Topsoil Loss and Modification During Suburbanization: Impact on Demands for Municipal Water. R.G. Darmody

Similar documents
Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series October 17, 2008

Soil Health and Crop Productivity. Brian Wienhold USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE

What is the Vadose Zone? Why Do We Care? Tiffany Messer Assistant Professor Biological Systems Engineering School of Natural Resources University of

Stormwater Management Studies in Areas Undergoing Reconstruction Following the Tornado that Hit Tuscaloosa, AL

Research and Practical Insights into Using Gypsum

Soil Compaction. By: Kelly Patches Soils 401 April 8, 2009

Part I. Ecological Sites and Soil Survey. Part II. A Framework for Soil and Vegetation Dynamics

Urban Soil Conservation and Management

Biochar Soil Amendment Opportunities

EVALUATION OF THE ILLINOIS SOIL NITROGEN TEST IN THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION i. Abstract. Introduction

Refining the N index to determine the risk of nitrate contamination of surface and groundwater for Ontario soils

Land Development and Soil Characteristics Affects on Runoff

Subsurface Fertigation In Highly Productive Soils Increases nutrient use and grain yield of corn and soybeans.

East TX Test Site (1/2 Treated)

MANAGEMENT OF MULCH TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON CLAY SOILS

INJECTING LIQUID HOG MANURE FOR IMPROVING CROP YIELDS

PHYSICAL SOIL PROPERTIES

EXHIBIT G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (DRAFT)

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

RI Site Specific Soil Mapping Standards and Procedures

Soil Health & Tillage Long-term Impacts

( ) or 811 or mo1call.com

Describe/characterize some Microclimate & Soil parameters

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION & ASSESSMENT TO ESTIMATE AQUIFER PARAMETERS

Corn Response to Sulfur on Illinois Soils

Ponds: planning, design, and construction

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering

Biochar and GHG mitigation

4R Nutrient Management Plan Worksheet

Determining the difference between a

HYDRIC SOILS. By Neal Svendsen Resource Soil Scientist Natural Resources Conservation Service Sept 2006

APPENDIX E. LESA Models

Infiltration Testing For Stormwater BMPs: What Would Mickey Mouse Do?

FIELD PHOSPHORUS RISK ASSESSMENT

Rainwater harvesting and greywater recovery - Part 1 -

Effect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation

BMPs OF OIL PALM IN SANDY SOIL

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Soil Characteristics. 3. Subsoil Consistence Class - In addition to topsoil depth, consistency of the subsoil layer has been

Water Resources Management Plan

LESA ASSESSMENT MOUNT SIGNAL SOLAR FARM I PROJECT AREA

WEPP Simulated Tillage Effects on Runoff and Sediment Losses in a Corn-Soybean Rotation

AP Environmental Science II. Unit 2-6: Soil, Agriculture, and Land Management

Soils and their Sustainable Management (2016) Trish Steinhilber extension.umd.edu/anmp

How & Where does infiltration work? Context: Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

THE PORTION OF THE SOIL WATER THAT IS USABLE BY PLANTS. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIELD CAPACITY AND WILTING POINT.

Irrigation Management for Young Orchards

No-till Oklahoma. Soil Compaction. Jason Warren Oklahoma State University Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

IS SOIL COMPACTION FROM ANIMAL TRAFFIC A PROBLEM IN PASTURES DICK WOLKOWSKI EXTENSION SOIL SCIENTIST UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Comparative study of chemical and biological diversity of soil of two rice fields subjected to organic and conventional farming

Remediation of Brine Spills- What Goes Wrong Kerry Sublette

HOW WATER MOVES IN SOIL Beth Guertal Auburn University

Building Soil Health: for Crop Production and the Environment

Overarching Principles of Soil Health

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

Managing Soil Fertility for Sustainable Agriculture in Taihang Mountain Piedmont, North China

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY AND DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AS INDICATORS OF AVAILABLE TOTAL MACRO AND MICRO NUTRIENTS IN THE SOIL

Managing phosphorus in ditch drained soils of the Delmarva Peninsula

PART 2D. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

Gypsum. John Sawyer. Professor Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Soil quality in corn cultivation using bamboo biochar, compost, and phonska

Appendix C Little Calumet River Watershed Curve Number Calculation

Chapter 9: Soil and Agriculture

USING CPNOZZLE FOR SPRINKLER PACKAGE SELECTION

Soil Physical Properties and Wastewater Treatment

PART 1b. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

Soil Test Advanced. Southwest Agricultural Conference Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada 3-4 January 2013

On-site Systems and Groundwater Washington State Department of Health February 6, 2014

CAN THE ILLINOIS N TEST IMPROVE NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN SUGAR BEET?

Soil Quality Assessment

Supplementary Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the influence of reducing conditions on

Nutrient Removal by Vegetable Crops: s. Texas

Academic Editor: Peter Langridge Received: 19 August 2016; Accepted: 2 November 2016; Published: 6 November 2016

University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland. Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, 2

Surface Irrigation Suitability Assessment of the Soils of Almanaqil Ridge, Gezira State, Sudan

The comparison between powder and granular lime to elevate low soil ph

INFLUENCE OF SOURCE AND PARTICLE SIZE ON AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE EFFICIENCY AT INCREASING SOIL ph

LESA ASSESSMENT LAUREL SOLAR PROJECT (T16S, R12E, S26, SBB&M)

Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization of Irrigated Maize University of Nebraska South Central Agricultural Laboratory

APPLICATION FOR GRAYWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT SIMPLE RESIDENTIAL GRAVITY SYSTEMS, NO STORAGE

The soil is a very. The soil can. The manure. Soil Characteristics. effective manure treatment system if manures are applied at the proper rate.

7-4 Soil. By Cyndee Crawford September 2014

A Toolbox for Water Management. By Nick Schneider, Winnebago County Ag Agent and Doral Kemper

Soil Specification Information

Improving soil physical and chemical properties for better tree performance

Agronomic rate for biosolids application to cropland. Andy Bary Soil Scientist Crop & Soil Science Washington State University Puyallup

Management of Lettuce. UCCE, Monterey County Tim Hartz and Tom Bottoms, Plant Sciences, UC Davis

The Decline of Soil Infiltration Capacity Due To High Elevation Groundwater

1991 USGS begins National Water Quality Assessment Program

Permeable Pavement: A New Chapter

USE DEPENDENT SOIL PROPERTIES: RESULTS FROM SOME STUDIES IN NJ & NYC. Richard K Shaw USDA-NRCS

Texture Definition: relative proportions of various sizes of individual soil particles USDA classifications Sand: mm Silt:

MWELO Providing Insight on Soil and Compost Requirements. Will Bakx

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF APPLICATION OF ALGIFOL (FOLIAR FERTILISER) ON THE YIELD OF CASSAVA

FESCUE-GREEN ( )

Evaluating nitrate leaching below maintained turfgrass sites, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York

SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS. Product Specifications and Application Guidelines for Compost Mulches for Orchard Production in NSW

Principles of nutrient management

Stormwater Non-potable Beneficial Uses: Modeling Groundwater Recharge at a Stormwater Drywell Installation. Leila Talebi 1 and Robert Pitt 2

Transcription:

Topsoil Loss and Modification During Suburbanization: Impact on Demands for Municipal Water R.G. Darmody Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois

The Problem Demands on water in the US, have grown tremendously. In 1900, the Americans used 5-10 gpd. In 2000, 50-100 gallons a day. 36% of U.S. domestic water goes to lawn and garden irrigation Sprawl, suburbanization National Wildlife Federation, 2004; Sustainable Building Sourcebook, 2004

Topsoil Definitions Topsoil is one of those things that are hard to define, but you know it when you see it. - Upper, outermost layer of soil, top 2 to 8 in., highest organic matter and microorganisms, most biological activity. - Upper surface of the Earth's crust, no deeper than 20 cm, rich humus, minerals, and compost, nutritious plant substrate. - Surface soil, including the organic layer in which plants root, farmers turn over in plowing. - Fertile, upper part of the soil. - Organically enriched A horizon at the soil surface. - Upper part of the solum, the plow-layer, synonymous with A horizon.

Illinois Topsoil, best in the world!

Research Methods 1. Site selection 2. Soil sample retrieval - description, lab materials; 3/site 3. Soil bulk density sampling; volumetric core sampler; 3/site 4. Infiltration measurement infiltrometer; 3/site 5. Penetrometer resistance; penetrometer 6. Soil fertility analysis, extractable elements

Research Sites Plainfield - 12 recently constructed schools, 1 8 years old - Sampled near and away from building, three reps per sub-site - Two reference farm fields, 10,000 years old - Total of 126 samples Champaign - 10 residential sites, 2 15 years old - Front and back lawns, three reps per site - 1 commercial site, 2 sun-sites - Three reference farm fields, 12,000 years old - Total of 69 samples/observation sets

Aux Sable Middle School Soil Map 2 1

Plainfield Reference Site

Commercial site

Plainfield Pre-Development Soils Site Soil Map Unit Soil Series Drainage Class Soil Classification 1 541B Graymont SiL Moderately Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Well Oxyaquic Argiudolls 2 541B Graymont SiL 3 541B Graymont SiL 4 356A Elpaso SiCL Poorly Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 5 293A Andres SiL Somewhat Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Poorly Aquic Argiudolls 6 293A Andres SiL 7 541B Graymont SiL Mod. Well Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Oxyaquic Argiudolls 8 541B Graymont SiL 9 356A Elpaso SiCL Poorly Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 10 356A Elpaso SiCL 11 442A Mundelein SiL Somewhat Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Poorly Aquic Argiudolls 12 152A Drummer SiCL Poorly Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 13 293A Andres SiL Somewhat Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Poorly Aquic Argiudolls 14 293A Andres SiL

Champaign Pre-Development Soils Site Soil Map Unit Soil Series 1 152A Drummer SiCL Drainage Class Poorly Soil Classification Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 2 152A Drummer SiCL 3 56B Dana SiL Moderately Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Well Oxyaquic Argiudolls 4 330A Peotone SiCL Very Poorly Fine, smectitic, mesic Cumulic Vertic Endoaquolls 5 152A Drummer SiCL Poorly Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 6 152A Drummer SiCL 7 152A Drummer SiCL 8 154B Flanagan SiL Somewhat Fine, smectitic, mesic Aquic Poorly Argiudolls 9 154B Flanagan SiL 10 152A Drummer SiCL Poorly Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 11 330A Peotone SiCL Very Poorly Fine, smectitic, mesic Cumulic Vertic Endoaquolls 12 152A Drummer SiCL Poorly Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 13 152A Drummer SiCL Poorly

Plainfield Pre-Development Soils Soil Map Unit Soil Map Unit Name Avail. H 2 O (in/in) Bulk Density Ksat (in/hr) ph CEC SOM % Limitation, lawns 152A Drummer SiCL 0.21-0.23 1.10-1.30 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.8 17-23 4.0-7.0 Very limited: depth to saturated zone, ponding 293A Andres SiL 0.17-0.21 1.35-1.55 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.3 10-22 3.5-5.0 Somewhat limited: depth to saturated zone 356A Elpaso SiCL 0.21-0.23 1.15-1.35 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.3 26-35 4.0-7.0 Very limited: depth to saturated zone, ponding 442A Mundelein SiL 0.22-0.24 1.15-1.30 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.3 18-26 3.0-5.0 Somewhat limited: depth to saturated zone 541B Graymont SiL 0.22-0.24 1.15-1.35 0.6-2.0 6.1-7.3 19-24 3.0-5.0 Not limited

Champaign Pre-Development Soils Soil Map Unit Soil Map Unit Name Avail. H 2 O (in/in) Bulk Density Ksat (in/hr) ph SOM % CEC Limitation, lawns 56B Dana SiL 0.22-0.24 1.25-1.50 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.3 3.0-5.0 17-26 Slight 152A Drummer SiCL 0.21-0.23 1.10-1.30 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.8 4.0-7.0 24-35 Severe, ponding 154B Flanagan SiL 0.22-0.24 1.20-1.40 0.6-2.0 5.1-7.3 4.0-5.0 20-26 Moderate, wetness 330A Peotone SiCL 0.21-0.23 1.20-1.40 0.6-2.0 5.6-7.8 5.0-7.0 30-38 Severe, ponding

Standard Infiltration Ratings Rate (in/hr) Rating < 0.2 very low 0.2 to 0.4 low 0.4 to 0.75 moderately low 0.75 to 1.25 moderate 1.25 to 1.75 moderately high 1.75 to 2.5 high > 2.5 very high

Penetrometer Resistance of Soil in Lawn Penetrometer Resistance (MPa) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 10 Depth (cm) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Soil Cores from Plainfield sites

Champaign Lawn Soil Cores

Soil Texture Plainfield Sites Champaign Sites 80 90 80 90 70 Clay 70 Clay 60 60 20 30 40 10 Loamy Sand Sand 50 Sandy Clay Sandy Clay Loam Sandy Loam Clay Loam Loam Silty Clay Silty Clay Loam Silt Loam Silt 20 30 40 10 Loamy Sand Sand 50 Sandy Clay Sandy Clay Loam Sandy Loam Clay Loam Loam Silty Clay Silty Clay Loam Silt Loam Silt Percent Sand Percent Sand Hydrometer method for silt and clay, sands by sieving.

Plainfield Extractable elements (0-8 cm) Site CEC meq/ 100g ph Org. Matter % Extractable (mg kg -1 ) S P Ca Mg K Na B Fe Mn Cu Zn Al Aux Sable 26 ab 6.7 ab 3.7 b 48 a 56 ab 3660 824 c 171 e 27 0.7 b 160 c 96 a 4.0 ab 2.3 b 788 b Plain. South 27 ab 6.9 ab 4.9 ab 57 a 65 ab 3878 835 c 277 c 24 0.8 ab 125 d 97 a 9.5 a 3.2 b 616 d Eagle Point 27 ab 7.0 ab 4.4 ab 33 ab 52 b 3744 950 ab 247 cd 20 0.7 ab 171 bc 98 a 3.6 ab 2.1 b 699 c Ridge 29 ab 7.2 a 5.4 a 34 ab 118 a 3801 1033 a 377 a 24 0.9 a 156 cd 72 b 6.1 a 11.7 a 599 d Dra. Point 29 a 7.3 a 5.2 ab 32 ab 180 a 4111 920 bc 325 b 26 0.9 a 147 cd 81 ab 7.0 a 17.0 a 586 d Ch. Reed 28 ab 6.6 b 4.3 ab 28 b 54 b 3922 962 c 274 c 25 0.8 ab 137 cd 56 c 4.1 ab 2.3 b 737 bc Ref. 24 b 5.8 c 5.0 ab 38 ab 98 ab 3192 828 c 220 d 27 0.7 b 224 a 38 d 3.3 b 3.8 b 835 a Mehlich III extractables, water ph.

Champaign Extractable elements (0-8 cm) Lawn Type CEC (meq/ 100g) ph Org. Matter (%) Extractable (mg kg -1 ) S P Ca Mg K Na B Fe Mn Cu Zn Al R 20 7.5 2.8 10 17 2849 658 126 40 0.7 379 101 4.6 1.5 677 R 21 7.5 2.8 14 39 3013 626 195 55 0.8 275 91 2.8 2.1 567 R 21 8.0 1.8 27 15 3284 462 121 70 0.7 235 127 2.3 1.8 420 R 21 7.8 2.0 31 19 3076 652 142 69 0.7 326 152 3.5 1.9 654 R 21 7.9 2.7 10 7 2801 746 110 45 0.8 169 222 2.7 1.3 765 R 16 7.6 3.2 11 10 2356 490 102 38 0.8 194 73 1.8 1.1 737 R 22 8.0 2.1 13 16 3162 672 116 46 0.7 367 102 2.6 1.2 616 C 24 8.1 2.1 60 13 3536 667 125 91 1.0 370 201 4.2 3.7 575 C 20 8.0 3.6 24 42 2822 595 213 52 0.8 421 101 3.3 4.8 684 R 21 7.8 2.9 10 7 2807 769 104 55 0.8 168 222 2.9 1.5 770 Mehlich III extractables, water ph.

Bulk Density Sampler

1.6 Plainfield Soil Bulk Densities 1.4 Bulk Density (g/cc) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

40 Plainfield Soil Volumetric Water Contents 35 Volumetric H 2 O (%) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Infiltrometer

4.5 Comparison of Infiltration Means 4.0 Alternative Mean (in/hr) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 Site Geomean Site Harmean Site Trimean Site Median 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Arithmetic Mean (in/hr)

Plainfield Sites Bulk Density vs. Infiltration Rate 1.6 Bulk Density (g/cc) 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Infiltration Rate (in/hr)

Champaign Sites 1.8 Bulk Density vs. Infiltration Rate 1.7 Bulk Density (g/cc) 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Infiltration Rate (in/hr)

Take Home Message 1. Illinois has some of the best soils in the world for agriculture 2. Illinois is a rapidly suburbanizing state 3. Water resources are limited, particularly in the collar counties 4. Soils are impacted by development, pavement is forever 5. Water that does not infiltrate is not available to plants and runs off exacerbating flooding 6. Soil bulk density and Infiltration rates are highly variable on disturbed soils 7. Statistically the research did not support the hypothesis that infiltration is negatively impacted by development.

Soil at Eagle Point School

Soil Cores from Champaign sites 60