Production, Pests, Profitability Neighborhood On-Farm Education for Field Corn and Alfalfa

Similar documents
Field Corn IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Related Topics. We may say IPM, but this series is about any sustainable farming method and can involve ANY aspect of farming.

Soybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Cucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012

MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER

MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER

How old are you? (1530 responses) 2009 Private Applicator Certification Program years years

An Agronomic Look at Low Lignin Crops.

Green Bean Production and Management

PEST&CROP INDEX 2010

Wheat IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

VEGETATIVE WEED ID CROP GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. 2. The sorghum plant shown here is in which of the following growth stages: NUTRIENT DEFICIENCY

YieldGard VT Triple : the stacked hybrids with enhanced trait performance.

Long term impact of soybean rust on the Midwest corn-soybean rotation system

Crop Pests. Chapter 9. Objectives. Discussion. Crop Pests

Between a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability

SOUTHERN STATES HYBRID SEED CORN

Challenges to Producing Peanuts Using the Organic Approach

2.) IDENTIFY ANY SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS AND RESULTS OF THE PROJECT TO DATE.

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Mid-April 2008, Volume 8, Issue 2. Available online at:

Mitigate the Downside Risks of Second-Year Corn

Overview of corn and alfalfa pest identification and damage

Eco-Label Opportunities for Processing Vegetable Crops. W. R. Stevenson J. A. Wyman P. Rogers L. Granadino

Purdue Crops Invitational

ontario.ca/environment Conducting a Pest Assessment for Use of Class 12 Pesticides

FUNGICIDE & INSECTICIDE ON SOYBEANS

Assumptions. Preventing Insect Problems in Organic Vegetable Systems. Organic Insect Management. Integrated Pest Management. The Life of an Insect

POTATO IPM PROTOCOL for PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

It s still winter in Indiana. Developments in Agronomy & Maize Management. Outline. Herbicide resistant weeds. Examples of HR weeds

AGRIS Co-operative and Wanstead Farmers Co-operative

Seedcorn. 12 For use only by commercial seed -treaters. Enhance AW imidacloprid captan vitavax. Danger 5 oz per 100 lbs seed --

ND and MT Pea Research Survey Results

Wensink Premium Seed Corn

Identify the principles for managing and maintaining forages. 4. What methods of maintaining or renovating a forage system are available?

Southwest MN IPM STUFF All the pestilence that s fit to print

2012 FFA CDE Agronomy Lab Practical

Managing Pesticide Resistance

Rice Insecticide Seed Treatments:

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Northern New York Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

Farmer Speaks Winter 2018 Results

KNOWING YOUR FIELD A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers

No matter the weather conditions, there will be problematic diseases every year. Which disease may change from year to year.

VEGETATIVE WEED ID. 1. This weed is

Integrated Pest Management. Tracey Baute and Gilles Quesnel OMAFRA

Syngenta delivers grower value in sunflowers

EQIP application information by state

2009 Vermont Corn Silage Seeding Rate Trial

A Critique of: An Appraisal of EPA s Assessment of the Benefits of Bt Crops. This Critique is authored by Leonard P. Gianessi

State Crops Exam 2017

State Crops Exam 2017

Pests Controlled: Corn earworm, western bean cutworm, black cutworm, dingy cutworm, fall armyworm, beet armyworm and stalk borer.

VegNet Vol. 14, No. 20. July 16, 2007 Ohio State University Extension Vegetable Crops On the WEB at: In This Issue 1.

Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans

Leopold Center. Use of planting date to avoid injury from soybean insect pests COMPETITIVE GRANT REPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

freedom to choose proven to perform 2017 product guide

Cannabis Conundrum. PART 1 Commercial Production

Southwest MN IPM STUFF

Peter Sexton and Jerry Roetcisoender

Maximizing the Value of Foliar Fungicides in Corn by Mark Jeschke, Agronomy Research Manager

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES

Vegetable Gardening and Season Extension

2008 FMC Product Update

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AGRONOMY DAY. agronomyday.cropsci.illinois.edu

Summary. Introduction. Spatial Variability in a Corn Pest Corn Rootworms. Yong-Lak Park, Michael M. Ellsbury, Rayda K. Krell,

Fruit and Vegetable Production

2005 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Purdue Invitational Crops Contest

2005 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Purdue Invitational Crops Contest

How to complete a Double Crop in NMP Appendix 4 Input

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

MONSANTO LEARNING CENTER AT MONMOUTH, IL 2017 DEMONSTRATION REPORTS

COLORADO CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

INSIDE THIS ISSUE. Corn Rootworms South Dakota untreated check

Pest Management in Indiana Soybean Production Systems

Impact of Crop Management Diagnostic Clinics on Advisors' Recommendations and Producer Practices

The Market-leading Seed Treatment Just Got Better

2016 Commercial Pesticide Applicator Training

Prepared by Mark Bell, Amanda Crump, Nick Madden and Maria Paz Santibanez 2012 For more information visit: International Programs ip.ucdavis.

DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

IPM USE IN UTAH S TREE FRUIT INDUSTRY SINCE 1996

Science of Life Explorations

Do new corn hybrids and yield levels influence potassium fertilizer management?

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES GUIDE

Do We Grow Another Bushel or Save a Buck?

Waunakee, Platteville, Janesville, Sparta, Eau Claire, Wausau,

One of the foundations for an IPM system is scouting your fields. This presentation will outline some of the basics of scouting.

CORN INSECTICIDE SEED TREATMENT AND FOLIAR FUNGICIDE EFFECTS ON CORN RESPONSE TO FERTILIZER NITROGEN

An Integrated Pest Management Adoption Survey of Sweet Corn Growers in the Great Lakes Region

2. Where do you work?

Technology and Agriculture: History and Future

Organic pest and disease control

2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn

Assessment of the role of neonicotinoid seed treatments to manage early season corn and soybean pests in Ontario

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key November 2, 2018

Who Am I? Farmer, Dietitian, Promoter of Food & Farming

The Early-Season Chlorophyll Meter Test for Corn

1 Corn Insect Control Recommendations E-219-W E-219-W. Field Crops CORN INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS

Transcription:

Production, Pests, Profitability Neighborhood On-Farm Education for Field Corn and Alfalfa The Pest, Production and Profit (Triple P) program was completed and was very successful! This intensive, on-farm educational program offered participating farmers the opportunity for in-depth Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Integrated Crop Management (ICM) training in an experiential, hands-on, locally adapted educational program. The program aimed to teach farmers best management techniques for addressing crop pests using scientific IPM and ICM principles and tactics. Farmers and/or farm laborer participants were actively engaged in a season-long program with timely on-farm meetings to discuss critical pest and crop management issues that arose during the growing season. Participants learned to implement specific targeted IPM and ICM practices that help with protecting the environment and enhance their own long term profitability and viability. There were 14 farmers that joined a Triple P team in Livingston and Franklin Counties. Dr. Mike Stanyard led the Livingston County team of 7 farmers that owned and managed 8550 acres of corn. The Livingston team focused on IPM and ICM for field corn. Dr. Kitty O Neil led the Franklin County Triple P team that consisted of 7 farmers that owned and managed 2200 acres of corn and alfalfa. The Franklin County team focused on corn and alfalfa IPM and ICM. Table 1: Triple P team numbers and acreage County Local Team Coordinator Number of Farms Number of acres farmed Livingston Mike Stanyard 7 8550 Franklin Kitty O Neil 7 2200 Each team identified key IPM and ICM educational needs, organized, and held timely meetings to address their topics. Meetings were scheduled relative to the needs and opportunities identified. Meetings were held to provide relevant teaching in critical educational moments during the growing season. Each team meet once pre-season to help plan what topics they wanted to discuss and learn over the summer. Each team met 5 times for field meetings with each meeting held at a different participants farm. Dr. Mike Stanyard s team discussed and learned the following concepts over the growing season. Livingston County Triple P Program April Meeting Conduct Pretest, Importance of scouting and data collection, Soil sampling, fertility and ph Tillage, Plant populations, Picking the right varieties Genetics/Structure, Protecting the seed treatments, Crop fertility Pop up and 2x2, Weed ID winter annuals/perennials, Preemergence herbicides, Resistance Management May Meeting Determining Corn Growth Stages, Seed Depth and Root Growth, Corn Emergence Problems, Determining Plant Population/Acre, Fertilizer Deficiency Symptoms, Seedling Disease ID/Management in Corn, Weed ID annuals, PP/Early Post Weed Management Options, Seed Corn Maggot, Wireworm, White Grubs and Black Cutworm, Demo Plot: Corn with fertilizer pop-up and Capture insecticide at planting vs. no pop-up and Capture. Noticeable difference in color and size.

June Meeting Early Season Corn - stage, what going on in the plant, and assess population (Group activity), European Corn Borer refuge vs. RIB, Corn rootworms, armyworms, slugs, Leaf diseases, Post Weed Management Options height restrictions, Nutrient Deficiencies leaf symptoms tissue testing, Nitrogen timing and how much?, Pre-Sidedress Nitrogen Test/Adapt N (Handout PSNT), N application options knife/drop tube/ Y drop, Demo Plot: Manure (fall & spring) vs. starter + sidedress vs. Manure (fall) + sidedress August Meeting Corn Physiology, VT and silking/pollination (Corn Rootworm Adult Assessment, Japanese Beetle silk clipping, Western Bean Cutworm, Foliar Disease Management NCLB/GLS Fungicide Options, Northern Corn Leaf Blight Gray Leaf Spot Fungicide Options Nutrient Deficiencies, Assess Weed Control Programs November Meeting Review the concepts discussed over the summer, conducted post-test and survey. The following is the topics and concepts that were coved by Dr. Kitty O Neil s team of farmers. Franklin County Triple P Program May Meeting Pre-test, Field Histories, IPM Principles, Soil Sampling & Fertility, Fertilizers, Stand Counts, Corn Growth Stages, Seed Corn Problems, Weed Management June Meeting Early weed identification, Early Season Corn Issues (Seed Corn Maggot, Wireworm, White Grubs and Black Cutworm), European Corn Borer, Initial Potato Leafhopper, Pre-sidedress nitrogen testing, Nutrient Deficiency Symptoms, Disease ID & Management July Meeting Potato Leafhopper on alfalfa, Initial Corn Rootworm, Weed Control, Western Bean Cutworm Foliar Disease Assessment, Manure applications August Meeting Corn Rootworm Assessment, Western Bean Cutworm, Weed Survey, Foliar Diseases, Stalk rots, Corn Harvest Considerations October Meeting Soil Fertility, Alfalfa Snout Beetle, Tillage Options, Corn disease evaluations December Evaluations Dr. Kitty O Neil conducted each post-test individually with each farmer on their farm. Evaluations

Field Scouting Field monitoring helps document timely data on current crop conditions and pest status. This information is highly relevant to producers, perks their interest and participation in meetings and helps to fully engage them in a fruitful learning and decision making process with direct application to their farm s net profitability. In short, real data on pest and crop management issues from a producer s own farm is ultimately more convincing and effective at promoting behavioral changes than hypothetical examples. This field data was shared with the producers and was used during the educational meetings to reinforce the information being delivered. Each producer was encouraged to scout other fields on their farms during the growing season. This data was also used in other extension educational efforts like newsletters and pest alerts that were shared throughout New York State. Evaluation of the Program We conducted a pre-test and a post-test to document participant s knowledge and IPM / ICM skill level prior to program participation. The post-test evaluation documents change in the participant s level of understanding following conclusion of the season. A post-season survey is also conducted to determine how many IPM or ICM practices participants expect to continue to do and participants suggestions for improving program efforts in their county. Impacts of the Triple P program General Perception of the Triple P Program by Farmers Triple P participants provided very positive feedback regarding their training experience. Of the 14 participants 100 % state they agreed the program helped them better understand pest and crop management issues. All the farmers in the program indicated that they would recommend the program to other farmers in their area. Knowledge and Adoption of IPM and ICM Results of the pre and post-testing indicated that participants dramatically increased their knowledge of IPM and ICM. Overall test scores increased 36 (Livingston ) and 27 (Franklin) percent from the pre-test to the post-test (Table 2). Table 2. Pre and Post-Test Scores. Mean scores on pre and post-tests by county Triple P program County Commodities covered Mean Pretest Score Mean Post-test Score Percent Improvement Livingston Corn 50 86 36 Franklin Corn and Alfalfa 40 67 27

General IPM Throughout the data presented, producers for the most part indicated that they would DO or would TRY to do most of the IPM and ICM practices that were taught. As shown in Table 3 their responses to general IPM information, use of thresholds and record keeping were positive. Table 3. Percent of participants implementing a General IPM Philosophy Not Keep records of scouting visits and management actions reports 17% 83% 0% Use threshold table and guidelines. 0% 100% 0% Field Corn Management Field corn management is one of the main focuses for both Franklin and Livingston County programs. Responses by producers indicate that they will try or will implement many of the practices taught during field meetings as shown in table 4. Table 4. Percent of Producers Implementing Field Corn IPM Not Scout for corn insect pests and diseases 67% 33% 0% Conduct weed surveys 50% 50% 0% Conduct plant population counts 33% 67% 0% Determine the proper leaf stage as it relates to timing of herbicide treatments 50% 33% 17% You will be better able to manage forage quality of corn 100% 0% 0% Alfalfa Management Alfalfa management was a second focus of the Franklin County program. As with field corn; producers indicated that they will do or will try to implement most of the alfalfa IPM practices into their farming operations as depicted in table 5. Table 5. Percent of Producers Implementing Alfalfa IPM Not Scout for alfalfa insect pests and diseases 33% 67% 0% Conduct weed surveys 17% 50% 33% Conduct plant population counts 25% 25% 50% You will be better able to manage forage quality of alfalfa 100% 0% 0%

General Crop Management As with the IPM practices, producers indicated the importance of implementing ICM practices in their farming operations. As illustrated in table 6, most growers indicated they will try or will implement many of the ICM practices taught during the meetings. Table 6. Percent of Producers Implementing ICM Practices Not Make a soil map of your fields 17% 33% 50% Conduct soil testing to determine proper fertilization needs 67% 33% 0% Use crop rotation to control certain pests 100% 0% 0% Understand the importance of testing forage for nutritional quality 40% 40% 20% Becoming a Better Crop Manager The goal of Triple P is to educate producers to help them become better field crop managers. The field crop producers in the program this season indicated that they felt they became better managers of their crops in their farming operations. The following are comments made by farmers when asked: Please indicate how this program has made you a better manager and/or more profitable of your crops. -It helped me understand/learn diseases, insects and growth stages of corn. -Need to spend more time scouting farms and fields -Made me more aware of what to look for in corn for insect and weeds and how to treat them. -Helped with weed identification -Helped with assessment of nutrient deficiencies. -Weed Identification -Very helpful in learning how to identify and manage insects. Helps remind me what to look for at certain growth stages. -It has brought topics and ideas to my attention that we over look or forget. -Has shown me new ways to think of better management for my corn. - recognize & acknowledge crop pests & management; made aware of losses due to lack of scouting Profitability Profitability is key to a successful farming operation. The following comments were made when the farmers were asked What will you use from this program to make your farming operation more profitable?

-Catching diseases and insects in a timely manner. a good job of scouting fields. -Scout for issues and try to prevent problems in fields. -Picking chemicals and hybrids that fit our operation. a better job of scouting fields. -Becoming a better pest manager. -Better insect (IPM) management and identification. Nitrogen and planting management ideas. -Better selection of seed. What did Farmers Like Most Here are some comments about what the farmers most liked about the Triple P program. -Conversations -Hands-on learning in the field. -It is a fun way to learn. -Comradery -Hearing what works for others. Getting into the field and scouting. -Conversations and exchange of ideas. -Food, scouting fields and talking with other farmers. -Review of topics & visual ID of pests & problems; timing and location Improving Triple P When asked Please indicate where we can improve the program. Anything we can add? the following were farmers comments. -Nothing come to mind -n t know -Nothing -Calibration of equipment demonstration, more field days and meeting, and more pre-plant information. -Follow one field from beginning to end. -The flexibility worked well and the outline was well setup. -More stuff on tillage. -Nothing Other Comments Made by Farmers Farmers were giving the opportunity to make any other comments about the program or how it helped them with their business. -Taught me the need to scout fields and pay closer attention.

-Information -Solidify a network of other growers to communicate with. -Good Program -Helped me think more about nitrogen use. Summary The Triple P program has proven to be an excellent educational model for producers to learn and implement IPM and ICM philosophy and practices in their farming operation. When the education is personalized to a producer s specific farming environment and is combined with good, interactive, and participatory learning, farmers will learn to adopt and implement IPM and ICM practices. Overwhelmingly, producers involved indicated receptiveness to the hands-on approach and have shown a willingness to implement many of the IPM and ICM practices highlighted in the course.