Quality of FLOSS development Yes, OMM can!

Similar documents
Trust and Quality on FLOSS

Research Article Assessing the Open Source Development Processes Using OMM

CMMI for Acquisition Quick Reference

CMMI-DEV V1.3 CMMI for Development Version 1.3 Quick Reference Guide

A Global Overview of The Structure

CMMI for Technical Staff

CMMI for Services Quick Reference

Leveraging Your Service Quality Using ITIL V3, ISO and CMMI-SVC. Monday Half-Day Tutorial

7. Model based software architecture

CMMI V2.0 MODEL AT-A-GLANCE. Including the following views: Development Services Supplier Management. CMMI V2.0 outline BOOKLET FOR print.

How to Assure your Subcontractors Quality with Cross Constellations and Multi Models Inspiration Continues Process Improvement Initiatives

Software Process Assessment

DORNERWORKS QUALITY SYSTEM

CMMI for Services (CMMI -SVC) Process Areas

The Rational Unified Process and the Capability Maturity Model Integrated Systems/Software Engineering

Systems Engineering Side of CMMI

Using Lean Six Sigma to Accelerate CMMI Implementation

CMMI Level 2 for Practitioners: A Focused Course for Your Level 2 Efforts

Managing a Project and Keeping Sane While Wrestling Elegantly With PMBOK, Scrum and CMMI (Together or Any Combination)

This resource is associated with the following paper: Assessing the maturity of software testing services using CMMI-SVC: an industrial case study

Software Quality Engineering Courses Offered by The Westfall Team

Chapter 26 Process improvement

Software Quality Engineering Courses Offered by The Westfall Team

1.0 PART THREE: Work Plan and IV&V Methodology

Comparing Scrum And CMMI

TOGAF 9.1. About Edureka

Lecture 2: Software Quality Factors, Models and Standards. Software Quality Assurance (INSE 6260/4-UU) Winter 2016

Overview of Maintenance. CPRE 416-Software Evolution and Maintenance-Lecture 3

9/24/2011 Sof o tw t a w re e P roc o e c s e s s s Mo M d o e d l e s l 1 Wh W a h t t i s i s a Pr P oc o ess s 2 1

IPM Systems Engineering EV Practitioners Forum August 25, 2017

8. CMMI Standards and Certifications

Business Architecture Fundamentals

Software technology 3. Process improvement models. BSc Course Dr. Katalin Balla

USAF Software Technology Support Center (STSC) STSC SPI Help Desk COM , DSN

DEVOPS. Know about DevOps.

Quest 2015 Webinar Series:

Exam questions- examples

WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY Information Technology - Independent Verification and Validation RFP No IVV-B

CMMI-SVC V1.3 CMMI for Services Version 1.3 Quick Reference Guide

Services Description. Transformation and Plan Services. Business Transformation and Plan Services

Project Quality Management

Program Lifecycle Methodology Version 1.7

Patricia A Eglin David Consulting Group

CMMI FOR SERVICES, THE PREFERRED CONSTELLATION WITHIN THE SOFTWARE TESTING FUNCTION OF A SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION

Integrated Measurements for CMMI

Project Planning and Management (PPM) V2.0. WBS Dictionary

Boost Your Skills with On-Site Courses Tailored to Your Needs

CMMI for Acquisition (CMMI-ACQ) Primer, Version 1.2

Project Management Framework with reference to PMBOK (PMI) July 01, 2009

Risk Management Beyond CMMI Level 5

Software Quality Assurance Framework (SQA) Yujuan Dou 窦玉娟 2008/11/28

CMMI for Acquisition (CMMI-ACQ) Primer, Version 1.2

This document describes the overall software development process of microcontroller software during all phases of the Company Name product life cycle.

Co-founder and Managing Director of RADTAC Specialist in Agile and Iterative approaches since mid 80s Agile Alliance Founder Member in 2002

Engineering. CMMI for Development V.1.2 Module 3. M03/Engineering/v1.2

Using an IEC Certified RTOS Kernel for Safety-Critical Systems

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Service Manager (Applications) Information Services (IS)

V&V = the Verification and Validation of Deliverables

CMMI Maturity Level 2 A Foundation for Large-Scale Agile Development. Jonathan Dean, Steve Handy. European SEPG 2010 Porto Portugal

Software Engineering

Staged Representation Considered Harmful?

Aldo Dagnino. ABB Corporate Research Industrial Software Systems. Raleigh, NC

MDICx Q4 Quarterly update on the CDRH Case for Quality Voluntary Medical Device Manufacturing and Product Quality Pilot Program

Maureen Weverka & Kathy Burnham Mutual of Omaha. November 9, Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

Advantages and Disadvantages of. Independent Tests. Advantages. Disadvantages

ADM The Architecture Development Method

Accelerate Business Success with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure

CC and CMMI. An Approach to Integrate CC with Development

MTAT Software Engineering Management

EUROPEAN LOCATION SERVICES VISION AND STRATEGY. Securing the long-term future of authoritative geospatial information and services

Federal Segment Architecture Methodology Overview

DoD Systems Engineering and CMMI

Service Manager (Workplace Computing) Information Services (IS)

Benchmarking Functional Verification by Mike Bartley and Mike Benjamin, Test and Verification Solutions

Creating opportunities. Changing lives.

An Holistic model to evaluate the Information Security Health State. Prof. Solange Ghernaouti-Hélie; Igli Tashi

Attachment J-4 Milestone Acceptance Criteria and Payment Schedule

Update Observations of the Relationships between CMMI and ISO 9001:2000

At the Heart of Assured Quality Management

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (RTD)

Practical Application of the CMMI for Building a Strong Project Management Infrastructure

USING PILOTS TO ASSESS THE VALUE AND APPROACH OF CMMI IMPLEMENTATION. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)

Cloudy skies. How to bring clarity to your cloud platform in order to optimize your investment. September 2016

CMMI v1.1 for a Service-Oriented Organization. By Steve Hall, Jeff Ricketts, Diane Simpson 16 November 2005

Chapter 6. Software Quality Management & Estimation

Selecting Software Development Life Cycles. Adapted from Chapter 4, Futrell

Project Engineering Support for the Site Construction Preparation and Coordination Activities. Technical Specification

Highlights of CMMI and SCAMPI 1.2 Changes

This chapter illustrates the evolutionary differences between

CSE 435 Software Engineering. Sept 14, 2015

IT Infrastructure Lead

Software Quality Factors

Do s Don ts and Pitfalls: Planning your first CMMI appraisal

Project Quality Management Training - Brochure

Digital & Technology Solutions Specialist Integrated Degree Apprenticeship (Level 7)

Review. The Radtac Key to Change

Your Partner for Building Change Management Capabilities

Exam 2012, Lecture Project Management

Integration Competency Center Deployment

Transcription:

Quality of FLOSS development Yes, OMM can! Presentation: Viviane Malheiros (USP - Serpro) 10 o. FISL/ Porto Alegre/June 24th, 2009

Topics The context QualiPSo project is... The OMM Overview Inside the OMM OMM for FLOSS integrators Summary More info 01/07/09 2

The context FLOSS (1) is not new concept but IT economic context is changing Economies are evolving from product orientation to service orientation FLOSS is a chance for industries to foster growth and increase competitiveness (1) Free Libre Open Source Software 01/07/09 3

The context Large perspectives A chance for enterprises & governments A chance for IT industries in Europe & emerging countries but still uncertainties Legal issues? Business models? Interoperability? Know how? Quality? Maturity? Industrialization? Support? 01/07/09 4

QualiPSo project is... A unique global alliance that facilitates the use of trusted low-cost, flexible open source software within industries and governments, fuelling innovation and competitiveness. The largest FLOSS project funded by the European Commission under its sixth framework program (FP6), as part of the Information Society Technologies (IST) initiative 18 founding members, across Europe, Brazil and China 01/07/09 5

Qualipso Competence Centers 01/07/09 6

Qualipso project - The mission IT IS ALL ABOUT TRUST! Trust cannot be claimed without being proved!!! To define and implement technologies, procedures and policies to leverage FLOSS development current practices to sound, well recognized and established industrial operations. 01/07/09 7

Qualipso project -The Challenges Dismiss the popular myths against FLOSS that prevent the industrial commitment Prove the quality of the FLOSS for the industry Industrial practices keeping the freshness and enthusiasm of FLOSS tradition 01/07/09 8

The Network of Competence Centres QualiPSo Competence Centers form a Network (federative model) sharing the same ethics, methods and tools Act locally but cooperate globally Provide expertise and a common set of services on a variety of topics related to quality Each Competence Center has its own legal model and be self-sustainable 07/01/09 9

Qualipso Project Structure 07/01/09 10

The OMM an overview 07/01/09 11

Trustworthy processes Objectives: Allow companies to use FLOSS to build their mainstream products and services Main results: Definition of the Open Maturity Model (OMM), a CMMI-like model for FLOSS to improve the trust in FLOSS software 01/07/09 12

What is OMM? Open Source Maturity Model (OMM) is a CMMI-like model for Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) It can be implemented in software organizations to enable FLOSS usage both in production and development of software products. It is organized as an evolutionary model, inspired on CMMI, but... Focusing on FLOSS development characteristics.

OMM The QualiPSo Open Maturity Model OMM is a process model for development by developers, and integration of FLOSS components by integrators. OMM is intended for use by individuals and development teams spread that may be spread across locations worldwide. Hence, the emphasis is on simplicity and ease of use. Being simple but organized as an evolutionary model, OMM can be just as useful for companies. This approach helps keep the model lean but still practical.

Who may benefit from OMM? OMM users FLOSS communities practitioners (developers, project managers, analysts, and testers). FLOSS communities practitioners can find guidance on what is required of them to conquer FLOSS integrators confidence. can make their products more attractive by knowing in advance how integrators might evaluate FLOSS products.

Who may benefit from OMM? OMM users FLOSS system integrators can find guidance on what to look for when considering to integrate a FLOSS project to their solution or develop a new one. FLOSS system integrators.

Who may benefit from OMM? OMM users OMM is appropriate for academic organizations and training centers on software development. As an open source model, it can serve as the basis for software engineering courses and courses in FLOSS development. FLOSS end users and instructors.

OMM Structure OMM structure It is divided in levels, each level building on and including the Trustworthy elements (TWE) at the lower level. Trustworthy elements (TWE) are close related to FLOSS development dynamic and core CMMI practices.

TWE Trustworthy Elements Trustworthy Elements (TWE) definition: A specific component or aspect of a software product that influences the belief and trust of the stakeholders in the overall quality of the software product, through the assessment of its development process.

TWE Trustworthy Elements TWEs included in OMM are from two different sources: 1) CMMI Process Areas 2) FLOSS-TWEs gathered from the survey of QualiPSo work package 6.1. TWEs are grouped into levels. Basic level The TWEs at the basic level are essential for developing and delivering a trustworthy (high quality) FLOSS component. Intermediate level Advanced level

The OMM Pyramid: TWEs in OMM Advanced Level Intermediate Level TST2, DSN2, RSKM, PI REP, RDMP PPQA, PMC, TST1, DSN1 STK, RASM, CONT PDOC Product Documentation STD Standards QTP Quality of Testing Plan LCS Licenses ENV Technical Environment DCFT # Commits and Bug Reports MST Maintainability and stability CM Configuration Management PP1 Project Planning Part 1 REQM Requirements REP Reputation RDMP Roadmap STK Stakeholders CONT Contribution from SW companies PPQA Quality Assurance PMC Project Monitoring and Control TST1 Test - Part 1 DSN 1 Design - Part 1 PP2 Project Planing Part 2 RASM Assessment by Third Part TST 2 Test - Part 2 PI Product Integration RSKM Risk Management DSN Design Part 2 Basic Level PDOC, STD, QTP, CM, PP, REQM LCS, ENV, MST DFCT,

Under construction Inside OMM 07/01/09 22

OMM Structure Level Structure of the OMM-Model TWE 1... TWE n Legend : contains Constructing elements of the OMM Practice n.1... Practice n.m Relevant for - Companies - FLOSS communities Metric 1 f(x)... Metric n f(x)

OMM Structure TWE TEX: Example of TWE Relevant for Practice companies FLOSS comm P1 Example of Practice 1 Mandatory Recommended P2 Create user documentation Mandatory Mandatory P3 Create technical documentation (for troubleshooting) Mandatory Mandatory P4 Example of practice 4 Mandatory Not important

PDOC - Product Documentation Main idea: Provide high quality documentation and keep the documentation updated. TWE PDOC: Product Documentatio n Practice P1 Document the product design / architecture (understandable) companies Mandatory Relevant for FLOSS comm Mandatory P2 Create user documentation Mandatory Mandatory P3 Create technical documentation (for troubleshooting) Mandatory Mandatory P4 Keep the documentation updated Mandatory Mandatory Basic Level Example: Under construction

STD - Standards Main idea: Use of Established and Widespread Standards. Basic Level

Quality of Test Plan Main idea: Plan for testing. e.g.: how tests will be carried out, tools to be used, test environment, testing responsibilities, how test results will be analyzed, defects corrected and open issues handled. Basic Level

ENV: Environment Main idea: Establish a technical environment. Important factors influencing the trust: Tools, operating systems, programming languages and environments used by FLOSS communities Basic Level

DCFT - Number of Commits and Bug Reports Main idea: The number of commits and bug reports are indicators of FLOSS product popularity and indicate that the product is being actively developed and supported, and that further change requests and bug reports will be undertaken. Basic Level

MST - Maintainability and stability Main idea: A potential integrator is more likely to view a FLOSS product favorably if it is proven to be maintainable and stable. Maintainability means how easy it is to locate the elements to improve and how much work is demanded to change. Stability means in wich degree things Basic Level

CM Configuration Management Main idea: Establish baselines and release timely and frequently. Focus: Create and release baselines Control configuration itens Track change requests Inspired on CMMI Configuration Management process area. Basic Level

PP1 Project Planning Part 1 Main idea: Establish project scope, life cycle, main milestones and needed resources CMMI Project planning area was divided into two TWEs: Project planning part 1 Project planning part 2 Basic Level

REQM - Requirements Main idea: Identify and manage FLOSS product requirements clearly. Obtain commitments to requirements. This TWE is inspired in CMMI Requirements process area Basic Level

REP - Reputation Main idea: The more popular the software product is the more likely people will trust on it. Such popularity can be indicated by, for instance, the number of users that have downloaded the product and that are using it. Discussions in mailing lists, forums, bug reporting systems and other communication environments are also relevant to indicate the popularity of a FLOSS product. Intermediate Level

RDMP - Roadmap Main idea: Define and evolve a product roadmap. This may clearly state product objetives and directions. Important aspects: responsibility for the roadmap is defined, roadmap includes plans for at least the next 2 versions, and roadmap is regularly updated. It provides an insight not only in the development process followed in the past but it also describes the improvements that are planned for the near future. It must be detailed enough. It has to be respected in order to ascertain a high quality level of the development process. Intermediate Level

STK - Stakeholders Main idea: It is important to know if there is good collaboration within the groups and how they communicate Plan stakeholders participation in advance (to ensure availability) Encourage Stakeholders to participate in the meetings where they are required Monitor Stakeholder Involvement Intermediate Level

CONT - Contributions Main idea: For a potential integrator, participation of reputed software or IT companies in the FLOSS development may be a positive indication of the FLOSS product. It is important to encourage contribution to FLOSS product from SW companies Intermediate Level

PPQA Product and Process Quality Assurance Main idea: Objectively evaluate the quality of the FLOSS process and product. This TWE is inspired on CMMI PPQA process area and is mandatory only for FLOSS integrators, not for FLOSS communities Intermediate Level

PMC Project Monitoring and Control Main idea: Monitor project progress, commitments and milestones This TWE is inspired on CMMI PMC process area and it is mandatory only for FLOSS integrators, not for FLOSS communities Intermediate Level

TST 1 Testing Part One Main idea: Conduct verifications to the product Focus: Peer Reviews This TWE is inspired on CMMI Verification process area Intermediate Level

DSN 1 Design Part One Main idea: Build the product or product components from high level design Focus: Architecture Intermediate Level

PP2 Project Planning 2 Main idea: Having a more mature project planning: data management reconcile works and resources levels Obtain plan commitment Intermediate Level

RASM Third part assesment Main idea: Assessment of the product by 3rd party companies may count in favor of the product, when potential integrators evaluate FLOSS products for use in their own development. Advanced Level

PI - Product Integration Main idea: Determine Integration Sequence Establish the Product Integration Environment Manage Interfaces Confirm Readiness of Product Components for Integration Assemble Product Components Package and Deliver the Product or Product Component. Advanced Level

DSN2 Design 2 Main idea: Incorporate advanced design practices such as: Design Interfaces Using Criteria Develop Alternative Solutions and Selection Criteria. Advanced Level

TST2 Testing Part Two Main idea: Conduct validations to the product Focus: Validation results This TWE is inspired on CMMI Validation process area Advanced Level

RSKM Risk Management Main idea: Incorporate risk management practices such as: Determine Risk Sources and Categories Define Risk Parameters Establish a Risk Management Strategy Evaluate, Categorize, and Prioritize Risks Develop Risk Mitigation Plans Implement Risk Mitigation Plans This TWE is inspired in CMMI RSKM process area Advanced Level

Metrics for Trustworthy Elements A6 team described the first ideas on which process related metrics could be of importance for OMM. At this stage, this is only a collection of goals, questions and metrics. Goal, question, metric (GQM) was used. A complete list of GQM for integrators can be found in WD 6.3.1V1.0.pdf. We present following only an example.

Metrics for Trustworthy Elements

OMM in Processes of Companies Integrating FLOSS 07/01/09 50

OMM in Processes of Companies Integrating FLOSS One of the objectives of this process model is also to facilitate the selection, use and further processing of FLOSS products for integration into their own products. 1- Corporate level policy / management decision to include FLOSS in the company s products; 2- Evaluation and selection of FLOSS products based on TWE 3- Appoint a suitably qualified person or a team for the evaluation and selection (henceforth called the selection team). 4- Document the requirements / functionality to be fulfilled by the proposed FLOSS component.

Other Implications of FLOSS Products to Integrators Not all TWE can be directly mapped to a specific CMMI process area. Particularly: 1. Resources required: resources for searching, selection, testing and integration of FLOSS components into the project. 2. Responsibility for all issues related to FLOSS, including defect tracking how it has to be done, who does it. 3. License and other legal issues should be addressed.

Summary Open Source Maturity Model (OMM) is a CMMI-like model for FLOSS OMM brings emphasis on effectiveness and ease of use for the benefit of FLOSS communities and FLOSS integrators. The model is built based on trustworthy elements considered necessary by the industry members to make the resulting product trustworthy. These trustworthy elements were gathered based on surveys of several European companies. 01/07/09 53

More info... Qualipso Project www.qualipso.org www.icmc.usp.br/qualipso (in Portuguese) OMM WD6 3 1V1 (already available at www.qualipso.org) WD6 3 1V2 (by the end of June/2009) www.icmc.usp.br/~viviane/omm (not formal) TWE survey Deliverable A6.D2.6.2 - Trustworthy elements identified in OS processes 01/07/09 54

Thank you Viviane Malheiros viviane at icmc.usp.br VISIT AND CONTACT QUALIPSO PROJECT! www.qualipso.org 01/07/09 55

Project Identity Card Project Acronym: QualiPSo Project Title: Quality Platform for Open Source Software Project instrument: Integrated Project Contract Number: 034763 Consortium: 18 organisations from 9 countries (3 continents) Thematic area: Open development Platforms for software and services Duration: 48 months (important results from every year) Budget: 17.3 MEuro (Funding 10.4 MEuro) 01/07/09 56