Mecklenburg County Solid Waste Management Plan Public Meeting Tuesday, April 17 th

Similar documents
Charrette Small Group Session Friday, January :30 am 12:00 pm

Zero Waste in Practice. Presented to the Maryland recycling network 2014 Annual Conference. Charlotte

2015 SOLID WASTE ANNUAL REPORT

Appendix A GLOSSARY OF TERMS

mendi ing th t e S ource Separation Ordinance

Zero Waste Implementation Plan August 25 th, 2010

Sumter County Recycling Plan

City of Red Deer Waste Management Master Plan

RECYCLING SYSTEM GAP ANALYSIS: ORLANDO REGION. Summary Report Prepared by RRS February 2018

City of Coral Springs Solid Waste & Recycling Strategic Plan Report Prepared for: City of Coral Springs

CYPRESS HILLS WORKSHOP. Sustainable Cost Effective Solid Waste Management

A Waste Management Master Plan for the County of Peterborough

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

Relevant Guiding Principles. Implementation Opportunities

Curbside Recycling & Rewards Programs: Philadelphia s Story Maryland Recycling Network 2015 Annual Conference

Tompkins County Solid Waste Management Plan Executive Summary

EPA Region 4. Municipal Government Toolkit for Recycling. Jay Bassett. EPA Region 4. Materials Management Section

CT Department of Environmental Protection. Getting SMART Waste Management to Reduce Disposal & Increase Recycling

Zero Waste Plan for the County of Hawai i. Richard Anthony Associates Recycle Hawai i February 2009

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

Menu of Options for Solid Waste and Recycling Services in Lawrence

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Waste Disposal Stream Analysis

LUESA Overview. Land Use and Environmental Services Agency (LUESA) FY Strategic Business Plan. Six Divisions

Local Solid Waste Management Plan Update. Transportation and Environment Committee December 10, 2012

1.0 Explore alternative methods for recovery of designated materials Examine diversion of additional materials at the public drop off depot

PLANNING ELEMENTS NC LOCAL GOVERNMENT 10 YEAR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Check appropriate element PLANNING YEARS 2012 through 2022

RESIDENTIAL WASTE DIVERSION STRATEGY November 30, 2015

City of Asheboro. Solid Waste Management Plan. July1, 2010 June 30, 2020

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Why Plan? Why we need to plan:

FY Budget Presentation Department of Environmental Services

2017 Iowa Statewide Waste Characterization Study

EPR The Unintended Consequences Conference on Canadian Stewardship RCA Waste Reduction Conference October 2, 2015

Management of Construction and Demolition Debris

MEMORANDUM. To: Cc: From:

MANDATORY COMMERCIAL RECYCLING DIVISION 7. CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD

CT Recycling Laws & Regulations Connecticut Department of. Energy and Environmental Protection

DEKALB COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TWENTY-YEAR UPDATE

1Step One: Section III: How To Implement A Recycling Program. Step Two: Designate A Recycling Program Coordinator. Obtain Management Support

Organics Diversion Strategy

THREE (3)-YEAR UPDATE For SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CLAY COUNTY PLANNING AREA JULY 1, JUNE 30, 2019

15. Create a Waste Reduction and Reuse Coordinator position within the Solid Waste Management Division

A WASTED OPPORTUNITY

W a k e C o u n t y. S o l i d W a s t e Mana g e m e n t Plan Planning Period JULY 2012

ORANGE COUNTY WASTE COMPOSITION STUDY

Metro Vancouver. Recycling and Solid Waste Management 2014 Report

RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Project #562 FINAL REPORT

The complete LUC Order is available at the State Land Use Commission website:

SECTION 5.13 Solid Waste

Composting Organic Waste in Santa Cruz County

SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ADOPTED BY THE SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSION

Solid Waste Study Update

Carroll County Solid Waste Management Plan

Just the Facts and the Data

Waste Diversion Opportunities. Waste Diversion Opportunities

Economic Impact of Recycling in Alabama and Opportunities for Growth. Alabama Department of Environmental Management. Land Division Solid Waste Branch

Innovative Public - Private Recycling Partnership in Massachusetts

CITY OF OAKLAND Art & Soul Festival Zero Waste Event Plan

Contribution of the Recycling Industry to the Local Economy. What Input-Output Models Show

Residential Advisory Committee Comprehensive Organics Management Plan Meeting #4 January 18, 2017

Appendix V: Solid and Hazardous Waste

Orange County. Solid Waste Study. Mayors Group Meeting

Getting the Max out of your MRF: Strategies for Increasing Revenues from Materials Recovery Facilities Contracts

APPENDIX A. Recommendations

LABORATORY 8: WASTE AND RECYCLING AT PLU Due November 7 th or 9 th

Pollution Prevention Appendix W: Solid and Hazardous Waste

Recycling and Zero Waste

Issue Paper #8 Zero Waste. 8.1 Overview Product Stewardship Sustainability

TSWAN. Tribal Solid Waste Advisory Network

Summary of Key Results

Construction & Demolition Waste Management Best Practices. Webinar November 26, 2013

Fauquier County Department of Environmental Services

Florida Recycling Overview. Karen Moore January 30, 2018

City of Austin. Curbside Organics Collection. Policy Analysis Report

San Francisco s Food Composting Program

1 / Consultant s Perspective & Role

Casar. Please submit this form to by September 1, Mailing Address:PO Box 1014 City: Shelby Zip: 28151

Zero Waste Strategic Plan

Getting at the last 25% SWANA Evergreen Chapter Workshop February 24, Tracie Bills SCS Engineers

Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2010

Zero Waste Around the World. Rick Anthony Richard Anthony Associates Sustainable Living Symposium Earth Day Festival at Washington Park April 2009

SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTE

CITY OF RIO VISTA Construction and Demolition Waste Management Plan and Disposal Report

Advisory Committee Meeting 03 February 13, 2018

strategic Plan October 2014

Cleveland. State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Local Government

RECYCLERS OF THE YEAR: MECKLENBURG COUNTY RECOGNIZES ORGANIZATIONS FOR WASTE-CUTTING PROGRAMS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS I. PUBLIC UTILITIES: SOLID WASTE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. a. Physical Setting

BEYOND 34 CASE STUDY: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RECYCLING PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

2016 Waste Management Benchmarking and Performance Monitoring Report

NATIONAL WASTE STREAM PROFILES

WELCOME. NRRA s Solid Waste Facility Operator 2016 Training Modules

(S.208) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: * * * Architectural Waste Recycling * * *

Ramsey County Solid Waste Master Plan:

Lincoln County. Solid Waste Management Plan

Del Norte Regional Recycling and Transfer Station Progress Report. November 15, 2016

Macon County. Three-year Update to the Solid Waste Management Plan for Macon County, Town of Franklin and Town of Highlands

Dem-Con Recovery & Recycling

RECYCLING SYSTEM GAP ANALYSIS MEMPHIS REGION PREPARED BY RRS FOR THE COALITION TO ADVANCE RECOVERY IN TENNESSEE (CART)

TITLE I SWA CODE DEFINITION OF TERMS

Transcription:

Mecklenburg County Solid Waste Management Plan 2012 Public Meeting Tuesday, April 17 th

Why do we Plan? A requirement of the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act of 1996 (NCGS 130A 309.09A) County responsibility under the seven (7) Solid Waste Interlocal Agreements Sound practice to ensure adequate systems and facilities for management of waste and recyclables

The Planning Process Steering Committee guided the development Representatives from each municipality, the Waste Management Advisory Board, Charlotte Chamber of Commerce, Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools & UNCC Planning Charrette provided input and feedback on waste reduction strategies 3 days of spirited interaction (January 26 28) 100+ attendees of diverse background and interest Public Outreach Dedicated Web page soliciting comments Social Media Print Advertisement and News Releases

The Planning Process (cont) Recommendation by the Waste Management Advisory Board to the BOCC April 17 Public Meeting April 17 Seek approval of the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners May 1 Seek approval of the seven (7) Participating Municipalities May & June Submit approved Plan to NCDENR June 30

2012 Plan Waste Reduction Goals Overall Waste Reduction Short Term and Long Term Goals Baseline FY98/99* Current FY10/11* Short Term Plan Year FY16/17 Long Term Plan Year FY21/22 Population 618,853 923,944 1,027,829 1,114,398 Disposal tons with NO new programs 1,214,764 1,089,624 1,356,734 1,471,005 Disposal tons with PROPOSED programs N/A N/A 1,034,619 912,332 Proposed rate tons/person/year 1.96 1.18 1.01 0.82 Rate reduction % of baseline year N/A 40% 49% 58% Proposed tons diverted from disposal * Actual, not proposed or forecasted. N/A = not applicable N/A N/A 322,115 558,673

2012 Plan Summary Goals 2.2 2.0 1.8 Per Capita Disposal Rate (Tons) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Historical Results Projected in 2009 SWMP Projected in 2012 SWMP

1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 Impact of Recommended Strategies on Overall Disposal Tonnage 0 FY 98 99 FY 10 11 FY 16 17 FY 21 22 Baseline Current Plan Year Plan Year Actual disposal tons Disposal tons if no new programs Disposal tons with proposed short term programs Disposal tons with proposed short term and long term programs

Solid Waste Disposal Breakdown FY 2005 FY 2011 C&D 30% Residential 27% C&D 18% Residential 35% Commercial 43% Commercial 47%

COMMERCIAL SECTOR

Commercial Waste Disposed Characterization (513,081 tons in 2011) Problem Mat., 2.1% Haz Mat., 0.4% Other 13.4% Paper, 30.3% Organics, 30.8% Glass, 2.7% Metal, 7.5% Plastic, 12.8%

Commercial Waste Diversion Short Term (2013 2017) Expand business recycling ordinance Add materials (those banned from landfills by NCGS) Lower threshold (approx. 1,700 more businesses) Expand outreach and education efforts Add reporting requirements Establish baseline & track progress Generating businesses, haulers, recycling facilities Pilot test organics diversion Institutional Estimated 10% diversion from commercial waste

Commercial Waste Diversion Long Term (2018 2022) Realize Organics Diversion Potential Staged implementation Foster infrastructure development KCI study estimates 30,000 tons of food scraps could be diverted from commercial/ institutional Targeted large food waste generators: restaurants, grocery stores, cafeterias (not all businesses) Estimated additional 11% diversion from commercial waste

Commercial Waste Reduction Goals Commercial Waste Reduction Short Term and Long Term Goals Baseline FY98/99* Current FY10/11* Short Term Plan Year FY16/17 Long Term Plan Year FY21/22 Population 618,853 923,944 1,027,829 1,114,398 Disposal tons if NO new programs 641,072 513,081 637,665 691,373 Disposal tons with PROPOSED programs N/A N/A 575,376 512,888 Proposed rate tons/person/year 1.04 0.56 0.56 0.46 Rate reduction % of baseline year N/A 47% 46% 56% Proposed tons diverted from disposal N/A N/A 62,289 178,485 * Actual, not proposed or forecasted. N/A = not applicable

Impact of Recommended Strategies on Commercial Tonnage 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 FY 98 99 FY 10 11 FY 16 17 FY 21 22 Baseline Current Plan Year Plan Year Actual disposal tons Disposal tons if no new programs Disposal tons with proposed short term programs Disposal tons with proposed short term and long term programs

RESIDENTIAL SECTOR

Residential Waste Disposed Characterization (380,882 tons in 2011) Paper 22% Plastics 18% Organics 37% Wood 6% Ferrous Metal 4% Glass 4% Other 9% Inert 3% Yard Waste 3% Non Ferrous Metal 2% Brown Goods 1% Special Waste 0% Source: Residential Waste composition data from the 2010 Orange County North Carolina Waste Composition Study applied to Mecklenburg County residential tons disposed.

Residential Waste Diversion Short Term (2013 2017) NC landfill disposal ban items banned via ordinance for generators Estimated 1.3% diversion from residential waste Volume based Rates Estimated 18% diversion from residential waste Timing considerations for communities that already have carts Incentive programs (like RecycleBank TM ) Estimated 10% increase in participation Estimated 5% diversion from residential waste

Residential Waste Diversion Long Term (2018 2022) Mandatory single family curbside recycling Estimated 5% diversion from residential waste tons Food scraps and other organics diversion Possibly with yard waste collection KCI study estimates 57,000 to 76,000 tons of residential food scraps in waste stream Approximately 17% of residential waste disposed Estimated 11% diversion from residential waste

Residential Waste Diversion Multi-family Short Term Profile model complexes, provide best practices Expand education and outreach Require it is provided at every complex Estimated 3% diversion from residential waste tons Long Term Mandatory for multi family Continue education and outreach Estimated 2% diversion from residential waste tons

Residential Waste Reduction Goals Residential Waste Reduction Short Term and Long Term Goals Baseline FY98/99* Current FY10/11* Short Term Plan Year FY16/17 Long Term Plan Year FY21/22 Population 618,853 923,944 1,027,829 1,114,398 Disposal tons if NO new programs 258,558 380,882 474,857 514,852 Disposal tons with PROPOSED programs N/A N/A 364,342 304,875 Proposed rate tons/person/year 0.42 0.41 0.35 0.27 Rate reduction % of baseline year N/A 2% 16% 35% Proposed tons diverted from disposal N/A N/A 110,515 209,977 * Actual, not proposed or forecasted. N/A = not applicable

Impact of Recommended Strategies on Residential Tonnage 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 FY 98 99 FY 10 11 FY 16 17 FY 21 22 Baseline Current Plan Year Plan Year Actual disposal tons Disposal tons if no new programs Disposal tons with proposed short term programs Disposal tons with proposed short term and long term programs

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION SECTOR

C&D (195,661 tons in 2011) 2007 C&D Composition Inerts 29% C&D Materials 20% Other 19% Metal 7% Paper 5% Wood 32% Bulky/Other 3% Green Waste 2% Plastic 1% Glass 1% Source: Construction and Demolition Debris Composition Study for Mecklenburg County by MSW Consultants dated September 2008.

C&D Waste Diversion Short Term (2013 2017) Focus on the generators Mandatory recycling ordinance tied to permit application and certificate of occupancy Require 50% of waste generated is recycled (by weight) Estimated 53% diversion from C&D waste Education and outreach Selective dismantling Promotion through LEED certification benefits Estimated 8% diversion from C&D waste

C&D Waste Diversion Long Term (2018 2022) Increase mandatory recycling percent From 50% to 60% recycled Additional estimated 8% diversion from C&D waste

C&D Waste Reduction Goals C&D Waste Reduction Short Term and Long Term Goals Baseline FY98/99* Current FY10/11* Short Term Plan Year FY16/17 Long Term Plan Year FY21/22 Population Disposal tons if NO new programs 618,853 923,944 1,027,829 1,114,398 315,134 195,661 244,212 264,781 Disposal tons with PROPOSED programs N/A N/A 94,901 94,570 Proposed rate tons/person/year 0.51 0.21 0.09 0.08 Rate reduction % of baseline year Proposed tons diverted from disposal * Actual, not proposed or forecasted. N/A = not applicable N/A 58% 82% 83% N/A N/A 149,311 170,211

Impact of Recommended Strategies on C&D Tonnage 350,000 300,000 Actual disposal tons 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 FY 98 99 FY 10 11 FY 16 17 FY 21 22 Baseline Current Plan Year Plan Year Disposal tons if no new programs Disposal tons with proposed short term programs Disposal tons with proposed short term and long term programs

OTHER STRATEGIES

Other Waste Diversion Strategies Extended Producer Responsibility Provide model purchasing plans and guidelines Regional Producer Identifier Adopt local EPR resolutions to support State and Federal initiatives Special Event Recycling Permit requirements Document and duplicate best practices Public Private Partnerships (marketing in exchange for recycling) Evolve with residential and commercial programs (recycle where you live, work and play) Place recycling bins wherever there are trash cans in all public locations, including temporary locations or special events. Continue with education and outreach across all sectors

PLAN SUMMARY

2012 Plan - Per Capita Disposal 2.2 2.0 1.8 Per Capita Disposal Rate (Tons) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Historical Results Projected in 2009 SWMP Projected in 2012 SWMP

2012 Plan - Summary Current solid waste and recycling collection infrastructure is adequate through the planning period Landfill disposal capacity is more than adequate to serve residential disposal needs through 2035 Significant additional waste reduction is economically achievable with strategies outlined here Additional infrastructure, collection and processing, is needed to realize the potential in organic waste reduction

2012 Plan - Summary In the Short Term, with Recommended Strategies: 49% waste reduction goal in FY 2017 629,348 Metric Tons of Carbon Emissions Reduced In the Long Term, with Recommended Strategies: 58% waste reduction goal in FY 2022 640,032 Metric Tons of Carbon Emissions Reduced

Closing Questions/Comments Entire Plan and Supporting Studies www.wipeoutwaste.com Click on Solid Waste Management Plan Thank You!