Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests. Southwire Company

Similar documents
477 kcmil, 3M Brand Composite Conductor Mechanical Properties, Volume 1 Tensile and Stress-Strain Tests

Room-temperature Creep. 3M Company Purchase Order NEETRAC Project Number:

596TW kcmil Type 13, 3M Brand Composite Conductor Compression Connector Qualification - Tensile, Sustained Load, and High-temperature Sustained Load

CTC Lisbon ACCC Conductor Stress-Strain, Clamp Slip, and Compression Fitting Tensile Tests, Modification 1 Lamifil Comments

Test Report on 3M ACCR 477-T16 Conductor Returned from Xcel Riverside Line after 13 Years of Service in Minneapolis, MN

TENSILE TEST SUMMARY- DRAKE ACCC/TW

How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam

SMU 2113 ENGINEERING SCIENCE. PART 1 Introduction to Mechanics of Materials and Structures

CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR A 2 IN, SCHEDULE 10 PIPE

1.103 CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS LABORATORY (1-2-3) Dr. J.T. Germaine Spring 2004 PROPERTIES OF HEAT TREATED STEEL

Testing of THERMOLIGN Dead-End. For. Prepared by: Robert Whapham Preformed Line Products, Principal Investigator

CEEN Behavior & Properties of Engineering Materials Laboratory Experiment No. 3 Tension, Shear and Impact Resistance of Metals

P A (1.1) load or stress. elongation or strain

Interaction Testing Report. 24 SF Units with Synteen Geogrids. Stone Strong Systems Lincoln, Nebraska

Kinectrics North America Inc. Report No.: K RC-0001-R01 November 4, 2005


Experiment B2 Uniaxial Tension Procedure

DURABILITY PERFORMANCE OF EPOXY INJECTED REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS WITH AND WITHOUT FRP FABRICS

Automatic Control Console for Concrete, Cement and Steel Testing

Sag-tension Calculations

Metal-plate connections loaded in combined bending and tension

Tensile/Tension Test Fundamentals

Lab Exercise #2: Tension Testing (Uniaxial Stress)

Laboratory Exercise -- Week 12 The Truss

Gage Series Stress Analysis Gages

Page 1 of 46 Exam 1. Exam 1 Past Exam Problems without Solutions NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines:

Failure Mechanism for Large-Sized Grouted Anchor Bolt under Tensile Load

Full-Scale Bending Tests of Strongwell s SE28 Fiberglass-Reinforced Polymer Poles

Engineering Materials

Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems Research Center Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA

ALUM HA DETERMINING TENSILE PROPERTIES Of PAPER

Creep testing of AMBEX AAC anchoring capsules

Test Report. Pipeline Seal & Insulator Co. Ltd. St. Neots, Cambridgeshire PE19 8HY. Project number (amtec): Report number: /-

INDEX. STP465-EB/Dec. 1969

TI Typical HDPE raw material and pipe test methods EDITION 0607 PAGE 1/10

Increasing the capacity of existing transmission lines by re-conductoring using ACSS HTLS conductors

SHORT CIRCUIT PERFORMANCE TEST ON 1020 kcmil ACCC/TW CONDUCTOR FOR COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

4 Image Analysis of plastic deformation in the fracture of paper

Design of a Horizontal Creep Testing Machine

BMS-500 / BMS-500E Computerized Electronic Universal Testing Machine

BMS-300 / BMS-300E Computerized Electronic Universal Testing Machine

MAE 171A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY Materials Testing Laboratory Week 1 - LINEAR ELASTIC FRACTURE MECHANICS

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES.

Extreme Environment SENSOR DATA SHEET kamansensors.com. For high pressure, low temperature, and high temperature applications

S E N S O R D A T A S H E E T. Extreme Environment. For high pressure, low temperature, and high temperature applications

ECO INSTRUMENT (NS M)

Laboratory 2 Topic: Build a Beam for 3-Point Bending

Full-Scale Cyclic Bending Test of Strongwell s SE28 FRP Pole

1. Cast-in-place concrete is specified in Section

EXTREME. When the heat and pressure are on NONCONTACT POSITION AND PRESSURE MEASURING SYSTEMS

PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGE TIMBER TIES UNDER STATIC AND DYNAMIC LOADING

ELASTOMER RATE-DEPENDENCE: A TESTING AND MATERIAL MODELING METHODOLOGY

I. Selection Procedure for DOUBLE PLUS, Outboard Roller and Top Roller Chain

AMERICAN LUMBER STANDARD COMMITTEE, INCORPORATED POLICY FOR EVALUATION OF RECOMMENDED SPANS FOR SPAN RATED DECKING PRODUCTS

LEAN DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL MATERIAL TESTS At Elevated Temperatures Using Steady State Method

Experiment 4 - Testing of Materials in Tension

Renovating a Mechanics of Materials Laboratory using Data Acquisition and LabVIEW

Buckling Strength Tests of Strongwell s SE28 Fiberglass-Reinforced Polymer Poles

NUTC R211 A National University Transportation Center at Missouri University of Science & Technology

EXPRESSION OF INTREST

SERVO-HYDRAULIC UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINE SERIES A

WDW-100 Computerized Electronic Universal Testing Machine

STATNAMIC LOAD TESTING OF HIGH CAPACITY MARINE FOUNDATIONS

Bolt-On Sensors. Question. Answer. What is Bolt-on Weight Measurement?

Load capacity rating of an existing curved steel box girder bridge through field test

Computer Servo Control Tensile Tester

Servo-hydraulic Universal Testing Machine HUT Type B

Laboratory 6. Metals Tested in Tension. Jeremy Wheeless. Group Members: entire laboratory section. Submittal date: 4/10/2014

Structural Performance of 8-inch NRG Concrete Masonry Units. Report Compiled for: Niagara Regional Group. Date: January 28, 2013

Fiberglass Composite Stop Logs, Stop Gates, and Stop Plates FM 1314 Conroe, TX (281) office (281) fax

Subject Index. a-c field measurements, crack shape monitoring (see Crack shape, monitoring, a-c field measurements)

VW Strain Gauge Embedment VWS-2100 Series

Characterization of Physical Properties of Roadware Clear Repair Product

DURABILITY OF PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE JOINTS

REPORT ON DRILLED SHAFT LOAD TESTING (OSTERBERG METHOD) I-215 Airport Connector - Las Vegas, NV - TS-1 Las Vegas, NV (LT )

NTPEP Evaluation of Spray Applied Non-Structural and Structural Pipe Liners for Storm Water Conveyance

Engineering Materials

TE 65 MULTIPLEX SAND/WHEEL ABRASION TESTER

HSM58 Universal Material Tester 20kN

1. SCOPE 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS

A METHOD FOR PREDICTING PRESTRESS LOSSES IN A PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE

APPENDIX B. LOAD FRAME. This Appendix will describe the philosophy in the design and operation of the loading system.

Deflection of Helical Piles: A Load Test Database Review

Improved Student Understanding of Materials and Structures through Non-Traditional Laboratory Project

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1

High-Temperature Materials Testing.» Dipl.-Ing. Andrej Mahr, Applications Engineer» MTS Systems GmbH

Power Systems 2 ELE3015. Lecture 1: Transmission Lines

ME 354, MECHANICS OF MATERIALS LAB CREEP

User Manual. Version 1.0 THERMISTOR CHARACTERISTICS TRAINER. Model No : (ITB - 06ACE)

TESTING ELASTOMERIC CONCRETE

Tensile Test. with those in reference books.

ME 354, MECHANICS OF MATERIALS LAB CREEP

Anchor Load Cells Installation - considerations

Electromechanical Creep Testing Machines

Canadian Council of Independent Laboratories Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) AASHTO T315-09

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

ME -215 ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND PROCESES

Standard Test Method for Measuring Compressive Properties of Thermal Insulations 1

Exploratory Investigation of Failure Mechanisms in Transition Regions between Solid Laminates and X-cor Truss Sandwich

Product Design Theory

Transcription:

Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Southwire Company NEETRAC Project Number: 05-204 November, 2005 A Research Center of the Georgia Institute of Technology Requested by: Mr. Kiran Manchiraju Southwire Company Principal Investigator: Janeen J. McReynolds Reviewed by: Paul Springer III, P.E

Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Southwire Company NEETRAC Project Number: 05-204 November, 2005 SUMMARY: Mr. Kiran Manchiraju of Southwire Company requested that NEETRAC measure the stress-strain properties for Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 conductors. This report outlines the test procedures and results of each test. SAMPLES: 1) Hand coil containing approximately 100 feet of 1433.6 kcmil Type-13 Merrimack ACSS/TW/HS285 2) Hand coil containing approximately 100 feet of 959.6 kcmil Type-16 Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 PROCEDURE AND RESULTS: Merrimack Conductor: Composite Conductor Stress-Strain Test: Samples were terminated with resin fittings, and mounted in the MTS hydraulic tensile machine. The free-span conductor length is 19 feet. The active gage section between knife-edges on the cable extensometer is 18 feet, +/- 1/16. Tension is controlled automatically. Load, crosshead position, elongation, and temperature data were saved to a computer file. The file was processed to produce the stress-strain charts. See Appendix 1 for an error analysis for the test system. The stress-strain plots are in Appendix 2. The modulus data are presented later in this section of the report. Photograph 1 shows the long view of the test apparatus for a typical test sample. Photograph 2 is a close-up of a resin socket and the extensometer attachment. Placing a support at 1/2 span minimizes conductor slack. This ensures the conductor is nearly straight, prevents slack from showing up as elongation in the stress-strain data. The test profile is in accordance with the Aluminum Association guide, as follows: NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 2 of 20

Merrimack Composite conductor: 1) Apply load of 1,000 lbs. Remove sag with a mid-span support. 2) Install extensometer, and set to zero. 3) Pull to 30% of RBS (14,520 lbs) 4) Hold for 30 minutes. 5) Relax load to 1,000 lbs. 6) Pull to 50% RBS (24,200 lbs). Hold for one hour. 7) Relax load to 1,000 lbs. 8) Pull to 70% RBS (33,880 lbs). Hold for one hour. 9) Relax load to 1,000 lbs. 10) Pull to 75% RBS (36,300 lbs). 11) Relax load to 1,000 lbs, and remove the extensometer (for its own protection). 12) Pull to destruction. Merrimack Core strands: 1) Pull to calculated initial tension (in this case, 550 lbs) 2) Install extensometer, and set to zero. 3) Pull to same strain as conductor at start of 30% of RBS test (0.2128%). Hold for 30 minutes. 4) Relax load to 550 lbs. 5) Pull to same strain as conductor at start of 50% of RBS test (0.4110%). Hold for one hour. 6) Relax load to 550 lbs. 7) Pull to same strain as conductor at start of 70% of RBS test (0.6497%). Hold for one hour. Relax load to 550 lbs. 8) Pull to 75% of the core rating (29,440 lbs) 9) Relax load to 550 lbs, and remove the extensometer (for its own protection). 10) Pull to destruction. NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 3 of 20

Figure 1, Long View of Typical Stress-Strain Test Figure 2, Typical Resin Socket and Extensometer NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 4 of 20

Data files containing test data were processed using Excel to obtain engineering values and graphical presentation. Temperature during testing was 21.5 o C. Graphs showing data for each test are shown in Appendix 2. Merrimack Composite Conductor Properties: Initial Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = -19,053*(Strain%) 2 + 51,611*(Strain%) Final Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 104,311*(Strain%) 48,818 Tensile Test, Stress Strain Sample: 48,980 lbs (101% RBS) Merrimack Core Properties: Initial Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 635*(Strain%) 2 + 266,728*(Strain%) Final Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 285,097*(Strain%) 12,300 Tensile Test, Core Stress Strain Sample: 39,110 lbs (99% Nominal Rating) ** ** Sample did not fail. The resin sockets were crushed in the test fixture prior to failure of the strands. Merrimack Aluminum Properties: Initial Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = --21,550*(Strain%) 2 + 24,325*(Strain%) Final Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 81,379*(Strain%) 53,347 Note: Second order fits will not extrapolate properly beyond the limits of the data. Therefore, the conductor properties are valid up to a strain of 0.73%, the strain reached during the 70% RBS load. A higher order polynomial may be used to improve the extrapolation. A non-polynomial fit may also provide more reasonable extrapolations to the test data. NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 5 of 20

Suwannee Conductor: Composite Conductor Stress-Strain Test: Test set-up was identical to the Merrimack sample. The test profile is in accordance with the Aluminum Association guide, as follows: Composite conductor: 1) Apply load of 1,000 lbs. Remove sag with a mid-span support. 2) Install extensometer, and set to zero. 3) Pull to 30.6% of RBS (11,800 lbs)* 4) Hold for 30 minutes. 5) Relax load to 1,000 lbs. 6) Pull to 51% RBS (19,660 lbs)*. Hold for one hour. 7) Relax load to 1,000 lbs. 8) Pull to 71% RBS (27,530 lbs)*. Hold for one hour. 9) Relax load to 1,000 lbs. 10) Pull to 76.4% RBS (29,490 lbs)*. 11) Relax load to 1,000 lbs, and remove the extensometer (for its own protection). 12) Pull to destruction. Core strands: 1) Pull to calculated initial tension (in this case, 222 lbs) 2) Install extensometer, and set to zero. 3) Pull to same strain as conductor at start of 30% of RBS test (0.1645%). Hold for 30 minutes. 4) Relax load to 222 lbs. 5) Pull to same strain as conductor at start of 50% of RBS test (0.3125%). Hold for one hour. 6) Relax load to 222 lbs. 7) Pull to same strain as conductor at start of 70% of RBS test (0.5058%). Hold for one hour. Relax load to 222 lbs. 8) Pull to 75.3% of the core rating (24,450 lbs)* 9) Relax load to 222 lbs, and remove the extensometer (for its own protection). 10) Pull to destruction. *Note: There is a very slight discrepancy in the % of RBS used for the test as compared to the Aluminum Association standard. The value was based upon reported RBS of 39,324 lbs for the composite conductor and 32,595 lbs for the steel core, while the actual required RBS was 38,600 lbs and 32,475 lbs, respectively. The difference resulted in slightly higher percentages of load used for the tests. NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 6 of 20

Data files containing test data were processed using Excel to obtain engineering values and graphical presentation. Temperature during testing was 21.5 o C. Graphs showing data for each test are shown in Appendix 2. Suwannee Composite Conductor Properties: Initial Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = -38,208*(Strain%) 2 + 78,030*(Strain%) Final Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 113,182*(Strain%) 32,962 Tensile Test, Stress Strain Sample: 44,270 lbs (115% RBS) Suwannee Core Properties: Initial Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = -1,675*(Strain%) 2 + 282,873*(Strain%) Final Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 292,846*(Strain%) 881 Tensile Test, Core Stress Strain Sample: 33,010 lbs (102% Nominal Rating) Suwannee Aluminum Properties: Initial Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = -44,146*(Strain%) 2 + 44,737*(Strain%) Final Modulus for Stress Strain Curve: Stress (psi) = 83,981*(Strain%) 37,295 Note: Second order fits will not extrapolate properly beyond the limits of the data. Therefore, the conductor properties are valid up to a strain of 0.57%, the strain reached during the 70% RBS load. A higher order polynomial may be used to improve the extrapolation. A non-polynomial fit may also provide more reasonable extrapolations to the test data. REFERENCES: 1) Aluminum Association Guide, Rev. 1999, A Method of Stress-Strain Testing of Aluminum Conductors and ACSR and A Test Method for Determining the Long Time Creep of Aluminum Conductors in Overhead Lines 2) Southwire Overhead Conductor Manual EQUIPMENT USED: 1) MTS Servo-hydraulic tensile machine, Control # CQ 0195 (load and crosshead data) 2) Dynamics Research Corporation (DRC)/NEETRAC cable extensometer, Control # CQ 3002 (strain data). 3) Yokogawa DC100 data acquisition system, Control # CN 3022 (temperature data) NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 7 of 20

Appendix 1, Calibration and Error Analysis for Stress-Strain Tests Mechanical load (stress): Measurement equipment is certified to exceed requirements of ASTM E4-2003 (+/-1%). MTS Tensile Machine as-found calibration data show accuracy is typically better than 0.5%. Stress is calculated based on the nominal (as opposed to measured) conductor dimensions. Conductor Elongation (strain): The DRC displacement transducer resolution is +/- 0.0001. For the 18 ft. gage section, resolution is 0.0001 /216, or 0.000046% (0.46 PPM). Sensor accuracy is +/- 0.0002, or 0.92 PPM. This is a digital measurement made with a laser diode reading an etched titanium silicate (glass) rod. The material has near-zero thermal coefficient. Data are transmitted via digital communication with an interface board in a PC data acquisition system. Therefore, there is no calibration drift or temperature sensitivity for the transducer. However, the elongation instrument has other error sources that need to be counted. Here is an estimate for those errors: Effect of load measurement errors: strain error is linear wrt load error. Error is 0.5% of reading. Effect of mechanical deflections of the gage rod: The gage rod is a 2 x 6 x 1/8 x 19 ft aluminum box beam, which is extremely stiff. The only bending force is friction in the guide bearings and wiper seals for the displacement sensor. Starting and running friction were measured as 0.3 lbs, and 0.2 lbs respectively. The error is less than 0.5 PPM. Effect of thermal expansion of the sample and gage rod: Lab temperature changed 0.4 o C and 0.6 o C from beginning of the test to the end for the Merrimack and Suwannee tests, respectively. Temperature change is partly compensated using a gage reference of the same material as the sample. In this case, the gage rod is aluminum (23 PPM/ o C), while the sample thermal elongation is estimated to be 16 PPM/ o C. Error in the strain measurement is, therefore, 7 PPM/ o C. For the 0.4 o C temperature variation, the error is 2.8 PPM. For the 0.6 o C temperature variation, the error is 4.2 PPM. The error does not affect the modulus values, because load is changed rapidly relative to rate of temperature change. Thermal effects could affect measurement of short-term creep during load hold periods. Thus, mathematical temperature compensation was used for both stress-strain tests. Effect of starting gage length: An error of +/- 1/16 is possible. The maximum error affects the strain measurement by 0.02% of reading. Overall accuracy is calculated based on root-mean squared error estimation. Given the assumptions above, the elongation measurement is considered accurate within 1% of reading, plus or minus 3 parts per million (Merrimack) or 4 parts per million (Suwannee). The Aluminum Association specifications do not provide accuracy requirements, but suggest that the resolution of the measurement should be 10 PPM. The system employed has resolution of 0.46 PPM (0.0001 inches in 18 ft). NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 8 of 20

Appendix 2 Stress-Strain Graphs Merrimack ACSS/TW/HS285 NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 9 of 20

30000 1433.6 kcmil, "Merrimack" ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Raw Test Data 25000 20000 Stress (psi) 15000 10000 5000 0 0.00000 0.10000 0.20000 0.30000 0.40000 0.50000 0.60000 0.70000 0.80000 Strain (%) Composite Stress-Strain Plot in Accordance with Aluminum Association Guide NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 10 of 20

35000 1433.6 kcmil, "Merrimack" ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Initial and Final Modulus Results 30000 25000 Stress-strain data Initial modulus data Final modulus data Poly. (Initial modulus data) Linear (Final modulus data) y = -19053x 2 + 50959x + 877.62 Stress (psi) 20000 15000 10000 y = 104311x - 44079 5000 0 0.00000 0.10000 0.20000 0.30000 0.40000 0.50000 0.60000 0.70000 0.80000 Strain (%) Composite Stress-Strain Plot with Data Fit for Initial and Final Modulus NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 11 of 20

250000 1433.6 kcmil, Merrimack ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Core Stress-Strain 200000 150000 Stress (psi) 100000 50000 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 Strain (%) Core Stress Strain per Aluminum Association Guide NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 12 of 20

y = 635.34x 2 + 266743x + 3116.9 1433.6 kcmil, Merrimack ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Core Stress-Strain y = 285167x - 9002.7 250000 200000 Test Data Init Mod Data Final Mod Data Poly. (Init Mod Data) Linear (Final Mod Data) 150000 Stress (psi) 100000 50000 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 Strain (%) Core Initial Modulus and Final Modulus Data NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 13 of 20

30000 1433.6 kcmil, "Merrimack" ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Combined Stress-Strain Complete Conductor 25000 20000 Stress*area ratio 15000 Core 10000 Aluminum 5000 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 Strain (%) Summary Graph Merrimack ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 14 of 20

Appendix 3 Stress-Strain Graphs Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 15 of 20

35000 Southwire "Suwannee" ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Raw Test Data 30000 25000 Stress (psi) 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0.00000 0.10000 0.20000 0.30000 0.40000 0.50000 0.60000 Strain (%) Composite Stress-Strain Plot in Accordance with Aluminum Association Guide NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 16 of 20

35000 Southwire "Suwannee" ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Initial and Final Modulus Results Stress-strain data Stress (psi) 30000 25000 20000 15000 Initial modulus data Final modulus data Poly. (Initial modulus data) Linear (Final modulus data) 10000 y = -38200x 2 + 76833x + 1209.1 y = 113182x - 29749 5000 0 0.00000 0.10000 0.20000 0.30000 0.40000 0.50000 0.60000 Strain (%) Composite Stress-Strain Plot with Data Fit for Initial and Final Modulus NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 17 of 20

250000 959.6 kcmil, Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Core Stress-Strain 200000 150000 Stress (psi) 100000 50000 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 Strain (%) Core Stress Strain per Aluminum Association Guide NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 18 of 20

959.6 kcmil, Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Core Stress-Strain 250000 200000 Test Data Init Mod Data Final Mod Data Poly. (Init Mod Data) Linear (Final Mod Data) y = -1675.3x 2 + 282865x + 640.59 y = 292846x - 5113.6 150000 Stress (psi) 100000 50000 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 Strain (%) Core Initial Modulus and Final Modulus Data NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 19 of 20

35000 959.6 kcmil, Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Combined Stress-Strain 30000 Complete Conductor 25000 Stress*area ratio 20000 15000 Core 10000 Aluminum 5000 0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Strain (%) Summary Graph Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor NEETRAC 05-204, Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests Page 20 of 20