Grinding & Superfinishing. Methods & Specifications

Similar documents
HVOF Hard Chrome Alternatives: Developments, Implementation, Performance and Lessons Learned

Off-angle Thermal Spray Coating Deposition: Enabling Approach to Coat Small Internal Diameters

ASETSDefense 09: Sustainable Surface Engineering for Aerospace and Defense

Progress in Implementing Non-Cr 6+ Surface Finishes for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Aircraft

Charting the Way Forward to Cadmium and Hexavalent Chromium Free Connectors: NAVSEA Usage and Testing

Hex Chrome Free Coatings for Electronics NASA-DoD-OEM Joint Project

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

Implication of Atmospheric Wetness Levels on Corrosion at a Coating Defect during Accelerated Testing

Implementation of Rare Earth Primers and Pretreatments for Military Applications

Atmospheric Plasma Depainting. Peter Yancey Atmospheric Plasma Solutions, Inc.

Environmentally Friendly Pretreatment for Department of Defense Applications

USMC Environmental and Corrosion Control Issues. Andrew Sheetz USMC CPAC Engineering Manager

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

309th Commodities Group

Chromate-free inhibitor and non-chrome fuel tank coatings

Development of Forced Pulse Water Strip of HVOF Coatings and Chrome Plating on Aircraft, Landing Gear, Engine and Propeller Components

CORROSION CONTROL Anniston Army Depot

Magnesium-Rich Coatings

Breakout Session 3 Non Hex Cr Treatments for IVD/Electroplated Al, Zn, Zn Alloy Coatings. By: Steve Gaydos And Lorraine Wass May 17, 2007

cworks Corrosion Control System

Field Demonstration of Alternative Coatings for High Strength Steel (HSS)

Progress on LHE Zinc-Nickel and Other Cadmium Alternatives

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

Defense Business Board

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

Laser Stripping of Aerospace Materials with Closed-Loop, Color-Recognition Control

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

Success with the DoD Mentor Protégé Program

AFLCMC Cd and Cr Replacement/ Elimination Strategy

Issues for Future Systems Costing

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

Testing Cadmium-free Coatings

Progress on S53 for Rotary Gear Actuators ESTCP Project WP-0619

Diminishing Returns and Policy Options in a Rentier State: Economic Reform and Regime Legitimacy in Saudi Arabia

Trends in Acquisition Workforce. Mr. Jeffrey P. Parsons Executive Director Army Contracting Command

JCAT Alternative Coatings for Fasteners on USMC- Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

Evaluation of Dipsol IZ-C17 LHE Zinc-Nickel Plating

ROCK STRIKE TESTING OF TRANSPARENT ARMOR NLE-01

Enhanced Corrosion Protection for the H-60 Helicopter

DESCRIPTIONS OF HYDROGEN-OXYGEN CHEMICAL KINETICS FOR CHEMICAL PROPULSION

Multifunctional UV (MUV) Coatings and Ce-based Materials

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

SEDD Our Vision. Anand Mudambi. Joseph Solsky USACE USEPA 3/31/2011 1

STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENTS

Ultraviolet (UV) Curable Coatings DoD Executive for Bullet Agent Tip Identification

A Family of SCAMPI SM Appraisal Methods

Ranked Set Sampling: a combination of statistics & expert judgment

ZnNi data. Keith Legg ASETSDefense Technical Manager Rowan Technology Group Libertyville, IL. Keith Legg

Processing of Hybrid Structures Consisting of Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) With Metallic Reinforcement of Steel or Titanium

Alex G. Manganaris Director, Workforce Plans and Resources

NEC2 Effectiveness and Agility: Analysis Methodology, Metrics, and Experimental Results*

Planning Value. Leslie (Les) Dupaix USAF Software S T S C. (801) DSN:

Overview of USD-AT&L Memo on Cr 6+ and Other Regulatory Issues

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Cr-FREE METALLIC-CERAMIC COATINGS

Supply Chain Modeling: Downstream Risk Assessment Methodology (DRAM)

Ultraviolet Curable Powder Coatings With Robotic Curing for Aerospace Applications

Cataloging Green Items

SE Tools Overview & Advanced Systems Engineering Lab (ASEL)

Microscale Waste Heat Driven Cooling System

Developing a More Complete Set of DMSMS Solutions

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Water Sustainability & Conservation in an Exhaust Cooling Discharge System Case Study

Future Capabilities of GenCade Ashley Frey

Addressing Species at Risk Before Listing - MCB Camp Lejeune and Coastal Goldenrod

Agenda. Current Acquisition Environment-Strategic Sourcing. Types of Contract Vehicles. Specific Contract Vehicles for Navy-wide Use DOD EMALL

Ogden Air Logistics Center

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

Bio-Response Operational Testing & Evaluation (BOTE) Project

PL and Payment of CWA Stormwater Fees

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Supersonic Particle Deposition (Cold Spray)

U.S. Trade Deficit and the Impact of Rising Oil Prices

A Quality Control Procedure Specialized for Incremental Sampling

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

ElectroSpark Deposition

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

NOGAPS/NAVGEM Platform Support

DEPLOYED BASE SOLAR POWER (BRIEFING SLIDES)

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

Two Approaches to Rehabilitation of Metal Roofing at Wheeler Army Airfield Hawaii

Warstopper Material Supply Chain Risk Assessments

Improving Energy Efficiency at the Watervliet Arsenal

11. KEYNOTE 2 : Rebuilding the Tower of Babel Better Communication with Standards

Some Human Factors Design Principles for Effective Visualization and Collaboration of Military Operations

An Open Strategy for the Acquisition of Models and Simulations. Rudolph P. Darken Director, MOVES Institute

Title: Human Factors Reach Comfort Determination Using Fuzzy Logic.

LASER-INDUCED SPALL IN SILICON CARBIDE

Report No. D August 1, Internal Controls Over U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works, Disbursement Processes

Cold Spray for Repair of Magnesium Gearboxes

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Energy Security: A Global Challenge

Augmenting Task-Centered Design With Operator State Assessment Technologies

Transcription:

Grinding & Superfinishing Methods & Specifications ASETS Defense 12 San Diego, CA Jon L. Devereaux NASA KSC August 30, 2012

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 30 AUG 2012 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2012 to 00-00-2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Grinding & Superfinishing Methods & Specifications 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) NASA - Kennedy Space Center,,Kennedy Space Center,FL,32899 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ASETSDefense 2012: Sustainable Surface Engineering for Aerospace and Defense Workshop, August 27-30, 2012, San Diego, CA. Sponsored by SERDP/ESTCP. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 20 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

High Strength Steel & Cr Grinding Spec Development of High Strength Steel & Chrome Plating Grinding Specification Draft AMEC 08AA Published as AMS 2453 Low Stress Grinding of High Strength Steel Parts Heat Treated to 180 KSI or Over, and Low Stress Grinding of Chrome Plating Applied to High Strength Steel Parts Heat Treated to 180 KSI or Over This Grinding Specification provides an option or an alternative to MIL-STD-866 which is no longer active for new design 2

High Strength Steel & Cr Grinding Spec Low Stress Grinding Specification for Steel & Chrome Plating Published in August 2010 as AMS 2453 3

HVOF Grinding Spec Grinding of HVOF Sprayed Tungsten Carbide Coatings Applied to High Strength Steels Published in July 2004 as AMS 2449 4

Development of ification The NASA Technical Standards Program (NTSP) is sponsored by the Office of the Chief Engineer (OCE). The primary mission is the enhancement of NASA's engineering capabilities by providing technical standards required to meet the needs of the Agency. The NTSP provides these standards to the Agency by doing the following: supporting the development of non-government Voluntary Consensus Standard (VCS) Industry Standards 5

Technical Standards Budget supporting the development of non-government VCS Industry Standards FY-10 SLIM FY-11 NONE FY-12 NONE SERDP provided support to attend SAE Technical Committee Meetings for completion of the Superfinishing Document and Publication as an Aerospace Material Specification. 6

Superfinishing of HVOF Applied Tungsten Carbide Thermal Spray Coatings AMS Specification covers two methods: - Oscillating Stone Method - Tape or Abrasive Film Method 7

Oscillating Stone Method Type and grit sizes of abrasives to be used Cutting fluids/coolants Workpiece surface speeds Contact pressure for stones Traverse rates Stone oscillation rates Polishing with diamond paste 8

Tape or Abrasive Film Method Microfinishing Film Lapping Film Type and grit sizes of abrasives to be used Cutting Fluids/Coolants Workpiece surface speeds Film index rates Contact pressure for film superfinishing Traverse rates Film oscillation frequency 9

Title Changed To: Superfinishing of HVOF Applied Tungsten Carbide Coatings Title changed to be less restrictive - applied to High Strength Steels deleted from title to allow for superfinishing of coatings applied to Titanium Reference source handbook and website link added to Section 8 for additional information on surface finish parameters, terms, & sketches 10

Superfinishing of HVOF Applied Tungsten Carbide Coatings Published in June 2011 as AMS 2452 11

Surface Finishing Requirements Surface Finish Requirements After Superfinishing April 24-25, 2006 SAE A-5 Landing Gear Meeting in Sacramento, CA To discuss inconsistensies in surface finish parameters used to characterize a surface finish Need for more standardized parameters and terminology to characterize the required surface finish depending on the application 12

Surface Finishing Requirements ARP 5935 (published 2007) Use of HVOF Thermal Spray Coatings for Hard Chrome Replacement in Landing Gear Applications Type 1 are surfaces that require seals/hydraulic fluid/sliding member Examples include Landing Gear Strut and Actuator Piston Barrels To maximize seal life, Superfinishing is required Recommended surface finish parameters include: Ra 4 µinch or better (roughness average) Rz 40 µinch max (avg. peak-to-valley) Rp 8 µinch max (mean line to highest peak) R mr 70 to 90% @ C o = 5% and C 1 = 0.25R z 13

Surface Finishing Requirements Need for more standardized parameters to characterize the required surface finish depending on the application Joe O Hearn, Process Engineer at Supfina working with ASME B46.1 committee on standardization of parameters Supfina working with ASME B46.1 for about 2 years Presentation at their meeting in September 2010 on specifications containing multiple surface roughness parameters, including AMS 2452 ASME focus more on instrumentation and definitions of parameters and not on how they are used in a specific industry (i.e. ASME focus not on specific applications ) 14

AMS 2452 - NOTICE (at very beginning of AMS 2452) ORDERING INFORMATION: The following information shall be provided to the superfinishing processor by the purchaser. 1) Purchase order shall specify not less than the following: Coating acceptance criteria if not as specified herein Minimum and Maximum surface finish requirements Examples: Ra (roughness average) Rz (avg. peak-to-valley height) Rp (mean line to highest peak) Rmr (bearing ratio) also referred to as Tp, Mr, Rtp Or other relevant parameters may be specified as necessary to adequately characterize the required surface finish depending on the application. 15

Questions??? 16

Backup Slides 17

Use of HVOF Thermal Spray Coatings for Hard Chrome Replacement in Other Applications Hydraulic Actuator Piston Rods Applications with seals/hydraulic fluid/sliding member Hydraulic Actuator Piston Rods To maximize seal life, Superfinishing is required Recommended surface finish parameters may include: Ra 4 µinch or better Rz 40 µinch max (avg. peak-to-valley) Rp 8 µinch max (mean line to highest peak) R mr 70 to 95% @ C o = 5% and C 1 = 0.25R z 18

Bearing Ratio or Material Ratio R mr 70 to 90% @ C o = 5% and C 1 = 0.25R z The ratio of material to air in a horizontal slice through the surface profile expressed as a percentage. The zero percent or reference line for the bearing ratio is located at the top of the highest peak within the evaluated profile. The bearing ratio may be measured at different depths (e.g. C 1, C 2, C 3 ) through the profile and varies with slice depth. To avoid dependence of the bearing (or material) ratio on a single peak, a reference line is selected to shift the reference line below the highest profile peak. The reference line is specified as a bearing (material) ratio percentage. 19

Specifying a five percent reference line indicates that the top five percent of the profile is not included in the bearing ratio calculation. A reference line of C ref = 5% (also referred to as C o = 5%) is commonly used for applications covered by this specification. A slice depth of C 1 = 0.25Rz is commonly used as the slice depth at which to measure bearing ratio for applications covered by this specification. Other slice depths commonly used include 6, 8, & 10 µinch 20