UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE)

Similar documents
Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide under the Safe Drinking Water Act s Underground Injection Control Program

Injection Wells. An injection well is a vertical pipe in the ground into which water, other liquids, or gases are

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Class I Injection Wells in Texas

Geologic Sequestration Rules: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage

Groundwater Fundamentals

Review of Existing Injection Well Permit Regulations and Expectations of Future Geologic Sequestration CO 2 Regulations with Monitoring Conditions

SUBCHAPTER 8. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) PROGRAM

This document also includes proposed permit requirements, including response actions, when excursions occur.

Best Petroleum Explorations, Inc. M. Brad and Sandra Dixon Themselves PROCEDURAL HISTORY

DEEP INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION

SUBCHAPTER 8. This is a courtesy copy of this rule. All of the Department s rules are compiled in Title 7 of the New Jersey Administrative Code.

RECENT CHANGES TO LOUISIANA S UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM. By: Marjorie A. McKeithen and Brett S. Venn

Summary of Issues Strategies Benefits & Costs Key Uncertainties Additional Resources

Implementation of Underground Injection Control Program Regulations for Class V Shallow Disposal Systems

A Technical Assessment of Protection of Underground Sources of Drinking Water under the UIC Rule and Aquifer Exemption Program

Deep Well Injection for Concentrate Disposal. Why use injection wells for concentrate disposal?

Railroad Commission. Class II Underground Injection Control Program Aquifer Exemption Project. February 12, 2018

Oil and Gas Monitoring. November 2, 2016 GRA Meeting John Borkovich, P.G. Groundwater Monitoring Section Chief

Class V Experimental Well Permit Process Items & Potential Issues for Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Project

Suffolk County Highway Superintendents Association

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

Detail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options

STATE OF ARKANSAS ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY. REGULATION NO. 17 Effective May 4, 1989 Arkansas Underground Injection Control Code

CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT ISSUES: GENERAL & A FOCUS ON DEEP WELL INJECTION. Mike Mickley. P.E., Ph.D. Mickley & Associates Boulder, CO

Client Alert. An Overview of EPA's New Rules Regulating the Underground Injection of Carbon Dioxide

Chaparral Natural Resources, Inc.

CO 2 Storage. Dr AK (Tony) Booer, Schlumberger Carbon Services, Abingdon, UK. 11 Jan, UKCCSC Winter Cambridge, UK

Siting and Monitoring CO 2 Storage Projects Sally M. Benson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720

EPA s Underground Injection Control Program Overview. Solid Waste Advisory Committee Meeting June 5, 2014

Florida s Diverse Use of Class I injection Wells

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 652. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL

Summary of Field Test Site and Operations

REVIEW OF THE AQUIFER EXEMPTION PROCESS, HISTORY AND IMPLEMENTATION RELATED TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION AND USE

Understanding The Class II Underground Injection Control Application Process In Colorado To Comply Cost-Effectively

Regulation of In Situ Mining in Texas

The State of Hydraulic Fracturing in CA: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?

UIC PROGRAM MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TESTING: LESSONS FOR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE?

Liability Issues Related to Geological Storage of CO 2

RULE 68. DISPOSAL OF NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS (NORM) ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION OF OIL AND GAS

Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Carbon Sequestration and Water: A Department of Energy Perspective

CARBON SEQUESTRATION: A Geologist s Perspective on the Economic, Scientific and Engineering Challenges.

Brenna McDonald Missouri Department of Natural Resources Missouri Geological Survey

Site selection: Technical site selection criteria and information needs

NAVAJO NATION UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL REGULATIONS

Federal Updates. Michael Moore Vice President of Business Development and External Affairs Blue Source LLC

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

CO 2 CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN WESTERN CANADA

CONCENTRATE AND BRINE MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEEP WELL INJECTION. Abstract

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

CO 2 -EOR. CCUS And The Fight Over Carbon Emissions. Presented to the American Action Forum. June Edward Dodge. CO 2 Injection Well

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

Developing Offshore Storage for Texas

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Virginia Walsh, PhD, P.G. Ed Rectenwald, P.G. February 25, 2016

What to do with CO 2 : The Knowns and Unknowns of Geologic Sequestration and CO 2 EOR in Greenhouse Gas Context

January 2017 Conducted by the

California Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations

Groundwater Protection and Management Critical to the Global Climate Change Discussion

The Equus Beds Aquifer: Opportunities and Challenges

Geological carbon sequestration: prediction and verification

Challenges in the Transition from of CO 2 -EOR to CCS

Dan Yates Associate Executive Director

Dear Director Zehringer and Chief Simmers,

The Critical Link between Aquifer Exemptions and the Sustainability of Water Resources as Part of Unconventional Resource Development

Criteria for mapping brackish groundwater

Aquifer Storage and Recovery: A Management Tool for Upstream Operators. Presented by: Lindsay Atkinson, PE James Dwyer, PE, D.W.R.

Lifecycle Water Management Considerations & Challenges for Marcellus Shale Gas Development

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9

Adapting to New CO2 Injection Well Regulations

Online Mechanical Integrity Assessment Training Coalbed Methane Example

The Geysers Geothermal Field, an Injection Success Story

Class III In Situ Uranium Injection Wells and Aquifer Exemptions in Texas: Multiple Levels of Permitting Protection for USDW Protection

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Deep Geological Formations. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage

State Baseline Water Quality Programs for Oil & Gas Operations

CO 2 Sequestration Market Development

EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

EXAMINERS' REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Natural Gas Extraction. Key Environmental Issues in US EPA Region 2 May 29, 2014

NGWA INFORMATION BRIEF

QUEST Carbon Capture & Storage Project Project Overview and Regulatory Process

WELL STIMULATION TREATMENTS

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Re: Contamination of Protected Underground Sources of Drinking Water; Request for Enforcement Action

Figure Initial Alternatives Numbering Characteristics Matrix

San Antonio. Water System BRACKISH GROUNDWATER DESALINATION PROJECT. Bill Stein, PG. LBG-Guyton Associates. San Antonio AMTA/AWWA 1

Salt Water Disposal (SWD) Wells: Advances in Evaluating their Environmental Impact

Representing EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Safety and Monitoring of CO 2 Storage Projects

Too much carbon in our atmosphere? Carbon sequestration One option

Additional criteria for approval of sanitary landfill facility permit to install applications.

Groundwater Monitoring Under a UIC Class VI Permit for a Carbon Storage Project

Geologic Sequestration. Regulatory and Legislative Updates

Rebel Production Company and Greg Cloud Gene Powell Investments REVISED EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Injection Wells for Liquid-Waste Disposal. Long-term reliability and environmental protection

SECTION SIX. Water Quality. Water Quality. Section 6

Desalination Concentrate Disposal Using Injection Wells: Technical Challenges

Transcription:

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE) Presented by Richard Brown Subsurface Technology, Inc.

INTRODUCTION Continued population growth and relocation, combined with changing climate conditions, will result in: Increased need for reliable, clean, safe sources of groundwater; and Greater demand for liquid waste management

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION Underground injection and sequestration has proved to be a safe and effective method for permanent disposal of industrial, municipal, and petroleum produced liquid wastes Emerging uses of permanent underground injection and sequestration include: - Anthropogenic CO2 geologic sequestration - Disposal of reject from groundwater desalination plants Emerging uses of cyclical underground injection and sequestration include: - Natural gas storage and recovery - Aquifer storage and recovery - Compressed air energy storage

UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS Class I Industrial and municipal liquid waste disposal Class II Saltwater disposal, enhanced oil recovery, and hydrocarbon storage Class III Solution mining (salt, sulphur, uranium) Class IV Banned, limited use with regulatory approval Class V Wells not included in Classes I through IV Class VI CO2 geologic sequestration (proposed)

CLASS I INJECTION WELLS Industrial (hazardous and non-hazardous) and municipal liquid waste disposal Approximately 550 Class I injection wells currently operating in the United States Most Class I wells located in the Gulf Coast and Great Lakes regions

CLASS II INJECTION WELLS Salt water disposal, enhanced oil recovery, and hydrocarbon storage Approximately 145,000 Class II injection wells currently operating in the United States Class II salt water disposal wells and enhanced oil recovery operations located in oil and gas producing regions of the Unites States Inject approximately 2 BILLION gallons per day (over 700 BILLION gallons per year)

CLASS III INJECTION WELLS Solution mining (salt, sulphur, uranium) Approximately 18,500 Class III injection wells currently operating in the United States

CLASS IV INJECTION WELLS Class of injection wells used to inject above a USDW USEPA Banned Class IV wells in 1984 Class IV Wells can only be used in conjunction with regulatory authorized groundwater cleanup action Currently approximately 32 waste cleanup sites using Class IV wells

CLASS V INJECTION WELLS Wells not included in Class I through IV CO2 geologic sequestration test wells Aquifer storage and recovery wells

CLASS VI INJECTION WELLS (PROPOSED) Anthropogenic CO2 geologic sequestration Several ongoing DOE funded testing programs Geologic sequestration is nothing new! As with other classes of injection wells, Class VI injection well siting is critical element Most geologic basins being considered for CO2 geologic sequestration have available subsurface data to allow for evaluation of siting criteria

GROUNDWATER PROTECTION Groundwater protection associated with underground injection and sequestration is driven by stringent state and federal UIC regulatory programs UIC regulations were established specifically to protect groundwater

MULTI-LAYERED GROUNDWATER PROTECTION MEASURES BUILT INTO UIC REGULATORY PROGRAM I. Injection well siting criteria ( Site Evaluation/Permitting ) Area of review Groundwater susceptibility Defined injection zone Defined confining zone(s) Artificial penetrations Faulting Seismic activity Potential interactions with other injection wells Potential interactions with oil & gas or geothermal resources

AREA OF REVIEW Varies with injection well classification/regulatory agency Minimum Area of Review Radius: Class I: 2-mile or 2.5-mile Class II and III: 0.25-mile Class I hazardous wells modeled plume movement (10,000 years following injection period) Class VI wells modeled plume movement (set time frame or until plume movement ceases?)

GROUNDWATER SUSCEPTIBILITY Aquifer recharge area Sole source aquifer Area of groundwater concern Base USDW depth (<10,000 ppm TDS)

INJECTION ZONE AND CONFINING ZONE Depth (below land surface/below base of USDW) Continuity Injection zone injectivity and storage capacity Confining zone containment capability Geochemistry (waste stream interaction with injection zone and confining zone matrix)

ARTIFICIAL PENETRATIONS (POTENTIAL MAN MADE VERTICAL CONDUIT ) How many in Area of Review? Location Depth Casing program Cementing program Plugging and abandonment method

FAULTING (POTENTIAL NATURAL VERTICAL CONDUIT ) Are faults present in Area of Review? Do faults transect injection and/or confining zones? Does a potential vertical pathway exist?

SEISMIC ACTIVITY

INTERACTION WITH OTHER INJECTION WELLS Are there other injection wells in Area of Review? Are they injecting in similar subsurface depths? Are waste streams compatible? Formation pressure increase interaction?

INTERACTION WITH OIL & GAS AND GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES Oil & gas producing formations? Geopressured geothermal resources? Injection zone = non-oil & gas producing zone? (except Class II EOR)

MULTI-LAYERED GROUNDWATER PROTECTION MEASURES BUILT INTO UIC REGULATORY PROGRAM II. Injection well construction ( Site Development ) External protective casings cemented into place to isolate USDW Internal injection tubing and packer Waste stream compatibility analyses

MULTI-LAYERED GROUNDWATER PROTECTION MEASURES BUILT INTO UIC REGULATROY PROGRAM III. Injection well operation/monitoring ( Site Management ) Injection pressure and rate limitations Continuous monitoring programs (annulus, lowermost USDW, etc.) Periodic mechanical integrity testing Waste analysis program

MULTI-LAYERED GROUNDWATER PROTECTION MEASURES BUILT INTO UIC REGULATORY PROGRAM IV. Injection well closure requirements ( Site Closure ) Regulatory approved closure plan Documentation of closure procedures to regulatory agency, i.e., certified closure report Property deed restriction

MULTI-LAYERED GROUNDWATER PROTECTION MEASURES BUILT INTO UIC REGULATROY PROGRAM V. Post-injection monitoring requirements ( Post-Closure ) Injection zone residual pressure decline Plume movement Water quality (injection zone and any monitored zones) Discontinue after satisfactory demonstration to regulatory agency

MOVING FORWARD Emerging underground injection and sequestration applications: Anthropogenic CO2 geologic sequestration Reject from groundwater desalination plants Aquifer storage and recovery Compressed air energy storage Other potential applications?

CONCLUSIONS Underground injection and sequestration: An excellent method for permanent disposal of industrial, municipal and O&G produced liquid wastes; and captured CO2 if properly sited, operated, monitored and closed An excellent method for cyclical underground storage of gases (natural gas storage) and compressed air (compressed air energy storage) Will be a critical component to ensure continued availability of reliable, clean, safe groundwater for a growing population (aquifer storage and recovery and desalination plant reject disposal) Can be utilized for all these, and other, applications without endangering valuable groundwater resources