Welcome and thank you for your interest in the proposed Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev Project.

Similar documents
Environmental Impact Statement for the Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev (SCMAGLEV) Project, between Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Evaluation of Alternatives

Agency Scoping Meeting

Central Corridor. Light Rail Transit. Navigating NEPA Between St. Paul and Minneapolis

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Draft EIS/EIR Scoping Meeting June 2017

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles

Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for High Capacity Transit

Appendix C Presentation Slides with Script

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Draft EIS/EIR Scoping Interagency Meeting June 19, 2017

Environmental Impact Statement; Lone Star Regional Rail Project Williamson, Travis, Bastrop, Hays, Caldwell, Comal, Guadalupe, and Bexar Counties, TX

I-20 East Transit Initiative

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HOUSTON DALLAS HIGH SPEED RAIL (TEXAS CENTRAL)

Purpose of the Public Hearing

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD

Southeastern Minnesota Freight Rail Capacity Study

Regional Transportation Studies Management Committee

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

WELCOME EAST LINK OVERLAKE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

Southern Maryland Transit Corridor Preservation Study Charles County Board of County Commissioners September 22, 2009

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses

Appendix D Presentation Slides with Script

C. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF INTEREST

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Stakeholder Advisory Group March 14, 2018

AMENDED RECORD OF DECISION. by the Federal Transit Administration. Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia

Environmental Impact Statement for the California High-Speed Rail System Burbank to Los Angeles Section, CA

Our Funding Approach. MeyerFoundation.org

LA 23 NOGC Railway Relocation PE/NEPA Project. Public Meeting

Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Community Workshop Palo Alto, April 27, 2010 Small Group Activity Summary

Environmental Scoping Information Report

Welcome. Public Meeting. August 2, :00 to 7:00 p.m. Presentation 6:00 to 6:30 p.m.

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/EIR)

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

I-20 East Transit Initiative

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

APPROVAL TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON I-45 AND MORE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Green Line extension Project Fall 2009

Northern Branch Corridor CLC Meeting. June 30, 2008

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Technical Advisory Committee/Agency Coordination. Kick-Off Meeting

Background. Purpose of This Phase of Project Development

Project Purpose. Federal Railroad Administration

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

Tier 2 Environmental Impact Statement for the High-Speed Rail Project from Granite

A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #7

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY. TPP Planning Conference 2014

Gold Line Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

Outer Loop/Rail Bypass Study

Federal Transit Administration s New Starts Process. Red Line Extension Alternatives Analysis Study

Public Meeting. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Section 106 Consultation. Preferred Alternative Selection November 29, 2018

Ann Arbor Station Environmental Review. Public Information Meetings April 2, 2014

Media Briefing. February 7, 2011

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Appendix C Scoping Meeting Materials

Willmar Wye Public Open House #4 and Public Hearing

ROSS VALLEY FLOOD PROTECTION & WATERSHED PROGRAM U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CORTE MADERA CREEK PROJECT. Community Meeting.

TIER 2 EIS SCOPING MEETING WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SCOPING MEETING

MARTINSVILLE SOUTHERN CONNECTOR STUDY CITIZEN INFORMATION MEETING Magna Vista High School 701 Magna Vista School Road Ridgeway, Virginia May 8,

Chicago Transit Authority Orange Line Alternatives Analysis Study

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration and Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

LA 23 NOGC Railway Relocation PE/NEPA Project

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Recommend to Board. Final Action

Chapter 5 - Transportation

DRAFT Scoping Booklet

Southwest Corridor Plan Project Update. June 11, 2013

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

WELCOME TO THE LONG BRIDGE PROJECT

Kentucky State Board on Electric Generation and Transmission Siting

Connecting the Nation's Capital Transportation System

11 Joint Development Regulatory Context and Methodology

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Chicago, Illinois, to Detroit-Pontiac,

Cotton Belt Corridor. Area Focus Group (AFG) DFW Airport/Coppell/Cypress Water May 4, John Hoppie, Capital Planning

Tier 1 EIS Round 2 Local Officials Briefing Fall 2011

Intent to Prepare a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Capitol

VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Alternatives Analysis Report

WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION SCOPING MEETING

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project. Draft Environmental Impact Report

Capitol Expressway Light Rail Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ANNOTATED OUTLINE

SH 35 Public Meeting

Mead Comprehensive Plan & Land Use Code Update. Project Description and Background Information Town of Mead, Colorado May 2017

Kammy Horne, AICP. Austin, Texas

Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Draft Environmental Impact Report

Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail Project Final Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix H. DART Cotton Belt Public Involvement Plan

SECTION 4. Citizen s Guide to DEIS

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 945

WANT A BETTER BUS SYSTEM? SO DOES MTA.

Updating Sound Transit s Long-Range Plan. ITE November 12, 2013

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY

Caltrain Business Plan Draft Business Strategy and Scope. Board of Directors December 7, 2017 Agenda Item 9

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Ohio s Passenger Rail Plan Investing in Ohio s Economic Future Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association June 11, 2010

Transcription:

Transcript for Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev Environmental Study Project Process & Information Video October 2017 Slide 1 Welcome and thank you for your interest in the proposed Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev Project. Though we re early in the process, the team encourages YOU to get involved with the environmental study. Your feedback has a REAL potential to make this project better. Slide 2 The project team has heard your expressed concerns loud and clear, and we are listening to you. Our staff is available to discuss the project and study process with you. There will be multiple opportunities to communicate with the Project Team, whether it s through public meetings, submitting comment cards, speaking over the phone, emailing, or posting comments to the website. We encourage you to provide your comments, speak with our staff, and visit the project website to view updated project information and responses to frequently asked questions. Slide 3 Right now, the federal project is a grant studying the feasibility of a superconducting magnetic levitation (or ES- SEE maglev) train. Engineers and planners are currently finalizing technical specifications and weighing the benefits and impacts of a proposed high-speed train service between Baltimore and Washington, DC. S-C- MAGLEV trains are now the fastest in the world, with cruising speeds more than 300 miles an hour. Slide 4 Baltimore Washington Rapid Rail (or BWRR) is a private company that is proposing to construct the SCMAGLEV system between Baltimore and Washington DC. Their proposal would provide an approximate 15-minute service between the new Baltimore and Washington stations, and would run on a new, dedicated guideway partially through tunnel and partially elevated with no surface-level intersections with existing roadways or other railroads. Slide 5 Congress authorized funding to *study* magnetic levitation projects in 2005 s Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act. The Federal Railroad Administration (or FRA) awarded $27.8 Million to the Maryland Department of Transportation (or MDOT) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (or EIS) for BWRR s proposal. Please note, though, that no one has yet set aside money for construction. 1

Slide 6 At this stage, it is too early to determine if or how the project will affect any landowners because a final alignment has not been determined. A goal of the proposed project is to maximize the use of existing rights-of-way intended for transportation uses and to minimize impacts to local communities and environmental resources. FRA and MDOT will have additional details on these factors as the project progresses and with completion of the alternatives analysis. Some alternative alignments will be eliminated from further study, and those alignments that are retained are likely to continue to evolve to minimize impacts on communities and environmental resources. Property owners can get a better idea of potential right-of-way impacts by examining maps of the alternative alignments posted on the project website (www.bwmaglev.info) and at public meetings. It is important to note, however, that FRA will likely adjust and refine alignments based on public and stakeholder input during the study process. Slide 7 Safety is of paramount importance. The safety and security for areas adjacent to the train facilities, as well as on-board trains and at train facilities, will be evaluated as part of preliminary design and documented in the EIS through coordination with relevant agencies, stakeholders, and technical experts. The Project Team will research and document safety issues and best practices related to personal safety and security for passengers, as well as address the safety and security of operating superconducting magnetic levitation trains under various conditions and environmental factors, such as snow events and during times of poor conductor visibility. The Project Team will also research and plan for potential threats such as terrorist attacks, fires, explosions, and severe weather events. Slide 8 The project includes three proposed stations: in Washington, DC, at BWI Thurgood Marshall Airport, and in Baltimore City. The system would require one maintenance facility, support facilities such as ventilation shafts along the route, and new electric substations. Slide 9 The project team is led by FRA. Working for FRA at the state level is MDOT. MDOT serves as the grantee and oversees the work being performed by the Maryland Economic Development Corporation or MEDCO, and the Maryland Transit Administration or MTA, a transportation business unit of MDOT. MEDCO is coordinating the engineering and design efforts being developed by the Private Project Sponsor BWRR. MDOT-MTA is overseeing the NEPA compliance and EIS process, which is being conducted by the Environmental Consultant AECOM. 2

Slide 10 The Alternatives Report will be published in the winter/spring of 2018, followed by the Draft EIS and corresponding public hearing in fall of 2018. Once comments on the Draft EIS have been addressed, the Final EIS and Record of Decision will be published in the Winter of 2019. Comments from the public and agencies are welcomed and encouraged throughout the process. Slide 11 The study area for the evaluation of potential environmental effects extends 40 miles from downtown Washington, DC, north to downtown Baltimore, and from the I-95 corridor east to central Anne Arundel and Prince George s Counties, a distance of about 10 miles. The Study Area was developed by the Study Team to define the area where SCMAGLEV could be implemented and the surrounding areas that could be affected by the construction and operation of the proposed system. Slide 12 In addition to neighborhoods and communities, the study area contains a number of important natural and cultural resources. Most of the land in the study area is privately owned, but large federal, state and institutional properties are located throughout the corridor. Slide 13 There are many Parks located throughout the study area, some are large Federal and State lands, while others are smaller community parks. The study team recognizes the importance and sensitivity of these parks and will work to avoid, minimize and mitigate potential impacts as part of the study process. Slide 14 Many key environmental considerations will be studied as part of this project such as environmental justice, noise and vibration effects, electromagnetic fields, safety, and construction. Slide 15 FRA and MDOT are coordinating with more than two dozen resource agencies to evaluate potential impacts to natural resources and ensure ecosystems within the study area continue to thrive. For each alternative alignment retained for detailed study, the team identifies these resources and evaluates the nature and extent of the potential impacts. Where possible, alignments are shifted to avoid or minimize impacts. Slide 16 The proposed project is being studied with federal funds. Therefore, its potential environmental effects must be evaluated and compared to a No-Build option, and comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (or NEPA) review process. 3

Slide 17 On large projects like SCMAGLEV, NEPA studies are a multi-year process involving many steps, many agencies at all levels of government, and many opportunities for public input. The goal of NEPA is to identify the potential negative effects of the project, study alternatives that do the least possible harm, consider a nobuild option when the adverse impacts could possibly outweigh project benefits, and throughout the process, provide the public with the opportunity to provide input. The results of this NEPA study will be published in an Environmental Impact Statement (or EIS) and available for public review and comment. Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies will review the EIS and associated public comments as part of the decision-making process. Correspondence and feedback from citizens, residents, and other project stakeholders is encouraged throughout the NEPA process and can be done a variety of ways. Perhaps the simplest way is through our project website and email address. Please visit www.bwmaglev.info or email us at info@bwmaglev.info. Slide 18 NEPA is also an umbrella law that encourages integrated compliance with other environmental laws. Because this project is funded by the Federal Government, it must comply with the NEPA process and all corresponding environmental laws and approvals. Slide 19 The NEPA process consists of five steps, requiring significant coordination between the project team, public stakeholders, elected officials, and governmental regulatory agencies. Slide 20 Step 1 consists of initiating the NEPA process by publishing a Notice of Intent, submitting a draft Purpose and Need, holding agency and public scoping meetings, developing initial preliminary project alternatives, and accepting comments from the public during a 30-day comment period. For this project, the Notice of Intent was published on November 25, 2016. Slide 21 Step 2 consists of collecting data on existing conditions and screening potential alternatives. The alternatives that do not meet the project purpose, sufficiently address needs, or contain fatal flaws or disproportionately high impacts or costs are screened out and dropped. Slide 22 In Step 3, the project team analyzes the remaining alternatives, and publishes an Alternatives Report. 4

Slide 23 In Step 4, the team determines a preliminary preferred alternative based on the analysis, publishes a Draft EIS, holds public hearings, and accepts comments from the public for 45 days. Slide 24 In Step 5, the team publishes the Final EIS, accepts comments from the public for 30 days, reviews the comments, and publishes a Record of Decision. The project team welcomes and encourages public and regulatory input throughout the entire NEPA process and will review all comments received from citizens, residents, and other project stakeholders, and incorporate the suggestions that will contribute to a successful outcome. Slide 25 Thank you for participating in the SC Maglev project. For the most up to date information or to provide comments and questions, please visit our website at www.bwmaglev.info. You can also email the project team at info@bwmaglev.info. 5