A Compact Transportable Nuclear Power Reactor

Similar documents
Compact, Deployable Reactors for Power and Fuel in Remote Regions

AFTER A REVIEW of designs of nine

AN INTRODUCTION TO SMALL MODULAR REACTORS (SMRs)

Modular Helium Reactor (MHR) for Oil Sands Extraction

HT 3 R. Building For The Future On 50 Years of Nuclear Experience

GT-MHR OVERVIEW. Presented to IEEE Subcommittee on Qualification

Module 09 High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors (HTR)

Module 11 High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors (HTR)

Very High Temperature Reactor

Physics Design of 600 MWth HTR & 5 MWth Nuclear Power Pack. Brahmananda Chakraborty Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India

Revival of Nuclear Energy (Part 3)

Design Study of Innovative Simplified Small Pebble Bed Reactor

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies May 2008

ANTARES Application for Cogeneration. Oil Recovery from Bitumen and Upgrading

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

Safety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective

Status of SMR Designs and their associated Fuel Cycle for Immediate-, Near-, and Long-term Deployment

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

Small Scale Nuclear Power: an Option for Alaska? Gwen Holdmann, Director

Module 11 High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors (HTR)

IAEA REPORT 2006 PRELIMINARY NEUTRONICS CALCULATIONS OF THE FIXED BED NUCLEAR REACTOR FBNR. Submitted to the INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

IAEA REPORT 2006 PRELIMINARY NEUTRONICS CALCULATIONS OF THE FIXED BED NUCLEAR REACTOR FBNR. Submitted to the INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

Small Modular Reactors

Small Modular Reactors

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor Development Overview

Nuclear-Power Ammonia Production

FBNR Letter FIXED BED NUCLEAR REACTOR FBNR

Workshop on PR&PP Evaluation Methodology for Gen IV Nuclear Energy Systems. Tokyo, Japan 22 February, Presented at

The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP)

Nuclear Energy Revision Sheet

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) Vienna University of Technology /Austria Atominstitute Stadionallee 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Design Study of Innovative Simplified Small Pebble Bed Reactor

Journal of American Science 2014;10(2) Burn-up credit in criticality safety of PWR spent fuel.

AREVA HTR Concept for Near-Term Deployment

VVER-440/213 - The reactor core

ANNEX XI. FIXED BED NUCLEAR REACTOR (FBNR) Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)

The Gen IV Modular Helium Reactor

Pressurized Water Reactors

Experiments Carried-out, in Progress and Planned at the HTR-10 Reactor

HTR Research and Development Program in China

Jülich, Author: Peter Pohl

Ability of New Concept Passive-Safety Reactor "KAMADO" - Safety, Economy and Hydrogen Production -

Large Scale Hydrogen Production Using Nuclear Energy

Oregon State University s Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Experimental Program

Small Reactors R&D in China. ZHENG Mingguang Ph D Presented on the meeting of TWG-LWR June 18 th -20 th 2013 IAEA, Vienna

Nuclear Reactors. 3 Unit Nuclear Power Station - Coastal Bryon Nuclear Plant, Illinois. 3 Unit Nuclear Power Station - Desert

Small Nuclear Steam Generators for Alberta's Bitumen Resources

SEALER: A small lead-cooled reactor for power production in the Canadian Arctic

NuScale: Expanding the Possibilities for Nuclear Energy

Core Management and Fuel Handling for Research Reactors

Small Modular Reactors & waste management issues

Westinghouse SMR & Nuclear Fuel Overview

CANDU Safety #1 - CANDU Nuclear Power Plant Design Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing

Nuclear Reactor Types. An Environment & Energy FactFile provided by the IEE. Nuclear Reactor Types

MIT/INEEL Modular Pebble Bed Reactor. Andrew C. Kadak Massachusetts Institute of Technology

LOCATION. Three Mile Island, in the Susquehanna River, Londonderry Township, Dauphin County, about 10 miles south of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

PRESENTATION. 1. Brief description of the IPPE

DC Section Meeting. American Nuclear Society

Chemical Engineering 412

The design features of the HTR-10

Nuclear Energy Fundamentals

Concept and technology status of HTR for industrial nuclear cogeneration

Nuclear Energy 101. The American Nuclear Society. Credit: W. D. Pointer, Ph. D. ANS Congressional Seminar Series

Nexus of Safeguards, Security and Safety for Advanced Reactors

Module 12 Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants. Atominstitute of the Austrian Universities Stadionallee 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Chemical Engineering 693R

Department of Nuclear Energy. Division of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Power. International Atomic Energy Agency. Akira OMOTO IAEA

FBNR Letter FIXED BED NUCLEAR REACTOR FBNR

Chapter 4 THE HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS COOLED REACTOR TEST MODULE CORE PHYSICS BENCHMARKS

Lecture (3) on. Nuclear Reactors. By Dr. Emad M. Saad. Mechanical Engineering Dept. Faculty of Engineering. Fayoum University

PRESENT STATUS OF THE HIGH TEMPERATURE ENGINEERING TEST REACTOR (HTTR)

Nuclear Energy 101. The American Nuclear Society. Credit: W. D. Pointer, Ph. D. ANS Congressional Seminar Series

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Burn up Analysis for Fuel Assembly Unit in a Pressurized Heavy Water CANDU Reactor

SMART Standard Design Approval inspection result July. 4 th

Nuclear power. ME922/927 Nuclear 1

Nuclear Issues 5. Decline of Nuclear Power? Three Mile Island Chernobyl Waste Disposal

HTR-PM Project Status and Test Program

Westinghouse-UK Partnership for Development of a Small Modular Reactor Nuclear Programme

Application of CANDLE Burnup to Block-Type High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor for Incinerating Weapon Grade Plutonium

Reactor Technology and Cogeneration for a Cleaner Environment

EM 2 : Nuclear Power for the 21 st Century

WHAT HAPPENED, WHAT IS GOING ON IN FUKUSHIMA NO.1 NUCLEAR POWER STATION?

Small Nuclear Power Reactors

Clean Energy America February

Benchmark Specification for HTGR Fuel Element Depletion. Mark D. DeHart Nuclear Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Pre-Conceptual Hydrogen Production Modular Helium Reactor Designs. IAEA International Conference on Non-Electric Applications of Nuclear Energy

Thermal Fluid Characteristics for Pebble Bed HTGRs.

THE NEW 10 MW(T) MULTIPURPOSE TRIGA REACTOR IN THAILAND

Types of Nuclear Reactors. Dr. GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering Nuclear Science and Technology Engineer

Fast and High Temperature Reactors for Improved Thermal Efficiency and Radioactive Waste Management

A RENAISSANCE OF U.S. NUCLEAR ELECTRIC POWER? SC 212. May 10 and 17, 2011

Nuclear power requires relatively large capital investments, long lead times, and a solid supporting infrastructure.

Small Modular Reactors: A Call for Action

VHTR System Prof. Dr. LI Fu

The Nuclear Crisis in Japan

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR SCIENCE COMMITTEE. Benchmark Specification for HTGR Fuel Element Depletion

SAFETY, SITTING, EMERGENCY PLANNING ISUES FOR SMR DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA

LABGENE CONTAINMENT FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS

Transcription:

A Compact Transportable Nuclear Power Reactor Can be rapidly deployed to remote locations to support oil recovery, disaster relief and basic infrastructure Paul Farrell and James Powell 1 Brookhaven Technology Group, Inc. and George Merkel U.S. Army Research Laboratory Canadian Nuclear Society Western Focus June 1-3, 2009 Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Outline Motivation for Deployable Reactors Requirements (weight, fuel, safety) Two Designs based on fuel type, system weight and overall safety Applications Summary

Conventional Nuclear Power is BIG BIG > 1000 MWe, $7bn, nuclear power plants dominate the headlines and the debate. These projects, involve reactors that produce thousands of megawatts of electric power and require many billions of investment dollars. Opponents question the safety of various designs. Disadvantage High Capital Cost > 48 to 96 Months License and Construction Time 60 year plant life Advantages Cost effective (license, siting) Economy of scale Reliable base power Nuclear is CLEAN POWER (No CO2)

What are the Constraints on Realistic Deployable Nuclear Power Systems Based on Well Developed Nuclear Technology Developing and certifying now nuclear fuels and coolant/power systems takes many years. Use Non-Weapons Grade Nuclear Fuel Maximum enrichment of 20%. Safe and Easy to Operate Complete containment of all radioactivity in fuel no releases to environment. Able to be Rapidly Deployed to and Removed from Operating Sites Minimal field construction required. Deployable by existing ground and/or air transport systems. Radiation exposure to operators, handlers, and transport personnel must be acceptable. Power Output Capability of at Least 10 MW(e) per Modular Unit Larger power output capability desirable for certain applications.

Deployable Electric Energy Reactor () Reactor System Modular Rapidly Deployable to Remote Locations Quickly Removable if Required Process Steam and Heat for Industry Extraction of Oil from Oilands, Etc. Micro-Grid System for Civilian Power More Robust System for Critical Power Needs for Civil Sector Disaster Relief Provides Emergency Power to Areas Hit by Severe Storms, Tsunamis, Earthquakes, etc. Electric Power and Heat for Remote Settlements Provides Continuous Power and Heat for Remote Settlements in Alaska, Canada, Islands, Etc. Power, Water, Etc. for Poor Nations Provides Power, Water, Fuel & Fertilizer for Poor Populations in Africa, Etc.

Small Nuclear Power Systems Currently Under Development or Proposed Small is a flexible term depending on developer/proposer. Output of designs range from 10 MW(e) up to ~ 300 MW(e). Demands above 50 MW(e) could be met by multiple units. Development is being carried out world-wide. U.S. programs for small [~ 50 MW(e)] reactors are only proposals not in development stage. None of the current small proposed or under development systems are transportable. All operate at a fixed site and require extensive field construction.

List of Small [< 50 MW(e)] Nuclear Power Systems Currently Under Development or Proposed Reactor Type Power Level Country Status Siting 1. CAREM PWR 27 MW(e) Argentina Under Development Ground 2. KLT 40S PWR 35 MW(e) Russia Developed Barge 3. ABV GM BWR 18 MW(e) Russia Under Development 4. MRX PWR 30 MW(e) Japan Under Development 5. RS MHR HTGR 10 25 MW(e) 6. 4S LMR 10 50 MW(e) 7. SSTAR LMR 10 50 MW(e) Ground or Barge Ground or Ship U.S. (GA) Proposed Ground Japan & U.S. (Westinghouse) Japan & U.S. (Argonne) Under Development Under Development Ground Ground 8. ENHS LMR 50 MW(e) U.S. (U. of Cal) Proposed Ground 9 NuScale PWR 45MW(e) U.S. Proposed Ground 9. Hyperion U-Hydride Fuel-Coolant Not Specified 10 MW(e) U.S. Proposed Ground

Zr Clad Zr/UO2 Silicon Carbide Stainless Cermet Outer Coating Steel Cladding 1 cm Fuel 0.07 UZrH1.8 1 cm Hydride Fuel cm Water Water Pyrographite Coolant UC Kernel Coolant Inner Layer Three Nuclear Fuel Options TRIGA 1 cm Stainless Steel Cladding UZrH 1.8 Hydride Fuel Water Coolant Used in dozens of research reactors around the world for decades. Extremely safe automatically shuts down when control rods are pulled out. UZrH 1.8 hydride fuel can withstand high temperatures. Zero release of fission products. 1 cm Used in 100's of reactors operating around the world for decades. UO2 particles dispersed in Zr metal matrix. Fuel is very tough and rugged. Operates to high burnings with Zero release of fission products. Zr Clad Zr/UO2 Cermet Fuel Water Coolant Silicon Carbide Outer Coating UC Kernel TRISO 0.07 cm Pyrographite Inner Layer Used in high temperature graphite reactors for decades. TRISO particles imbedded in graphite blocks or potable. Normally helium cooled. In, TRISO. Particles would be water cooled. Operates to high temperature with Zero release of fission products.

TRIGA Fuel Selected for Baseline System TRIGA Reactors Operate at Many Locations Worldwide Have operated safely for decades and 1000s of reactor years Perceived as Safe, Reliable and Simple to Operate Automatic, Safe Shutdown from Large Reactivity Insertions Excellent Retention of Fission Products Non-Weapons Grade Fuel 20% Enriched, Minimal Testing of TRIGA Fuel required for System 40 MWt Reactor 10MPa Water Tank for Shutdown 575K 516K Steam Generator 7.2 MPa 560K 7.0 MPa 365K Turbine\ Generator 0.1MPa Heat Exchanger 300K Air In 10 MWe Output Power 30 MWt Output Heat 365K Air Out

deployable electric energy reactor 50 MW(e) 12 E-9 E-12 2078 fuel elements in 10 MWe unit Reflector/Core Separator Thickness 0.5 cm Water (5 cm) OD 63 cm Pressure Vessel OD 69 cm 10 MW(e) 40 metric ton 14 metric ton E-7 E-6 E-2 Tantalum Shield OD 109 cm Core OD 52 cm o o o Reactor Neutronic Performance is Predicted with High Accuracy using 3D Monte Carlo Codes and Detailed Representation of 3D Geometry MCNP Code Calculates Initial Reactor Criticality, Power Distribution, Control Rod Effectiveness, etc. MonteBurns Code Provides Fuel Burn up, Criticality, Control, and Power Distribution over Expected Operating Period 3D MCNP Code Determines Shielding Requirements for: Operation at Full Power Transport of Shut-Down Reactor Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics is Accurately Calculated using standard Heat Transfer Codes

(TRIGA Fuel) Reactor Parameters Thermal Power (MWt) 200 40 Electric Power (MWe) 50 10 Cycle Efficiency 25% 25% Reactor OD( cm) 124 63 Module OD (cm) (20 cm thick tungsten shield) 174 109 Core OD, cm 120 53 Core Length (cm) 120 60 Fuel Element Diameter (cm) 1 0.9 Fuel Elements in Core 5149 2078 Uranium in UZrH1.8 Fuel (Wt. % ) 30 30 Uranium in Core, kg (20% U-235) 226 37 Weight w/fuel, metric tons 7.4 1.3 Module Weight w/tungsten Shield, metric tons 40 13

Comparison of GA Research and TRIGA Reactors Component Nuclear Fuel TRIGA Research Reactor UZrH 1.8 Fuel, 1 cm Diameter Fuel Elements TRIGA REACTOR Same Coolant Type Water Same Coolant Pressure and Temperature 1 atm, < 100 C 100 atm, 300 C Peak Power Density in Fuel Elements 400 megawatts per liter 0.8 megawatts per liter Peak Temperature Inside Fuel Element 1200 C 700 C Type of Operation Thousand of Pulses per Year Steady State

Criticallity Constant (K eff ) K eff vs. Operating Time for with TRIGA Fuel at 10 MWe and 50 MWe Output. 1.30 1.20 50 MW(e) 1.10 1.00 Keff =1 is the criticallity condition 0.90 10 MW(e) 0.80 0.70 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Operating Time (Days) In operation, the reactor control rods are used to control K eff

Zr Clad Zr/UO2 Silicon Carbide Stainless Cermet Outer Coating Steel Cladding 1 cm Fuel 0.07 UZrH1.8 1 cm Hydride Fuel cm Water Water Pyrographite Coolant UC Kernel Coolant Inner Layer Three Nuclear Fuel Options TRIGA 1 cm Stainless Steel Cladding UZrH 1.8 Hydride Fuel Water Coolant Used in dozens of research reactors around the world for decades. Extremely safe automatically shuts down when control rods are pulled out. UZrH 1.8 hydride fuel can withstand high temperatures. Zero release of fission products. 1 cm Used in 100's of reactors operating around the world for decades. UO2 particles dispersed in Zr metal matrix. Fuel is very tough and rugged. Operates to high burnings with Zero release of fission products. Zr Clad Zr/UO2 Cermet Fuel Water Coolant Silicon Carbide Outer Coating UC Kernel TRISO 0.07 cm Pyrographite Inner Layer Used in high temperature graphite reactors for decades. TRISO particles imbedded in graphite blocks or potable. Normally helium cooled. In, TRISO. Particles would be water cooled. Operates to high temperature with Zero release of fission products.

TRISO Fuel Selected for Advanced System TRISO Fuel Enables very Compact, very Lightweight, High Power Advanced Reactor Systems Packed Beds of TRISO Fuel Particles would be Directly Cooled by Water Core Power Densities can be >> 1 MW(th)/Liter TRISO Particles can be Hydraulically Loaded into, and Unloaded from, Reactors Spent Fuel Particles transferred to Small Transport Cask in a Few Hours and Rapidly Transported away from Site After TRISO Particles are Removed, Residual Radioactivity in Reactor System is Much Less Reactor can be Re-Loaded with Fresh, Non-Radioactive TRISO Particles, or Removed from Site TRISO Particles Have Excellent Retention of Fission Products

10 MW(e) Advanced -2 System Transport Cask

TRISO Fueled Reactor Parameters Based on Fuel Elements with Hydraulically Loaded/Unloaded TRISO Particles TRISO Reactor Parameters -10-50 Thermal Pow er (MW) 40 200 Cycle Efficiency (%) 25 25 Reactor OD (cm) 65 92 Core OD (cm) 45 71 Reactor Core Length (cm) 100 176 # of Fuel Elements in Core 37 91 Fuel Element OD (cm) 6 6 Thickness of TRISO Bed in Fuel Element (cm) 1.45 1.45 Avg. Pow er Density in TRISO Bed MW(th)/liter 0.78 0.78 Initial U-235 Loading in Core (kg) 14.6 73 50% Burnup Lifetime (months) 6 6 Weight of Reactor including Fuel (m etric tons) 1.25 4.5

Unique Market Sectors Military and National Security Domestic Military Bases Forward Operating Bases Overall Grid Vulnerability Process Heat Chemical/Industrial Commercial Power Power for Remote Locations Potable Water, Desalination, Fertilizer Oil Recovery

Applications Steam and Hot Water Output Industrial Processes Habitat Heating Oil Extraction from Oil Sands Residences, Hospitals, Industrial Buildings, etc. Deployable Reactor Module Industrial Processes Mining Machinery Electric Power Output Habitat Electric Power Lighting, Cooling,, Refrig., Cooking, Communications, etc. Electric Power for making Support Materials Condensing Water from Atmosphere Vehicle Fuel (e.g., ammonia) Ammonia Fertilizer, etc.

Functional Processes for Fuel and Power Generation Using the Compact Deployable Reactor System Module #1 Reactor with Integral Tungsten Shield Module #2 Steam Generator Pressurized Water Coolant Steam Generator Turbine & Generator Electric Generator Air Out H20 #4 Electric Loads At Field Base Module #4 Water Electrolyzer O2 Reject #1 #2 H20 Potable Water Power Water Heat Fuel Hydrogen Pump Pump #3 Module #3 Waste Heat Rejection to Ambient Atmosphere Ambient Air In CO2 CO2 Module #5 Synthetic Fuel Production H2 #5 Hydrogen for Fuel Cells and/or Vehicles Synthetic Diesel Fuel for Vehicles

The Product Add-Ons Production 10 MW(e) 50 MW(e) JP-8 Fuel Potable Water [40 C, 23% humidity atmospheric conditions in Iraq] 3,000 gallons per day 430,000 gallons per day* 15,000 gallons per day 2,150,000 gallons per day*

Installation and Removal Reactor Module Turbine Generator & Power Conditioning Module Transport to operating site Transport from operating site Reactor Module to Different Site or to Refueling or Disposal Turbine- Generator Module to Different Site Water Heat Rejection Module (Air or Water Heat Exchange) Module Integration at Site Startup and Operation at Site Shutdown and Cooldown at Site Waste Heat Module to Different Site Steam and Hot Water Process Heat Module Process Modules (Water, H2, NH3 Production) if Desired Field Construction Activities at Site, as Needed Optional Hydraulic Refueling with TRISO Fuel Particles (Adv. -2 Reactor) Steam and Hot Water Module to Different Site Process Module to Different Site

After Heat, Kilowatts (Thermal) Thermal Afterheat thermal power following shutdown for the 10 MW(e) reactor Two days after shutdown, the thermal power is 150 kilowatts, about 0.3% of the 40 megawatts generated at full power. 350 Approximately one-third is from short range beta particles, which stop inside the reactor, and two-thirds is from gamma photons, which require shielding 300 250 200 150 100 Beta After Heat Total After Heat Gamma After Heat 50 0 0.46 0.81 1.16 2.32 4.6 Days After Shutdown

Gamma Dose Rate (Rads per Day) Gamma Dose Rate Gamma dose rates after 1000 hours of operation as a function of the distance from the surface of the reactor. Calculation is based on a 20 cm thick tungsten shield with 2.3 days after reactor shutdown. The gamma attenuation factor inside the reactor is assumed to be 10:1 100 10 50 MW(e) = 200MW(th)] Distance from surface of reactor (ft) 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.1 10 MW(e) = 40 MW(th 0.01 Maximum permissible dose is 5 rem per year

Oil Sands Processing Chain Mining Oil Sand Extraction Upgrading Synthetic Crude Oil Sands Water Oil Separation Bitumen Refineries Thermal In Situ Blend With Dilutent Bitumin Blend North American Oil Sands: History of Development, Prospects for the Future Marc Humphries, Analyst in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Updated January 17, 2008 Fuels, Lubricants, Petrochemicals

Role of in Oil Recovery reactors can supply either : (A) steam and hot water; (B) steam, hot water, and electrical power; and (C) electrical power only Percent caloric value of operations as % of synthetic crude energy Process Options Mining Extraction Coking or Extraction /Coking Surface Mining Hydrotreating Total 1 Hot Water 10 13 7 10 40 2 Direct Coking 10 -- 15 10 35 In Situ Recovery 3 Steam Flooding -- 26 7 10 43 4 Combustion -- -- 13-25 10 23-35 Probstein and Hicks, Synthetic Fuels, Dover, 2006 40 MWt Reactor 10MPa Mining Water Tank for Shutdown 575K 516K Oil Sand Extraction Steam Generator 7.2 MPa 560K 7.0 MPa 365K Upgrading Turbine\ Generator 0.1MPa Heat Exchanger 300K Air In 10 MWe Output Power 30 MWt Output Heat 365K Air Out Synthetic Crude option B offers a low cost way to make hydrogen for hydrotreating. The turbine exhaust pressure is set relatively high, e.g., above 1 atmosphere, which results in steam and hot water for options 1 and 3 in processing the oil sands, while still enabling the generation of substantial amounts of electric power to be used for electrolyzing water to make hydrogen. Oil Sands Water Oil Separation Thermal In Situ Bitumen Blend With Dilutent Bitumin Blend Fuels, Lubricants, Petrochemicals Refineries

Summary Safe compact deployable 10 to 50 MWe reactors with integral radiation shield can be prebuilt and transported to and from locations where and when they are needed. Two designs are presented that differ in type of fuel, fuel handling and overall system weight. Applications are Military Industrial Humanitarian Dedicated industrial process heat and electric Off grid power applications