MANURE MANAGEMENT AND POTATO PRODUCTION. Amber D. Moore and Nora L. Olsen

Similar documents
HIGHLAND RUSSET AGRONOMY NOTES. Highland Russet (A9045 7) Fertilization Total Yield Response to N Rate of Highland Russet vs.

CLEARWATER RUSSET AGRONOMY NOTES. Clearwater Russet (AOA ) Fertilization

NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY TO CORN FROM DAIRY MANURES AND FERTILIZER IN A CALCAREOUS SOIL

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

Phosphorus Update. Addy Elliott Colorado State University Department of Soil and Crop Sciences

FACTORS AFFECTING CROP NEEDS FOR POTASSIUM WESTERN PERSPECTIVE TERRY A. TINDALL AND DALE WESTERMANN MANAGER OF AGRONOMY J.R

In-Crop Application of Liquid Hog Manure in Irrigated Potato Production

Phosphorus Management

EFFECTS OF LIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOLIDS CONTENT IN GARLIC CLOVES

Soil fertility management for pepper production

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

Strategies for Reducing Nitrate Leaching from Irrigated Potato. Carl Rosen Department of Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Manure Management Plan Nutrient Balance Worksheet User Guide Completing Nutrient Balance Worksheets for Manure Management Plans

The Agronomics of Land Application. Jim Friedericks Outreach and Education

BAND PLACEMENT FOR POTATOES IN CALCAREOUS SOIL ABSTRACT

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

How Much Land Will Be Needed for Manure Disposal in a Changing Regulatory Climate?

CENTRAL OREGON POTATO NITROGEN FERTILIZER TRIALS Progress Report. Alvin R. Mosley, Shelton C. Perrigan and Steven R. James'

On-Farm Evaluation of Polymer Coated Urea Rates and Blends on Potato Yield and Quality

Irrigated Spring Wheat

DEP Manure Management Manual COMPLETING A MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN PART 3

Leaching fraction effects on salt management and nitrate losses in commercial lettuce production

Laboratory Fee Schedule

Agronomic rate for biosolids application to cropland. Andy Bary Soil Scientist Crop & Soil Science Washington State University Puyallup

Alfalfa. Dr. AJ Foster Southwest Area Agronomist Kansas State University Garden City, KS

PRINCIPLES OF RECYCLING DAIRY MANURES THROUGH FORAGE CROPS. Marsha Campbell Mathews 1

Potato Fertility Experiments

Calculating the Fertilizer Value of Manure from Livestock Operations

MANAGING CHAFF TRAILS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS IN STRIP-TILL SUGAR BEET PRODUCTION

Refer to Appendix B, Livestock Manure and Mortalities Management Regulation.

Large-Scale Evaluations of In-Season Liquid NPK Applications to Push Alfalfa Production

LIQUID PHOSPHORUS POTATO FERTILITY TRIALS. Final Report. January 2016

Value of Poultry Manure Nutrients for Crop Production. Antonio Mallarino and John Sawyer Department of Agronomy

Manure Management Milk Shake Dairy Ken Johnson Cache County, Utah

Impact of Changing From Nitrogen- to Phosphorus- Based Manure Nutrient Management Plans

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Clovers.. 75 pounds of "N" per acre

NUTRIENT BUDGETING AND MANAGEMENT ON ORGANIC FARMS

Evaluation of Nitrogen Source and Rate on Tuber Yield and Quality in Old and New Potato Fields

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Sources, Timing, and Rates On Tuber Specific Gravity

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Comparison of Organic and Conventional Crops at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research Site

EFFECTIVENESS OF AVAIL FOR IMPROVING POTATO YIELD. Matthew J. Repking and Carrie A.M. Laboski 1. Introduction

Characterization of Solid Beef Manure

Fertilizing Potato. in North Dakota. Potato production has been a part of North Dakota agriculture NDSU EXTENSION SERVICE

Northeast Oregon Potato Soil Fertility Studies

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series October 17, 2008

MANAGEMENT OF MANURES IN CORN AND SORGHUM. Robert Flynn 1 ABSTRACT

Interpret soil test information.

Availability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Editor: Robert Waggener

o o! Potassium Fertility Experiment

Corn/Soybean Efficient Fertility Management - Manure

2011 Central Oregon Alfalfa Variety Trial. Rhonda Simmons, Marvin Butler, and Mylen Bohle. Abstract

The Nutrient Value of Manure: What s it Really Worth? Brad Joern Department of Agronomy

Fertilizer Management

Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations. Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009

2017 Pasture Productivity Trial

Simplot FŪSN Fertilizer Potato Trials

Effect of Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Potatoes in the. Willamette Valley AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Comparing Two Soil Management Approaches. Brian Caldwell Cornell Organic Cropping Systems Project

Manure, Crops and Soil Health Jeff Schoenau PAg Department of Soil Science S.S. Malhi AAFC Melfort

Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Mineralization of Nitrogen from Compost

Soil Fertility Management for Forage Crops: Maintenance

NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION

Agricultural Services and Diagnostic Laboratories of the University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service

Comparing Strip Trials of Chicken Litter, Compost, Hog Manure, and Wet Cattle Manure on Soil Fertility

AVAIL / DAP Potatoes 11 Caribou, Maine Preplant DAP application 300lbs/ac Yields: average of two trials

Nutrient Management in Organic Production

MU Guide PUBLISHED BY MU EXTENSION, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA

November 2003 Issue # TILLAGE MANAGEMENT FOR MANURED CROPLAND

Basic Principles of Liming. John Peters UW Soil Science Department

Organic Manures and Fertilizers for Vegetable Crops

2014 Georgia Grazing School:

Managing nutrient needs in organic farming. Judith Nyiraneza


2013 Georgia Grazing School:

Corn Silage Potential in Central Oregon

FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE PRICE OF MANURE AS A FERTILIZER Ray Massey, Economist University of Missouri, Commercial Ag Program

Evaluation of 18 Specialty Potatoes in Southwest Michigan

FREQUENCY OF NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES IN CORN PRODUCTION

Processing Potato Trial Nesson Valley, North Dakota Asunta (Susie) Thompson, Jerald Bergman, Tyler Tjelde North Dakota State University

Knowledge grows. The Nutrition of Almonds

Nitrogen management in annual vegetable crops

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Farm Water Quality Considerations

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

2010 State FFA Crops Contest Written Exam

FERTILIZERS, MANURE, OR BIOSOLIDS?

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Analysis of chicken litter

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Transcription:

MANURE MANAGEMENT AND POTATO PRODUCTION Amber D. Moore and Nora L. Olsen With the recent expansion of the dairy industry in Idaho, field crops with highest nutrient removal potential (corn silage, alfalfa hay, and small grain crops) receive the majority of dairy waste applications in the state. However, as dairies have expanded into prominent potato growing regions, more and more potato growers are planting into fields with extensive and even recent manure applications. It is critical for the growers to fully understand the potential benefits and issues associated with growing potatoes in fields with histories of manure applications to serve the greatest benefit to the grower, the consumer, and the environment. The purpose of this discussion is to 1) summarize research that has been done outside of Idaho on manure application to potato fields, and 2) to present our research findings on this topic. MANURE AND COMPOST LONG_TERM RESIDUAL EFFECTS The residual effects of manure applications on tuber yield have been examined in a small number of studies. Dawson and Kelling found that yields were reduced with a recent application of liquid dairy manure application, but yields of potatoes increased over the next two year when grown on the same site. Sharma and Grewal (1986) and Conn and Lazarovits (1999) did not detect any residual effects on potato yield over 3 years after manure applications. In contrast, plots receiving manure applications for 20 years at 15 tonnes manure ha -1 significantly increased barley yields in comparison to control plots (Hall, 1905). To determine the residual effects of manure applications in Idaho, a two-year study looked at potato production on a field that previously received manure, compost, and phosphorus fertilizers applications. Specifically, Russet Burbanks potatoes were planted into a 2 acre ARS agricultural field that had previously received applications of fresh solid dairy waste, composted solid dairy waste, inorganic P fertilizers, and/or no P source in the fall for three consecutive years (2003, 2004, and 2005). Chemical sources of N, P, and K were applied to the field in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, based on the needs of the crop. Potatoes were planted in this field in 2008 and 2009. While residual effects of manure and compost applications significantly increased yield in 2008, they did not significantly effect yields in 2009 (table 1). Soil nitrate concentrations followed a similar trend, with residual effects of manure applications significantly increasing soil nitrate concentrations in 2008 but not in 2009 (table 2). Soil potassium and phosphorus followed similar trends in 2008 and 2009 (table 2). These results suggest that plant available nitrogen originating from manure and compost may have the greatest influence on yield Presented at the Idaho Potato Conference on January 20, 2010.

in comparison to the effects of altering phosphorus or potassium levels. Tubers from the control plots showed a trend (p<0.10) for higher glucose levels (data not shown). There were no other noticeable differences in processing quality between the treatments. The presence of E. coli 0157:H7 was not detected on the surface of five potatoes selected in any of the treatments. Also, these treatments had no significant effect on coliform counts on the surface of five potatoes from each plot. Table 1. Total yield, marketable yield, culls, and yield of US#2 grade (cwt/a). Values in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p 0.05 Total Yield cwt/a) US#1 (cwt/a) 2008 2009 2008 2009 Manure 494a 428 333 345 Compost 487a 365 319 305 Fertilizer 412b 452 271 390 Control 349b 329 199 268 LSD p 0.05 70.9 NS NS NS Table 2. Effects of historical nutrient field treatments on soil chemical properties. NO3-N (ppm) Olsen P (ppm) K (ppm) 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 Manure 43.3 a 19.0 19.8 a 23.2 a 204 a 182 a Compost 31.0 b 13.7 17.3 a 20.7 ab 170 a 162 a Fertilizer 26.3 b 12.6 22.3 a 16.7 b 130 b 107 b Control 22.5 b 11.1 5.0 b 4.7 c 128 b 110 b LSD p 0.05 12.0 NS 11.2 4.9 34.3 45.3 RECENT MANURE APPLICATIONS Several studies on recent applications of cattle, dairy, and farmyard derived manure (planting within 6 months after application) to potatoes in northern United States and southern Canada have shown significant potato yield increases in comparison to nonlimiting fertilizer applications (Dawson and Kelling, Holliday et al. 1965, Black and White, 1973, Curless et al., 2004). These studies suggest that factors beyond nutrient content were involved in the yield increases. Grandy et al. (2002) found that while soil bulk density was not affected with these manure applications, the soil carbon content increased 28 and 46% and medium and large aggregate content increased on potato cropping rotation fields receiving 16 tonnes cattle manure ha -1 for 5 and 6 years prior,. Conversely, Lee and MacDonald (1977) and Hall (1905) did not detect potato yield changes with cow and farmyard manure applications compared to fertilizer applications. Conn and Lazarovits (1999) did not detect potato yield increases with cow manure application of 100 tonnes ha -1 in comparison to control plots not receiving any fertilizers. In 2009, Russet Burbank potatoes were planted into a certified organic field in Kimberly, Idaho, after a spring barley cover crop (table 3). Fresh dairy manure was spring-applied at

a rate of 8.9 wet tons/acre and incorporated to a 6-inch soil depth prior. While not statistically significant, yields did increase by 37 cwt./acre with the spring-manure application, illustrating that recent manure applications may increase tuber yield in Southern Idaho. Table 3. Total yield, marketable yield, culls, and yield of US#1 grade (cwt/a). Values in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p 0.05. Petiole Petiole rate (ton Total rate US#1 NO3 NO3 dry Yield treatment (total lb (cwt/a) 7/14/09 7/27/09 matter/ (cwt/a) N/acre) (ppm) (ppm) acre) Dairy manure 3.1 54 296 a 260 a 875 ab 1275 a None 0 0 259 a 234 a 575 a 1575 ab NUTRIENT CYCLING Nutrient cycling and accumulations in potato production systems are also of great interest to growers, as applications of fertilizers often need to be adjusted to compliment the nutrient supply from a manure source. Curless et al. (2004) estimated 62% of manure P to be available to the potato. They also found luxury consumption of fertilizer P by potato plants but not for manure P. Finally, it should also be noted that Curless et al. (2004) found that potato petiole nitrate concentrations were significantly lower for manure treated plants than for nitrogen fertilized plants, while yields were significantly higher with manure applied treatments, suggesting that petiole nitrate targets for inseason N fertilizer applications may need to be adjusted for manured soils. In estimating long-term release of N from dairy manure applications, Klausner et al. (1994) used decay principles to predict nitrogen availability from dairy manure to be 21, 9, 3, 3, and 2% for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following dairy manure applications under New York growing conditions, respectively. However, decay constants of dairy manure-nitrogen have not been established specifically for irrigated, cool climate calcareous soils, as are found in Idaho. To determine effects of phosphorus and salt in dairy waste on soluble salt and phosphorus concentrations in potato field soils and corresponding potato tuber yields, 50 potato fields throughout South Central Idaho were soil sampled in 2009. The cooperator s fields had received different fertilizer treatments including manure (14 fields), lagoon water (10), both lagoon water and manure (5), compost (6), and conventional fertilizer only (15). Field and background soil samples (with minimal disturbance) were collected. Tuber yield data is currently being collected from cooperators. Preliminary soil data shows a potential accumulation of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), and phosphorus (P) on fields receiving compost, manure, and/or lagoon water applications in comparison to fertilizer only, with minimal effect on electrical conducitivity (Table 3). Significant potassium accumulations were detected only on fields that have received fresh dairy manure applications.

Table 3. Contribution of fertilizer or dairy waste applications on soluble salts and Olsen P concentration from 50 cooperators fields in South-Central Idaho. Background values from neighboring non-agricultural fields have been subtracted. E.C. Ca Mg K Na Olsen P ds/m --------------------------mmol/l------------------------ ----ppm-- Fertilizer only 0.40 0.22-0.12-0.82 0.45 14.1 Compost 0.53 6.78 2.56-0.60 2.56 43.6 Lagoon water 0.66 3.14 1.90-0.05 2.24 36.2 Manure 0.42 3.81 1.73 0.27 1.87 64.1 Lagoon water + Manure POTATO TUBER QUALITY 0.54 6.76 2.73 1.16 2.74 47.7 Shifts in tuber quality and crop toxicities may also be anticipated due to an overabundance of specific nutrients that are not typically found in potato fields. Dawson and Kelling found that tuber solids decreased with liquid dairy manure applications (93,500-2,805,000 l ha -1 ) in comparison to fertilized plot at two locations, suspecting an accumulation of salts as the cause. Black and White (1973) found that starch content was not affected in the first 8 years of yearly manure applications (9 tonnes ha -1 ) to potatooat-alfalfa rotations, but significantly decreased tuber starch content in the ninth year. While the cause was not identified, the author suspected potassium accumulations, as increasing amounts of potassium fertilizers had lowered starch content in another treatment used in this study. Manganese toxicities have also been attributed to cow manure applications (Lee and MacDonald, 1977), although this was identified only under very acidic soil conditions (soil ph < 4.8). SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DISEASE AND E. COLI Scab, sclerotia, verticillium wilt, and pathogenic bacterial persistence are major concerns associated with potato production on manured fields, as manure is often suspected to provide optimal conditions for these diseases, disorders, and bacteria. Dawson and Kelling showed that scab incidence increased with liquid dairy manure applications (93,500-2,805,000 l ha -1 ) in only one of four site-years in comparison to fertilized plots. Blodgett (1940) showed that the combination of lime and manure increased scab from 0.3 to 63% on acidic soils, while manure applications alone had no significant effect. Adversely, Conn and Lazarovits (1999) found the scab incidence was actually reduced 2 and 3 years after cattle manure had been applied at a rate of 100 tonnes ha -1 at one of two sites, suggesting that the reduction in soil ph may have been the cause of the scab reduction. In one study, sclerotia incidence reduced by 10% in manure plots comparison to fertilized plots (Blodgett, 1940). In another study, incidence of verticillium wilt was reduced at one of two sites 1 year after application, but not the 2 nd or 3 rd years (Conn and Lazarovits, 1999). The seasonal difference may have been related to a subsequent decrease in nematode populations and/or a documented increase in soil microbial populations. Finally, Entry et al. (2006) found greater incidence of Enterococcus and fecal coliform in fresh potato skins and potato rhizosphere on plots receiving dairy

manure solids applications in comparison to dairy compost, fertilizer, and control treatments, while no E. coli was detected in any of the treatments. SUMMARY Based on information from the literature and research that conducted in Idaho, it is apparent that manure applications can be potentially beneficial to potato production when applied at agronomic rates. More information is needed on manure applications in extreme excess of viable amounts taken up by the plant in order to more closely address the issue of recent and long-term manure applied fields that Idaho potato growers may be facing in years to come, if not already.