CTSA Trial Innovation Network Early Vision & Goals MONICA SHAH, MD DIRECTOR, TRIAL INNOVATION NETWORK

Similar documents
Leading Efforts to Tackle Roadblocks & Leverage Efficiencies. Jamie Roberts, MPH, MA, CCRP Director, Research Networks Duke CTSI

Christopher P. Austin, M.D. Director, NCATS IOM CTSA Review Committee January 24, 2013

Evaluation of the Prime Partnership between Accelence and Quintiles. James Brook Senior Director, Head Site Management Western Europe, Quintiles

University of Utah Annual IRB Member Training Ann Johnson, PhD Associate Director Institutional Review Board

Webinar Tips Please mute your phone. Please do not put the call on hold. There will be time for questions after the presentation.

CIRB in your future?

Progress Through Partnership: Actively Engaging Patient Groups in the Clinical Research Process

Recruiting and Retention (R&R) for Human Subjects Research: Part 1 Inventory and Open Discussion

Webinar Tips Please mute your phone. Please do not put the call on hold. There will be time for questions after the presentation.

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

The Strategic Planning Process and Optimal Strategic Alternatives COOK COUNTY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS SYSTEM BOARD MEETING MONDAY, MAY 23, 2016

TransCelerate Overview. Tozheg Roshankar

THE IMPACT OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA) ON CANCER RESEARCH, CARE, AND PREVENTION

DEVELOPING CLINICAL TRIALS INFRASTRUCTURE

Summary of Provisions in 21 st Century Cures Act (H.R. 6) as passed by full House of Representatives, July 10, 2015

GW Human Resources Strategic Plan

New Health Data Economy: Strategic Partnerships with Life Sciences Company

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute Integrated home of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA)

Lili M. Portilla, MPA Acting Director, Office of Policy, Communications and Strategic Alliances National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

William Barsan, MD SIREN Clinical Coordinating Center

June 7, Harold E. Varmus, MD Director National Cancer Institute 31 Center Drive Building 31 Room 11A48 MSC 2590 Bethesda, Maryland

The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project: Lessons Learned in Data Sharing

PAREXEL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS. Optimizing relationships for shorter time to market

THREE -YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN

A Potential Innovative CMC Solution: Responding To Public Health Needs With An Accelerated Clinical Pathway A Vaccine Example

CHSOR. Johns Hopkins Clinical Data Opportunities for Clinical and Translational Research. Baltimore, 6 Feb 2018

TRANSFORMING CLINICAL RESEARCH FOR FASTER ACCESS TO INNOVATIVE MEDICINES. Establishing the Value of EHR4CR for Pharmaceutical Industry

MANAGING AND INTEGRATING CLINICAL TRIAL DATA: A Challenge for Pharma and their CRO Partners

Genetic Research at Intermountain Healthcare. Marc S. Williams, MD, FAAP, FACMG Director, Clinical Genetics Institute Feb.

Summary of Day 1. Christopher Granger

Large, Simple Trials Policy Needs: Ethics, Trial Processes

March 5, Discussion Guide

Governing Interinstitutional

Real World Evidence Generation in the 21 st Century: National Evaluation System for health Technology (NEST)

On behalf of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and the 30,000 people with cystic

Clinical and Translational Research: Expectations and Goals

STRATEGY FORWARD. University of Iowa Health Care Integrated Strategic Plan Approved Strategies for FY18

Development of a Dual University System Health Research Partnership as a Foundation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Rare Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities NIH Perspective

Introducing your Recruitment Innovation Center. December 2016

NIH GRANTEE SUPPORT FOR MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN SUBJECTS AND CLINICAL TRIALS STUDY INFORMATION

Enabling faster insights to improve clinical trial efficiency and quality

NIH Policy Priorities for Clinical Research

Improve Trial Efficiency & Quality with CTMS

McGill ITS Strategic Plan

Department At-A-Glance

Clinical Research at MSU

Chairman Cole, Ranking Member DeLauro and distinguished members of the

SOLVING THE PATIENT RECRUITMENT DILEMMA

Goal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society

Trial Innovation Network Hub Liaison Team Meeting. August 1, 2017

Yale University. Open Data Access Project

What is the Future of NIH funded Clinical Research in IBD?

Clinical Trials Series Part II

Facilitating Antibacterial Drug Development Outlining the Path Forward

Clinical Messaging in Mendocino and Lake County

Rethinking the Role of IT

Nov 14, Jennifer Lewis Commercial IT Millennium Pharmaceuticals. From Vision to Reality and then some Nov 14,

Integrating Trial Data Processes Across Functional Areas using Electronic Data Capture (EDC) Technology

An Integrated Approach to Patient Experience Analytics

Guidance on Request for Information on Rapid Response Platform Technologies for Epidemic Preparedness

CPhA Strategic Plan

Early Feasibility Studies (EFS) in the U.S. with a Focus on Valvular Heart Disease: Updates, Impact and Future Directions. Chip Hance June 16 th 2017

All of Us Research Program

medicines, improving the health of people around the world.

CDER Keynote Address. Patrizia Cavazzoni M.D. Deputy Center Director for Operations CDER/FDA. AAM GRx+Biosims Conference September 5, 2018

ClinicalTrials.gov. Why Does it Affect Me? Should I Be Concerned?

A new Model of Vaccine R&D Global Health Public Private Partnership : The Global Health Vaccine Center of Innovation (GHVCI)

2016 San Antonio Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center Pilot and Exploratory Study Core REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS PILOT PROJECTS

Chandler. The Innovation and Technology Hub of the Southwest! CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (CIO)

Business Process Services. White Paper. Reimagining the Clinical Trials Process through Digital Disruption

Data-Driven Strategies for Improved Site Activation and Patient Enrollment Forecasting

FINANCE & BUSINESS AT PENN STATE...

Delivering the NIHR Central Commissioning Facility

Technology to Transform Your Clinical Trials

The Argonaut Project. July 31, 2015

GLOBAL Trend and opportunities in drug development

A Streamlined Data Capture and Exchange Partnership that Delivers Faster Decisions

FDA Driving Biomedical Product Innovation

Yale University. Open Data Access Project

Why Industry Collaboration Matters

CTSA Program Common Metrics Initiative

Policy Appendix IV: DRCR.net Industry Collaboration Policies Version 5.0, February 2, 2009

Columbus Water Works. Five Year Strategic Plan FY

Acurian on. The Staggering Costs of Clinical Trial Delays and How to Avoid Them. Trial Delays May Be Costing You More than You Realize

Accelerating Clinical Trials Through Access to Real-World Patient Data

NIH Policy on Dissemination of NIH- Funded Clinical Trial Information

SOCIETY OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS ORLANDO FLORIDA OCTOBER 2018

Policy Appendix IV: DRCR.net Industry Collaboration Policies Version 6.0, August 2, 2017

Recommendations for Strengthening the Investigator Site Community

Perspectives on Large Simple Trials

Process for Solicitation and Review of Clinical Trials for NETT

Improving Pa-ent Outcomes with Research: The Appliance of Science NIHR UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre

How is trial registration affecting gjournals?

The Critical Path to TB Drug Regimens Initiative

Welcome. Thank you for joining us. Irina Moissiu, Director Client Relations Laurie Furiness, EVP Operations & Consulting Services

Generating Real-World Evidence

NATIONAL PRIORITIES:

Strategic Plan. Uniting to care & cure

THE IMPACT OF ADR REPORTING ON SAFE USE OF MEDICINES IN SINGAPORE THE 10-YR EXPERIENCE

Transcription:

CTSA Trial Innovation Network Early Vision & Goals MONICA SHAH, MD DIRECTOR, TRIAL INNOVATION NETWORK

What Do They Have in Common? Hammer M. Harvard Business Review, 2004.

What Do They Have in Common? Operational Innovation Inventing and deploying new ways of doing work Hammer M. Harvard Business Review, 2004.

Clinical Trials Opportunity for Operational Innovation Califf RM et al. JAMA 2012; Hirsch BR et al. JAMA Intern Med 2013; Goswami ND et al. PLOS One 2013; Alexander KP et al. JAHA 2013;Todd JL et al. Annals ATS 2013; Inrig JK et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2014

Clinical Trials Opportunity for Operational Innovation Results of Current Work Models Small, single-center studies Variations in rigor Poor enrollment Decreased scientific impact Operational Challenges Parallel research universe Fragmented infrastructure Huge budgets, misaligned incentives Lack of collaborative efforts Califf RM et al. JAMA 2012; Hirsch BR et al. JAMA Intern Med 2013; Goswami ND et al. PLOS One 2013; Alexander KP et al. JAHA 2013;Todd JL et al. Annals ATS 2013; Inrig JK et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2014

Clinical Trials Opportunity for Operational Innovation Results of Current Work Models Opportunity for Operational Innovation Small, single-center studies Variations in rigor Poor enrollment Decreased scientific impact Invent & deploy new Operational Challenges approaches Parallel research universe to clinical trials Fragmented infrastructure Huge budgets, misaligned incentives Lack of collaborative efforts Califf RM et al. JAMA 2012; Hirsch BR et al. JAMA Intern Med 2013; Goswami ND et al. PLOS One 2013; Alexander KP et al. JAHA 2013;Todd JL et al. Annals ATS 2013; Inrig JK et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2014

NIH Clinical Trials Opportunity for Operational Excellence NIH Budget FY 2015 $3.2 B ~10% Clinical Trials $27.1 B NIH Budget Office; Mullard A. Nature Reviews Drug Disc 2016; GAO Report, 2016; Innovation for Healthier Americans, 2015

NIH Clinical Trials Opportunity for Operational Excellence NIH Budget FY 2015 Results of Current Work Models $3.2 B ~10% Clinical Trials Large unobligated balances Trials not finishing on time or within budget Decreased return on research investments Decreased public trust $27.1 B Operational Challenge Enhance stewardship & accountability of NIH clinical trials NIH Budget Office; Mullard A. Nature Reviews Drug Disc 2016; GAO Report, 2016; Innovation for Healthier Americans, 2015

NIH Clinical Trials Opportunity for Operational Excellence NIH Budget FY 2015 Results of Current Work Models $3.2 B ~10% $27.1 B Opportunity for Clinical Trials Large unobligated balances Trials Operational not finishing on Excellence time or within budget Decreased return on research investments Execute trials Decreased public better, trust faster, & more Operational Challenge cost-effectively Enhance stewardship & accountability of NIH clinical trials NIH Budget Office; Mullard A. Nature Reviews Drug Disc 2016; GAO Report, 2016; Innovation for Healthier Americans, 2015

Imagine A Clinical Trials Superhighway A Network that Accelerates the Translation of Novel Interventions to Evidence Based Treatments Single IRB Reliance Model Master Contracts Harmonized Data Collection Streamlined Protocols Poised Research Teams Patient Engagement

Trial Innovation Network Mission Leverage, in an unprecedented way, the talent, expertise, & resources of the CTSA Program to transform clinical trials Collaborative national Network Accelerate planning & implementation of high quality multi-center trials & studies Provide more treatments to more patients Improve public health Create a national laboratory to study, understand, and improve multi-center clinical trials

Trial Innovation Network What Is It? CTSA Hubs Partners NIH ICs Federal Non-federal Network Center Collaborative Strategic Management Partners Patients Trial Innovation Centers (TICs) NCATS & Network Exec. Comm. & CTSA Recruitment Innovation Centers (RICs)

Partnership Scientific Questions Supported By: NIH Institutes Industry Other Partners Trial Innovation Network How Will It Work? Operational Excellence Doing Trials Better, Faster, & More Cost- Efficiently Trial Innovation Network Results New Science Studies that Finish on Time & within Budget Generate Evidence to Change Clinical Practice Early Protocols CTSA Hubs RICS NCATS TICS Robust Clinical Trials Operational Questions Supported By: NCATS Operational Innovation Testing New Approaches to Clinical Trials Recruitment, Contracts, IRB, Other Results New Operational Approaches Generate Evidence to Change Research Practice

Trial Innovation Network Key Elements Infrastructure Elements o Single IRB Reliance Model SMART IRB Model o Strong Business Models Master contracts Streamlined budgeting Clear workflows o Streamlined Protocols Master protocol & CRF templates Common data elements Protocol review committee o Poised Research Teams Standardized site training o Harmonization Informatics Collaboration Elements o Clear Organization Structure supports collaboration & early engagement o Clear Communication Regular meetings to share and discuss plans with key partners Trial Innovation Network Website o Foster Relationships Teams that focus on collaboration with CTSA Hubs, NIH Institutes, Patients, Other Partners o Evidence Based Learning & Improvement Performance Metrics o Dissemination Plan Focus on engagement & impact Publications & data sharing

Trial Innovation Network Leveraging Operational Innovations from the CTSA Program Master Contracts SMART IRB Reliance Platform Standards for Competencies & Training in Clinical Trials EHR Based Recruitment

Trial Innovation Network What Is the Added Value? For Investigators One-stop shopping to implement clinical trials TICS & RICS expertise in operational innovation & operational excellence CTSA Hubs broad expertise; large, diverse patient populations More competitive clinical trials applications for NIH ICs For NIH Institutes and Industry Partners Trials completed on time and within budget Shared NIH mission to innovate & transform clinical trials & optimize stewardship

Trial Innovation Network Timeline Collaborative Strategic Planning & Management First 6 Months May NCATS Council June Awards Released Develop Network Strategic Plan Launch Demonstration studies Year 1 Demonstrate & disseminate key elements of superhighway Year 2 Launch large scale clinical trials Operationalize SMART IRB Model, Master Contracts, Workflows, Other Strategic Priorities in Demonstration Studies

Trial Innovation Network Demonstration Studies To be implemented immediately Small clinical trials & studies (n ~200) testing simple, low-risk interventions Ideal candidates R01 clinical trial applications Reviewed but pending funding decisions Early stage investigators Feasibility analysis of entry criteria

Trial Innovation Network NCATS Team Name Monica Shah Michelle Culp Todd Wilson Mary Purucker Ken Gersing Kat Schwartz Patricia Jones Tiina Urv Stacia Fleisher Redonna Chandler Petra Kaufmann Role Director, Trial Innovation Network Director, Clinical Operations Program Officer Director, CTSA Hub Program Director, Biomedical Informatics Program Analyst, Trial Innovation Network Program Officer Program Officer Deputy Director, Office of Grants Management Deputy Director, DCI Director, DCI

Trial Innovation Network The Future Collaboration key to transform the clinical trials enterprise & optimize stewardship Trial Innovation Network Operational Excellence & Operational Innovation Resource for scientific community & NIH NCATS welcomes your input, engagement, & partnership as we develop the Trial Innovation Network Program Contacts Monica.Shah@nih.gov Petra.Kaufmann@nih.gov

Trial Innovation Network A Historic Opportunity to Accelerate Translation Through Operational Innovation, Operational Excellence & Collaboration