograph can be entered if required. The reader should refer to the CHP users manual for additional information. 54 WATERSHED SIZE RAINFALL DISTRIBTION ADJSTMENTS Rainfall distributions for watersheds larger than 1 square miles need to be adjusted to account for rainfall not typically being evenly distributed over such a large area. The adjustment procedure is performed within CHP on the Raingages worksheet. Any CHP subcatchment draining to a design point with a total drainage area larger than 1 square miles must use an area-corrected rainfall distribution. Note that the requirement for area correction is determined at the design point level. CHP subcatchment hydrographs that were created for a design point that requires area correction cannot be used for the analysis of a design point that either does not require area correction or requires a different amount of area correction. A large project with multiple design points may require multiple hydrologic models to account for the varying amounts of area correction that are required at different design points. Individual area-corrected rainfall distributions should typically be created each time a design point with a total drainage area changes by more than 1 square miles. For example, a unique rainfall distribution should be created for use with design points with a drainage area greater than 1, 2, 3, and 4 square miles, and so on; although, specific projects may require a higher degree of refinement. 5-2 November 216

Boulder Storm Drainage Criteria Manual 55 REFERENCES MacKenzie, K., 213. SFCD Position of the NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation-Frequency Atlas, olume 8, memorandum prepared by K. Mackenzie, rban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 213. Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the nited States, Midwestern States Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wisconsin), NOAA Atlas 14, ol. 8, prepared by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1973. Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the Western nited States, Colorado, NOAA Atlas 2, ol. III, prepared by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC. rban Drainage and Flood Control District, 216. rban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual: olume 1 Management, Hydrology, and Hydraulics, prepared by the rban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO. November 216 5-3

7 1 RIERSIDE PEACEFL ALLEY 1.4 7 HYGIENE RAYMOND 1.3 JAMESTOWN 1.2 5 NIWOT 1. BRAINARD LAKE 8 GOLD HILL Weld 287 GNBARREL 1.1 7 7 ELDORA CRESCENT ILLAGE ELDORADO SPRINGS SPERIOR 8 1. 4 8 Gilpin 1.1 1.1 Miles 16 Jefferson LOISILLE MARSHALL 7W NEDERLAND LAFAYETTE 8 CARIBO 1 6 12 BOLDER 72 11 12 WARD LONGMONT Broomfield Adams $ Grand 8 8 6 11 1.4 66 7 9.9 1.5 ALLENSPARK 8 7W LYONS.9 6 8.9 1.5 Larimer LONG'S PEAK 13 12 1.1.9 6 Figure 5-1 Boulder 5-Year 1-Hour Point Rainfall Depths Rainfall Depths Based on: NOAA Atlas 2 PrecipitationFrequency Atlas of the Western nited States

7W Larimer LONG'S PEAK 6 8 7 LYONS ALLENSPARK PEACEFL ALLEY 7 RAYMOND Grand GOLD HILL 1.6 72 11 1.8 2. GNBARREL BOLDER NEDERLAND 7 LAFAYETTE 8 CARIBO ELDORA CRESCENT ILLAGE ELDORADO SPRINGS SPERIOR Jefferson Gilpin 8 Miles 16 LOISILLE MARSHALL 8 4 287 7 1 1.6 8 Weld 7W 12 1.4 5 NIWOT WARD LONGMONT Broomfield Adams $ JAMESTOWN 12 1.3 HYGIENE 6 RIERSIDE 6 1 8 8 7 11 66 8 9 BRAINARD LAKE 2. 13 12 1.2 6 Figure 5-2 Boulder 5-Year 6-Hour Point Rainfall Depths 2. Rainfall Depths Based on: NOAA Atlas 2 PrecipitationFrequency Atlas of the Western nited States

Figure 5-3 Boulder 1-Year 1-Hour Point Rainfall Depths LONG'S PEAK LYONS 1 PEACEFL ALLEY BRAINARD LAKE 6 HYGIENE 7 RAYMOND JAMESTOWN 2.2 8 WARD LONGMONT 7 RIERSIDE 2.1 1.9 2. 5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.6 NIWOT 2.7 2.7 GOLD HILL Weld 287 GNBARREL BOLDER 72 11 7 2.1 CRESCENT ILLAGE 4 8 Miles 16 ELDORADO SPRINGS SPERIOR 8 Jefferson Gilpin LOISILLE MARSHALL 7W 7 ELDORA 6 NEDERLAND LAFAYETTE 8 CARIBO 1 Broomfield Adams $ 12 12 8 8 8 11 66 7 ALLENSPARK 1.8 6 2.1 13 12 9 7W Larimer 1.7 Grand 8 1.7 6 Rainfall Depths Based on: NOAA Atlas 2 PrecipitationFrequency Atlas of the Western nited States

Figure 5-4 Boulder 1-Year 6-Hour Point Rainfall Depths 7W 6 8 7 LYONS ALLENSPARK 6 7 RAYMOND JAMESTOWN GOLD HILL 12 8 WARD 3. 3.4 BOLDER 72 11 7 12 NEDERLAND 7 ELDORA LAFAYETTE 8 CARIBO 1 CRESCENT ILLAGE ELDORADO SPRINGS SPERIOR Jefferson Gilpin 4 8 Miles 16 LOISILLE MARSHALL 8 287 GNBARREL 3.8 3.8 BRAINARD LAKE Weld 7W 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 5 NIWOT 3. LONGMONT Broomfield Adams $ 2. PEACEFL ALLEY HYGIENE 6 1 RIERSIDE 7 11 8 8 8 9 66 13 12 Larimer LONG'S PEAK Grand 6 Rainfall Depths Based on: NOAA Atlas 2 PrecipitationFrequency Atlas of the Western nited States