Early Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective

Similar documents
Quality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review

How to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs. Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER

Strategies for IND Filing Success: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls

CGMP Requirements for Investigational Products

Industry Perspective on Manufacturing in Early Development

CMC Considerations for 505(b)(2) Applications. Monica Cooper, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/OPS/ONDQA AAPS Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.

Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C.

Risk Management in Drug Product Manufacturing with Emphasis on Batch Documentation/Execution

Setting Specifications for Biotech Products

Introduction to CMC Regulatory Affairs

Guidance for Industry

Phase Appropriate GMPs for IMPs. Presented by: Karen S. Ginsbury For: IFF, October 31, Nov 02, 2017

An Overview of IQ s Position Paper: Early Development GMPs for Small-Molecule Specifications

Dr. Earl Dye CMC/GMP Considerations for Expedited Development Programs

IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS

Derivation and Justification of Safety Thresholds

Investigational New Drug Application

Method Validation Studies How GLP Interacts With Guidance Documents

Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development IQ Workshop, Feb 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C.

US FDA: CMC Issues for INDs

FDA S GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY ANDAS: STABILITY TESTING OF DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

Examples of regulatory expectations for analytical characterization and testing

ICH Topic Q 3 B Impurities in New Medicinal Products

STABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

Drug Development - Points to Consider

Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing A Regulatory Perspective

Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Equivalence Requirements

Guidance for Industry

Accelerating Therapeutic Development through a look at current Regulatory Applications A Non-Clinical Perspective

DECISION TREE #1: ESTABLISHING ACCEPTANCE CRITERION FOR A SPECIFIED IMPURITY IN A NEW DRUG SUBSTANCE

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR STABILITY

Documentation requirements for an initial consultation

GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY ON FIXED DOSE COMBINATIONS (FDCs)

Validation/Verification of Test Methods An FDA Perspective. Laure H. Kairawicz, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Expert Witness

ICH Topic M 4 Q Location issues for Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Quality Questions and Answers

Future of Question-based Review and Regulatory Submissions

GPhA Fall Technical Conference Nov 2-5, 2015 Bethesda, MD ICH M7 Guidance Overview and Current FDA Perspectives

Mitigating Commercial Risks in Continuous Manufacturing Drug Product

Supplies and Reagents

Consultation by a notified body on an ancillary medicinal substance integrated in a medical device

Conducting Successful pre-ind Meetings to Reach FDA Concurrence for Sound 505(b)(2) Development

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

Regulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA

How do you know the drug you are using is safe and effective?

Supplies and Reagents

Regulatory perspective on setting clinically relevant specifications. Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Team Leader Office of Biotechnology Products

Expanded Access and the Individual Patient IND

A Regulator s Perspective on Risk Based and Phase Appropriate Comparability. Marjorie Shapiro, Ph.D. Division of Monoclonal Antibodies OBP, CDER,FDA

Guidance for Industry

Preparing the CMC section of IMPD for biological/biotechnology derived substances

Guidelines: c. Providing the investigational drug for the requested use will not interfere with the initiation, conduct, or completion of clinical

Balancing the time, cost and risk of drug development. Christina Gustafsson, PhD Pharm, Formulation Scientist at Pharmaceutical Development, APL

Changes to a Potency Bioassay for Biotechnology Products: a Regulatory Perspective Kathleen A. Clouse, Ph.D., Director Division of Monoclonal Antibodi

Regulatory Perspective on Analytical Method Validation During Product Development

2017 AAM CMC Workshop

CHECKLIST FOR VARIATIONS APPLICATIONS FOR MEDICINES

New Drug Product Impurities

Complexity of Retention Samples Selection in non-traditional Bioequivalence studies

Structure and content of an IMPD. What is required for first into man trial?

1. Checklist for Grant of permission to manufacture/import of Bulk Drug already approved in the country

Question-based Review (QbR)

Workshop Summaries. Discussions of the Global Stability Workshop are summarized for the following topics:

The Application of Pharmaceutical cgmp to Live Bacterial Products. James Harris Business Development Manager


The Right Prescription for Working with Investigational Drug Service at BMC

ICH Q3D RISK ASSESSMENT: REGULATORY SUCCESS AND STANDARDIZED METHODOLOGY FOR NEW FILINGS WILLIAM STEVENS- MERCK & CO., INC.

Commonly Seen Drug Product Related Quality Deficiencies

Docket #: FDA-2018-D-3268

Guideline on the Requirements for Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials

Oral Dosage Formulation Development

How to put together an IND application

Further Stability Considerations

Cleaning and Cleaning Validation of API Plant and Equipment

Clinical trial applications in the EU and US

Recent experience in scientific advice and marketing authorisations

Office for Human Subject Protection. University of Rochester

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use

Evolution of Quality Assessments Recent Trends in FDA Queries. Mike Saleh, Pfizer Inc.

Key-points of Post approval variation in Korea

Regulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017

Synthesis to Clinic 14 C studies in man a Chemistry. Stephen Lewinton Managing Director Chemistry & Metabolism Feb 2013

Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing CBER Perspective

Established Conditions: Reportable CMC Changes for Approved Drug and Biologic Products Guidance for Industry

Role of Academic Investigators in Drug Development

Subpart H [Reserved] Subpart I Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs for Treatment. 21 CFR Ch. I ( Edition)

CMC Writing for IND Applications. David H. McKenna, Jr., M.D. University of Minnesota PACT Web Seminar II July 14, 2005

DMTC Technology Readiness Levels Guideline

Device research sponsors, whether companies or investigators, are held responsible for meeting the same regulations.

3.1. Overall Principal Investigator (PI), who holds the IDE and/or is the Sponsor

Roadmap of stability studies for Biosimilarproduct development. Head Biotech Stelis Biopharma

Impurities from degradation of Drug Substances

How to ensure the Stability of Products in Clinical Trials an Industry Perspective. Volker Schnaible

Formulation Development & CTM Manufacturing Services

IACUC Policy 14: Use of Non-Pharmaceutical Grade Compound in Animal Studies

Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications: FDA Perspective and Initiatives

DEVELOPMENT PHARMACEUTICS AND PROCESS VALIDATION

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL OR MICROBIOLOGICAL TESTS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

CGMP for Phase 1 INDs

Stability Report. Stability profile of. BIWG 98 SE tablets 40 mg SR of 133. This stability report comprises 133 pages.

Regula'on of Contracep'ves

Transcription:

Early Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective IQ Workshop, Feb. 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C. Ramesh Sood, Ph.D. Division Director (Acting) Office of New Drug Quality Assessment 1

Outline Purpose of an IND Regulatory requirements for stability information Stability expectations at early IND stage Guidance recommendations General observations from submitted INDs Some examples Points for discussion during breakout sessions 2

Purpose of an IND IND required when an investigator intends to conduct a clinical investigation with an investigational product FDA conducts a review of the IND contents and has 30- days to determine if the study is safe to proceed Information that needs to be submitted depends upon; Novelty of the drug Previous human experience Known or suspected risks Developmental phase 3

Purpose of an IND The FDA s review focus is; To assure the safety and rights of the subjects in phase 1 To help assure that the quality of the scientific evaluation is adequate to permit an evaluation of the drugs effectiveness and safety during phase 2/3 The information submitted in the IND should be enough for the FDA to meet these objectives. 4

Stability requirements for INDs CFR 312.23 (a)(7)(iv)(a):.and information sufficient to support stability of the drug substance during the toxicological studies and the planned clinical studies CFR 312.23 (a)(7)(iv)(b): and information sufficient to assure the product s stability during the planned clinical studies 5

Data recommended 21 CFR 312.23(a)(7)(ii): stability data are required in all phases of the IND to demonstrate that the drug substance and drug product are within acceptable chemical and physical limits for the planned duration of the proposed clinical investigation The amount of data will depend upon the duration of the proposed clinical study 6

What does it mean Stability information to support stability of DS during toxicological studies Stability information to assure the product s stability during planned clinical studies All phases of INDs need to contain DS and DP stability data that assures products acceptable quality during the proposed clinical studies 7

Purpose of stability studies During early investigational studies DS stability data from toxicological batches provide impurity profile of the batches qualified during non-clinical toxicological studies Provides information about the inherent stability of DS and its suitability for use in making DP 8

Purpose of stability studies The DP stability data should provide information about the stability behavior of the clinical batches The stability information should provide assurance that the quality, purity and safety of the investigational product is acceptable throughout the clinical trial period 9

Expiration dating period Investigational products are exempt from having an expiration dating period (CFR 211.137 (g) new drug products for investigational use are exempt from the requirements of this section provided that they meet appropriate standards or specifications as demonstrated by stability studies during their use in clinical investigations Expiration information needed for the reconstituted drug products where new drug product for investigational use are to be reconstituted at the time of dispensing, their labeling shall bear expiration information for the reconstituted drug product 10

Data recommended FDA guidance on phase 1 studies states A brief description of the stability study and test methods used to monitor the stability of the product packaged in the proposed container/closure system and storage conditions Preliminary tabular data based on representative material http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecompli anceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm071597.p df 11

Data recommended contd. FDA recommendations for phase 2 studies Provide a list of tests, analytical procedures, acceptance criteria, time points for each test, storage conditions, and duration of study that covers the trial duration Available stability data from phase 1 study that were not reported previously (amendment) Data from phase 2 clinical material as data become available (annual report) Encourages early performance of DS stress studies http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregul atoryinformation/guidances/ucm070567.pdf 12

General observations from submitted INDs For early phase studies Appropriate stability attributes are monitored on storage (e.g., assay, impurities, sterility, in vitro drug release) Typically contains long-term and accelerated storage stability data for DS and DP clinical batches Often have 1-3 month of data on clinical DP and DS batches At times may have additional data on developmental batches Sometimes data for closely related developmental DP batch with commitment to pursue concurrent stability studies on DP clinical batch Data from DS batches for stable molecules with commitment to follow DP stability concurrent to the clinical studies for simple drug products (powder in bottle or powder in capsule) with proper justification 13

General observations from submitted INDs For early phase studies Data to support in-use period for the DP that involve extemporaneous reconstitution or dilution of DS alone or DP, mixing of DP with foods prior to clinical use. Appropriate stability data when the FDA approved drug product is manipulated prior to its use in clinical studies Appropriate stability data when an approved drug is used as comparator after manipulation by the sponsor Stability information for placebo if changes in physical characteristics or degradation is suspected (appearance, hardness, microbial purity of meter-dose container) No stability data can be a cause of concern 14

Potential stability concerns Scenario 1: Non formulated API-in-bottle or APIin-capsule drug product No DS stability data, clinical or representative batch No DP stability data, clinical or representative batch Proposal to monitor stability of clinical DP batch 15

Potential stability concerns Scenario 2: Formulated product Acceptable DS stability data No clinical or representative DP stability data No API-excipient compatibility data Proposal to monitor stability of clinical supplies 16

Reviewer s concerns Is the provided stability data sufficient to ensure stability and quality of drug substance and drug product during the clinical evaluation period? If data is from representative batches, are the representative batches really representative of clinical batches? What is the plan for monitoring the stability of GMP clinical batches? Is there a rationale to support the proposed plan for monitoring stability of clinical supplies when needed? 17

Points to be discussed in the breakout sessions What are the considerations for leveraging accelerated stability data form drug substance and drug product developmental batches to support an initial IND? What are the considerations for leveraging real-time stability data from developmental drug substance and drug product batches to support an initial IND? What are the considerations to ensure the stability and safety of clinical batches during the proposed clinical study duration? 18

Available resources FDA Guidance for industry: Content and format of investigational new drug applications (INDs) for phase 1 studies of drugs, including well characterized, therapeutic, biotechnologyderived products (1995) FDA Guidance for industry: INDs for phase 2 and phase 3 studies. Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls information (2002) 19

Thank You!! Questions? NewDrugCMC@fda.hhs.gov 20