Brussels, 23 September 2015

Similar documents
ELB End of Life Boats 1 philosophy

Strategies of Circular Economy in the Netherlands

Council conclusions on the EU action plan for the circular economy

european suppliers OF Waste-tO-eNergy technology everything you always WaNteD to KNOW about Waste-tO-eNergy

View Paper Commission Proposal amending the Waste Framework Directive Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive Landfill Directive COM(2014)397 final

Enabling technologies for the circular economy. Reverse logistics, traceability of plastic products and their waste, the ReSOLVE method

Stakeholder Information Meeting. Thematic Strategies on the sustainable use of resources and on the prevention and recycling of waste

PRO EUROPE COMMENTS. Extended impact assessment on the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste

FICCI ENVIRONMENT CONCLAVE "Sustainable waste management: harnessing the. potential for business and technology"

EU legal context of glass recycling

Circular Economy European Package European Commission

epp european people s party

KANSUI (Ver. 2)

Danish examples to reduce plastic pollution and making plastic circular

EUROCITIES response to the circular economy package. February 2016

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions Communication on a European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy (2018/C 461/05)

ACR+ EPR Club: EU packaging law and the (EPR) principles of Directive 2008/98

DRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/0272(COD) of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

MARINE LITTER: What role for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)?

Waste Management Plan of the Moravian-Silesian Region

PROSPERING IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY

POLICY ISSUES OF INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN EUROPE. Jim Philp Policy Analyst 2 Rue Andre-Pascal, Paris

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Position Paper addressed to the first Ad Hoc Open-Ended Expert Group on Marine Litter and Microplastics

Toyama Framework on Material Cycles

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

APPLYING THE CONCEPT OF CIRCULAR ECONOMY TO INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT. CASE STUDY

Sustainable issues: Introduction of the LMI advisory group report: Taking Bio-Based from Promise to Markets

Dell s Producer Responsibility Policy

European and German Waste Policy

A European Strategy for Plastics in the circular economy Hugo-Maria Schally DG ENVIRONMENT

Circular economy: the case of the ecological production of "terrazzo" tiles, Questions & Answers F. Ansaloni, V. Grandinetti, E.

T O R O N T O LONG TERM WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Role of local governments in fostering the transition to sustainable lifestyles and livelihoods and improved wellbeing

Delivering One Planet Prosperity A House Builder s contribution to SEPA s Landfill Sector Plan. Richard Birch Deputy Sector Lead - Landfill

NUMBERS AT A GLANCE. EU Member States have implemented. packaging waste policies

Council conclusions on eco-innovation:enabling the transition towards a circular economy

CEN-CENELEC reply to the European Commission s consultation on the Circular Economy

Action against litter and littering an integral part of the Commission's Circular Economy Action Plan

25th commission meeting, 16 October 2014 WORKING DOCUMENT. Commission for the Environment, Climate Change and Energy

METRO S COMMITMENT TO THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY

Konferenz Stahl und Recycling Ressourcenpolitik der EU

Emerging EU Resource Efficiency Policy

CIRCULAR ECONOMY. Kemira Position Paper

Resource Efficiency. ResourceWise June Presentation by Karolina Fras, European Commission, DG Environment.

UNIVERSITY OF TEESSIDE DEPARMENT OF CAMPUS FACILITIES WASTE STRATEGY/RECYCLING - UPDATE ON POSITION FEBRUARY 2009

6515/18 AM/am 1 DG E 1A

GETTING THE MOST FROM PLASTICS

The ELV Directive What comes next? Artemis Hatzi-Hull, LL.M European Commission, DG ENV Brussels, 6 March 2018

DGE 1 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 April 2018 (OR. en) 2015/0274 (COD) PE-CONS 10/18 ENV 127 CODEC 251

Horizon 2020 SC5 Work Programme 2015

WASTE MANAGEMENT Concrete actions taken and specific progress made in implementation

The EU Packaging Policy. Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste

Christina Meskers, Umicore. Consumer electronics recycling a growing source of copper and much more

RECYCLING vs. REUSE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF RE-CYCLING VERSUS RE-USE CORRUGATED BOARD PACKAGING AS ILLUSTRATION

Innovation and Policy Support in Mineral and Metallurgical Processing

Urban cleanliness through Extended Producer Responsibility

The Circular Economy and the ELV Directive the future changes. Artemis Hatzi-Hull, LL.M European Commission, DG ENV Ecomondo Rimini, 9 November 2018

Advanced Waste Management and climate protection - Experiences in Germany Workshop Waste and Climate Change New Delhi

Horizon Societal Challenge 5: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials. Dublin, 2 October 2014

Conclusions on clean and energy-efficient vehicles for a competitive automotive industry and decarbonised road transport

Brussels, COM(2018) 28 final. ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES. to the

Circular Economy. Jiannis Kougoulis European Commission DG Environment

Living well, within the limits of the planet

EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY

A European Strategy for Plastics in the circular economy Werner Bosmans DG ENVIRONMENT 2 October 2018

Discussion points for the internationally-harmonized EPR systems

Critical Raw Material Charter

Eurometaux Position on the review of the European waste management legislation

Implementation of EU waste legislation. Karolina Fras European Commission DG Environment

Energy policy at the crossroads. Finding the road to a competitive, low carbon and energy efficient Europe

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

Circular Economy Closing the loop An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy

1. Sustainability assessments of buildings requires taking into account all phases of the lifecycle

EUMEPS EU Voluntary Pledge. 1. Introduction

Moving towards Sustainable Material Management - Modelling Aspects. European Commission, DG Environment

14060/1/14 REV 1 AM/am 1 DG E 1A

1.0 Summary of Recommendations

Current Resource Efficiency Policy Issues in Europe. Carina Vopel, EC - DG Environment 1 st DYNAMIX Policy Platform Brussels, 2o March 2013

EUROPEN position on Extended Producer Responsibility for post-consumer packaging in the EU

EUROPEN position on Extended Producer Responsibility for post-consumer packaging in the EU

Civil Society and Progressive Businesses Put to Rest Single-Use Plastic Directive Fears

3R Ministerial Conference on the 3R Initiative Tokyo, Japan, April THE ROLE OF THE BASEL CONVENTION IN PROMOTING 3Rs

The aim of this paper is to outline how PRO EUROPE and its members participate to these efforts through:

More And Better Recycling for a Circular Economy the EU in Action

unpackaging extended producer responsibility

Our position. Low-Emission Mobility strategy: a technology-neutral and holistic approach

IEEP activities on resource efficiency and resource use

10447/18 KS/mb 1 DG E 1A

Developing a Green Waste Management System for Brunei Darussalam - What is required? Jerry Leonard

The transition to a circular economy therefore requires fundamental changes across the entire economy based on the following interdependent pillars:

Boosting non-ferrous Metals Recycling

The Challenge (1) fossil fuel food, feed and fibre ecosystems by to 10 fold by 2020

Waste management and treatment in Poland

Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for Panels and Profiles

Circular Economy: from Compliance to Champion

July 2018 RECHARGE s Position on the Review of the Batteries Directive

Lecture 12 Scrap Tires

EU Action Plan for a circular economy H2020 Examples

Transcription:

Brussels, 23 September 2015 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fibre Reinforced Plastic (FRP) vessels highly durable and endof-life (EOL) disposal progressively becoming a major issue. As regulation restricts the disposal of FRP to landfill, recycling will become the only realistic option. Many projects on boat dismantling and recycling practices : Increased awareness, but none addressed how disposal to be financed; a few suggested costs should fall on the boat owner; not recognized the boatbuilding industry has its part to play and development of marine products more sustainable throughout their life cycle must be incentivized; 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Europe, in spite of advances in waste management, there is a compelling need for specific and uniform provisions related to management, scrapping and recycling of boats; For EBA it s time marine Industry start developing viable EOL strategies itself so as : boats are designed and manufactured to allow their reuse, recycling and recovery; producers meet a significant part for the costs of the implementation of these measures. 3

BACKGROUND On ELB EBA mandated its WG to make inventory of the problem from a Consumer perspective; Findings confirm the problem exists with a rapid growth. The estimated normal lifespan for boats in FRP is about 30/40 years. As the mass production of such hulls started in the early 70ies, the tsunami of ELB cases is expected in the next years to come. 4

BACKGROUND Unlike metal and wooden boats, made of recyclable or naturally degrading materials, fiberglass craft need particular consideration and safe, ecofriendly working practices; Present disposal methods generally involve chopping up composite structures, reducing them to fragments for landfill. Approach unsustainable in the long run!! Countries, as Germany and the Netherlands, have regulations restricting the disposal of FRP to landfill. Recycling will become the only realistic and viable option!!!! It meets the legal provisions as set out by EU Waste Directive 2008/98/EC 5

LOGISTICS Recycling of clean waste material is already viable; Process to facilitate this recycling focused on: dismantling (using existing breaker yard facilities); separation of different materials (tooling already existing) tackling specific impurities like AF paint/asbestos insulation, etc. 6

The industrial process Today, 1 broad model being developed, based on: Creating a local network of professionals to organize boat collection; Assessment of each individual boat; De-pollution, dismantling and boat dispatching into gross waste condition; Treatment in industrial waste recycling plants; URGENT issue: The final cost is born by the owners (1300-1500 /10 m) 7

Boat DIGEST and EBA EBA: involved in the Boat DIGEST project as Advisory Board member, providing suggestions and feedback on the deliverables, the vocational education and awareness developed; disseminated info to its members and discussed the outputs with them; recognizes the valuable contribution that Boat DIGEST made in raising the level of awareness among a number of key sectors; however, the project hasn t make an assessment on the possible financing models for disposing of an old craft: this and where costs fall, issues that concern boat owners/consumers. 8

Responding to the B.D. Questionnaire DONE : close and continuous contacts with EBI and BD; Guidelines for boat owners, with the WG extended comments; BD s aim to promote owners/users liability NOT ENOUGH; Stressed EBA stances & perspectives on preventing owners shouldering associated dismantling/recycling costs; EBA-EBI cooperation appropriate to progress common aspects but also monitor and address the consumers concerns; For EBI, a new horizon to be explored: convenience of a closer cooperation with EBA, as over 10 millions of owners/users constitute a "critical mass" with large impact on the boating policies and their makers; 9

Responding to the BD Questionnaire EBA s opinion: EBI and EBA to fight the equation boat owners = wealthy people as unrealistic, outdated and contrary to any recreational/economic al logic. Industry develop solutions preventing inadequate costs for last owner. However, the big question to be answered is: what costs are involved and who will pay for them?. 10

WHO WILL PAY? Conventional dismantling a 7 m long boat, including logistics, is 800, rising to some 1500 for a 10-12 m craft and 15,000 for a 15 m vessel. (The escalation is related more to boat volume than to length and to the greater complexity of larger vessels); Suggested costs could fall on the boat owner, unwilling or unable to afford such substantial sums, at least within a short time span; Unlike owners of metal boats, which have significant scrap value in their recyclable metals, those of reinforced plastic craft cannot rely on embodied scrap value to reduce disposal costs; Risks of abandoned boats, already present, to be enhanced, increasing environmental impact. 11

WHO WILL PAY? For EBA the main problem is: this scheme doesn t recognize the boatbuilding Industry has its part to play; so far little incentive for innovation in green design and development of new marine products more sustainable throughout their life cycle and during scrapping and recycling; Now time that European policy makers consider the concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR) as the best route to take; In this approach, the Industry itself has the primary responsibility for EOL disposal; 12

WHO WILL PAY? This reflects the fact boat builders and their suppliers are, after all, key stakeholders in the life-cycle process and working towards sustainable production is in their interests; Although EPR is not without its problems: who inherits the responsibility if the original fabricator goes out of business since many boat builders last nowhere near as long as the composite boats they build, EBA believes the marine Industry must start developing viable EOL strategies itself or risk of solutions imposed by European legislation akin to those that have evolved for the auto trade. 13

OPTIONS ON ELB Different national measures concerning end-of life vehicles should be harmonized to minimize the impact of end-of life boats on the environment, thus contributing to the protection, preservation and improvement of the quality of the environment; A Community-wide framework necessary to ensure coherence between national approaches, particularly with a view to: the design of boats for recycling and recovery; the requirements for collection and treatment facilities, and the attainment of the targets for reuse, recycling and recovery, taking into account the principle of subsidiarity and the polluter-pays principle. 14

OPTIONS ON ELB In line with the Community strategy for waste management: the generation of waste must be avoided as much as possible; IAW the fundamental principle, waste should be reused and recovered, and Priority be given to reuse and recycling. 15

OPTIONS ON ELB Member States should take measures to ensure that: economic operators set up systems for collection, treatment and recovery of FRP boats no longer fit for use; last holder and/or owner can deliver the boat to an authorized treatment facility without any cost as a result of the boat having no or a negative market value; producers meet a significant part of the costs for the implementation of these measures; the normal functioning of market forces should not be hindered; The requirements for dismantling reuse and recycling of ELB and their components should be integrated in the design and production of new boats; innovation budget is available to stimulate recycling of GRP material originating from pleasure craft (the 7^ EAP) 16

THE 7th ENVIRONMENT ACTION PROGRAMME (EAP) The main objective guiding the European Environment Policy for the years to come. EAP sets out a life within the planet s ecological limits, nothing is wasted, natural resources sustainably managed and low-carbon growth decoupled from resource use, setting the pace for a safe and sustainable global society. Any progress is possible only within an environmental framework; EAP identified the objectives for intermediate and final goals. It financially supports investments for : the sustainable management and efficient use of resources, including waste, and the value of an economy based on products environmentally sound. To this target, then, should also aim ELB!! 17

THE 7th ENVIRONMENT ACTION PROGRAMME (EAP) Special focus on turning waste into a resource-efficient, green, and competitive economy and to move towards a better implementation of existing legislation, with more and wiser investment for the EU waste management and recycling sector. The programme entered into force in January 2014. EU institutions and Member States to ensure it is implemented and that priority objectives set out are met by 2020. 18

THE EBA WG POSITION Today, in spite of the great advances in waste management in Europe, there is a compelling need for specific, harmonized provisions on management, scrapping and recycling of boats. Similar to the EOL Vehicles, there is now a requirement for harmonized measures on EOL boats that lay down procedures aimed at: Ensuring boats are designed and manufactured so as to allow targets for reuse, recycling and recovery to be achieved; preventing of waste; promoting the reuse, recyclability and recovery; obligating the use of manufacturing processes without hazardous substances; improving the environmental performance of all of the economic operators involved in the life cycle of boats. 19

20 THE EBA WG POSITION Work collectively with Industry so as: The scheme cover boats and end-of life boats, including their components and materials; Address Administrations on the possibility of creating partnerships with builders/dismantlers/recyclers; The aim is to: stress the chance of significant incomes for reusing products; foresee financial support for this activity( i.e. car recycling) both at national and EU level, IAW the 7^ EAP; reduce significantly the current owners costs; mitigate the ELB impact on the environment; preserve boating ecological image/reputation; Contribute to the long term growth of European boating!!

OPPORTUNITIES For the environment: ELB would lead to the establishment of a return cycle that allows to reduce the costs both for management of waste and for the use of a secondary raw material, result of a up-cycling process and cheaper than the materials currently available on the market; For the environment & the consumer: The abandonment of ELB boats creates extensive economic problems related to the management of the generated waste: Possible action: Benefiting of a mechanism/scheme which could encourage, either fiscally or indirectly, the boats disposal at their end life. 21

For the builder: 22 OPPORTUNITIES The market of raw materials sees an increase of their value that is reflected in an increase of the price of the finished product; Possible action: Stimulate an industrial policy that rewards activities of design and construction aimed at promoting the separation of components for their eco-friendly disposal, with a consequent better and recognized qualification of yards that are distinguished by these characteristics (i.e. progressive number of quality stars etc.) For the commerce: A simpler new procedure for a more eco-friendly recycling of boats at their end-of-life could encourage consumers to purchase new boats: Possible action: The EU Institutions/Governments should encourage fiscally the collection and recycling of boats at the end of their lives.

Any Questions? P