Demonstrating a Swedish Feeder Pig Production System in Iowa

Similar documents
Performance of a Swedish deep-bedded feeder pig production system in Iowa

Economics of Breeding, Gestating and Farrowing Hogs in Natural Pork Production; Financial Comparison

Confinement Sow Gestation and Boar Housing

Two-litter Outdoor Farrowing System Budget

Beef Cattle Feeding in a Deep Bedded Hoop Barn: A Preliminary Study

Author(s) First Name Middle Name Surname Role Joseph M. Zulovich Ph.D., P.E., Extension Assistant Professor, Commercial Agricultural Engineer

Cost of Organic Pork Production: A Seasonal Analysis and Needed Price Premium for Continuous Production

The Barn: New Building or Renovation? Murray Elliott, FGC Limited Steve Beadle, OMAFRA

19 A New Prefabricated 3,200 Sow Pig Unit and its Environmental Impact Assessment

World Pig Meat Production Welcome to Denmark 5.4 million people 16, 000 sq miles 62% farmed

Environmental Conditions in a Bedded Hoop Barn with Market Beef Cattle

Swine System Options for Iowa Swedish Deep- Bedded Group Nursing Systems for Feeder Pig Production

Construction Resource Use of Different Types and Scales of Swine Production Facilities

Feasibility of Hoop Structures for Market Swine in Iowa: Pig Performance, Pig

Exploring Sustainable Hog Production Methods for Missouri Farmers

Information about pig house interior: Sow housing

Review of Manitoba Guidelines for Estimating Costs of Production 2013 Name (optional):

5-Step Animal Welfare Rating Standards Program Application: PIG FARMS

The PigSAFE Project: Developing an alternative to the farrowing crate Final summary report October 2012

Swine Production Records

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

THE EFFECT OF WATER ON PIGS: PERFORMANCE OR WASTE

Economic Impacts from Increasing Pig Farrowing in Iowa

Recommendations to Estimate Swine Nutrient Production in the Phase 6 Watershed Model

Winter Farrowing in Greenhouse Project Results and Data Summary

Sustainable Meat Initiative for Dutch CBL Module 2 - Animal welfare. ENGLISH VERSION 1.0_JAN14 Valid from: JANUARY 2014

RECENT PROGRESS IN SWINE BREEDING AND RAISING TECHNOLOGIES

CONSTRUCTION RESOURCE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT TYPES

Project aims. My aims were:

Pastured Pork Production Standards and Certification Form

Highlighting New & Innovative Technology from Around the Globe

AA22 Animal Science II Unit C Animal Management

Turnkey buildings. for the Pig and Poultry sector

Swine Housing in Cover-All Buildings

DESIGN SUPPLY BUILD. Pig Equipment Specialist Supplier. Company and Product Presentation. By Clifford Richardson, M.D. Mobile

DRAFT REPORT. November Tim Sexton, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA

THE EFFICACY OF VIUSID VET ON SWINE PRODUCTION IN VIETNAM

Farmer Skill & Knowledge Checklist: Swine Production

Sponsors Allen D. Leman Swine Conference

Market Forces. Sharpen the saw concepts, resources & issues. Market Forces. Market Forces

Alterna(ve swine housing and produc(on: Lessons from Iowa and beyond

Corral Systems for Handling and Sorting Hogs

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Born in Canada and Raised in the USA

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Production Performance & Costs

Economics of Finishing Pigs in Hoop Structures and Confinement: A Summer Group under Different Space Restrictions

Livestock Buildings LESTERBUILDINGS.COM ' x 130' x 14' Beef Open Front Marshall, WI

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

UNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS

04/11 14/10 23/09 02/09 12/08 22/07 01/07 10/06 20/05 29/04 08/04 18/03

What is a Mono-Slope Barn?

Overview. About Me. Why Confinement? Types of Confinements. Spacing Needs. Facility and Ventilation Concerns. Final Thoughts

COREPIG. Prevention of selected diseases and parasites in organic pig herds - by means of a HACCP based management and surveillance programme

Recommended dimensions and details for building PigSAFE pens (November 2010) The PigSAFE Project: Developing an alternative to the farrowing crate

Pigs Lecture 1 ANS 101 / VET

Floor systems. for energetic sows and healthy piglets

Cattle Comfort Reducing Heat and Cold Stress

25 Years of Swine Research

Food Defense Assignment Due: Name:

costs and returns guide for hogs in virginia

Peter J. Lammers 301A Kildee Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA Ames, IA

Farrowing Systems for the Sow and her Piglets

Guidelines for Estimating. Swine Farrow-Finish Costs 2012 in Manitoba

Improving Sow Lifetime Performance by Focusing on Longevity PIC

Manure Production and Management Record Keeping Forms

Agricultural Science Past Exam Questions Animal Production Higher Level

SKIOLD pig farm projects

Together with our clients this is the basis for a successfull project

5-Step Animal Welfare Rating Program Audit Prep Tool Pigs

Hog manure plus mortalities equals compost Written by Tony Kryzanowski. The Biovator: primarily a long, insulated galvanized vessel.

CAIP Investment Area Guidelines: SMALL ANIMAL (2017)

October 1998 ARPR 98-03

Decking for Nursery Pigs

Biofiltration is. The average odor. Treating Odor Emissions from Buildings Biofilters

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Pastured Pork Production. Tim Holmes Director of Compliance A Greener World

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Committee on Budget and Finance ******************************************************************************

Enhance Air Quality for the Calf. David W. Kammel BSE- UW-Madison

Managing Large Group Grow Finisher Pigs

How to Write a. (519)

Challenges and Emerging Needs for the Next Generation of Swine Production Facilities

Surface Tempera ture Distrib ution of Commercia l Electrical Heat Mats for Farrowing Creep Heating

Modeling Heat Mat Operation for Piglet Creep Heating

Future Animal Care Rules: Lessons from the 2013 EU Animal Care Study Tour

your source for innovative solutions

TRAINING COURSE ON ANIMAL WELFARE CONCERNING FARMING OF PIGS

Electric and Thermal Energy Consumption in Commercial Swine Facilities

Farmstead with Hog Production Buildings

into alternative hog production. The website will offer information through a collection

BIOFILTRATION - ADAPTATION TO LIVESTOCK FACILITIES

TEAM Electronic sow feeding

Tab 1a. Pigs Data Entry and Assumptions (April 26, 2018)

How. are. raised. A guide offering clarity on the facts of pork production

CASE STUDIES USING THE OUTDOOR PIG MODEL IN OVERSEER

MARGINS EVERY PRODUCER SHOULD HAVE 2017 I.S.U. Swine Day. June 28, 2017

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

Composting for Routine Disposal of Poultry and Livestock Mortalities

Avoiding Landmines Converting to Loose Sow Housing

Transcription:

Demonstrating a Swedish Feeder Pig Production System in Iowa M. S. Honeyman, associate professor of animal science D. Kent, livestock research specialist ASL-R1390 Summary and Implications At the Iowa State University (ISU) Armstrong Farm in southwest Iowa, a Swedish feeder pig production system is being demonstrated. The Swedish system relies on bedding, simple buildings, intensive management, and keen husbandry for success. Gestation and breeding phases are housed in a hooped structure with individual feeding stalls. Large round bales of cornstalks are used for the deep bedded areas where the sows live in groups. A 1950s style hog house has been remodeled for farrowing, group lactation, and nursery. Farrowing cubicles with rollers and oat straw bedding are used. The hog house has been remodeled with ÒbreathableÓ ceiling and exhaust fans. Oat straw is used for bedding. Two groups of Yorkshire x Landrace sows bred to Hampshire boars will produce feeder pigs in the system. Performance of the system will be documented. Introduction In a northern climate and under restrictive animal welfare laws and a strict ban on the use of subtherapeutic antibiotics, Swedish pig farmers have developed a management-intensive system of pig production that relies on straw, the pigsõ natural behavior, group housing dynamics, and keen husbandry skills. In Sweden, the sows perform well, producing large litters of healthy pigs. The housing is simple and versatile. Farrowing and gestating crates are not used. Called ÒVŠstgštmodellenÓ after the region in western Sweden where it was developed by farmers during the 1980s, the system now is successfully used on approximately 100 farms in Sweden. The system is designed to produce 50 to 60 lb. feeder pigs for feeding in more conventional European-style finishing units. One version features deep-bedding, group-housed gestating sows, farrowing cubicles, and group lactation. Because of the success of the deep-bedded Swedish system and because of the dramatic contrast it represents in comparison to conventional U.S. swine production (table 1), this project was designed to: 1) demonstrate the deep-bedded Swedish system in Iowa, and 2) identify key factors of the Swedish system which are critical to its success when practiced under U.S. conditions, e.g, climate, markets, social norms, management, breeding stock, etc. Materials and Methods Description of the system The Swedish system demonstrated is known as the Thorstensson version of VŠstgštmodellen as documented by Algers (1991), Halverson (1991a, 1991b, 1994), and Honeyman (1995). The system is described as follows (adapted from Honeyman, 1995). The system (Figure 1) uses group housing of sows in deep straw during breeding and gestation. During gestation the sows are fed daily in individual feeding stalls with rear gates that the farmer closes after the sows have entered the stalls. The stalls also have front access gates that open into the feeding alley. The stalls offer the advantages of individual stalls: individual feeding, control of the sow for vaccinations and artificial insemination, and easy sorting of sows. The group housing helps stimulate estrus and reduce stress on the sows by allowing them to live in groups, which they prefer. Fighting is minimized by using feeding stalls and introducing new sows to the groups at optimum times, such as at farrowing. Conception rates are high, sow longevity is long, and sow mortality and culling rates are low. The producer keeps exact records of breeding. The pregnant sows are moved from the gestation area to a lactation room as a group. Pregnant gilts are added to the group at this time. Temporary farrowing cubicles are set up in the lactation room. The cubicles are removed when the pigs are about two weeks old. The lactation rooms are large and quiet. They are approximately square, with a solid concrete floor, a large access door for delivering straw (usually large round bales) and removing manure, automatic waterers, and a raised feeding platform. Usually no supplemental heat is used in the rooms. Animal heat, bedding pack heat, and the straw bedding provide a good environment for the pigs. While the pigs are from two to five weeks of age, they and the sows occupy the lactation rooms. During this time the sows are allowed free access to feed and water and the pigs begin consuming feed, often with the sows. Pig mortality is low, about 6% (Halverson, 1991a). Straw is added often, usually daily, when the pigs are inspected. Within the group the pigsõ age varies by only 3 to 5 days. At nursing, the sows position themselves around the room. Some cross-suckling occurs, but it is not a problem because of uniform pig age and size. The quiet rooms allow for good sow-pig communication. Many producers grind off the pigsõ needle teeth to minimize fighting injuries. Sow lactation problems (e.g., mastitis, metritis, and agalactia) are almost nonexistent, probably because the sow has plenty of exercise and consumes some straw as a fiber source,

and because stress is low. The sowõs feed intake and milk output are high, which results in rapid pig growth. At five or six weeks of age the pigs are weaned by moving the sows back to the breeding/gestation area. Weaning stress is minimized by removing the sows rather than the pigs. The piglets are fed in the lactation rooms as a group until about 55 lb. or 14 weeks of age, when they are moved to a finishing unit, which is usually at a different location. Results and Discussion Replicating the Swedish system in Iowa Duplicating the Swedish system in Iowa presented several challenges. The ISU Armstrong Research and Demonstration Farm, Lewis, Iowa (Pottawattamie County), was selected as the site for the demonstration. The farm was new to the ISU farm system in 1993 and is owned by the Wallace Foundation for Rural Research and Development, a non-profit group interested in sustainable agriculture. In addition the farm is located in southwest Iowa where summer temperatures and humidity should be extreme for Iowa and test the system for heat effects. Breeding and gestation phases are housed in a hooped structure (37 ft. x 70 ft.). The hooped structure is oriented north-south and consists of 6-ft. wooden side walls and an arched tubular frame covered by a polyethylene cover or tarp. The structure is marketed by Cover-All, 1 Clarinda, Iowa, and was erected by the farm staff during fall 1995. In Sweden, a variety of naturallyventilated buildings, including old barns, are used for breeding and gestation; thus the new hooped structure seemed to be an analogous choice. The floor plan (Figure 2) followed Swedish concepts of lockable feeding stalls with front access doors, a feeding and service alley, a deep bedded area for the group-housed sows, bedded boar pens nearby and pen partitions that could be raised and lowered to match the height of the bedding pack. The feeding stalls and energy-free waterers were placed on an 18-in. concrete platform (Figure 3). A wooden observation deck was built along the outside of the north end of the structure to accommodate visitors. All floor areas of the hooped structure are concrete. Access for adding bedding is from the south end. Large round bales of cornstalks are used for bedding. Swedish guidelines for bedded space of 27 sq. ft. per gestating sow were followed. The structure is naturally ventilated and drippers were installed over the feeding stalls. Yorkshire x Landrace F 1 gilts (17 head) and two Hampshire boars arrived in the gestation unit during March 1996. Breeding began on May 14, 1996, and 14 gilts were bred using natural service (hand mating) and 1 Mention of company or product names is for presentation clarity, and does not imply endorsement by the authors or Iowa State University; nor exclusion of any other products that may also be suitable for application. artificial insemination (AI). Most pig farms in Sweden use Yorkshire x Landrace boars on Hampshire sows. The second group of gilts (13 head) arrived in June 1996. Fifteen gilts were bred beginning Aug. 1, 1996, using natural service and AI. The first group of gilts were due to start farrowing Sept. 5, 1996. The second group was due to farrow Nov. 24, 1996. The breeding/gestation unit worked well. The cornstalk big round bales for bedding were easy to use and were unraveled by the gilts into absorbent bedding. The gilts were fed daily in the feeding stalls. The summer of 1996 was generally mild. Ventilation and sow comfort was adequate at all times. The drippers were used occasionally. The gilts were generally quiet and content. An existing 1950s style hog house (32 ft. x 48 ft.) was retrofitted for farrowing and nursery. Remodeling started in the fall of 1995 and was completed in the summer of 1996. The building was in overall good condition. The interior walls and roof were insulated with 6 in. of fiberglass insulation. The walls were lined with 3/8 in. plastic sheets. Following Swedish guidelines, a ÒbreathableÓ ceiling for the air inlet and variable speed exhaust fans were installed. The Swedish system uses this style of ventilation system to minimize drafts and noise in the lactation room. The building is oriented east-west with an insulated overhead door on the west. On the east end an observation room was constructed with viewing windows. A concrete feeding platform 12 in. high was constructed below the windows inside the farrowing room. The waterer is in the southwest corner above a floor drain. The existing concrete floor was used. Twelve farrowing cubicles 6 ft. x 8 ft. were built of plywood and the openings equipped with 3 in. PVC rollers (about 15-16 in. above the floor) to help keep the pigs in the cubicles. The entire room was bedded with oat straw. The first group of gilts was moved to the farrowing unit on Aug. 30, 1996. Farrowing was occurring at the time this article was being written. When the pigs are approximately two weeks of age (about Sept. 15), the cubicles will be removed and group lactation will begin. Weaning is scheduled for Oct. 10, 1996, and the pigs will be moved to finishing on Nov. 11. Results of the farrowings will be reported next year. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and encouragement of the following: The Wallace Foundation for Rural Research and Development, the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture; the staff at the ISU Armstrong Farm; Marlene Halverson, Northfield, MN; Shawn Shouse, ISU Extension agricultural engineer; U.S. Dept. of Agriculture North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (SARE); Dan and Lorna Wilson,

Paullina, IA; Cain Farms/Donn Damos, Altona, IL; the Swedish American Foundation, New York, NY; Earl Cain, Chariton, IA; Cover-All, Clarinda, IA; Ritchie Industries, Conrad, IA; and Lauren Christian and Dennis Shannon, ISU, Ames, IA. References Algers, B. 1991. Group housing of farrowing sows, health aspects of a new system. Proceedings Seventh International Congress on Animal Hygiene, Leipzig, Germany. pp. 851-857. Halverson, M. 1991a. Farm animal welfare: crisis or opportunity for agriculture? Staff paper 91-1. Dept. of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul. 68 pp. Halverson, M. 1991b. Using nature as both mentor and model: Animal welfare research and development in sustainable swine production. Staff paper P 91-26. Dept. of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul. 44 pp. Halverson, M. 1994. Whole-hog housing. The New Farm 16(2):51-54,62. Honeyman, M.S. 1995. VŠstgštmodellen SwedenÕs sustainable alternative for pig production. American Journal Alternative Agriculture. 10(3)129-132. Figure 1. Flow diagram of Thorstensson version of Swedish pig production. (Honeyman, 1995).

Table 1. A simple comparison of Swedish deep-bedded and conventional U.S. confinement pig raising systems. Sweden U.S. Sub therapeutic antibiotics no yes Swine buildings simple easily modified specialized single purpose Potential production level high high Equipment almost none extensive Gestation Farrowing group with straw and feeding stalls free-choice cubicles with straw individual stalls on slatted floors raised farrowing stall with wire mesh flooring Lactation group with straw raised farrowing stall with wire mesh flooring Nursery Weaning large groups in pen with straw sows removed, pigs stay in bedded room controlled environment, small groups on slatted floors pigs moved to hot nursery Tail docking no yes Cross-fostering yes, by the pigs yes, by the manager Floors solid concrete with straw slats and liquid manure pits Manure solid liquid Bedding (straw) yes no Pig behavior important not as important

Figure 2. Gestation-breeding hooped structure plan view at ISU Armstrong Research Farm, Lewis, IA. Figure 3. Gestation-breeding hooped structure end view at ISU Armstrong Research Farm, Lewis, IA.