The idea behind ECCO Objectives, methodology and main outcome

Similar documents
Infrastructure, transport and system aspects on CCS. Maurice Hanegraaf TNO

IMPACTS Recommendations for Safe and Efficient Handling of CO 2 with Impurities

Development of strategies for CO 2 value chain deployment: ECCO European value chain for CO 2

CCS European projects in FP7 coordinated by SINTEF: ECCO, DECARBIT and DYNAMIS

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Status CSLF TASK FORCE ON OFFSHORE CO 2 -EOR. Enabling Large-scale CCS using Offshore CO 2 Utilization and Storage Infrastructure Developments

Notice of National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) on Promoting Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage Pilot and Demonstration

CO 2 Transport for CCS: Global Potential & Local Challenges

Mapping and estimating the potential for geological storage of CO2 in the Nordic countries a new project in NORDICCS

Legal barriers to CCS

The post-2020 Cost-Competitiveness of CCS Cost of Storage. Dr. Wilfried Maas Carbon Capture Manager Shell

CCS A Powerful Catalyst for change: Power, Industry, Hydrogen, Biomass

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

HiOx - Emission Free Gas Power A technology developed by Aker Maritime

Cost Estimation of Fossil Power Plants with Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage

The case for a market maker and a business model for CO 2 storage

The Commission s s Holistic View on CCS Development in Europe

CCS system modelling: enabling technology to help accelerate commercialisation and manage technology risk

CCUS Status and New Developments.

Strategic Engineering of Large Infrastructure Systems: Real Options, Staged Development, and the Role of Flexibility

Carbon Capture and Storage in Climate Change Mitigation

CO 2 -EOR in the UK: Analysis of fiscal incentives

The European Perspective

Eleventh Annual Conference on Carbon Capture, Utilization & Sequestration

OPTIMIZING HYDROCARBON and ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Dave Penner and John Harness UOP, A Honeywell Company

IEA CCS Roadmap and what s next? John Gale IEAGHG on behalf of Juho Lipponen 5 th April 2015

Large scale CCS infrastructure in a European, in a Nordic and in a Swedish perspective

Ship transport of CO 2 An Overview

Financing existing CCS projects. How has it been done?

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

DYNAMIS. Towards Hydrogen Production with CO 2 Management CSLF Meeting in Cape Town, South Africa 16th April 2008 Nils A. Røkke Co-ordinator - SINTEF

Review of Project Proposed for CSLF Recognition: Al Reyadah CCUS Project (Phase I: Emirates Steel)

Economic Analysis (Task 5.3): Integrated CCUS Project Lifecycle Economics

Coal Combustion Plant with Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage.

Analysis of potentials and costs of CO 2 storage in the Utsira aquifer

Norway s role as a flexibility provider in a renewable Europe

CCS costs for industry:

Incentivising the connection of DG: Promoting efficient connection and appropriate benefit sharing

IEAGHG Work on Gas CCS

INTRODUCING THE LIQUID LOGISTIC SHIPPING CONCEPT

Renewable energy in Europe. E-turn 21 workshop Cologne, 10 May 2006

CCS CAN LESS BE MORE? AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

The Role of EOR in CO 2 Capture and Storage Lessons and Opportunities

Carbon Capture and Storage

CCS TECHNOLOGY IN E.ON

Standardization vs. Individual Solutions in Upstream Gas Processing

SET-Plan MONITORING & REVIEW of the IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS. Stathis D. Peteves DG JRC, IET

Carbon capture and storage

Dynamis SP2: Power plant & capture technologies

Demonstrating CCS in Italy The Enel s project

The status of Carbon Capture and Storage within the UK

GE Energy. IGCC s Role in Advancing

Key Performance Indicators for the CCS - EII

Review of Project Proposed for CSLF Recognition: Al Reyadah CCUS Project (Phase I: Emirates Steel)

WP Future opportunities for geothermal and energy system integrated

Transforming the energy system in Västra Götaland and Halland linking short term actions to long term visions

Economic and Social Council

Could China meet CO2 emission reduction targets by CO2-EOR? Sa d Shannak

SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE (SBSTA)

Research and Development Centre for Oil and Gas Technology (LEMIGAS)

The CO2WELLS Joint Industry Project

Do we have a full portfolio?

R&D Roadmap-Issues and Problems to be Solved before CCS Deployment

Towards an EU Policy Framework for CCS

Zero Emission Power Production from gas and coal, today

Linear Models for Optimization of Infrastructure for CO 2 Capture and Storage

in 2050? Hydrogen Council Technology for a better society S.Møller-Holst, May 2010

Innovative Zero-emission Coal Gasification Power Generation Project

Estimates of CO2 storage capacity in Europe

From NCCS kick-off November 4, 2016

Norway as a CO 2 Laboratory

CCS Policy Development in Japan

European Energy Research Alliance (EERA) CCS Joint Programme Jonathan Pearce Storage Subprogramme Coordinator

Nordic CCS Roadmap Update 2015

Carbon Capture and Storage

CCUS ACTIVITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN CHINA

Maximising oil recovery with stored CO 2 : A win-win for the North Sea

Long-term perspective on CO2 reduction by utilizing CCS technologies. Yutaka MATSUZAWA

CO2 Storage Functional Requirements Impacts by the CO2 Quality

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

22 nd 27 th August 2010 Longyearbyen, Svalbard Norway Hosted by Gas Technology Centre NTNU - SINTEF

WIN WIN - Wind-powered water injection Industry innovation and the development of an «impossible» idea

Review of Project Nominated for CSLF Recognition: Al Reyadah CCUS Project

Demonstrating CCS in Italy The Zero Emission Porto Tolle Project

Carbon Capture and Storage. in the EU Climate Change Programme:- Incentivisation and Regulation

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Scaling Up CO 2 Capture Technologies for Commercial Use. ICEF 5 th Annual Meeting Tokyo, Japan October 11, 2018

Modelling Marine Impact

CCEP Overview. January Unlocking CCS in the UK

Past and future of CCS in Norway

CCS Technology Development & Transfer. Pierre Le Thiez CCS Project Manager IFP, France

CCS - Commercially Viable but a Political Priority?

The "CASTOR" Project and the CO 2 Sequestration Activities of RAG

from a project management perspective Gerbert van der Weijde Global CCS Institute / CSLF meeting on project integration London, November 2011

Managing Large Scale CCS: A Supplier Industry s Perspective

RESPONSE TO SHAREHOLDER RESOLUTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE 2015 AGM 19 MAY 2015 ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC

Utility Perspective on CO 2 Sequestration

DEPLETED FIELDS WITH ACTIVE AQUIFERS

Developing a Pipeline Infrastructure for CO 2 Capture and Storage: Issues and Challenges

WORKSHOP BIO-ENERGY, CCS & BECCS : OPTIONS FOR INDONESIA

Transcription:

The idea behind ECCO Objectives, methodology and main outcome 2010 IEAGHG INTERNATIONAL CCS SUMMER SCHOOL Longyearbyen, Svalbard 22-27 August 2010 http://www.co2balance.com/ Prepared by Dr. Jana P. Jakobsen, Senior Research Scientist, SINTEF Energy Research Presented by Dr. Mona J. Mølnvik, Chief Scientist, SINTEF Energy Research 1

Outline ECCO objectives Framing the problem ECCO strategy Scenario Case Tool ECCO structure Main outcomes 2

ECCO - Overall objective The main objective of ECCO is to facilitate robust strategic decision making regarding early and future implementation of CO 2 value chains in the face of uncertainty. ECCO should provide recommendations enabling cost- effective use of CO 2 being produced from zero-emission emission power plants and other industries in Europe by exploring the opportunities and challenges of CO 2 for EOR/EGR in the context of the value chain. 3

Framing the problem 1. What are the questions? 2. How can we address these questions? 3. What competence, methodology and tools do we need for that? 4

1. What are the questions? Is there enough CO 2 available for EOR? How will investment models affect CCS economics? Will it be commercially interesting to implement CCS for EOR? Will CCS be accepted How the price of oil affects the economics? How to ensure continuous supply of CO 2? How the price of electricity affects the economics? by public? How will offshore CO 2 processing affect CCS? What modification will be needed at the platform? How the price of gas affects the economics? Will the wellhead be overheated? Will CO 2 leakage occur? How the price of CO 2 quota affects the economics? Which parts of the chain are technologically critical? Which parts of the chain are most costly? Will hydrates form? How will CO 2 quality affect the equipment/ operations along the chain? Is there need for governmental engagement? 5

2. How can we address these questions? Political and regulatory political focus on CO 2 handling international agreements legal framework public accept CO 2 quota market mechanisms other incentives Governmental engagement investments risks infrastructure Market economy price profiles: oil gas electricity steel CO 2 quota other projects/ investments Business economy investments models discount rates cash flow NPV analysis ownerships risk Technology availability price efficiency Infrastructure/logistics CCS chain design Matching sources and sinks in capacity and time Optimizing the infrastructure Ownership 6

2. How can we address these questions? Soft qualitative data Scenarios analysis Political decisions Public acceptance Technology development Energy demand Economic growth semi" data qualitative/ quantitative Case studies Translate Scenario storylines into quantitative parameters for the tool Hard" quantitative data Simulation with the tool Evaluation of NPV Cash flows for a particular CO 2 chain characterized by specific infrastructure design and values of parameters 7

3. What competence and methods do we need? Scenario analysis Case studies Techno-economical economical tool Technical proxy models Business economical models for chain components source/transport/sink Optimization routines Risk analysis 8

ECCO Strategy 1. Scenario storylines defining the environment 2. Case study defining chain options CO 2 3. Economic analysis profit vs. costs 4. Case study evaluating options & recommendations Electricity it CO 2 CO 2 emissions emissions Power plant Oil/Gas Platform EOR/EGR CO 2 capture CO 2 conditioning CO 2 transport CO 2 injection Gas CAPEX/OPEX 9

SP0 Management and co-ordination SP1 ECCO dissemination and training SP2 CCS analysis and recommendations WP 2.1 Envisaging CCS in Europe by 2020 WP 2.2 Formulation of CCS case studies WP 2.3 Strategies for implementation of CO 2 value chains SP3 CO 2 value chain methodology and tool development WP 3.1 CO 2 value chain WP 3.4 Implementation and assessment tool simulation of CCS cases WP 3.2 Global parameters and market models WP 3.3 Techno-economic models for CO 2 chain components ECCO Structure SP4 Reservoir technology for EOR/EGR WP 4.1 Techno-economic strategies for optimal CO 2 injection WP 4.2 EOR/EGR potential ti with CO 2 injection WP 4.3 Integration of aquifers into CO 2 infrastructure 10

Scenarios - storylines defining the environment for the case studies Scramble Decision makers focus on the need to secure energy for themselves and allies Bilateral deals and agreements Environmental policy not seriously addressed Uncoordinated incentives Patchwork of local standards and technologies Shell energy scenarios to 2050 Blueprint Formation of coalitions and focus on energy security and sustainability Pro-active actions on climate changes Local communities take first actions but national governments are forced to harmonize the initiatives 11

Case studies - Base case Exhaust stream containing 5 Mt CO 2 /year Corresponds to 2x 700 MW GTCC EOR storage basecase J.P.Jakobsen, G.Tangen, Ø.Nordbø, and M.J.Mølnvik, Methodology for CO2 Chain Analysis, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (4), 439-447, 2008. Global assumptions NG price 0.6 kr/sm^3 Price oil (offshore) 25 USD/bl Aquifer storage basecase Price CO2 quote 10.0 EUR/ton Exchange rate Euro 8.5 NOK/EUR Exchange rates Dollar 6.5 NOK/USD Availability 7885 hr/yr Discount rate 9% 12

Case studies - sensitivity analysis 13

ECCO: Scenario Tool vision Case Case specific input sources and sinks Tool Flexible CCS chain network design Relatively simple Case specific inputs Transparent cost factors Consistent investment models discount rates Business Technical Quality data economical parameters Smart use parameters and and models models Case specific inputs efficiency capacity energy consumption recovery rate Price profiles or models Market parameters Financial analysis output NPV, cash flow 14

Tool functionalities t A. Chain network design B. Technical parameters and models Matching sources and sink in capacity and time C. Market and economical parameters Proxy models Choose level of detail Tampen D. Scotland 3000 km total Rim offshore multiple 250 Market Financial development: analysis (NPV, cash flow) Absorber pipelines 240 km onshore pipeline oil price Electricity gas price Identify: E. Super structures Input steel variables price Vl Volume/mass el. Price of fco 2 Optimization CO 2 quota CO price 2 Parameters Plant Sensitivity analysis capture Capture London Risk analysis efficiency i Energy Decision investments making Holland consumption models Mid England 270 km onshore pipeline CO 2 emissions Ekofisk Business economical: Denmark 400 km onshore pipeline CO Friesland 2 conditioning 280 km onshore pipeline Raw Gas London 0 cost parameters Gas Ruhr area CAPEX/OPEX Optimizing the transport pipeline optimization ship design Treated gas logistic Time profiles Injection possibility, Case 6 Condenser CO 2 200 for analyzed CO Oil 2 period emissions 150 CO2 captured Gas case 2 CO2 captured case 6 for each CCS chain network module design : CO2 captured case 4 100 EOR injection possibility 2 (Mton/year) Amount CO CAPEX 50 OPEX CO 2 transport HX CO 2 injection Business economical parameters Technical parameters and models 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 Market Financial Year parameters analysis Flash Desorber EOR/ storage Reboiler 15

CO2-quota threshold 45 40 CO2-quot a price ( / /ton) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 EOR- basecase Case 1 (Improved amine capture) Case 2 (Oxyfuel) Aquifer - basecase Case 3 (Improved monitoiring) 16

Net present value (MN OK) 20000 15000 10000 5000 0-5000 Base case EOR Case 1, Improved amine capture Case 2, Oxyfuel 20 40 60 80 Oil price ($/bl) 17

Main results ECCO is focused towards the complete CO 2 value chain, and will generate results and cause progress beyond state of the art within the following topics Methodology for CO 2 value chain assessment by means of establishing scenarios as input for formulation of CCS cases, which are further analysed with the tool. CO 2 value chain assessment tool that enables transparent and robust analysis of CO 2 value chains. The tool will be designed to allow for flexible, demand-driven tailoring Reservoir technology for EOR and EGR increasing the ability to predict EOR and EGR profiles and potentials for CO 2 injection into European oil and gas reservoirs. Strategies and recommendations for deployment of CO 2 value chain: Main report: ECCO Strategies for CO 2 value chain deployment. The report comprises ECCO s joint strategies es and recommendations e o regarding g deployment of the CO 2 infrastructure in the near and mid-term future, liability issues and cross-border regulations, Emission Trading Schemes (ETS), financing schemes, and regime of incentives, and organization of the supply chain. 18

Thank you for your attention! http://www.co2balance.com/ com/ 19