The firing and co-firing of difficult biomass fuels W R Livingston Doosan Babcock R&D

Similar documents
Biomass firing and. coal-fired utility boilers. W R Livingston. Forum/RSC Leeds Nov 2010

The direct co-firing of biomass at high co-firing ratios. W R Livingston Hamburg June 2009

Biomass ash. 9:10 Opening and welcome, Sjaak van Loo, IEA Bioenergy Task 32 and ThermalNet Combnet

15 Years on Uniper s Experiences with Biomass Fuels. Will Quick, Uniper Technologies, Ratcliffe on Soar, Nottingham

15 Years on Uniper s Experiences with Biomass Fuels. Will Quick, Uniper Technologies, Ratcliffe on Soar, Nottingham

FULL-SCALE INVESTIGATIONS ON CO- FIRING OF STRAW

Current status of biomass cofiring

What we need to know about Coal : the view of a Utility Ian Wright, Fuel Procurement Officer Robert Ghent, Performance Engineer

Co-combustion in fluidised bed influence of K, Cl and S

The Current Status of Biomass Co- Firing at Coal-Fired Power Stations in Britain. W R Livingston Mitsui Babcock May 2004

Characterisation of CTF deposits from coal-biomass combustion. Fraser Wigley and Jim Williamson Imperial College London Gerry Riley RWE npower

FRANCE S BIGGEST BIOMASS CHP PLANT

Co-combustion of Lignite with Biochar

Regional biomass supply chains in Ukraine

Methods for controlling chlorine induced superheater corrosion

Co-Utilization of Coal and Biomass - Experience in Europe

Experience with straw firing in Danish combined heat and power plants

CO27: DEVELOPMENT OF AN EFFICIENT SLOP FIRED BOILER. Speaker Rajesh Singla. ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd, Noida, India IBEES

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

DOMOHEAT PROJECT. 8th Coordination Meeting. Athens, Greece University of Vigo. Forest Engineering group

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

Biomass ash deposition, erosion and corrosion processes. W R Livingston IEA Task 32/Thermalnet Workshop Glasgow September 2006

Ash Deposition Prediction Tool for PF Boilers Fired with Coal and Biomass

Upgrading of Malaysian Biomass for Cofiring with Coal. Adlansyah Abd Rahman Centre for Renewable Energy, UNITEN

Biomass co-firing. Technology, barriers and experiences in EU. Prof.dr.ir. Gerrit Brem. TNO Science and Industry

Fireside Corrosion: Implications and Solutions for Oxy-combustion Boilers. Jo hn E. Oakey

Biomass Combustion Technology

Optimization of Coal Blend proportions for sustained improvements in generation & efficiency

Low-temperature corrosion in fluidised bed combustion of biomass

Normative Issues and Standards Key issues for new markets

Opportunities for conversion of biomass and waste using hydrothermal Carbonisation

First Operating Experiences of 55 MWe Konin and 205 MWe Polaniec CFB Boilers Firing 100% Biomass

AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF BIOMASS*

Low emission pulverised biomass fuel combustion systems

CONVERSION FROM COAL TO WOOD PELLETS BY PREBEN MESSERSCHMIDT PROJECT DIRECTOR

10/1/18 Proposed revision of section 10 (Wood Pellets) of TG1 Solid Wood Fuel Classification Guidelines

NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES ON THE BASIS OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH. Author: Vasilii Azarenkov Olesia Azarenkova

Coal Quality & Combustion

International Workshop on Bioenergy Policies, Technologies and Financing

We are greening the energy!

Maximising the available fuel portfolio improved affordability

EVALUATION OF COMBUSTION PROPERTIES OF BIOMASS MIXTURES

SLUDGE GASIFICATION FOR CHP APPLICATIONS

Fuel specification and classes,

AGROENERGY CLOSED-CYCLE CONCEPT

Coal biomass ash deposition during deeply staged combustion. BCURA project B78. Fraser Wigley. Imperial College London

Entrained Flow gasification of coal/torrefied woody biomass blends

Co-firing of Biomass and Coal JAN SLEGL CAPTURE AND TENDERING

Boiler using Biomass as Fuel

Emissions from wood-fuelled equipment. Senior research scientist Heikki Oravainen Technical Research Centre of Finland

Property analysis and pretreatment of rice straw for energy use in grain. drying: A review

Generation. Jim Twomey Executive Vice President, Fossil. Conference on Biomass and Energy for the Great Lakes Economy.

Practical Issues of Co-Firing and Gasification of Biomass October 28, 2003

Impact of biomass co-firing on selected parameters of a 225 MW power unit

Biomass Residues as Power Station Fuels

SLOP / VINASSE CONCENTRATION AND INCINERATION

CEREAL STRAW TORREFACTION: RESULTS ON PILOT PLANT TEST. June 2013

ECN s torrefaction-based BO 2 - technology from pilot to demo

Biomass combustion and boiler corrosion:

Entrained Flow gasification of coal/torrefied woody biomass blends

BFB (bubbling fluidized bed) Power Plants (CHP) Fuel: RDF or Biomass CHP

moving bioenergy forward

Effect of co-firing of biomass on operation of fluidized bed boiler

Energy Efficient and Ecological Housing (ECOHOUSING)

Malaysian - Danish Environmental Cooperation Programme Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Component

Coal Blending. Pankaj Ekbote NTPC Ltd

Coal Quality & Boiler Efficiency

Optimising biofuels/biomass use in the energy mix for various end use purposes EU examples

Comparison of technologic parameters of pellets and other solid fuels produced from various raw materials

NOVEL CHARACTERISATION METHODS FOR BIOMASS FUELS AND THEIR APPLICATION - CASE STUDY STRAW

Cool & Hot 11. May Paris. Boiler conversion to biomass

ACCEPTED MODERN TECHNOLOGY WOOD-FIRED BOILERS FOR POWER STATIONS SOUTHWOOD RESOURCES FORESTRY TASMANIA

WOOD PELLETS- A GROWING MARKETPLACE

ECO2 LINCS LTD SLEAFORD RENEWABLE ENERGY PLANT IPPC APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Large-Scale Biomass Use for Bioenergy 2 November BioCleantech Conference Presenter: Deborah Keedy, Head of Biomass

Combined Cycle Gasification Plant

Biomass Power Plants

Retrofit of Rodenhuize 4 power station: The Max Green and Cold Back-up-projects

Influence of O 2 during Sulphation of KCl in a Biomass Fired CFB Boiler ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Co-firing of biomass. Lecture on 10 th October Matti Nieminen VTT Technical research centre of Finland Ltd

Production of big straw bales, straw pellets, transport and storing for power plants and CHP plants

Anders Evald. 2. Internationale Fachtagung Strohenergie. Berlin March FORCE Technology, Denmark

FUEL FLEXIBILITY, EFFICIENCIES AND PAY-BACK OF ADVANCED ENERGY PLANTS!!

Operational Experience with a High Fouling Biomass Fuel

Coal to biomass (wood pellet) mill conversion

What is Bioenergy? William Robinson B9 Solutions Limited

PORTFOLIO OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

Chemometric analysis for the relationship between mineral contents, particle matter and bottom ash distribution during pellets combustion

Evaluation of torrefied bamboo for sustainable bioenergy production C.M. Daza Montaño J.R. Pels L.E. Fryda R.W.R. Zwart

Coal Quality As the Boiler Sees It. Rod Hatt Chief Technical Officer Coal Combustion, Inc.

ECN s torrefaction-based BO 2. -technology from pilot to demo. Jaap Kiel. IEA Bioenergy workshop Torrefaction, Graz Austria, 28 January 2011

Cross-effects and total gas clean-up system lay-out

Optimisation of multi-fuel operation in fluidized bed boilers

The SECTOR project: Status quo and outlook of co-firing torrefied material

WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS

Agriculture related bio-energy production in Wales

THE PRESENT STATE AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL BIOMASS COMBUSTION FOR HEAT AND POWER GENERATION

PROJECT FINAL REPORT. Project title: DEmostration of Large Scale Biomass CO Firing and Supply Chain Integration

Biomass and bio-energy

Manipulating biomass ash content and ash quality in herbaceous biomass

Transcription:

The firing and co-firing of difficult biomass fuels W R Livingston Doosan Babcock R&D IEA Bioenergy Task 32 Combustion of challenging g biomass fuels Lyon, 4 May 2010 Date: May 2010

The principal types of difficult biomass fuels Biomass fuels with difficult physical properties Wet sludges Straws and grasses, which are stored and handled in baled form. Very wet fuels Wet sludges Wet chips, p, dusts and small flakes The co-firing of wet sawdusts with coal Fuels with difficult ashes Animal and poultry wastes Distillers grains and similar materials The co-firing of a range of biomass materials and the impact on ash deposition Page 1

Biomass materials with difficult physical properties

Biomass with difficult physical properties Cereal straws for biomass are harvested, transported, stored and handled as large Hesston bales. The bulk handling of Hesston bales requires relatively expensive specialist equipment. The bales need to be broken up prior to feeding to a boiler, and this requires specialist equipment. For grate firing, the bales are broken up and a deep fuel bed is formed. For pulverised fuel co-firing, the straw is milled and pneumatically injected through modified coal burners. Page 3

General process diagram of the straw-fired power plant near Ely, England Page 4

Bale breaking and straw milling equipment at Studstrup (after Overgaard et al., 2006) Page 5

Modified Doosan Babcock Mark III Low NOx burners for the combustion of chopped straw at Studstrup in Denmark Page 6

Overview of straw firing and co-firing Cereal straws and energy crop grasses are harvested, stored and handled on baled form. Specialist equipment is required for handling, processing and feeding the baled material to the boiler. The equipment is expensive and not very flexible in nature. There has been only limited utilisation of baled cereal straws as fuels outside Denmark, where there are specific government policy instruments encouraging the utilisation of indigenous biomass materials. There is now significant quantities of milled and pelletised straw and similar materials available. Page 7

Co-firing wet sawdusts

The co-firing of wet biomass fuels with coal in pulverised coal boilers Green wood materials generally have total moisture contents up to around 55-60%. A significant quantity of wet sawdust material; has been co-firing in large pulverised coal boilers. In the main, the wet sawdust has been co-fired by pre-mixing i with the coal at less than 10% by mass in the coal handling system, and processing the mixed fuel in the installed coal milling and firing system. The co-firing of the wet biomass has a significant impact on the mill heat balance. Page 9

Vertical spindle coal mill schematic Wet Coal Inlet Pipe Mill Outlet Temperature (Set point 75 o C) Pulverised Coal Outlet Pipe Coal Mill Primary Air Inlet Cold Tempering Air Hot Secondary Air Page 10

Coal-sawdust blend compositions Sample Total moisture content (%) MJ kg -1, as received) Gross calorific value MJ kg -1, dry ash free) 2% Blend Coal 14.5 24.30 33.15 Sawdust 61.4 7.69 20.30 Blend 15.3 23.99 33.00 6% blend Coal 14.5 25.21 33.40 Sawdust 53.5 9.14 20.12 Blend 16.6 24.27 32.93 10% blend Coal 14.2 25.51 33.17 Sawdust 57.1 847 8.47 21.71 Blend 18.6 23.64 32.48 Page 11

The impact of wet coal on the mill outlet temperatures. Biomass level 2% by mass 10% by mass Boiler output 450-500 MW e 490-500 MW e Mill Coal flow rate Minimum mill Coal flow rate Minimum mill (tonnes h -1 ) outlet temp. (tonnes h -1 ) outlet temp. ( C) B 34-37 60 37-38 55 C 36-37 74 35-37 60 D 55/60? 64 68-76? 58 E 30-31 73 37-41 54 F 30-37 73 35-36 60 G 20-23? 60 18-24? 66 H 34-36 61 43-46 53 Page 12

The co-firing of wet biomass materials with can be achieved by mixing the biomass with the coal and processing the mixed fuel through the installed coal mills and firing systemstem With very wet solid biomass materials like sawdust, there is a significant impact on the heat balance across the mill and this can be a limiting factor, This can limit the co-firing ratio that is achievable in some cases. Page 13

Co-firing biomass materials with coal ash effects

Biomass ash effects on boilers and associated equipment The biomass ashes are very different chemically from coal ashes, i.e. they are not an alumino-silicate systems, but mixtures of simple inorganic compounds, of Si, K, Ca, P and S. The levels of Ca, K and P in biomass materials can be significantly higher than in coal ashes. This can lead to concerns about increased ash deposition on boiler surfaces, when co- firing biomass with coal. There can be concerns about increased rates of high temperature corrosion of boiler components, with high chlorine biomass materials. Biomass co-firing tends to increase the level of submicron aerosols and fume in the flue gases, and may impact on ESP collection efficiency. There may be utilisation/disposal i l issues with mixed coal/biomass ashes. Page 15

Biomass ash compositions Biomass Forestry residue SRC willow Cereal straw Oil seed rape straw Olive residue Palm kernel Distillers grains Poultry litter Ash (%) 2 2 5 5 7 4 4 13 Analysis (mg kg -1 ) Al - - 50 50 1,500 750-600 Ca 5,000 5,000 4,000 15,000 6,000 3,000 1,000 20,000 Fe - 100 100 100 900 2,500-900 K 2,000 3,000 10,000 10,000 23,000 3,000 8,000 5,000 Mg 800 500 700 700 2,000 3,000 2,000 5,000 Na 200-500 500 100 200 1,500 3,000 P 500 800 1,000 1,000 1,500 7,000 12,000 14,000 Si 3,000-10,000 1,000 5,000 3,000 400 9,000 Page 16

Ash Fusion Temperatures of coal ash-biomass ash mixtures Parameter 100% Longannet coal ash 95% Longannet ash + 5% Wheat straw ash Difference 100% Trinity 95% Trinity coal ash coal ash + 5% wheat straw ash Difference Deformation 1330 1230-100 1110 1130 +20 Temp. (red.) ( C) Hemisphere Temp. (red.) ( C) 1490 1380-110 1120 1130 +10 Flow Temp. (red.) ( C) >1500 1420-80 1150 1140-10 Page 17

The ash fusion temperatures of mixed ashes 1400 Longannet - wheat straw Trinity - Wheat straw 1350 Deformation temperature e (redu ucing) 1300 1250 1200 1150 1100 0 5 10 15 20 % Biomass Ash Page 18

The slagging and fouling behaviour of mixed ashes at high cofiring ratios Parameter Ash content (%) Ash analysis (% in ash) SA Export coal Wood pellets 50% blend Olive residue 50% blend DDGS 50% blend 14.6 2 7.1 2.9 7.6 4.2 8.6 SiO 2 51.0 16.1 45.4 22.1 44.4 0.6 37.7 Al 2 O 3 31.0 4.1 26.7 2.1 24.4 0.1 22.8 Fe 2 O 3 4.4 6.5 4.7 6.0 4.8 1.3 3.6 CaO 8.0 30.9 11.6 18.7 10.5 3.6 6.0 MgO 1.6 8.0 2.6 11.1 3.8 12.8 4.7 Na 2 O 0.5 0.9 0.6 14.5 3.7 7.1 2.3 K 2 O 0.5 12.8 2.4 16.2 4.1 28.1 8.1 P 2 O 5 1.1 15.8 3.4 6.1 2.3 44.3 12.9 SO 3-4.0 0.6 2.5 0.6 2.0 0.5 Slagging 0.83 1.09 1.01 N/A 1.43 N/A 1.63 Index (Medium) (High) (Medium/high) h) (Severe) (High) (Severe) (High) Fouling Index 1 0.08 (Low) 2.3 (Severe) 0.5 (Low/medium) 5.1 (Severe) 1.2 (High/severe) 5.9 (Severe) 1.6 (Severe) Fouling Index 0.028 0.157 0.102 0.515 0.288 0.804 0.418 2 (Low) (Medium/high) (Medium) (Severe) (High) (Severe) (Severe) Page 19

Conclusions on biomass ash behaviour The chemistry and mineralogy of biomass ashes and of the mixed ashes from co-firing biomass with coal are reasonably well understood. There are risks of decreased ash fusion temperatures and increased slag formation, depending principally on the co-firing ratio, and the ash content and ash chemistry of the biomass. The Slagging and Fouling indexes and other assessment methods devised for coal ashes can be applied successfully to biomass-coal ash mixtures, with appropriate modification. In general, the plant experience at co-firing ratios less than 10% on a heat input basis, indicates that the impacts on ash deposition have been modest. At higher co-firing ratios the risks of increased deposition and other ash-related impacts are higher, and this will lead to restrictions in the range of biomass materials that can be co-fired. Page 20

Summary of the utilisation of difficult biomass materials as fuels Difficult physical properties Some biomass materials have physical properties that can require relatively expensive specialist harvesting, storage transport and handling equipment. Metering and feeding these materials in to the boiler or reactor vessel can be problematic. High moisture content The co-firing of wet sawdusts with coal in pulverised coal-fired boilers by pre-mixing the biomass with the coal and co-milling in the installed coal mills is quite widely practised. The high moisture content has a significant impact on the mill heat balance and this can be a limiting factor. Difficult ash behaviour Biomass ashes are very different from coal ashes and a number have high propensities to slagging and fouling of furnace and boiler surfaces. This can result in significant problems in dedicated biomass combustion plants and boilers This can limit the allowable co-firing ratio when co-firing with coal. Page 21

Thank you for your attention WRLi Livingston i Doosan Babcock blivingston@doosanbabcock.com Page 22